Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: A systematic review of the literature

European Spine Journal

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2006, Pages

  Freeman, Brian J C ^a   Davenport, James ^a  

^a QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intervertebral disc disease; Literature review; Lumbar vertebrae; Prostheses; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR SPINE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DISKECTOMY; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748575947     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0186-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11:S130-S136
2. Bertagnoli R, Yue J, Shah RV, et al (2005) The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis. Spine 30:2192-2199
3. Bertagnoli R, Yue J, Fenk-Mayer A, et al (2006) Treatment of symptomatic adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with total disc arthroplasty by using the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow up. J Neurosurg Spine 4:91-97
4. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al (2005) A prospective, randomised multi-centre food & drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565-1575
5. Buttner-Janz K, Hahn S, Schikora K, et al (2002) Principles for successful application of the Link SB Charité artificial disc. Orthopade 31:441-453
6. Buttner-Janz K, Schellnack K, Zippel H, et al (1988) Experience and results with the SB Charite lumbar intervertebral endoprosthesis. Z Llin Med 43:1785-1789
7. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of two years. Spine 21:995-1000
8. David T (2005) Revision of a Charité artificial disc 9.5 years in vivo to a new Charité artificial disc: a case report and explant analysis. Eur Spine J 14:507-511
9. de Kleuver M, Oner FC, Jacobs WCH (2003) Total disc replacement for chronic low back pain: background and a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 12:108-116
10. Delamarter RB, Bae HW, Pradhan BB (2005) Clinical results of ProDisc II lumbar total disc replacement: report from the United States Clinical Trial. Orthop Clin North Am 36:301-313
11. Delamarter RB, David MF, Linda EAK (2003) ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 28:S167-S175
12. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J, et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. Br Med J 330:1233-1238
13. Fraser RD, Ross ER, Lowery GL, Freeman BJ, et al (2004) Lumbar disc replacement. AcroFlex design and results. Spine J 4:245S-251S
14. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al (2001) Volvo award winner in clinical studies: lumbar fusion versus non-surgical treatment for chronic low back pain. A multi-centre randomised controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 26:2521-2534
15. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, et al (2004) Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. J Neurosurg (Spine 2) 1:143-154
16. German JW, Foley KT (2005) Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segement. Spine 30:S60-S67
17. Griffith SL, Shelokov AP, Buttner-Janz K, et al (1994) A multi-centre retrospective study of the clinical results of the link SB Charité intervertebral prosthesis. Spine 19:1842-1849
18. Huang RC, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, et al (2005) Correlation between range of motion and outcome after lumbar total disc replacement: 8.6-year follow-up. Spine 30:1407-1411
19. Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP, et al (2004) The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 29:2538-2541
20. Interventional Procedure Guidance 100 (2004) Prosthetic intervertebral disc replacement. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. ISBN: 1-84257-817-0 (www.nice.org.uk)
21. Kurtz SM, Peloza J, Sisky R, et al (2005) Analysis of a retrieved polyethylene total disc replacement component. Spine J 5:344-350
22. Le Huec JC, Mathews H, Basso Y, et al (2005) Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am 36:315-322
23. Lemaire JP, Skalli W, Lavaste F, et al (1997) Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:64-76
24. Lemaire JP, Carrier H, et al (2005) Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charité artificial disc. A 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:353-359
25. Lui J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP, et al (2006) Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 31:E198-E202
26. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, et al (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11:S124-S130
27. Mayer HM (2005) Total disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 87-B:1029-1037
28. Mathew P, Blackman M, Redla S, et al (2005) Bilateral pedicle fractures following anterior dislocation of the polyethylene inlay of a ProDisc artificial disc replacement: a case report of an unusual complication. Spine 30:E311-E314
29. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al (2003) Experimental design of total disk replacement: experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charite. Spine 28:S153-S162
30. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al (2003) SB Charite disc replacement. Report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a US Centre. J Spinal Disord Tech 4:424-433
31. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al (2005) A prospective, randomised, multi-centre food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of total lumbar disc replacement with the Charité artificial disc versus lumbar fusion. Part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576-1583
32. Mirza SK (2005) Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to food and drug administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine 30:1561-1564
33. Möller H, Hedlund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine 25:1711-1715
34. Shekelle PG, Woolf SH, Eccles M, et al (1999) Clinical guidelines; developing guidelines. BMJ 318:593-596
35. Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, et al (2005) Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: a report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(5):465-469
36. Steiber JR, Donald GD (2006) Early failure of lumbar disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(1):55-60
37. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al (2003) Lumbar disc replacement: Preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of one year. J Spinal Disord Tech 4:362-368
38. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al (2005) Lumbar total disc replacement. Seven to eleven year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87A:490-496
39. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al (2006) Lumbar total disc replacement: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:50-64
40. Van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement; a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369-383
41. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LMLG, Laaper M, et al (1999) Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: two-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8:210-217
42. Zigler JE (2003) Clinical results with ProDisc: european experience and US Investigation Device Exemption Study. Spine 28:S163-S166
43. Zigler JE (2004) Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II. Spine J 4:260S-267S
44. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty. Early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 4:352-361