Conflicting gene trees and phylogenomics

Journal of Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 795-807

  Zou, Xin Hui ^a   Ge, Song ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Conflicting gene trees; Gene tree; Molecular phylogenetics; Phylogenomics; Species tree

Indexed keywords

ORYZA;

EID: 65249164777     PISSN: 16744918     EISSN: 17596831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1002.2008.08081     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Andreasen K, Baldwin BG. 2001. Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18: 936-944.
2. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
3. Bapteste E, Brinkmann H, Lee JA, Moore DV, Sensen CW, Gordon P, Durufle L, Gaasterland T, Lopez P, Müller M, Philippe H. 2002. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 1414-1419.
4. Bergthorsson U, Richardson AO, Young GJ, Goertzen LR, Palmer JD. 2004. Massive horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes from diverse land plant donors to the basal angiosperm Amborella. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 17747-17752.
5. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Steel MA. 2002. THE (SUPER) TREE OF LIFE: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 265-289.
6. Boore JL. 2006. The use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 439-446.
7. Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2008. Animal phylogeny and large-scale sequencing: progress and pitfalls. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 46: 274-286.
8. Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu YL, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michaels HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KG, Clark WD, Hedren M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim KJ, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang QY, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GH, Graham SW, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide-sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
9. Chen FC, Li WH. 2001. Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 444-456.
10. Collins TM, Fedrigo O, Naylor GJ. 2005. Choosing the best genes for the job: the case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 54: 493-500.
11. Comas I, Moya A, Gonzalez-Candelas F. 2007. From phylogenetics to phylogenomics: the evolutionary relationships of insect endosymbiotic gamma-Proteobacteria as a test case. Systematic Biology 56: 1-16.
12. Crawford DJ. 2000. Plant macromolecular systematics in the past 50 years: one view. Taxon 49: 479-501.
13. Cronn RC, Small RL, Haselkorn T, Wendel JF. 2002. Rapid diversification of the cotton genus (Gossypium: Malvaceae) revealed by analysis of sixteen nuclear and chloroplast genes. American Journal of Botany 89: 707-725.
14. Cummings MP, Otto SP, Wakeley J. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 814-822.
15. Daubin V, Gouy M, Perriere G. 2002. A phylogenomic approach to bacterial phylogeny: evidence of a core of genes sharing a common history. Genome Research 12: 1080-1090.
16. de Queiroz A, Donoghue MJ, Kim J. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
17. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 361-375.
18. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Brown AH. 1999. Incongruence in the diploid B-genome species complex of Glycine (Leguminosae) revisited: histone H3-D alleles versus chloroplast haplotypes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 354-362.
19. Eisen JA. 1998. Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. Genome Research 8: 163-167.
20. Enard W, Paabo S. 2004. Comparative primate genomics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 5: 351-378.
21. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
22. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O, Clayton RA, Kirkness EF, Kerlavage AR, Bult CJ, Tomb JF, Dougherty BA, Merrick JM, McKenney K, Sutton G, FitzHugh W, Fields C, Gocayne JD, Scott J, Shirley R, Liu L, Glodek A, Kelley JM, Weidman JF, Phillips CA, Spriggs T, Hedblom E, Cotton MD, Utterback TR, Manna MC, Nguyen DT, Saudek DM, Brandon RC, Fine LD, Fritchman JL, Fuhrmann JL, Geoghagen NSM, Gnehm CL, McDonald LA, Small KV, Fraser CM, Smith HO, Venter JC. 1995. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269: 496-512.
23. Foster PG, Hickey DA. 1999. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based phylogenetic reconstructions. Journal of Molecular Evolution 48: 284-290.
24. Futuyma DJ. 1998. Evolutionary biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
25. Ge S, Sang T, Lu BR, Hong DY. 1999. Phylogeny of rice genomes with emphasis on origins of allotetraploid species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 14400-14405.
26. Goremykin VV, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Wolfl S, Hellwig FH. 2003.Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1499-1505.
27. Goremykin VV, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Wolfl S, Hellwig FH. 2004. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1445-1454.
28. Gu X, Fu YX, Li WH. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12: 546-557.
29. Gu X, Wang Y, Gu J. 2002. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nature Genetics 31: 205-209.
30. Guo YL, Ge S. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Oryzeae (Poaceae) based on DNA sequences from chloroplast, mitochondrial, and nuclear genomes. American Journal of Botany 92: 1548-1558.
31. Haeckel E. 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen. Vol. 2: Allgemeine Entwickelungsgeschichte der Organismen. Berlin: Reimer.
32. Huelsenbeck JP. 2002. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 698-707.
33. Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254-267.
34. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics: the beginning of incongruence? Trends in Genetics 22: 225-231.
35. Johnson LA, Soltis DE. 1998. Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ eds. Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing. Boston: Kluwer. 297-348.
36. Kellogg EA, Appels R, Mason Gamer RJ. 1996. When genes tell different stories: The diploid genera of Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Botany 21: 321-347.
37. Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Systematic Zoology 38: 7-25.
38. Koch MA, Dobes C, Kiefer C, Schmickl R, Klimes L, Lysak MA. 2007. Supernetwork identifies multiple events of plastid trnF (GAA) pseudogene evolution in the Brassicaceae. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 63-73.
39. Kumar S, Gadagkar SR. 2001. Disparity index: a simple statistic to measure and test the homogeneity of substitution patterns between molecular sequences. Genetics 158: 1321-1327.
