Evolutionary Ecology of the Prezygotic Stage

Science

Volumn 303, Issue 5660, 2004, Pages 971-975

  Bernasconi, G ^a   Ashman, T L ^b   Birkhead, T R ^c   Bishop, J D D ^d,e   Grossniklaus, U ^a   Kubli, E ^a   Marshall, D L ^f   Schmid, B ^a   Skogsmyr, I ^g   Snook, R R ^c   Taylor, D ^h   Till Bottraud, I ⁱ   Ward, P I ^a   Zeh, D W ^j   Hellriegel, B ^k  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^e THE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^g LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^h UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^k TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES; NATURAL SCIENCES; PLANTS (BOTANY);

FEMALE GAMETES; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY;

ECOLOGY;

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; SEXUAL REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; GAMETE; GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; LIFE CYCLE; PLANT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SEXUAL SELECTION; ZYGOTE;

ANGIOSPERMS; ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COPULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; MALE; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPERMATOZOA;

ANIMALIA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 10744225534     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1092180     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. In both clades, the haploid generation starts with meiosis in the diploid parent. Animals: Gametes arising through meiosis do not divide further before fertilization. Only primordial germ cells that are set aside early during development undergo meiosis. Angiosperms: Stem cells produce leaves and shoots until they switch to reproduction. Meiosis is followed by mitotic divisions to yield male (pollen grain) and female (embryo sac) gametophytes. These produce the gametes. Both clades: The haploid sperm is transferred (usually directly in animals, via pollen in plants) from its diploid male parent to the haploid egg inside the female parent. Functional integration of paternal and maternal genomes in the offspring may continue after the zygote has been formed (e.g., imprinted genes controlling early embryonic growth, delayed expression of paternal genes).
2. T. R. Birkhead, A. P. Møller, Eds, Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
3. M. F. Willson, N. Burley, Mate Choice in Plants: Tactics, Mechanisms, and Consequences (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1983).
4. L. F. Delph, K. Havens, in Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, T. R. Birkhead, A. P. Møller Eds. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
5. T. R. Birkhead, T. Pizzari, Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 262 (2002).
6. J. A. Zeh, D. W. Zeh, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 263, 1711 (1996).
7. T.-L. Ashman et al., in preparation.
8. A. A. Snow, P. O. Lewis, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 331 (1993).
9. G. Bernasconi, Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6, 147 (2003).
10. G. A. Parker, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 45, 525 (1970).
11. G. A. Parker, M. A. Begon, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 253, 255 (1993).
12. D. Haig, C. Bergström, J. Evol. Biol. 8, 265 (1995).
13. G. A. Parker, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 242, 120 (1990).
14. D. Carré, C. Rouviere, C. Sardet, Dev. Biol. 147, 381 (1991).
15. N. Schultz, F. K. Hamra, D. L. Garbers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 12205 (2003).
16. C. Wedekind, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 346, 303 (1994).
17. D. R. Page, U. Grossniklaus, Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 124 (2002).
18. D. Honys, D. Twell, Plant Physiol. 132, 640 (2003).
19. J. D. Becker, L. C. Boavida, J. Carneiro, M. Haury, J. A. Feijó, Plant Physiol. 133, 713 (2003).
20. I. Skogsmyr, Å. Lankinen, Biol. Rev. 77, 537 (2002).
21. K. Arthur, Z. Vejlupkova, R. B. Meeley, J. E. Fowler, Genetics 165, 2137 (2003).
22. A. G. Stephenson, S. E. Travers, J. I. Mena-Ali, J. A. Winsor, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 1009 (2003).
