Congruence, consensus, and the comparative phylogeography of codistributed species in California

American Naturalist

Volumn 166, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 290-299

  Lapointe, François Joseph ^a   Rissler, Leslie J ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Comparative phylogeography; Maximum agreement subtrees; Supertrees

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; CALIFORNIA; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 23044447420     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/431283     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Arbogast, B. S., and G. J. Kenagy. 2001. Comparative phylogeography as an integrative approach to historical biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 38:819-825.
2. Avise, J. C. 1998. The history and purview of phylogeography: a personal reflection. Molecular Ecology 7:371-379.
3. _. 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Avise, J. C., J. Arnold, R. M. Ball Jr., E. Bermingham, T. Lamb, J. E. Neigel, C. A. Reeb, and N. C. Saunders. 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:489-522.
5. Barrowclough, G. F., R. J. Gutierrez, and J. G. Groth. 1999. Phylogeography of spotted owl (Strix occidentalis) populations based on mitochondrial DNA sequences: gene flow, genetic structure, and a novel biogeographic pattern. Evolution 53:919-931.
6. Baum, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
7. Bermingham, E., and C. Moritz. 1998. Comparative phylogeography: concepts and applications. Molecular Ecology 7:367-369.
8. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. 2004a. The evolution of supertrees. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:315-322.
9. _, ed. 2004b. Phylogenetic supertrees: combining information to reveal the Tree of Life. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
10. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., J. L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biological Reviews 74:143-175.
11. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., J. Gittleman, and M. A. Steel. 2002. The (super) tree of life: procedures, problems and prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33:265-289.
12. Brooks, D. R. 1985. Historical ecology: a new approach to studying the evolution of ecological associations. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72:660-680.
13. Brooks, D. R., M. G. P. van Veller, and D. A. McLennan. 2001. How to do BPA, really. Journal of Biogeography 28:345-358.
14. Calsbeek, R., J. N. Thompson, and J. E. Richardson. 2003. Patterns of molecular evolution and diversification in a biodiversity hotspot: the California Floristic Province. Molecular Ecology 12:1021-1029.
15. Chamberlain, C. P., and M. A. Poage. 2000. Reconstructing the paleotopography of mountain belts from the isotopic composition of authigenic minerals. Geology 28:115-118.
16. Cicero, C. 1996. Sibling species of titmice in the Parus inornatus complex (Aves: Paridae). University of California Publication in Zoology 128:1-217.
17. Cracraft, J., and R. Prum. 1988. Patterns and processes of diversification: speciation and historical congruence in some Neotropical birds. Evolution 42:603-620.
18. Ditchfield, A. D. 2000. The comparative phylogeography of Neotropical mammals: patterns of intraspecific mitochondrial DNA variation among bats contrasted to nonvolant small mammals. Molecular Ecology 9:1307-1318.
19. Dobson, A. P., J. P. Rodriguez, W. M. Roberts, and D. S. Wilcove. 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275:550-553.
20. Dobson, A. P., J. P. Rodriguez, and W. M. Roberts. 2001. Synoptic tinkering: integrating strategies for large-scale conservation. Ecological Applications 11:1019-1026.
21. Edwards, S. V., and P. Beerli. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variance in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54:1839-1854.
22. Finden, C. R., and A. D. Gordon. 1985. Obtaining common pruned trees. Journal of Classification 2:225-276.
23. Gupta, A., and N. Nishimura. 1998. Finding largest subtrees and smallest supertrees. Algorithmica 21:183-210.
24. Hall, J. P. W., and D. J. Harvey. 2002. The phylogeography of Amazonia revisited: new evidence from riodinid butterflies. Evolution 56:1489-1497.
25. Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
26. Jockusch, E. L., and D. B. Wake. 2002. Falling apart and merging: diversification of slender salamanders (Plethodontidae: Batrachoseps) in the American West. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76:361-391.
27. Jones, K. E., A. Purvis, A. MacLarnon, O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, and N. B. Simmons. 2002. A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Biological Reviews 77:223-259.
28. Kelemen, L., and C. Moritz. 1999. Comparative phylogeography of a sibling pair of rainforest Drosophila species (Drosophila serrata and D. birchii). Evolution 53:1306-1311.
29. Kennedy, M., and R. D. M. Page. 2002. Seabird supertrees: combining partial estimates of procellariiform phylogeny. Auk 119:88-108.
30. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120.
31. Kuchta, S. R. 2003. Systematics, speciation, and mimicry in Taricha (Caudata: Salamandridae). PhD diss. University of California, Berkeley.
32. Lapointe, F.-J., and G. Cucumel. 1997. The average consensus procedure: combination of weighted trees containing identical or overlapping sets of taxa. Systematic Biology 46:306-312.
33. _. 2003. How good can a consensus get? assessing the reliability of consensus trees in phylogenetic studies. Pages 205-220 in M. Janowitz, F.-J. Lapointe, F. R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, and F. S. Roberts, eds. Bioconsensus. DIMACS Series in Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
34. Lapointe, F.-J., M. Wilkinson, and D. Bryant. 2003. Matrix representations with parsimony or with distances: two sides of the same coin? Systematic Biology 52:865-868.
35. Law, J. H., and B. J. Crespi. 2002. The evolution of geographic parthenogenesis in Timema walking sticks. Molecular Ecology 11: 1471-1489.
