Epidemiology of indications and contraindications to total disc replacement in an academic practice

Spine Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 392-398

  Chin, Kingsley R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraindication; Disc Replacement; Epidemiology; Incidence; Indication; Lumbar; Prevalence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEVICE REMOVAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LAMINECTOMY; LEG PAIN; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE COMPRESSION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPENIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SPONDYLOLYSIS; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TOTAL INTERVERTEBRAL DISK REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ZYGAPOPHYSEAL JOINT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LAMINECTOMY; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 34447323629     PISSN: 15299430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albee F.H. Transplantation of a portion of the tibia in to the spine for Pott's disease. JAMA 57 (1911) 885-886
2. Hibbs R.A. An operation for progressive spinal deformities. N Y Med J 93 (1911) 1012-1016
3. Weinstein M, Denhoy R, Krishnan A. Disruptive medical technologies. The next big thing in spine. JP Morgan. North America Equity Research 2003.
4. Bono C., and Lee C. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the last twenty years: influence of technique on fusion and clinical outcome. Spine 29 (2004) 455-463
5. Turner J.A., Ersek M., Herron L., Haselkorn J., Kent D., Ciol M.A., and Deyo R. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA 268 (1992) 907-911
6. Deyo R.A., Nachemson A., and Mirza S.K. Spinal-fusion surgery-the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 722-726
7. Ivar Brox J., Sorenson R., Friis A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercise in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 28 (2003) 1913-1921
8. Fritzell P., Hagg O., Wessberg P., et al. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques. A prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 27 (2002) 1131-1141
9. Fritzell P., Hagg O., Wessberg P., and Nordwall A. Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26 (2001) 2521-2534
10. Szpalski M., Gunzburg R., and Mayer M. Spine arthroplsty. A historical review. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 (2002) S65-S84
11. Bao Q.B., and Yuan H.A. Prosthetic disc replacement: the future?. Clin Orthop 342 (2002) 139-145
12. Singh K., Vaccaro A.R., and Albert T.J. Assessing the potential impact of total disc arthroplasty on surgeon practice patters in North America. Spine J 4 (2004) 195S-201S
13. Lemaire J.P., Skalli W., Lavaste F., templier A., Mendes F., Diop A., Sauty V., and Laloux E. Intervertebral disc prosthesis: results and prospects for the year 2000. Clin Orthop 337 (1997) 64-76
14. Guyer R.D., and Ohnmeiss D.D. Intervertebral disc prosthesis. Spine 28 Suppl (2003) 15-23
15. Bao Q.B., and Huan Y.A. New technologies in spine: nucleus replacement. Spine 27 (2002) 1245-1247
16. Tropiano P., Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammissa F.P., and Marnay T. Lumbar total disc replacement: seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87A (2005) 490-496
17. Pointillart V. Cervical disc prosthesis in humans: first failure. Spine 26 (2001) E90-E92
18. Zigler J.E., Burd T.A., Vialle E.N., et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasy. Early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 352-361
19. Hochschuler S.H., Ohnmeiss D.D., Guyer R.D., et al. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 (2002) 106-110
20. Zeegers W.S., Bohnen L.M., Laaper M., and Verhaegen M.J. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 8 (1999) 210-217
21. Mayer H.M., Wiechert K., Korge A., et al. Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 (2002) 124-130
22. Tropiano P., Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., et al. Lumbar disc replacement:preliminary results with ProDisc II after a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. J Spinal Disod Tech 16 (2003) 362-368
23. Cinotti G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
24. Griffith S.L., Shelokov A.P., Buttner-Janz K., LeMaire J.P., and Zeegers W.S. A multicenter retrospective study of the clinical results of the LINK SB Charite intervertebral prosthesis. The initial European experience. Spine 19 (1994) 1842-1849
25. Delamarter R.B., Fribourg D.M., Kanim L.E., et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 20 Suppl (2003) S167-S175
26. McAfee P.C., Fedder I.L., Saredy S., et al. Experimental design of total disc replacement. Experience with a prospective randomized study of the Sb Charite. Spine 20 Suppl (2003) S153-S162
27. Wigfield C.C., Gill S.S., Nelson R.J., Metcalf N.H., and Robertson J.T. The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 27 (2002) 2446-2452
28. Mahomed N.N., Barrett J.A., Katz J.N., et al. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A (2003) 27-32
29. Blumenthal S., McAfee P.C., Guyer R.D., et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30 (2005) 1565-1575
30. Cinott G., David T., and Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21 (1996) 995-1000
31. Lemaire J.P., Carrier H., Ali-el H.S., Skalli W., and Lavaste F. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite trademark artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 (2005) 353-359
32. Putzier M., Funk J.F., Schneider S.V., Gross C., Tohtz S.W., Khodadadyan-Klostermann C., Perka C., and Kandziora F. Charite total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15 (2006) 183-195
33. Heim S.E., and Arbitol J.J. Complications and strategies for salvage of intervertebral fixation devices. Orthop Clin North Am 3392 (2002) 393-402
34. Lonstein J.E. Re: four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage. Spine 26 (2001) 1506-1508
35. Huang R.C., Lim M.R., Girardi F.P., and Cammisa F.P. The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 29 (2004) 2538-2541
36. Wong DA, Annesser B, Birney TJ, Kumar A, Lamond R, Johnson SD, Jatana S, Ghiselli G. Contraindications to total disc arthroplasty in fusion patients including analysis of facet arthrosis. Paper #112. Paper presented at: the AAOS 73rd Annual Meeting; March 22-26, 2006; Chicago, IL.
37. Bertagnoli R., and Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indication. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 (2002) 131-136
38. Sott A.H., and Harrison D.J. Increasing age does not affect good outcome after lumbar disc replacement. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 50-53
39. McAfee P.C. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J 4 (2004) 177S-181S
40. Van Ooij A., Oner F.C., and Verbout A.J. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 369-383
41. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammisa F.P., Tropiano P., and Marnay T. Long-term flexion-extension range of motion of the ProDisc total disc replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 (2003) 435-440
42. Huang R.C., Girardi F.P., Cammissa Jr. F.P., and Wright T.M. The implications of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement. J Spinal Disod Tech 16 (2003) 412-417
43. Gardner A., and Pande K.C. Graf ligamentoplasty. A 7-year follow-up. Eur Spine 11 suppl (2002) 157S-163S
44. Stoll T., Dubois G., and Schwarzenbach O. The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multicenter study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine 11 Suppl (2002) 170S-178S
45. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: The Wallis system. Eur Spine 11 Suppl (2002) 164S-169S