Divergence in replicated phylogenies: The evolution of partial post-mating prezygotic isolation in bean weevils

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1345-1354

  Fricke, C ^a   Arnqvist, G ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Arbitrariness; Male female coevolution; Natural selection; Parallel speciation; Reproductive proteins

Indexed keywords

DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WEEVILS;

ACANTHOSCELIDES OBTECTUS; CALLOSOBRUCHUS; CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM);

EID: 8144229653     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00757.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andrés, J.A. & Arnquist, G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 399-405.
2. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1993. Hidden preferences and the evolution of signals. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 340: 207-213.
3. Arak, A. & Enquist, M. 1995. Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B 349: 337-344.
4. Arnqvist, G. 2004. Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase. Evolution 58: (in press).
5. Barraclough, T. G. & Nee, S. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 391-399.
6. Bieri, J. & Kawecki, T.J. 2003. Genetic architecture of differences between populations of cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) evolved in the same environment. Evolution 57: 274-287.
7. Boake, C.R.B, McDonald, K., Maitra, S. & Ganguly, R. 2003. Forty years of solitude: life-history divergence and behavioural isolation between laboratory line of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 83-90.
8. Brown, D.V. & Eady, P.E. 2001. Functional incompatibility between the fertilization systems of two allopatric populations of Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Evolution 55: 2257-2262.
9. Chapman, T. 2001. Seminal fluid-mediated fitness traits in Drosophila. Heredity 87: 511-521.
10. Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. & Rowe, L. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 41-47.
11. Chen, P.S. 1984. The functional morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory glands and their secretions. Ann. Rev. Entmol. 29: 233-255.
12. Civetta, A. & Singh, R.S. 1995. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41: 1085-1095.
13. Civetta, A. & Singh, R.S. 1998. Sex-related genes, directional sexual selection, and speciation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15: 901-909.
14. Clark, A.G., Begun, D.J. & Prout, T. 1999. Female x Male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283: 217-220.
15. Credland, P.F. & Wright, A.W. 1989. Factors affecting female fecundity in the cowpea seed beetles, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored. Prod. Res. 25: 125-136.
16. Crudgington, H. S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855-856.
17. Das, A.K., Huignard, J., Barbier, M. & Quesneau-Thierry, A. 1980. Isolation of the two pragonial substances deposited into the spermatophores of Acanthoselides obtecus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Experiantia 36: 918-920.
18. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
19. Eady, P.E. 2001. Postcopulatory, prezygotic reproductive isolation. J. Zool. 253: 47-52.
20. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
21. Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2004. Conspecific sperm precedence in flour beetles. Anim. Behav. 67: 729-732.
22. Galindo, B.E., Vacquier, V.D. & Swanson, W.J. 2003. Positive selection in the egg receptor for abalone sperm lysin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 4639-4643.
23. Gilliot, C. 2003. Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48: 163-184.
24. Hewitt, G.M., Mason, P. & Nichols, R.A. 1989. Sperm precedence and homogamy across a hybrid zone in the alpine grasshopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity 62: 343-353.
25. Hosken, D.J., Blanckenhorn, W.U. & Garner, T.W.J 2002. Heteropopulation males have a fertilization advantage during sperm competition in the yellow dung fly (Scathophaga stercoraria). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1701-1707.
26. Howard, D.J. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 109-132.
27. Howard, D.J. & Berlocher, S.H. 1998. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Howard, D.J., Gregory, P.G., Chu, J. & Cain, M.L. 1998a. Conspecific sperm precedence is an effective barrier to hybridisation between closely related species. Evolution 52: 511-516.
29. Howard, D.J., Reece, M., Gregory, P.G., Chu, J. & Cain, M.L. 1998b. The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher, eds), pp. 279-288. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Huignard, J. 1983. Transfer and fate of male secretions deposited in the spermatophore of females of Acanthoscelides-obtectus Coleoptera Bruchidae. J. Insect Physiol. 29: 55-64.
