Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants

American Naturalist

Volumn 166, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 330-338

  Brandvain, Yaniv ^a,c   Haig, David ^b  

^a Policy and Design   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genomic imprinting; Mating systems; Postzygotic; Prezygotic; Speciation; Weak inbreeder strong outbreeder (WISO)

Indexed keywords

HYBRIDIZATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANGIOSPERM; ARTICLE; FLOWER; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; FLOWERS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 24644512211     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/432036     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Afzal, M., and H. Khan. 1950. Natural crossing in cotton in Western Punjab. Agronomy Journal 42:14-19, 89-93, 202-205, 236-238.
2. Bernacchi, D., and S. D. Tanksley. 1997. An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147:861-877.
3. 1 hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum. Journal of Agricultural Research 77:33-53.
4. Bushell C., M. Spielman, and R. J. Scott. 2003. The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. Plant Cell 15:1430-1442.
5. Catalán P., P. Torrecilla, J. A. L. Rodriguez, and R. G. Olmstead. 2004. Phylogeny of the festucoid grasses of subtribe Loliinae and allies (Poeae, Pooideae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31:517-541.
6. Cooper, D. C., and R. A. Brink. 1945. Seed collapse following matings between diploid and tetraploid races of Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Genetics 30:376-401.
7. Dawson, W. D. 1965. Fertility and size inheritance in a Peromyscus species cross. Evolution 19:44-55.
8. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Heidelberg.
9. de Nettancourt, D., M. Devreux, U. Laneri, M. Cresti, E. Pacini, and G. Sarfatti. 1974. Genetical and ultrastructural aspects of self and cross incompatibility in interspecific hybrids between self-compatible Lycopersicon esculentum and self-incompatible L. peruvianum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 44:278-288.
10. Dilkes, B. P., and L. Comai. 2004. A differential dosage hypothesis for parental effects in seed development. Plant Cell 16:3174-3180.
11. Griffiths, D. J., R. A. D. Pegler, and T. Tonguthaisri. 1971. Cross compatibility between diploid and tetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L). Euphytica 20:102-112.
12. Gutierrez-Marcos, J. F., P. D. Pennington, L. M. Costa, and H. G. Dickinson. 2004. Imprinting in the endosperm: a possible role in preventing wide hybridization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358:1105-1111.
13. Eberhard, W. G., and C. Cordero. 1995. Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products: a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:493-496.
14. Haig, D. 2000. The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31:9-32.
15. Haig, D., and C. Graham. 1991. Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor-II receptor. Cell 64:1045-1046.
16. Haig, D., and M. Westoby. 1991. Genomic imprinting in the endosperm: its effects on seed development in crosses between species and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 333:1-13.
17. Hawkes, J. G., and J. P. Hjerting. 1969. The potatoes of Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay: a biosystematic study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Hogenboom, N. G. 1972. Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. V. The inheritance of the unilateral incompatibility between L. peruvianum (L.) Mill. and L. esculentum Mill. and the genetics of its breakdown. Euphytica 21:405-414.
19. _. 1975. Incompatibility and incongruity: two different mechanisms for the non-functioning of intimate partner relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 188:361-374.
20. Jenkin, T. J. 1935. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. II. Lolium perenne x L. temulentum. Journal of Genetics 31:379-412.
21. _. 1954a. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. V. Lolium rigidum sens. ampl. with other Lolium species. Journal of Genetics 52:252-281.
22. _. 1954b. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. VI. Lolium italicum intercrossed with other Lolium types. Journal of Genetics 52:282-299.
23. _. 1954c. Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. VIII. Lolium loliaceum, Lolium remotum and Lolium temulentum, with references to 'Lolium canadense'. Journal of Genetics 52:318-331.
24. Johnston, S. A., and R. E. Hanneman. 1982. Manipulations of endosperm balance number overcome crossing barriers between diploid Solanum species. Science 217:446-448.
25. Johnston, S. A., T. P. M. den Nijs, S. J. Peloquin, and R. E. Hanneman Jr. 1980. The significance of genie balance to endosperm development in interspecific crosses. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 57:5-9.
26. Katsiotis, A., R. E. Hanneman Jr., and R. A. Forsberg. 1995. Endosperm balance number and the polar-nuclei activation hypotheses for endosperm development in interspecific crosses of Solanaceae and Gramineae, respectively. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 91:848-855.
27. Kondoh, M., and M. Higashi. 2000. Reproductive isolation mechanism resulting from resolution of intragenomic conflict. American Naturalist 156:511-518.
