Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 270, Issue 1528, 2003, Pages 2009-2016

  Rowe, Locke ^a   Cameron, Erin ^b   Day, Troy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arms races; Comparative biology; Mating rate; Sexual conflict; Theory

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; OVIPOSITION;

ARTICLE; COEVOLUTION; MATING; MODEL; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

EID: 0141751731     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2453     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aguadé, M. 1999 Positive selection drives the evolution of the Acp29AB accessory gland protein in Drosophila. Genetics 152, 543-551.
2. Andres, J. & Arnqvist, G. 2001 Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies, the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 399-405. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1392.)
3. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1993 Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340, 207-213.
4. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1995 Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349, 337-344.
5. Arnqvist, G. 1998 Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393, 784-786.
6. Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. 2000 The evolution of polyandry, multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60, 145-164.
7. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002a Sexually antagonistic coevolution: correlated evolution of male and female morphologies in water striders. Evolution 56, 936-947.
8. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2002b Comparative analysis unveils antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415, 787-789.
9. Arnqvist, G., Edvardsson, M., Friberg, U. & Nilsson, T. 2000 Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10 460-10 464.
10. Basolo, A. L. 1996 The phylogenetic distribution of a female preference. Syst. Biol. 45, 290-307.
11. Basolo, A. L. 1998 Evolutionary change in a receiver bias, a comparison of female preference functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2223-2228. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1998.0563.)
12. Berglund, A. 1993 Risky sex: male pipefishes mate at random in the presence of a predator. Anim. Behav. 46, 169-175.
13. Bergsten, J., Töyrä, A. & Nilsson, A. N. 2001 Intraspecific variation and intersexual correlation in secondary sexual characters of three diving beetles (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73, 221-232.
14. Brown, D. V. & Eady, P. E. 2001 Functional compatibility between the fertilization of two allopatric populations of Callosobruchus maculates (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Evolution 55, 2257-2262.
15. Chapman, T. 2001 Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87, 511-521.
16. Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F. & Partridge, L. 1995 Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster is mediated by accessory gland products. Nature 373, 241-244.
17. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003 Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 41-47.
18. Choe, C. & Crespi, B. J. 1997 Social competition and cooperation in insects and arachnids, evolution of mating systems. Princeton University Press.
19. Civetta, A. & Singh, R. S. 1995 High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41, 1085-1095.
20. Clark, A. G., Begun, D. J. & Prout, T. 1999 Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283, 217-220.
21. Eberhard, W. G. 1985 Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Eberhard, W. G. 1996 Female control, sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press.
23. Gavrilets, S. 2000 Rapid evolution of reproductive barriers driven by sexual conflict. Nature 403, 886-889.
24. Gavrilets, S. & Waxman, D. 2002 Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 99, 10 533-10 538.
25. Gavrilets, S., Arnqvist, G. & Friberg, U. 2001 The evolution of female mate choice by sexual conflict. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 531-539. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1382.)
26. Haig, D. 2000 The kinship theory of genomic imprinting. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 9-32.
27. Hedrick, A. V. & Dill, L. M. 1993 Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46, 193-196.
28. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. 1999 Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083-5088.
29. Hosken, D., Garner, T. W. J. & Ward, P. I. 2001 Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11, 489-493.
30. Hosken, D. J., Blanckenhorn, W. U. & Garner, T. W. J. 2002 Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1701-1707. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2002.2094.)
31. Houde, A. E. & Endler, J. A. 1990 Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy poecilia-reticulata. Science 248, 1405-1408.
32. Howard, D. J., Reece, M., Gregory, P. G., Chu, J. & Cain, M. L. 1998 The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. In Endless forms: species and speciation (ed. D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 279-288. Oxford University Press.
33. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. 1991 The evolution of costly mate preference. II. The handicap principle. Evolution 45, 1431-1442.
34. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. 1991 The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33-38.
35. Knowles, L. L. & Markow, T. A. 2001 Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a post-mating prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8692-8696.
36. Lande, R. 1976 Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30, 314-334.
37. Lande, R. 1980 Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34, 292-305.
38. Lande, R. 1981 Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725.
39. Miller, G. T. & Pitnick, S. 2002 Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298, 1230-1233.
40. Miller, G. T. & Pitnick, S. 2003 Functional significance of seminal receptor length in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 114-126.
41. Morris, M. R., Wagner, W. E. & Ryan, M. J. 1996 A negative correlation between trait and mate preference in Xiphophorus pygmaeus. Anim. Behav. 52, 1193-1203.
42. Nilsson, T., Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2002 Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56, 111-120.
43. Palumbi, S. R. & Metz, E. C. 1991 Strong reproductive isolation between closely related tropical sea-urchins (genus Echinometra). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 227-239.
44. Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001 Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364-371.
45. Parker, G. A. 1979 Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (ed. M. S. Blum & N. B. Blum), pp. 123-166. New York: Academic.
46. Parker, G. A. & Partridge, L. 1998 Sexual conflict and speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 261-274. (DOI 10.1098/rstb.1998.0208.)
47. Pitnick, S., Markow, T. & Spicer, G. S. 1999 Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53, 1804-1822.
48. Pitnick, S., Brown, W. D. & Miller, G. T. 2001a Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 557-563. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2000.1400.)
49. Pitnick, S., Miller, G. T., Reagan, J. & Holland, B. 2001b Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1071-1080. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.2001.1621.)
50. Presgraves, D. C., Baker, R. H. & Wilkinson, G. S. 1999 Coevolution of sperm and female reproductive tract morphology in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1041-1047. (DOI 10.1098/rspb.1999.0741.)
51. Rice, W. R. 1996 Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381, 232-234.
52. Rice, W. R. 1998 Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In Endless forms - species and speciation (ed. D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher), pp. 261-270. Oxford University Press.
53. Rice, W. R. & Holland, B. 1997 The enemies within, intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE), and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 1-10.
54. Rosenthal, G. G. & Servedio, M. R. 1999 Chase-away sexual selection: resistance to 'resistance'. Evolution 53, 296-299.
55. Rowe, L. & Arnqvist, G. 2002 Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system, combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes. Evolution 56, 754-767.
56. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. 1996 The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1415-1421.
57. Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A. & Krupa, J. 1994 Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 289-293.
58. Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. 2002 The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 137-144.
59. Swanson, W., Zhang, Z. H., Wolfner, M. F. & Aquadro, C. F. 2001 Positive Darwinian selection drives the evolution of several reproductive proteins in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2509-2514.
60. Taylor, P. D. 1996 The selection differential in quantitative genetic and ESS models. Evolution 50, 2106-2110.
61. Trivers, R. L. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man. 1871-1971 (ed. B. Campbell), pp. 136-179. London: Heinemann.
62. Wagner, W. E. 1998 Measuring female mating preferences. Anim. Behav. 55, 1029-1042.
63. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983 Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Quart. Rev. Biol. 58, 155-183.
64. Westlake, K. P., Rowe, L. & Currie, D. C. 2000 Phylogeny of the water strider genus Rheumatobates (Heteroptera, Gerridae). Syst. Entomol. 25, 125-145.