Delayed stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae): Genetic variation and adaptive significance in relation to pollen competition, delayed self-pollination, and mating-system evolution

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 1183-1192

  Lankinen, Åsa ^a,b   Armbruster, W Scott ^a,c,d   Antonsen, Liv ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collinsia heterophylla; Delayed selfing; Delayed stigma receptivity; Evolvability; Flower development; Heritability; Mixed mating system; Plantaginaceae

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; AUTOGAMY; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; GENETIC VARIATION; HERITABILITY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

COLLINSIA; COLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA; PLANTAGINACEAE;

EID: 34447319655     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.7.1183     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. AIZEN, M. A., K. B. SEARCY, AND D. L. MULCAHY. 1990. Among-flower and within-flower comparisons of pollen-tube growth following selfpollinations and cross-pollinations in Dianthus chinensis (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 671-676.
2. ARMBRUSTER, W. S. 1992. Phylogeny and the evolution of plant-animal interactions. BioScience 42: 12-20.
3. ARMBRUSTER, W. S., C. P. H. MULDER, B. G. BALDWIN, S. KALISZ, B. WESSA, AND H. NUTE. 2002. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsiae (Scrophulariaceae S.L.). American Journal of Botany 89: 37-49.
4. ARMBRUSTER, W. S., AND D. G. ROGERS. 2004. Does pollen competition reduce the cost of inbreeding? American Journal of Botany 91: 1939-1943.
5. ARMBRUSTER, W. S., AND K. E. SCHWAEGERLE. 1996. Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 9: 261-276.
6. ASCHER, P. D., AND S. J. PELOQUIN. 1966. Effect of floral aging on growth of compatible and incompatible pollen tubes in Lilium longiflorum. American Journal of Botany 53: 99-102.
7. BARRETT, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 358: 991-1004.
8. BARRETT, S. C. H., L. D. HARDER, AND A. C. WORLEY. 1996. The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 351: 1271-1280.
9. BERTIN, R. I. 1993. Incidence of monoecy and dichogamy in relation to self-fertilization in angiosperms. American Journal of Botany 80: 557-560.
10. BERTIN, R. I., AND M. SULLIVAN. 1988. Pollen interference and cryptic selffertility in Campsis radicans. American Journal of Botany 75: 1140-1147.
11. BHATTACHARYA, A., AND S. MANDAL. 2004. Pollination, pollen germination and stigma receptivity in Moringa oleifera Lamk. Grana 43: 48-56.
12. BOAVIDA, L. C., M. C. VARELA, AND J. A. FEIJO. 1999. Sexual reproduction in the cork oak (Quescus suber L.). I. The progamic phase. Sexual Plant Reproduction 11: 347-353.
13. BUIDE, M. L., AND J. GUITIAN. 2002. Breeding system in the dichogamous hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Annals of Botany 90: 691-699.
14. CHARLESWORTH, D., AND S. S. MAYER. 1995. Genetic variability of plant characters in the partial inbreeder Collinsia heterophylla (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 112-120.
15. CRUDEN, R. W. 1977. Pollen-ovule ratios: a conservative indicator of breeding systems on flowering plants. Evolution 31: 32-46.
16. CRUDEN, R. W. 2000. Pollen grains: why so many? Plant Systematics and Evolution 222: 143-165.
17. CRUZAN, M. B., AND S. C. H. BARRETT. 1993. Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47: 925-934.
18. DAHL, Å. E., M. FREDRIKSON. 1996. The timetable for development of maternal tissues sets the stage for male genomic selection in Betula pendula (Betulaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 895-902.
19. DARWIN, C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London, UK.
20. DOLE, J. A. 1992. Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 79: 650-659.
21. DOUGLAS, K. L., AND R. W. CRUDEN. 1994. The reproductive biology of Anemone canadensis (Ranunculaceae): breeding system and facilitation of sexual selection. American Journal of Botany 81: 314-321.
22. ENDLER, J. A. 1995. Multiple trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 22-29.
23. FALCONER, D. S., AND T. F. C. MACKAY. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Harlow, UK.
24. FENSTER, C. B., P. K. DIGGLE, S. C. H. BARRETT, AND K. RITLAND. 1995. The genetics of floral development differentiating two species of Mimulus (Scophulariaceae). Heredity 74: 258-266.
25. FISHMAN, L., AND R. WYATT. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53: 1723-1733.
