Pollen donor identity affects timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): A sexual conflict during pollen competition?

American Naturalist

Volumn 170, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 854-863

  Lankinen, Åsa ^a   Kiboi, Samuel ^a,b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

Author keywords

Delayed stigma receptivity; Flower development; Manipulation; Pollen competition; Sexual conflict

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DICOTYLEDON; GERMINATION; POLLEN; SEXUAL CONFLICT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; PLANTAGO; REPRODUCTION;

FLOWERS; PLANTAGO; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS;

COLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA; PLANTAGINACEAE;

EID: 36749002180     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/522839     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Andersson, M., and L. W. Simmons. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:296-302.
2. Armbruster, W. S., and D. G. Rogers. 2004. Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? American Journal of Botany 91:1939-1943.
3. Armbruster, W. S., C. P. H. Mulder, B. G. Baldwin, S. Kalisz, B. Wessa, and H. Nute. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsieae (Scrophulariaceae s.l.). American Journal of Botany 89:37-49.
4. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2002. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787-789.
5. _. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Barrett, S. C. H. 2002. Sexual interference of the floral kind. Heredity 88:154-159.
7. Bernasconi, G., T.-L. Ashman, T. R. Birkhead, J. D. D. Bishop, U. Grossniklauss, E. Kubli, D. L. Marshall, et al. 2004. Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303:971-975.
8. Bertin, R. I. 1988. Paternity in plants. Pages 30-59 in J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust, eds. Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Bertin, R. I., and M. Sullivan. 1988. Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. American Journal of Botany 75:1140-1147.
10. Bhattacharya, A., and S. Mandal. 2004. Pollination, pollen germination and stigma receptivity in Moringa oleifera Lamk. Grana 43:48-56.
11. Brandvain, Y., and D. Haig. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. American Naturalist 166:330-338.
12. Broyles, S. B., and R. Wyatt. 1993. The consequences of self-pollination in Asclepias exaltata, a self-incompatible milkweed. American Journal of Botany 80:41-44.
13. Buide, M. L., and J. Guitian. 2002. Breeding system in the dichogamous hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Annals of Botany 90:691-699.
14. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:41-47.
15. Charlesworth, D., and S. S. Mayer. 1995. Genetic variability of plant characters in the partial inbreeder Collinsia heterophylla (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 82:112-120.
16. Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76:2480-2484.
17. Cowan, A. A., A. H. Marshall, and T. P. T. Michaelson-Yeates. 2000. Effect of pollen competition and stigmatic receptivity on seed set in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Sexual Plant Reproduction 13:37-42.
18. Cruzan, M. B., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1993. Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925-934.
19. Dajoz, I., I. Till-Bottraud, and P.-H. Gouyon. 1991. Evolution of pollen morphology. Science 253:66-68.
20. de Jong, T. J., N. M. Waser, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1993. Geitonogamy: the neglected side of selfing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9:321-325.
21. Delph, L. F., C. Weinig, and K. Sullivan. 1998. Why fast-growing pollen tubes give rise to vigorous progeny: the test of a new mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:935-939.
22. de Nettancourt, D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Heidelberg.
23. Douglas, K. L., and R. W. Cruden. 1994. The reproductive biology of Anemone canadensis (Ranunculaceae): breeding system and facilitation of sexual selection. American Journal of Botany 81:314-321.
24. Edlund, A. F., R. Swanson, and D. Preuss. 2004. Pollen and stigma structure and function: the role of diversity in pollination. Plant Cell 16:S84-S97.
25. Fiebig, A., R. Kimport, and D. Preuss. 2004. Comparisons of pollen coat genes across Brassicaceae species reveal rapid evolution by repeat expansion and diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 101:3286-3291.
26. Galen, C., J. A. Shykoff, and R. C. Plowright. 1986. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. American Naturalist 127:462-476.
27. Ganeshaiah, K. N., and R. Uma Shaanker. 1988. Regulation of seed number and female incitation of mate competition by a pH-dependent proteinaceous inhibitor of pollen grain germination in Leucaena leucocephala. Oecologia (Berlin) 75:110-113.
28. Gavrilets, S., G. Arnqvist, and U. Friberg. 2001. The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:531-539.
29. Goodwillie, C., S. Kalisz, and C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36:47-79.
30. Haig, D., and C. T. Bergström. 1995. Multiple mating, sperm competition and meiotic drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:265-282.
31. Härdling, R., and J. Bergsten. 2006. Nonrandom mating preserves intrasexual polymorphism and stops population differentiation in sexual conflict. American Naturalist 167:401-409.
32. Härdling, R., and P. Nilsson. 1999. Parent-offspring and sexual conflicts in the evolution of angiosperm seeds. Oikos 84:27-34.
33. Hedhly, A., J. I. Hormanza, and M. Herrero. 2005. The effect of temperature on pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and stigmatic receptivity in peach. Plant Biology 7:476-483.
34. Herrero, M. 1983. Factors affecting fruit set in 'Agua de Aranjuez' pear. Acta Horticulturae 139:91-96.
35. _. 2003. Male and female synchrony and the regulation of mating in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358:1019-1024.
36. Herrero, M., and J. I. Hormaza. 1996. Pistil strategies controlling pollen tube growth. Sexual Plant Reproduction 9:343-347.
