Sexual conflict over floral receptivity

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2454-2465

  Lankinen, Asa ^a   Hellriegel, Barbara ^b,d   Bernasconi, Giorgina ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Arms race; Floral longevity; Pollen competition; Pollination; Protandry; Receptivity

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; COEVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; FLOWER VISITING; GAME THEORY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PATERNITY; PLANT DEFENSE; POLLEN; POLLINATION; PROTANDRY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; WILTING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GAME; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; GAME THEORY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALIA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 33846857537     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-259.1     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Aizen, M. A. 1993. Self-pollination shortens flower life-span in Portulaca umbraticola Hbk (Portulacaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 154:412-415.
2. Arathi, H. S., A. Rasch, C. Cox, and J. K. Kelly. 2002. Autogamy and floral longevity in Mimulus guttatus. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163:567-573.
3. Armbruster, W. S., E. M. Debevec, and M. F. Willson. 2002a. Evolution of syncarpy in Angiosperm: theoretical and phylogenetic analyses of the effects of carpel fusion on offspring quantity and quality. J. Evol. Biol. 15:657-672.
4. Armbruster, W. S., C. P. H. Mulder, B. G. Baldwin, S. Kalisz, B. Wessa, and H. Nute. 2002b. Comparative analysis of late floral development and mating-system evolution in tribe Collinsiae (Scrophulariaceae S.L.). Am. J. Bot. 89:37-49.
5. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict: monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. Ashman, T.-L. 2004. Flower longevity. Pp. 349-362 in L. D. Nooden, ed. Cell death in plants. Elsevier, London.
7. Ashman, T.-L., and D. J. Schoen. 1994. How long should flowers live? Nature 371:788-791.
8. Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358:991-1004.
9. Bernasconi, G. 2003. Multiple paternity in flowering plants and its evolutionary consequences. Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 6:147-156.
10. Bernasconi, G., M. Paschke, and B. Schmid. 2003. Diversity effects in reproductive biology. Oikos 102:217-220.
11. Bernasconi, G., T.-L. Ashman, T. R. Birkhead, J. D. D. Bishop, U. Grossniklaus, E. Kubli, D. L. Marshall, B. Schmid, I. Skogsmyr, R. R. Snook, D. Taylor, I. Till-Bottraud, P. I. Ward, D. Zeh, and B. Hellriegel. 2004. Evolutionary ecology of the pre-zygotic stage. Science 303:971-974.
12. Bernasconi, G., D. J. Lang, and B. Schmid. 2006a. Microgrametophyte population sizes and plant reproductive output in the insect-pollinated Prunella grandiflora (Lamiaceae). New Phytol. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137. 2006. 01920x.
13. Bernasconi, G., L. S. Corley, and M. K. N. Lawniczak. 2006b. "Trick or treat": the battle of the sexes. J. Evol. Biol. 16:1003-1005.
14. Bingham, R. A., and A. R. Orthner. 1998. Efficient pollination of alpine plants. Nature 391:238-239.
15. Bishop, J. D. D., A. J. Pemberton, and L. R. Noble. 2000. Sperm precedence in a novel context: mating in a sessile marine invertebrate with dispersing sperm. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:1107-1113.
16. Bulmer, M. 1994. Theoretical evolutionary ecology. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA.
17. Campbell, D. 1998. Multiple paternity in fruits of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85:1022-1027.
18. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:41-47.
19. Clayton, S., and M. A. Aizen. 1996. Effects of pollinia removal and insertion on flower longevity in Chloraea alpina (Orchidaceae). Evol. Ecol. 10:653-660.
20. Cowan, A. A., A. H. Marshall, and T. P. T. Michaelson-Yates. 2000. Effect of pollen competition and stigmatic receptivity on seed set in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Sex. Plant Reprod. 13:37-42.
21. Christiansen, F. B. 1991. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat. 138:37-50.
22. Cresswell, J. E., A. P. Bassom, S. A. Bell, S. J. Collins, and T. B. Kelly. 1995. Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oil-seed rape: a comparison of three models. Funct. Ecol. 9:829-841.
23. da Costa-Nunes, J. A., and U. Grossniklaus. 2003. Unveiling the gene-expression profile of pollen. Genome Biol. 5:205.
24. Dahl, Å. E., and M. Fredrikson. 1996. The timetable for development of maternal tissues sets the stage for male genomic selection in Betula pendula (Betulaceae). Am. J. Bot. 83:895-902.
