Quantifying the gender load: Can population crosses reveal interlocus sexual conflict?

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 361, Issue 1466, 2006, Pages 363-374

  Long, Tristan A F ^a   Montgomerie, Robert ^a   Chippindale, Adam K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Drosophila melanogaster; Gender load; Intersexual coevolution; Reproductive divergence; Sexual conflict; Speciation; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; COEVOLUTION; DIVERGENCE; FITNESS; FLY; MATING BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 33646555426     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1786     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Andrés, J. A. & Arnqvist, G. 2001 Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 399-405. (doi:10.1098/rspb.200. 1392)
2. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1993 Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 340, 207-213.
3. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1993 Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 349, 337-334.
4. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002 Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415, 787-789.
5. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000 Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10 460-10 464. (doi:10.1073/pnas.97. 19.10460)
6. Attia, F. A. & Tregenza, T. 2004 Divergence revealed by population crosses in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 927-935.
7. Bateman, A. J. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368.
8. Boorman, E. & Parker, G. A. 1976 Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol. Entomol. 1, 145-155.
9. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. B., Wolfner, M. R & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244. (doi:10.1038/373241a0)
10. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003 Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41-47. (doi:10.1016/80169-5347(02)00004-6)
11. Clark, A. G. & Begun, D. J. 1998 Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149, 1487-1493.
12. Fowler, G. L. & Partridge, L. 1989 A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338, 760-761. (doi:10.1038/338760a0)
13. Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2004 Divergence in replicated phylogenies: the evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils. J. Evol. Biol. 17, 1345-1354. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00757.x)
14. Gavrilets, S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 888-889. (doi:10.1038/35002564)
15. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001 The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. B 268, 531-539. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1382)
16. Gilchrist, A. S. & Partridge, L. 1997 Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 264, 1271-1275. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0175)
17. Greenspan, R. J. & Ferveur, J.-F. 2000 Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 205-232. (doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.205)
18. Gromko, M. H., Gilbert, D. G. & Richmond, R. C. 1984 Sperm transfer and use in the multiple mating system of Drosophila melanogaster. In Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems (ed. R. L. Smith), pp. 371-426. Academic Press: London.
19. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1998 Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1-7.
20. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1999 Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083-5088. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 96.9.5083)
21. Hosken, D. J., Blanckenhorn, W. U. & Garner, T. W. J. 2002 Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathopha'ga stercoraria). Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 1701-1707. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2094)
22. Howard, D. J. 1999 Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 109-132. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30. 1.109)
23. Kidwell, J. F. & Kidwell, M. M. 1966 The effects of inbreeding on body weight and abdominal chaeta number in Drosophila melanogaster. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 8, 207-215.
24. Leroi, A. M., Chippindale, A. K. & Rose, M. R. 1994 Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-by-environment interaction. Evolution 48, 122-1257.
25. Linder, J. E. & Rice, W. R. 2005 Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 568-575. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00872.x)
26. Martin, O. Y. & Hosken, D. J. 2003 The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423, 979-982. (doi:10.1038/ nature01752)
27. Pai, A. & Yan, G. 2002 Female choice in relation to heterozygosity in Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 1076-1082. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101. 2002.00456.x)
28. Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001 Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364-371. (doi:10.1016/S0169- 5347(01)02160-7)
29. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (ed. M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum), pp. 123-163. New York: Academic Press.
30. Parker, G. A. & Partridge, L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 353, 261-274. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0208)
31. Pitnick, S. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2002 Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B 269, 1821-1828. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2090)
32. Pitnick, S., Miller, G. T., Schneider, K. & Markow, T. A. 2003 Ejaculate-female coevolution in Drosophila mojavensis. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 1507-1512. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2382)
33. Pizzari, T. & Snook, R. 2003 Sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57, 1223-1236.
34. Promislow, D. E. L., Smith, E. A. & Pearse, L. 1998 Adult fitness consequences of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10 687-10 692. (doi:10.1073/pnas.95.18.10687)
35. Rice, W. R. 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234. (doi:10.1038/381232a0)
36. Rice, W. R. 1998 Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Endless forms-species and speciation (ed. D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 261-270. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Rice, W. R. & Chippindale, A. K. 2002 The evolution of hybrid infertility: perpetual coevolution between gender-specific and sexually antagonistic genes. Genetica 116, 179-188. (doi:10.1023/A:1021205130926)
38. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Evol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10. (doi:10.1007/s002650050357)
39. Rose, M. R. 1984 Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38, 1004-1010.
40. Rose, M. R., Nusbaum, T. J. & Chippindale, A. K. 1996 The experimental Wonderland and the Cheshire cat syndrome. In Adaptation (ed. M. R. Rose & G. V. Lauder), pp. 221-241. New York: Academic Press.
41. Rose, M. R., Passananti, H. B. & Matos, M. (eds) 2004 Methuselah flies: a case study in the evolution of ageing. Singapore: World Scientific.
42. Rowe, L., Cameron, E. & Day, T. 2003 Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 2009-2016. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2453)
43. Snook, R. R. & Hosken, D. J. 2004 Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. Nature 428, 939-941. (doi:10.1038/nature02455)
44. Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. 2002 The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Rev. Gen. 3, 137-144. (doi:10.1038/nrg/733)
45. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971 (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
46. Ward, P. I. 2000 Cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria. Evolution 54, 1680-1686.
47. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004 Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58, 1028-1037.