36. Legendre, P., F.-J. Lapointe, and P. Casgrain. 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behavior. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
37. Liu, F. G. R., M. M. Miyamoto, N. P. Freire, P. Q. Ong, M. R. Tennant, T. S. Young, and K. F. Gugel. 2001. Molecular and morphological supertrees for eutherian (placental) mammals. Science 291:1786-1789.
38. Maldonado, J. E., C. Vila, and R. K. Wayne. 2001. Tripartite genetic subdivisions in the ornate shrew (Sorex ornatus). Molecular Ecology 10:127-147.
39. Markos, S., and B. G. Baldwin. 2001. Higher-level relationships and major lineages of Lessingia (Compositae: Astereae) based on nuclear rDNA internal and external transcribed spacer (ITS and ETS) sequences. Systematic Botany 26:168-183.
40. Matocq, M. D. 2002. Phylogeographical structure and regional history of the dusky-footed woodrat, Neotoma fuscipes. Molecular Ecology 11:229-242.
41. Mittermeier, R. A., P. R. Gil, M. Hoffman, J. Pilgrim, T. Brooks, C. G. Mittermeier, J. Lamoreux, and G. A. B. da Fonseca. 2005. Hotspots revisited: Earth's biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
42. Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853-858.
43. Page, R. D. M. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, areas and organisms. Systematic Zoology 43:58-77.
44. Page, R. D. M., and M. A. Charleston. 1998. Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:356-359.
45. Parker, M. A., J. L. Doyle, and J. J. Doyle. 2004. Comparative phylogeography of Amphicarpaea legumes and their root-nodule symbionts in Japan and North America. Journal of Biogeography 31: 425-434.
46. Pastorini, J., U. Thalmann, and R. D. Martin. 2003. A molecular approach to comparative phylogeography of extant Malagasy lemurs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 100:5879-5884.
47. Racheli, L. 2004. The nightmare of the combination: comments on matrix representation with parsimony and its first application in biogeography. Cladistics 20:208-211.
48. Ragan, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1:53-58.
49. Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. M. Olson, C. J. Loucks, W. Eichbaum, D. DellaSala, K. Kavanagh, et al. 1999. Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island, Washington, DC.
50. Riddle, B. R., D. J. Hafner, and L. F. Alexander. 2000. Comparative phylogeography of Bailey's pocket mouse (Chaetodipus baileyi) and the Peromyscus eremicus species group: historical vicariance of the Baja California peninsular desert. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17:161-172.
51. Rodriguez-Robles, J. A., D. F. Denardo, and R. E. Staub. 1999. Phylogeography of the California mountain kingsnake, Lampropeltis zonata (Colubridae). Molecular Ecology 8:1923-1934.
52. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:406-425.
53. Sanderson, M. J., A. Purvis, and C. Henze. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13:105-109.
54. Seabloom, E. W., A. P. Dobson, and D. M. Storms. 2002. Extinction rates under nonrandom patterns of habitat loss. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:11229-11234.
55. Stein, B. A., L. S. Kutner, and J. S. Adams, eds. 2000. Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York.
56. Sullivan, J., E. Arellano, and D. S. Rogers. 2000. Comparative phylogeography of mesoamerican highland rodents: concerted versus independent response to past climatic fluctuations. American Naturalist 155:755-768
57. Swofford, D. L. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? Pages 295-333 in M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
58. _. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
59. Taberlet, P., L. Fumagalli, A.-G. Wust-Saucy, and J.-F. Cosson. 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Molecular Ecology 7:453-464.
60. Templeton, A. R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene flow and population history. Molecular Ecology 7:381-397.
61. Thorley, J. L., and R. D. M. Page. 2000. RadCon: phylogenetic tree comparison and consensus. Bioinformatics 16:486-487.
62. Turner, T. F., J. C. Trexler, D. N. Kuhn, and H. W. Robinson. 1996. Life-history variation and comparative phylogeography of darters (Pisces: Percidae) from the North American Central Highlands. Evolution 50:2023-2036.
63. van Veller, M. G. P., D. R. Brooks, and M. Zandee. 2003. Cladistic and phylogenetic biogeography: the art and the science of discovery. Journal of Biogeography 30:319-329.
64. Van Welzen, P. C., H. Turner, and P. Hovenkamp. 2003. Historical biogeography of Southeast Asia and the West Pacific, or the generality of unrooted are networks as historical hypotheses. Journal of Biogeography 30:181-192.
65. Weisrock, D. W., and F. J. Janzen. 2000. Comparative molecular phylogeography of North American softshell turtles (Apalone): implications for regional and wide-scale historical evolutionary forces. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14:152-164.
66. Wilkinson, M., J. A. Cotton, C. Creevey, O. Eulenstein, S. R. Harris, F.-J. Lapointe, C. Levasseur, J. O. Mcinerney, D. Pisani, and J. L. Thorley. 2005. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods. Systematic Biology (forthcoming).
67. Zamudio, K. R., and W. K. Savage. 2003. Historical isolation, range expansion, and secondary contact of two highly divergent mitochondrial lineages in spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum). Evolution 57:1631-1652.
68. Zink, R. M. 1991. The geography of mitochondrial-DNA variation in two sympatric sparrows. Evolution 45:329-339.
69. _. 1996. Comparative phylogeography in North American birds. Evolution 50:308-317.
70. _. 2002. Methods in comparative phylogeography, and their application to studying evolution in the North American aridlands. Integrative Comparative Biology 42:953-959.
71. Zink, R. M., G. F. Barrowclough, J. L. Atwood, and R. C. Blackwell-Rago. 2000. Genetics, taxonomy, and conservation of the threatened California gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 14:1394-1405.
72. Zink, R. M., A. E. Kessen, T. V. Line, and R. C. Blackwell-Rago. 2001. Comparative phylogeography of some aridland bird species. Condor 103:1-10.