25. De Jong, T. J. and P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 2005. Evolutionary ecology of plant reproductive strategies. Cambridge. Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
26. De Jong, T. J., H. van Dijk, P. G. L. Klinkhamer. 2005. Hamilton's rule, imprinting and parent-offspring conflict over seed mass in partially selfing plants. J. Evol. Biol. 18:676-682.
27. Delph, L. F., and K. Havens. 1998. Pollen competition in flowering plants. Pp. 149-173 in T. R. Birkhead and A. P. Møller, eds. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, New York.
28. Dieckmann, U., and R. Law. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34:579-612.
29. Douglas, K. L., and R. W. Cruden. 1994. The reproductive biology of Anemone canadensis (Ranunculaceae): breeding system and facilitation of sexual selection. Am. J. Bot. 81:314-321.
30. Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Multiple paternity within the fruits of the wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am. Nat. 123:819-828.
31. Fiebig, A., R. Kimport, and D. Preuss. 2004. Comparisons of pollen coat genes across Brassicaceae species reveal rapid evolution by repeat expansion and diversification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:3286-3291.
32. Galen, C., J. A. Shykoff, and R. C. Plowright. 1986. Consequences of stigma receptivity schedules for sexual selection in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 127:462-476.
33. Ganeshaiah, K. N., and U. R. Shaanker. 1988. Regulation of seed number and female incitation of mate competition by a pH-dependent proteinaceous inhibitor of pollen grain germination in Leucaena leucocephala. Oecologia 75:110-113.
34. Gori, D. F. 1983. Post-pollination phenomena and adaptive floral changes. Pp. 31-49 in C. E. Jones and R. J. Little, eds. Handbook of experimental pollination biology. van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
35. Harder, L. D., and S. D. Johnson. 2005. Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:2651-2657.
36. Harder, L. D., and J. D. Thomson. 1989. Evolutionary options for maximazing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat. 133:323-344.
37. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.
38. Herrero, M. 2003. Male and female synchrony and the regulation of mating in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358:1019-1024.
39. Herrero, M., and A. Arbeola. 1989. Influence of the pistil on pollen tube kinetics in peach (Prunus persica). Am. J. Bot. 76:1441-1447.
40. Higashiyama, T., S. Yabe, N. Sasaki, Y. Nishimura, S. Miyagishima, H. Kuroiwa, and T. Kuroiwa. 2001. Pollen tube attraction by the synergid cells. Science 293:1480-1483.
41. Hormaza, J. I., and M. Herrero. 1994. Gametophytic competition and selection. Pp. 372-400 in E. G. Williams, A. E. Clarke, and R. B. Knox, eds. Genetic control of self-incompatibility and reproductive development in flowering plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
42. Johnstone, R. A., and L. Keller. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins and the cost of mating. Am. Nat. 156:368-377.
43. Jones, M. L. 2002. Ethylene responsiveness in carnation style is associated with stigma receptivity. Sex. Plant Reprod. 15:107-112.
44. Leimar, O. 2006. Multidimensional convergence stability and the canonical adaptive dynamics. In U. Dieckmann and J. A. J. Metz, eds., Elements of adaptive dynamics. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K. In press.
45. Lessells, C. M. 2005. Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behavior. Am. Nat. 165:S46-S63.
46. Levin, D. A. 1990. Sizes of microgametophyte populations in pistils of Phlox drummondii. Am. J. Bot. 77:356-363.
47. Lloyd, D. G., and C. J. Webb. 1986. The avoidance of interference between the presentation of pollen and stigmas in angiosperms. I. Dichogamy. NZ J. Bot. 24:135-162.
48. Marshall, D. L., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1985. Proximal causes of multiple paternity in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am. Nat. 126:596-605.
49. Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and theory of games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
50. Maynard Smith, J., and G. R. Price. 1973. The logic of animal conflict. Nature 6:15-18.
51. Meagher, T., and L. Delph. 2001. Individual flower demography, floral phenology and floral display size in Silene latifolia. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:845-860.
52. Morrow, E. H., and G. Arnqvist. 2003. Costly traumatic insemination and a female counter-adaptation in bed bugs. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:2377-2381.
53. Murdy, W. H., and M. E. B. Carter. 1987. Regulation of the timing of pollen germination by the pistil in Talinum mengesii (Portulacaceae). Am. J. Bot. 74:1888-1892.
