Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 738-743

  Rohlmann, Antonius ^a   Zander, Thomas ^a   Bergmann, Georg ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Biomechanics; Finite element method; Intersegmental rotation; Lumbar spine; ProDisc

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; BIOMECHANICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMPLANT; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR SPINE; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; ROTATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ROTATION;

EID: 16844371695     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157413.72276.c4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full, prosthetic disc arthroplasty: A correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002;2 (suppl):S131-6.
2. Büttner-Janz K. Optimal minimally traumatic approach for the SB Charite Artificial Disc. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl):S111-4.
3. Mayer HM, Korge A. Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: Facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl):S85-91.
4. Steffen R, Büttner-Janz K, Nolte LP, et al. Biomechanische Untersuchungen zur Bandscheibenprothese SB-Charité. Claes L, Wilke HJ, eds. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie. Ulm: 1997:36.
5. Dooris AP, Goel VK, Grosland NM, et al. Load-sharing between anterior and posterior elements in a lumbar motion segment implanted with an artificial disc. Spine 2001;26:E122-9.
6. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, et al. Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper-body inclination. Clin Biomech 2001;16:S73-80.
7. Smit T. The Mechanical Significance of the Trabecular Bone Architecture in a Human Vertebra. Aachen: Shaker; 1996.
8. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Klöckner C, et al. Influence of bone graft characteristics on mechanical behaviour of the spine. J Biomech 2002;35:491-7.
9. Rohlmann A, Neller S, Bergmann G, et al. Effect of an internal fixator and a bone graft on intersegmental spinal motion and intradiscal pressure in the adjacent regions. Eur Spine J 2001;10:301-8.
10. Panjabi MM, Oxland T, Takata K, et al. Articular facets of the human spine. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 1993;18:1298-310.
11. Bogduk N, MacIntosh JE, Pearcy MJ. A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 1992;17:897-913.
12. Calisse J, Rohlmann A, Bergmann G. Estimation of trunk muscle forces using the finite element method and in vivo loads measured by telemeterized internal spinal fixation devices. J Biomech 1999;32:727-31.
13. Wilke HJ, Rohlmann A, Neller S, et al. ISSLS Prize Winner: A novel approach to determine trunk muscle forces during flexion and extension: A comparison of data from an in vitro experiment and in vivo measurements. Spine 2003;28:2585-93.
14. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, et al. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine 1999;24:1003-9.
15. Rohlmann A, Neller S, Claes L, et al. Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 2001;26:E557-E61.
16. Wilke HJ, Neef P, Caimi M, et al. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 1999;24:755-62.
17. Rohlmann A, Claes L, Bergmann G, et al. Comparison of intradiscal pressures and spinal fixator loads for different body positions and exercises. Ergonomics 2001;44:781-94.
18. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd ed. Philadelphia-Toronto: J.B. Lippincott Company; 1990.