Sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic coevolution in an annual plant

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2009, Pages

  Madjidian, Josefin A ^a   Lankinen, Åsa ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS FERTILIZATION; GAMETOPHYTE; GEOGRAPHY; GREENHOUSE; HERB; NONHUMAN; PISTIL STIGMA; PLANT EVOLUTION; PLANT REPRODUCTION; POLLEN; SEED PRODUCTION; SELFING; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPOROPHYTE; CHEMISTRY; CROSS BREEDING; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; PLANTAGO; REPRODUCTION;

COLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA;

CROSSES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; PLANTAGO; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS;

EID: 65549094554     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005477     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Michiels NK, Newman LJ (1998) Sex and violence in hermaphrodites. Nature 391: 647.
2. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. New Jersey Princeton University Press. pp 230.
3. Koene J M, Schulenburg H (2005) Shooting darts: co-evolution and counteradaptation in hermaphroditic snails. BMC Evol Biol 5: 25.
4. Michiels NK, Koene JM (2006) Sexual selection favours harmful mating in hermaphrodites more than in gonochorists. Integr Comp Biol 46: 473-480.
5. Rice WR (1996) Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
6. Holland B, Rice WR (1998) Perspective: Chase-away sexual selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1-7.
7. Gavrilets S, Arnqvist G, Friberg U (2001) The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 531-539.
8. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2002) Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415: 787-789.
9. Holland B, Rice WR (1999) Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 5083-5088.
10. Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. New York: Academic Press Inc. 474 p.
11. Parker GA, Partridge L (1998) Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 353: 261-274.
12. Gavrilets S (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 400: 886-88.
13. Anthes N, Michiels N (2007) Precopulatory stabbing, hypodermic injections and unilateral copulations in a hermaphroditic sea slug. Biol Lett 3: 121-124.
14. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen Å (2002) Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 77: 537-562.
15. Bernasconi G, Ashman T.-L, Birkhead TR, Bishop JDD, Grossniklaus U, et al. (2004) Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303: 971-975.
16. Brandvain Y, Haig D (2005) Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. Am Nat 3: 330-338.
17. Lankinen Å, Hellriegel B, Bernasconi G (2006) Sexual conflict over floral receptivity. Evolution 60: 2454-2465.
18. Prasad NG, Bedhomme S (2006) Sexual conflicts in plants. J Genet 85: 161-164.
19. Jolivet C, Bernasconi G (2007) Within/between population crosses reveal genetic basis for siring success in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). J Evol Biol 20: 1361-1374.
20. Lankinen Å, Kiboi S (2007) Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): a sexual conflict during pollen competition? Am Nat 170: 854-863.
21. Lankinen Å, Larsson MC (2007) Conflicting selection pressures on reproductive functions and speciation in plants. Evol Ecol; In press.
22. Charnov EL (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76: 2480-2484.
23. Queller DC (1983) Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant. Nature 305: 706-707.
24. Queller DC (1984) Pollen-ovule ratios and hermaphrodite sexual allocation strategies. Evolution 38: 1148-1151.
25. Uma Shaanker R, Ganeshaiah KN (1997) Conflict between parent and offspring in plants: Predictions, processes and evolutionary consequences. Curr Sci 72: 932-939.
26. Härdling R, Nilsson P (1999) Parent-offspring and sexual conflicts in the evolution of angiosperm seeds. Oikos 84: 27-34.
27. Marshall D L, Folsom MW, Hatfield C, Bennett T (1996) Does interference competition among pollen grains occur in wild radish? Evolution 50: 1842-1848.
28. Mazer SJ (1987) Maternal investment and male reproductive success in angiosperms: parent-offspring conflict or sexual selection? Biol J Linn Soc 30: 115-133.
29. Ashman T.-L, Schoen DJ (1994) How long should flowers live? Nature 371: 788-791.
30. Service PM, Fales AJ (1993) Evolution of delayed reproductive senescence in male fruit flies: sperm competition. Genetica 91: 111-125.
31. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T (1999) Female×male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283: 217-220.
32. Andreés JA, Arnqvist G (2001) Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc R Soc Lond B 268: 399-405.
33. Knowles LL, Markow TA (2001) Sexually antagonistic coevolution of postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98: 8692-8696.
34. Rowe L, Arnqvist G (2002) Sexually antagonistic evolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56: 754-767.
35. Nilsson T, Fricke C, Arnqvist G (2002) Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56: 111-120.
36. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 41-47.
37. Pizzari T, Snook RR (2003) Perspective: Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57: 1223-1236.
38. Rowe L, Cameron E, Day T (2003) Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 2009-2016.