26. GALEN, C., J. A. SHYKOFF, AND R. C. PLOWRIGHT. 1986. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. American Naturalist 127: 462-476.
27. GANESHAIAH, K. N., AND R. U. UMA- SHAANKER. 1988. Regulation of seed number and female incitation of mate competition by a pH-dependent proteinaceous inhibitor of pollen grain germination in Leucaena leucocephala. Oecologia 75: 110-113.
28. GOODWILLIE, C., S. KALISZ, AND C. G. ECKERT. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 36: 47-79.
29. GOODWILLIE, C., AND M. N. NESS. 2005. Correlated evolution in floral morphology and the timing of self-compatibility in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 166: 741-751.
30. GOODWILLIE, C., K. L. PARTIS, AND J. W. WEST. 2004. Transient selfincompatibility confers delayed selfing in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 387-394.
31. GRANT, V. 1958. The regulation of recombination in plants. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 23: 337-363.
32. HANSEN, T. F., C. PELABON, W. S. ARMBRUSTER, AND M. L. CARLSON. 2003. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: components of variance and measures of evolvability. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 754-766.
33. HARDER, L. D., S. C. H. BARRETT, AND W. W. COLE. 2000. The mating consequences of sexual segregation within inflorescences of flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 267: 315-320.
34. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. D. PAGEL. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
35. HERRERO, M. 1983. Factors affecting fruit set in 'Agua de Aranjuez' pear. Acta Horticulturae 139: 91-96.
36. HERRERO, M. 2003. Male and female synchrony and the regulation of mating in flowering plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 358: 1019-1024.
37. HERRERO, M., AND A. ARBEOLA. 1989. Influence of the pistil on pollen tube kinetics in peach (Prunus persica). American Journal of Botany 76: 1441-1447.
38. HESLOP-HARRISON, Y. 2000. Control gates and micro-ecology: the pollen-stigma interaction in perspective. Annals of Botany 85 (Supplement A): 5-13.
39. HOLSINGER, K. E. 1991. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of plant mating systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 307-308.
40. HOULE, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
41. IGIC, B., AND J. R. KOHN. 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60: 1098-1103.
42. JAIN, S. K. 1976. The evolution of inbreeding in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7: 469-495.
43. JARNE, P., AND D. CHARLESWORTH. 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphrodite plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 441-466.
44. KALINGANIRE, A., C. S. HARWOOD, M. U. SLEE, AND A. J. SIMONS. 2000. Floral structure, stigma receptivity and pollen viability in relation to protandry and self-incompatibility in silky oak (Grevillea robusta A. Cunn.). Annals of Botany 86: 133-148.
45. KALISZ, S., D. VOGLER, B. FAILS, M. FINER, E. SHEPARD, T. HERMAN, AND R. GOZALES. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 1239-1247.
46. KEARNS, C. A., AND D. W. INOUYE. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado, USA.
47. KEARSEY, M., AND H. S. POONI. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
48. KELLY, J. K., AND H. S. ARATHI. 2003. Inbreeding and the genetic variance in floral traits of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 90: 77-83.
49. KINGSTON, B. L. 1998. Papillate tepal hoods and delayed pollen germination in Albuca L. (Liliaceae). Annals of Botany 82: 263-266.
50. KLIPS, R. A., AND A. A. SNOW. 1997. Delayed autonomous self-pollination in Hibiscus laevis (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 48-53.
51. KRUSZEWSKI, L. J., AND L. F. GALLOWAY. 2006. Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-incompatibility. International Journal of Plant Sciences 167: 455-461.
52. LANDE, R., AND S. J. ARNOLD. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
53. LANKINEN, Å., AND W. S. ARMBRUSTER. 2007. Pollen competition reduces inbreeding depression in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 737-749.
54. LLOYD, D. G. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. International Journal of Plant Sciences 153: 370-380.
55. LLOYD, D. G., AND C. J. WEBB. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. New Zealand Journal of Botany 24: 135-162.
56. LYNCH, M., AND B. WALSH. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