54. Niesenbaum, R. A. 1999. The effects of pollen load size and donor diversity on pollen performance, selective abortion, and progeny vigor in Mirabilis jalapa (Nyctagynaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86:261-268.
55. O'Neill, S. D. 1997. Pollination regulation of flower development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:547-574.
56. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
57. _. 1990. Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242:120-126.
58. Paschke, M., C. Abs, and B. Schmid. 2002. Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:1250-1259.
59. Paschke, M., G. Bernasconi, and B. Schmid. 2005. Effects of inbreeding and pollen donor provenance and diversity on offspring performance under environmental stress in the rare plant Cochlearia bavarica. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6:325-338.
60. Pimentel de Carvalho, A. C., and D. Message. 2004. A scientific note on the toxic pollen of Stryphnodendron polyphyllum (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae) which causes sacbrood-like symptoms. Apidologie 35:89-90.
61. Preston, R. E. 1991. The intrafloral phenology of Streptanthus tortuosus (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78:1044-1053.
62. Primack, R. B. 1985. Longevity of invidual flowers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:15-37.
63. Proctor, H. C., and L. D. Harder. 1995. Effect of pollination success on floral longevity in the orchid Calypso bulbosa (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:1131-1136.
64. Rathcke, B. J. 2003. Floral longevity and reproductive assurance: seasonal patterns and an experimental test with Kalmia latifolia (Ericaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90:1328-1332.
65. Rice, W. R., and B. Holland. 1997. The enemies within: intragenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific Red Queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41:1-10.
66. Schaal, B. A. 1980. Measurement of gene flow in Lupinus texensis. Nature 284:450-451.
67. Schemske, D. W., and L. P. Pautler. 1984. The effects of pollen composition on fitness components in a neotropical herb. Oecologia 62:31-36.
68. Schlichting, C. D., A. G. Stephenson, L. D. Davis, and J. A. Winsor. 1987. Pollen competition and offspring variance. Evol. Trends Plants 1:35-40.
69. Schlichting, C. D., A. G. Stephenson, and L. E. Small. 1990. Pollen loads and progeny vigor in Cucurbita pepo: the next generation. Evolution 44:1358-1372.
70. Schoen, D. J., and T.-L. Ashman. 1995. The evolution of floral longevity: resource allocation to maintenance versus construction of repeated parts in modular organisms. Evolution 49:131-139.
71. Service, P., and R. E. Vossbrinks. 1996. Genetic variation in ''first'' male effects on egg laying and remating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 26:39-48.
72. Shaanker, R. U., and K. N. Ganeshaiah. 1989. Stylar plugging by fertilized ovules in Kleinhovia hospita (Sterculiaceae): a case of vaginal sealing in plants. Evol. Trends Plants 3:59-64.
73. Shykoff, J. A., E. Bucheli, and O. Kaltz. 1996. Flower lifespan and disease risk. Nature 379:779.
74. Skogsmyr, I., and Å. Lankinen. 2000. Potential selection for female choice in Viola tricolor. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:965-979.
75. Snow, A. A., and P. O. Lewis. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: empirical approaches. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:331-351.
76. Snow, A. A., T. P. Spira, and H. Liu. 2000. Effects of sequential pollination on the success of "fast" and "slow" pollen donors in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:1656-1659.
77. Stanley, R. G., and H. F. Linskens. 1974. Pollen: Biology, Biochemisty, Management. Springer, Berlin.
78. Stanton, M. L. 1994. Male-male competition during pollination in plant populations. Am. Nat. 144:S40-S68.
79. Taylor, L. P., and P. K. Hepler. 1997. Pollen germination and tube growth. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 48:461-491.
80. Taylor, P. D. 1989. Evolutionary stability in one-parameter models under weak selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 36:125-143.
81. Thomson, J. D., and R. C. Plowright. 1980. Pollen carryover, nectar rewards and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia 46:68-74.
82. van Doorn, W. G. 1997. Effects of pollination on floral attraction and longevity. J. Exp. Bot. 48:1615-1622.
83. Willson, M. F., and N. Burley. 1983. Mate choice in plants: tactics, mechanisms, and consequences. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
84. Young, H. J., and L. Gravitz. 2002. The effects of stigma age on receptivity in Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 89:1237-1241.
85. Zinkl, G., and D. Preuss. 2000. Dissecting Arabidopsis pollen-stigma interactions: a species-specific interaction reveals novel mechanisms that confer mating specificity. Ann. Bot. 85:15-21.