39. Pizzari T, Snook RR (2004) Sexual conflict and sexual selection: measuring antagonistic coevolution. Evolution 58: 1389-1393.
40. Long TAF, Montgomerie R, Chippindale AK (2006) Quantifying the gender load: can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict? Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 361: 363-374.
41. Gavrilets S, Waxman D (2002) Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 10533-10538.
42. Arnqvist G (2004) Sexual conflict and sexual selection: Lost in the chase. Evolution 58: 1383-1388.
43. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
44. Calsbeek R, Thompson JN, Richardson JE (2003) Patterns of molecular evolution in a biodiversity hotspot: the California Floristic Province. Mol Ecol 12: 1021-1029.
45. Lapointe F.-J, Rissler LJ (2005) Congruence, consensus, and the comparative phylogeography of codistributed species in California. Am Nat 166: 290-299.
46. Lynch M (1991) The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
47. Burke JM, Arnold ML (2001) Genetics and the fitness of hybrids. Annu Rev Genet 35: 31-52.
48. Rhode JM, Cruzan MB (2005) Contributions of heterosis and epistasis to hybrid fitness. Am Nat 166: E124-E139.
49. Armbruster WS, Mulder CPH, Baldwin BG, Kalisz S, Wessa B, et al. (2002) Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution of tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae S.L.). Am J Bot 89: 37-49.
50. Endler JA (1995) Multiple trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 22-29.
51. Armbruster WS, Schwaegerle KE (1996) Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. J Evol Biol 9: 261-276.
52. Attia FA, Tregenza T (2004) Divergence revealed by population crosses in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evol Ecol Res 6: 927-935.
53. Fricke C, Arnqvist G (2004) Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils. J Evol Biol 17: 1345-1354.
54. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
55. Zahavi A (1975) Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol 53: 205-214.
56. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. pp 599.
57. Lalonde RG, Roitberg BD (1989) Resource limitation and offspring size and number trade-offs in Cirsium arvense( Asteraceae). Am J Bot76: 1107-1113.
58. Li B, Suzuki J.-I, Hara T (1998) Latitudinal variation in plant size and relative growth rate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Oecologia 115: 293-301.
59. Olsson K, Ågren J (2002) Latitudinal population differentiation in phenology, life history and flower morphology in the perennial herb Lythrum salicaria. J Evol Biol 15: 983-996.
60. Brody A (1997) Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78: 1624-1631.
61. Burdon JJ, Thrall PH, Brown AHD (1999) Resistance and virulence structure in two Linum marginale-Melampsora lini host-pathogen metapopulations with different mating systems. Evolution 53: 704-716.
62. Pilson D (2000) Herbivory and natural selection on flowering phenology in wild sunflower, Helianthus annuus. Oecologia 122: 72-82.
63. Taylor LP, Hepler PK (1997) Pollen germination and tube growth. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48: 461-491.
64. Fiebig A, Kimport R, Preuss D (2004) Comparisons of pollen coat genes across Brassicaceae species reveal rapid evolution by repeat expansions and diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 3286-3291.
65. Hiscock SJ, Allen AM (2008) Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollenstigma interactions: the search for consensus. New Phytol 179: 286-317.
66. Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36: 47-79.
67. Lankinen Å, Armbruster WS, Antonsen L (2007) Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating system evolution. Am J Bot 94: 1183-1192.
68. Galen C, Shykoff JA, Plowright RC (1986) Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. Am Nat 127: 462-476.
69. Armbruster WS, Rogers DG (2004) Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? Am J Bot 91: 1939-1943.
70. Lankinen Å, Armbruster S (2007) Pollen competition reduces inbreeding depression in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). J Evol Biol 20: 737-749.
71. Newsom VM (1929) A revision of the genus Collinsia. Botanical Gazette 87: 260-301.
72. Neese EC (1993) Collinsia. In: Hickman JC, ed (1993) The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Weil J, Allard RW (1964) The mating system and genetic variability in natural populations of Collinsia heterophylla. Evolution 18: 515-525.
74. Charlesworth D, Mayer SS (1995) Genetic variability of plant characters in the partial inbreeder Collinsia heterophylla (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 82: 112-120.
75. Hoekstra FA, Bruinsma J (1975) Respiration and vitality of binucleate and trinucleate pollen. Physiol Plant 34: 221-225.
76. Lankinen Å, Maad J, Armbruster WS (2009) Pollen-tube growth rates in Collinsia heterophylla(Plantaginaceae): one-donor crosses reveal heritability but no effect on sporophytic-offspring fitness. Ann Bot 103: 941-950.
77. Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. Boulder: University Press of Colorado. 583 p.
78. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd Freeman WH, ed. San Fransisco, California, USA.
79. SPSS (2005) SPSS 14.0, Syntax Reference Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.