31. Huignard, J., Quesneau-Thierry, A. & Barbier, M. 1977. Isolation biological effect and development of paragonial substances in the spermatophore of Acanthoscelides-obtectus Coleoptera. J. Insect Physiol. 23: 351-357.
32. Jamart, J.A., Casares, P., Carracedo, M.C. & Pineiro, R. 1995. Consequences of homo- and heterospecific rapid remating on the fitness of Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Insect Physiol. 41: 1019-1026.
33. Johannesson, K. 2001. Parallel speciation: a key to sympatric divergence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 148-153.
34. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ravigné, V. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159: S22-S35.
35. Knowles, L.L. & Markow, T.A. 2001. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8692-8696.
36. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
37. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
38. Markow, T.A. 1997. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 7756-7760.
39. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
40. Mitchell, R. 1991. The traits of a biotype of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) from South India. J. Stored. Prod. Res. 27: 221-224.
41. Morrow, T., Arnqvist, G. & Pitnick, S. 2003. Adaptation vs. pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates. Behav. Ecol. 14: 802-806.
42. Nakano, S. 1985. Effect of interspecific mating on female fitness in two closely related ladybirds (Henosepilachna). Kontyû. Tokyo 53: 112-119.
43. Nilsson, T., Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2002. Patterns of divergence in the effects of mating on female reproductive performance in flour beetles. Evolution 56: 111-120.
44. Nilsson, T., Fricke, C. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53: 227-233.
45. Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J. & Sandoval, C.P. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417: 440-443.
46. Orr, H.A. & Presgraves, D.C. 2000. Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules. Bioessays 22: 1085-1094.
47. Orr, M.R. & Smith, T.B. 1998. Ecology and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 502-506.
48. Orr, H.A. & Turelli, M. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1085-1094.
49. Palumbi, S.R. 1999. All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 12632-12637.
50. Panhuis, T.M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
51. Parker, G.A. & Partridge, L. 1998. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 261-274.
52. Pitnick, S. & Brown, W.D. 2000. Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution 54: 1052-1056.
53. Price, C.S.C. 1997. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388: 663-666.
54. Price, C.S.C., Kim, C.H., Gronlund, C.J. & Coyne, J.A. 2001. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex. Evolution 55: 81-92.
55. Rice, W.R. 1998. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (D. J. Howard & S. H. Berlocher, eds), pp. 261-270. Oxford University Press, New York.
56. Robinson, T., Johnson, N.A. & Wade, M.J. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation: intraspecific and interspecific sperm precedence in Tribolium spp., flour beetles. Heredity 73: 155-159.
57. Rowe, L., Cameron, E. & Day, T. 2003. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2009-2016.
58. Rundle, H.D., Nagel, L., Wenrick Boughman, J. & Schluter, D. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287: 306-308.
59. Schluter, D. 2000. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, New York.
60. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 372-380.
61. Schluter, D. & Price, T. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 253: 117-122.
62. Swanson, W.J. & Vacquier, V.D. 2002. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nat. Genet. 3: 137-143.
63. Swanson, W.J., Yang, Z., Wolfner, M.F. & Aquadro, C.F. 2001. Positive Darwinian selection drives the evolution of several female reproductive proteins in mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 2509-2514.
64. Tatar, M., Cary, J.R. & Vaupel, J.W. 1993. Long-term cost of reproduction with and without accelerated senescence in Callosobruchus maculatus: analysis of age-specific mortality. Evolution 47: 1302-1312.
65. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1013-1027.
66. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415: 71-73.
67. Turelli, M. & Orr, H.A. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
68. Turelli, M., Barton, N.H. & Coyne, J.A. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 330-342.
69. Wade, M.J., Patterson, H., Chang, N.W. & Johnson, N.A. 1994. Postcopulatory, prezygotic isolation in flour beetles. Heredity 72: 163-167.
70. West-Eberhard, M.J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58: 155-183.
71. Wolfner, M.F. 1997. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27: 179-192.