Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: The spike and the fin method

European Spine Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 165-173

  Cakir, Balkan ^a   Richter, Marcus ^a   Puhl, Wolfhart ^a   Schmidt, René ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Disc replacement surgery; Functional radiography; Lumbar range of motion; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEVICE; ERROR; FEMALE; FIN METHOD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; RELIABILITY; SPIKE METHOD; SPINE SURGERY; TECHNIQUE; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; VERTEBRA BODY; X RAY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33645090665     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0942-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams MA, Dolan P (1991) A technique for quantifying the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine in vivo. J Biomech 24:117-126
2. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S (2002) Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):131-136
3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310
4. Boden SD, Wiesel SW (1990) Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals. Have we been measuring instability properly? Spine 15:571-576
5. Cakir B, Schmidt R, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M (2004) Sagittales Alignement und segmentale Beweglichkeit nach endoprothetischer Versorgung lumbaler Bewegungssegmente. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:159-165
6. Dickey JP, Pierrynowski MR, Bednar DA, Yang SX (2002) Relationship between pain and vertebral motion in chronic low-back pain subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:345-352
7. Dillard J, Trafimow J, Andersson GBJ, Cronin K (1991) Motion of the lumbar spine. Reliability of two measurement techniques. Spine 16:321-324
8. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Chang DG, Theiler R, Grob D (1991) Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine, flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 16:562-571
9. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Novotny JE, Chang DG, Grob D (1991) Clinical validation of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine. Spine 16:943-950
10. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (1999) Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop 28:336-340
11. Gauvin MG, Riddle DL, Rothstein JM (1990) Reliability of clinical measurements of forward bending using the modified fingertip-to-floor method. Phys Ther 70:443-447
12. Harada M, Abumi K, Ito M, Kaneda K (2000) Cineradiographic motion analysis of normal lumbar spine during forward and backward flexion. Spine 25:1932-1937
13. Hopf C, Heeckt H, Beske C (2002) Der Bandscheibenersatz mit der SB Charite-Bandscheibenendoprothese - Erfahrungen, Fruhergebnisse und Feststellungen nach 35 prospektiv durchgefuhrten Operationen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140:485-491
14. Hyytiainen K, Salminen JJ, Suvitie T, Wickstrom G, Pentti J (1991) Repro-ducibility of nine tests to measure spinal mobility and trunk muscle strength. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:3-10
15. Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375-377
16. Maigne JY, Lapeyre E, Morvan G, Chatellier G (2003) Pain immediately upon sitting down and relieved by standing up is often associated with radiologic lumbar instability or marked anterior loss of disc space. Spine 28:1327-1334
17. Mayer HM, Korge A (2002) Non-fusion technology in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: facts, questions, challenges. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S85-S91
18. Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A, Qose I (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S124-S130
19. Mayer TG, Tencer AF, Kristoferson S, Mooney V (1984) Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. Spine 9:588-595
20. McGill SM (1992) A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. J Biomech 25:395-414
21. Miller SA, Mayer T, Cox R, Gatchel RJ (1992) Reliability problems associated with the modified Schober technique for true flexion measurement. Spine 17:345-348
22. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT (1999) Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion. Its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine 24:262-268
23. Okawa A, Shinomiya K, Komori H, Muneta T, Arai Y, Nakai O (1998) Dynamic motion study of the whole lumbar spine by videofluoroscopy. Spine 23:1743-1749
24. Panjabi MM, Chang D, Dvorak J (1992) An analysis of errors in kinematic parameters associated with in vivo functional radiographs. Spine 17:200-205
25. Pearcy M, Portek I, Shepherd J (1984) Three-dimensional X-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9:294-297
26. Reynolds PM (1975) Measurement of spinal mobility: a comparison of three methods. Rheumatol Rehabil 14:180-185
27. Rolander SD (1966) Motion of the lumbar spine with special reference to the stabilizing effect of posterior fusion. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 90:1-186
28. Saur PM, Ensink FB, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J (1996) Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine 21:1332-1338
29. Sjolie AN, Ljunggren AE (2001) The significance of high lumbar mobility and low lumbar strength for current and future low back pain in adolescents. Spine 26:2629-2636
30. Steffen T, Rubin RK, Baramki HG, Antoniou J, Marchesi D, Aebi M (1997) A new technique for measuring lumbar segmental motion in vivo. Method, accuracy, and preliminary results. Spine 22:156-166
31. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, Marnay T (2003) Lumbar disc replacement. Preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disord 16:362-368
32. Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T (1993) Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. Phys Ther 73:33-44
33. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352-361