28. Kottur, G. L. 1921. Cross-fertilization and sterility in cotton. Agricultural Journal of India 16:52-59.
29. Kuhl, J. C., M. J. Havey, and R. E. Hannemann. 2002. A genetic study of unilateral incompatibility between diploid (1EBN) Mexican species Solanum pinnatisectum and S. cardiophyllum subsp. cardiophyllum. Sexual Plant Reproduction 14:305-313.
30. Lamm, R. 1953. Investigations on some tuber-bearing Solanum hybrids. Hereditas 39:97-112.
31. Lewis, D., and L. K. Crowe. 1958. Unilateral incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233-256.
32. Liedl, B. E., S. McCormick, and M. A. Mutschler. 1996. Unilateral incongruity in crosses involving Lycopersicon pennellii and L. esculentum is distinct from self-incompatibility in expression, timing and location. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9:299-308.
33. Lin, B.-Y. 1984. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107:103-115.
34. Lloyd, D. G. 1968. Partial unilateral incompatibility in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Evolution 22:382-393.
35. Martin, F. W. 1961a. Complex unilateral hybridization in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 47:855-857.
36. _. 1961b. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233-256.
37. _. 1963. Distribution and interrelationships of incompatibility barriers in the Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. complex. Evolution 17:519-528.
38. _. 1964. The inheritance of unilateral incompatibility in Lycopersicon hirsutum. Genetics 50:459-469.
39. Miller, J. C., and S. D. Tanksley. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 80:437-448.
40. Murfett J., T. J. Strabala, D. M. Zurek, B. Q. Mou, B. Beecher, and B. A. McClure. 1996. S RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. Plant Cell 8:943-958.
41. Nilsson, F. 1934. Studies in fertility and inbreeding in some herbage grasses. Hereditas 19:1-162.
42. Nishiyama, I., and T. Yabuno. 1975. Meiotic chromosome pairing in two interspecific hybrids and a criticism of the evolutionary relationship of diploid Avena. Japanese Journal of Genetics 50:443-451.
43. _. 1978. Causal relationships between polar nuclei in double fertilization and interspecific cross-incompatibility in Avena. Cytologia 43:453-466.
44. _. 1983. A mechanism of the alteration of crossability in artificial Avena polyploids. Japanese Journal of Genetics 58:51-57.
45. Pandey, K. K. 1962. Interspecific incompatibility in Solanum species. American Journal of Botany 49:874-882.
46. Rajhathy, T. 1971. Chromosome polymorphism in Avena ventricosa. Chromosoma 35:206-216.
47. Reusch, J. D. H. 1959. Embryological studies on seed development in reciprocal crosses between Lolium perenne and Festuca pratensis. South African Journal of Agricultural Science 2:429-443.
48. Rick, C. M. 1960. Hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii: phylogenetic and cytogenetic significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 46:78-82.
49. _. 1963. Barriers to interbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17:216-232.
50. Sansome, E. R., S. Satina, and A. F. Blakeslee. 1942. Disintegration of ovules in tetraploid-diploid and in incompatible species crosses in Datura. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 69:405-420.
51. Scott, R. J., M. Speilman, J. Bailey, and H. G. Dickinson. 1998. Parent of origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125:3329-3341.
52. Stephens, S. G. 1942. Colchicine-produced polyploids in Gossypium. I. An autotetraploid Asiatic cotton and certain of its hybrids with wild diploid species. Journal of Genetics 44:272- 295.
53. Szteyn, K. 1965. Interspecific crosses in genus Lycopersicum. II. Advantage of using tetraploid tomatoes as pistillate parents in interspecific crosses. Euphytica 14:209-216.
54. Tycko, B., and I. M. Morison. 2002. Physiological functions of imprinted genes. Journal of Cellular Physiology 192:245-258.
55. Valentine, D. H., and S. R. J. Woodell. 1963. Studies in British primulas. X. Seed incompatibility in intraspecific and interspecific crosses at diploid and tetraploid levels. New Phytologist 62:125-143.
56. van den Berg, R. G., J. T. Miller, M. L. Ugarte, J. P. Kardolus, J. Villand, J. Nienhuis, and D. M. Spooner. 1998. Collapse of morphological species in the wild potato Solanum brevicaule complex (Solanaceae: sect. Petota). American Journal of Botany 85:92-109.
57. Vinkenoog, R., C. Bushell, M. Spielman, S. Adams, H. G. Dickinson, and R. J. Scott. 2003. Genomic imprinting and endosperm development in flowering plants. Molecular Biotechnology 25:149-184.
58. von Wangenheim, K.-H., and H.-P. Peterson. 2004. Aberrant endosperm development in interploidy crosses reveals a timer of differentiation. Developmental Biology 270:277-289.
59. Vrana, P. B., P. G. Matteson, J. V. Schmidt, R. S. Ingram, A. Joyce, K. L. Prince, M. J. Dewey, and S. M. Tilghman. 2001. Genomic imprinting of placental lactogen gene in Peromyscus. Development Genes and Evolution 211:523-532.
60. Wendel, J. F., J. M. Stewart, and J. H. Rettig. 1991. Molecular evidence for homoploid reticulate evolution among Australian species of Gossypium. Evolution 45:694-711.
61. Zeh, D. W., and J. A. Zeh. 2000. Reproductive mode and speciation: the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis. BioEssays 22:938-946.