40. Li WH. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
41. Lockhart PJ, Penny D. 2005. The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms. Trends in Plant Science 10: 201-202.
42. Lopez P, Casane D, Philippe H. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 1-7.
43. Mason-Gamer RJ. 2008. Allohexaploidy, introgression, and the complex phylogenetic history of Elymus repens (Poaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47: 598-611.
44. Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Systematic Biology 44: 64-76.
45. Nayar NM. 1973. Origin and cytogenetics of rice. Advances in Genetics 17: 153-292.
46. Nei M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
47. Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Olmstead RG, Sweere JA. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using 3 molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Systematic Biology 43: 467-481.
49. Pamilo P, Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 5: 568-583.
50. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA. 2004. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 9903-9908.
51. Patterson N, Richter DJ, Gnerre S, Lander ES, Reich D. 2006. Genetic evidence for complex speciation of humans and chimpanzees. Nature 441: 1103-1108.
52. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N. 2005a. Phylogenomics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 541-562.
53. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. 2005b. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 1246-1253.
54. Philippe H, Lopez P. 2001. On the conservation of protein sequences in evolution. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 26: 414-416.
55. Philippe H, Zhou Y, Brinkmann H, Rodrigue N, Delsuc F. 2005c. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evolution Biology 5: 50.
56. Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1455-1458.
57. Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Moses AM, Eisen MB. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genetics 2: e173.
58. Qiu YL, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404-407.
59. Qiu YL, Li L, Wang B, Chen Z, Knoop V, Groth-Malonek M, Dombrovska O, Lee J, Kent L, Rest J, Estabrook GF, Hendry TA, Taylor DW, Testa CM, Ambros M, Crandall-Stotler B, Duff RJ, Stech M, Frey W, Quandt D, Davis CC. 2006. The deepest divergences in land plants inferred from phylogenomic evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103: 15511-15516.
60. Rieppel O. 2005. The philosophy of total evidence and its relevance for phylogenetic inference. Papeis Avulsos de Zoologia 45: 77-89.
61. Rieseberg LH, Whitton J, Linder CR. 1996. Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and phylogenetic trees. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 243-262.
62. Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biology 4: e352.
63. Rokas A, Holland PW. 2000. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 454-459.
64. Rokas A, Kruger D, Carroll SB. 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310: 1933-1938.
65. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425: 798-804.
66. Salamin N, Hodkinson TR, Savolainen V. 2002. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). Systematic Biology 51: 136-150.
67. Savard J, Tautz D, Richards S, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA, Werren JH, Tettelin H, Lercher MJ. 2006. Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Research 16: 1334-1338.
68. Second G. 1985. A new insight into the genome differentiation in Oryza L. through isozymic studies. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A eds. Advances in chromosome and cell genetics. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH. 45-78.
69. Seelanan T, Schnabel A, Wendel JF. 1997. Congruence and consensus in the cotton tribe (Malvaceae). Systematic Botany 22: 259-290.
70. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MC, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 13627-13632.
71. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Savolainen V, Hilu K, Qiu YL, Chase MW, Farris JS, Stefanovic S, Rice DW, Palmer JD, Soltis PS. 2004. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends in Plant Science 9: 477-483.
72. Soltis DE, Kuzoff RK. 1995. Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Heuchera Group (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 49: 727-742.
73. Soltis ED, Soltis PS. 2000. Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 45-75.
74. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Chase MW. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402-404.
75. Stefanovic S, Rice DW, Palmer JD. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evolutionary Biology 4: 35.
76. Takezaki N, Figueroa F, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, Takahata N, Klein J. 2004. The phylogenetic relationship of tetrapod, coelacanth, and lungfish revealed by the sequences of forty-four nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1512-1524.
77. Venkatesh B, Erdmann MV, Brenner S. 2001. Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 11382-11387.
78. Wang X, Shi X, Hao B, Ge S, Luo J. 2005. Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytologist 165: 937-946.
79. Wang ZY, Second G, Tanksley SD. 1992. Polymorphism and phylogenetic-relationships among species in the genus Oryza as determined by analysis of nuclear RFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 83: 565-581.
80. Wendel JF, Doyle JJ. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ eds. Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing. Boston: Kluwer. 265-296.
81. Wendel JF, Schnabel A, Seelanan T. 1995. Bidirectional interlocus concerted evolution following allopolyploid speciation in cotton (Gossypium). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 92: 280-284.
82. Whitfield JB, Lockhart PJ. 2007. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 258-265.
83. Wolfe KH, Shields DC. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387: 708-713.
84. Won H, Renner SS. 2003. Horizontal gene transfer from flowering plants to Gnetum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 10824-10829.
85. Wortley AH, Rudall PJ, Harris DJ, Scotland RW. 2005. How much data are needed to resolve a difficult phylogeny? Case study in Lamiales. Systematic Biology 54: 697-709.
86. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 306-314.
87. Zhu Q, Ge S. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships among A-genome species of the genus Oryza revealed by intron sequences of four nuclear genes. New Phytologist 167: 249-265.
88. Zou XH, Zhang FM, Zhang JG, Zang LL, Tang L, Wang J, Sang T, Ge S. 2008. Analysis of 142 genes resolves the rapid diversification of the rice genus. Genome Biology 9: R49.