37. Hoekstra, F. A., and J. Bruinsma. 1975. Respiration and vitality of binucleate and trinucleate pollen. Physiologia Plantarum 34:221-225.
38. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1-7.
39. Hurst, L. D., A. Atlan, and B. O. Bengtsson. 1996. Genetic conflicts. Quarterly Review of Biology 71:317-364.
40. Johnstone, R. A., and L. Keller. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. American Naturalist 156:368-377.
41. Kalinganire, A., C. S. Harwood, M. U. Slee, and A. J. Simons. 2000. Floral structure, stigma receptivity and pollen viability in relation to protandry and self-incompatibility in silky oak (Grevillea robusta A. Cunn.). Annals of Botany 86:133-148.
42. Kalisz, S., D. Vogler, B. Fails, M. Finer, E. Shepard, T. Herman, and R. Gonzales. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 86:1239-1247.
43. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.
44. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:653-664.
45. Kruszewski, L. J., and L. F. Galloway. 2006. Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-incompatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167:455-461.
46. Lankinen, Å. 2001. In vitro pollen competitive ability in Viola tricolor: temperature and pollen donor effects. Oecologia (Berlin) 128:492-498.
47. Lankinen, Å., B. Hellriegel, and G. Bernasconi. 2006. Sexual conflict over floral receptivity. Evolution 60:2454-2465.
48. Lankinen, Å., W. S. Armbruster, and L. Antonsen. 2007. Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): genetic variation and possible adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating-system evolution. American Journal of Botany 94:1183-1192.
49. Lewis, D., and L. K. Crowe. 1958. Unilateral incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12:233-256.
50. Melser, C., M. C. J. Rademaker, and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 1997. Selection on pollen donors by Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 10:305-312.
51. Murdy, W. H., and M. E. B. Carter. 1987. Regulation of the timing of pollen germination by the pistil in Talinum mengesii (Portulacaceae). American Journal of Botany 74:1888-1892.
52. Murfett, J., T. J. Strabala, D. M. Zurek, B. Q. Mou, B. Beecher, and B. A. McClure. 1996. S RNase and interspecific pollen rejection in the genus Nicotiana: multiple pollen-rejection pathways contribute to unilateral incompatibility between self-incompatible and self-compatible species. Plant Cell 8:943-958.
53. Neese, E. C. 1993. Collinsia. Pages 1024-1027 in J. C. Hickman, ed. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
54. Newsom, V. M. 1929. A revision of the genus Collinsia (Scrophulariaceae). Botanical Gazette 87:260-301.
55. O'Brien, S. P. 1996. Timetable of stigmatic receptivity and development and pollen tube growth rate in Chanelaucium uncinatum (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 44:649-659.
56. O'Neill, S. D. 1997. Pollination regulation of flower development. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:547-574.
57. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pages 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
58. Pizzari, T., and R. R. Snook. 2003. Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
59. Queller, D. C. 1984. Models of kin selection on seed provisioning. Heredity 53:151-165.
60. _. 1994. Male-female conflict and parent-offspring conflict. American Naturalist 144(suppl.):S84-S99.
61. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
62. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 1997. The enemies within: intragenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:1-10.
63. Schaal, B. A. 1980. Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature 284:450-451.
64. Service, P. M., and A. J. Fales. 1993. Evolution of delayed reproductive senescence in male fruit flies: sperm competition. Genetica 91:111-125.
65. Siegel, S., and N. J. Castellan Jr. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.
66. Simmons, L. W., and M. T. Siva-Jothy. 1998. Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. Pages 341-434 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Møller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
67. Skogsmyr, I., and Å. Lankinen. 2002. Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biological Reviews 77:537-562.
68. Snow, A. A., and T. P. Spira. 1993. Individual variation in the vigor of self pollen and selfed progeny in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 80:160-164.
69. SPSS. 1999. SPSS for Windows, release 10.0.5. SPSS, Chicago.
70. Taylor, D. R., and P. K. Ingvarsson. 2003. Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 117:27-35.
71. Taylor, L. P., and P. K. Hepler. 1997. Pollen germination and tube growth. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:461-491.
72. Thomson, J. D., and R. C. Plowright. 1980. Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behaviour with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:68-74.
73. Thornhill, R., and J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
74. Uma Shaanker, R., and K. N. Ganeshaiah. 1997. Conflict between parent and offspring in plants: predictions, processes and evolutionary consequences. Current Biology 72:932-939.
75. van Doorn, W. G. 1997. Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1615-1622.
76. Wedell, N., C. Kvarnemo, C. M. Lessels, and T. Tregenza. 2006. Sexual conflict and life histories. Animal Behaviour 71:999-1011.
77. Willson, M. F. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspective and overview. American Naturalist 144(suppl.):S13-S39.
78. Willson, M. F., and N. Burley. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
79. Yi, W., S. E. Law, D. McCoy, and H. Y. Wetzstein. 2006. Stigma development and receptivity in almond (Prunus dulcis). Annals of Botany 97:57-63.
80. Young, H. J., and L. Gravitz. 2002. The effects of stigma age on receptivity in Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 89:1237-1241.
81. Zinkl, G. M., and D. Preuss. 2000. Dissecting Arabidopsis pollen-stigma interactions reveals novel mechanisms that confer mating specificity. Annals of Botany 85:15-21.