57. MARSHALL, D. L., AND N. C. ELLSTRAND. 1986. Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: experimental data on nonrandom fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. American Naturalist 127: 446-461.
58. MELSER, C., M. C. J. RADEMAKER, AND P. G. L. KLINKHAMER. 1997. Selection on pollen donors by Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 305-312.
59. MOTTEN, A. F., AND J. L. STONE. 2000. Heritability of stigma position and the effect of stigma-anther separation on outcrossing in a predominantly self-fertilizing weed, Datura stramonium (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 339-347.
60. MULCAHY, D. L. 1979. The rise of the angiosperms: a genecological factor. Science 206: 20-23.
61. MULCAHY, D. L. 1983. Models of pollen-tube competition in Geranium maculatum. In L. Real [ed.], Pollination biology, 151-161. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
62. MURDY, W. H., AND M. E. B. CARTER. 1987. Regulation of the timing of pollen germination by the pistil in Talinum mengesii (Portulacaceae). American Journal of Botany 74: 1888-1892.
63. NEESE, E. C. 1993. Collinsia. In J. C. Hickman [ed.], The Jepson manual: higher plants of California, 1024-1027. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
64. NEMETH, M. B., AND N. L. SMITH-HUERTA. 2002. Effects of pollen load composition and deposition pattern on pollen performance in Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 795-802.
65. NEWSOM, V. M. 1929. A revision of the genus Collinsia. Botanical Gazette 87: 260-301.
66. O'BRIEN, S. P. 1996. Timetable of stigmatic receptivity and development and pollen tube growth rate in Chanelaucium uncinatum (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 44: 649-659.
67. PASCHKE, M., C. ABS, AND B. SCHMID. 2002. Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 1250-1259.
68. QUESADA, M., J. A. WINSOR, AND A. G. STEPHENSON. 1993. Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous cucurbit. American Naturalist 142: 694-706.
69. RITLAND, C., AND K. RITLAND. 1989. Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 1731-1739.
70. ROUTLEY, M. B., R. I. BERTIN, AND B. C. HUSBAND. 2004. Correlated evolution of dichogamy and self-incompatibility: a phylogenetic perspective. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 983-993.
71. SANCHEZ, A. M., M. BOSCH, M. BOTS, J. NIEUWLAND, R. FERON, AND C. MARIANI. 2004. Pistil factors controlling pollination. Plant Cell 16 (Supplement): 98-106.
72. SANZOL, J., P. RALLO, AND M. HERRERO. 2003. Asynchronous development of stigmatic receptivity in the pear (Pyrus communis; Rosaceae) flower. American Journal of Botany 90: 78-84.
73. SKOGSMYR, I., AND Å. LANKINEN. 2002. Sexual selection: an evolutionary force in plants? Biological Review 77: 537-562.
74. SNOW, A. A., AND T. P. SPIRA. 1993. Individual variation in the vigor of self pollen and self-fed progeny in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 80: 160-164.
75. SOGO, A., AND H. TOBE. 2006. Mode of pollen-tube growth in pistils of Myrica rubra (Myricaceae): a comparison with related families. Annals of Botany 97: 71-77.
76. SPSS. 1999. SPSS 11.0, Syntax reference guide. SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
77. STEBBINS, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
78. STEBBINS, G. L. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
79. STEWART, H. M., S. C. STEWART, AND J. M. CANNE-HILLIKER. 1996. Mixed mating system in Agalinis neoscotica (Scrophulariaceae) with bud pollination and delayed pollen germination. International Journal of Plant Sciences 157: 501-508.
80. TAKEBAYASHI, N., AND P. L. MORRELL. 2001. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? Revisiting an old hypothesis with genetic theories and a macroevolutionary approach. American Journal of Botany 88: 1143-1150.
81. TAKEBAYASHI, N., D. E. WOLF, AND L. F. DELPH. 2006. Effect of variation in herkogamy on outcrossing within a population of Gilia achilleifolia. Heredity 96: 159-165.
82. VAN KLEUNEN, M., AND K. RITLAND. 2004. Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 1389-1399.
83. WELLER, S. G., AND A. K. SAKAI. 1999. Using phylogenetic approaches for the analysis of plant breeding system evolution. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 167-199.
84. WILLSON, M. F. 1994. Sexual selection in plants: perspective and overview. American Naturalist 144 (Supplement): 13-39.
85. WILLSON, M. F., AND N. BURLEY. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
86. YI, W., S. E. LAW, D. MCCOY, AND H. Y. WETZSTEIN. 2006. Stigma development and receptivity in almond (Prunus dulcis). Annals of Botany 97: 57-63.