23. J. B. Nasrallah, Science 296, 305 (2002).
24. D. L. Mulcahy, Science 206, 20 (1979).
25. J. P. Vielle-Calzada, R. Baskar, U. Grossniklaus, Nature 404, 91 (2000).
26. V. Walbot, M. M. S. Evans, Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 369 (2003).
27. S. C. H. Barrett, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 358, 991 (2003).
28. L. Keller, Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 355 (1995).
29. J. G. Swallow, G. S. Wilkinson, Biol. Rev. 77, 153 (2002).
30. I. Till-Bottraud, D. L. Venable, I. Dajoz, P. H. Gouyon, Am. Nat. 144, 395 (1994).
31. H. M. Moore, K. Dvorakova, N. Jenkins, W. Breed, Nature 418, 174 (2002).
32. K. A. W. Bowers, Am. J. Bot. 62, 633 (1975).
33. I. Dajoz, I. Till-Bottraud, P. H. Gouyon, Science 253, 66 (1991).
34. G. A. Parker, in Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, T. R. Birkhead, A. P. Møller, Eds. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1998).
35. T.-L. Ashman, D. J. Schoen, Nature 371, 788 (1994).
36. M. Herrero, J. I. Hormaza, Sex. Plant Reprod. 9, 343 (1996).
37. S. C. Stearns, The Evolution of Sex and Its Consequences (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1987).
38. J. A. Zeh, S. D. Newcomer, D. W. Zeh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 13732 (1998).
39. A. G. Clark, D. J. Begun, Genetics 149, 1487 (1998).
40. N. Wilson, S. C. Tubman, P. E. Eady, G. W. Robertson, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 264, 1491 (1997).
41. M. Edvardsson, G. Arnqvist, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 267, 559 (2000).
42. B. Hellriegel, G. Bernasconi, Anim. Behav. 59, 311 (2000).
43. P. I. Ward, Evolution 54, 1680 (2000).
44. B. Hellriegel, P. I. Ward, J. Theor. Biol. 190, 179 (1998).
45. D. L. Marshall, Am. J. Bot. 85, 1389 (1998).
46. E. M. Lord, J. Exp. Bot. 54, 47 (2003).
47. D. C. Queller, in Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, J. W. Bradbury, M. Andersson Eds. (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1987).
48. N. Huck, J. M. Moore, M. Federer, U. Gressniklaus, Development 130, 2149 (2003).
49. N. Rotman et al., Curr. Biol. 13, 432 (2003).
50. R. I. Bertin, M. Sullivan, Am. J. Bot. 75, 1140 (1988).
51. J. D. D. Bishop, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 263, 369 (1996).
52. T. Tregenza, N. Wedell, Nature 415, 71 (2002).
53. J. A. Zeh, D. W. Zeh, Anim. Behav. 61, 1051 (2001).
54. J. A. Zeh, D. W. Zeh, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 264, 69 (1997).
55. D. R. Taylor, M. Saur, E. Adams, Evolution 53, 1028 (1999).
56. G. S. Wilkinson, C. L. Fry, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268, 2559 (2001).
57. T. Chapman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9923 (2003).
58. H. Liu, E. Kubli, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9929 (2003).
59. W. R. Rice, Nature 381, 232 (1996).
60. G. Arnqvist, M. Edvardsson, U. Friberg, T. Nilsson Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 10460 (2000).
61. C. D. Meiklejohn, J. Parsch, J. M. Ranz, D. L. Hartl, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 9894 (2003).
62. T. Pizzari, R. R. Snook, Evolution 57, 1223 (2003).
63. J. Wolf, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 4665 (2003).
64. R. N. Hughes, P. H. Manriquez, J. D. D. Bishop, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14884 (2002).
65. V. L. Scofield, J. M. Schlumpberger, L. A. West, I. L. Weissman, Nature 295, 499 (1982).
66. R. N. Hughes, P. H. Manriquez, J. D. D. Bishop, M. T. Burrows, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 10326 (2003).
67. G. Bernasconi, M. Paschke, B. Schmid, Oikos 102, 217 (2003).
68. K. Foerster, K. Delhey, A. Johnsen, J. T. Lifjeld, B. Kempenaers, Nature 425, 714 (2003).
69. We thank A. Hector, O. Petchey, and 5. C. Stearns for comments; the Swiss NSF (3100A0-100331) and Zurich University (FK 560065) for support; and Centro Stefano Franscini, ETH Zurich, and Swiss Academy of the Natural Sciences for funding the meeting "Evolutionary ecology of the pre-zygotic stage in animals and plants" (Monte Verità, Ascona, Switzerland; www. unizh.ch/uwinst/MonteVerita/ascona.html.)