Building supertrees: An empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 136-150

  Salamin, Nicolas ^a,b   Hodkinson, Trevor R ^a   Savolainen, Vincent ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Matrix representation with parsimony; Phylogeny; Poaceae; Supertree

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE;

POACEAE;

EID: 0036005526     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351502753475916     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Arnqvist, G., and D. Wooster. 1995. Meta-analysis: Synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:236-240.
2. *Barker, N. P. 1997. The relationships of Amphipogon, Elytrophorus and Cyperochloa (Poaceae) as suggested by rbcL sequence data. Telopea 7:205-213.
3. *Barker, N. P., H. P. Linder, and E. H. Harley. 1995. Polyphyly of Arundinoids (Poaceae): Evidence from rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 20:423-435.
4. *Barker, N. P., H. P. Linder, and E. H. Harley. 1999. Sequences of the grass-specific insert in the chloroplast rpoC2 gene elucidate generic relationships of the Arundinoids (Poaceae). Syst. Bot. 23:327-350.
5. *Baum, B. R. 1982. A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae) based on morphological characters of the genera. Can. J. Bot. 61:518-535.
6. Baum, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10.
7. *Baum, B. R., J. R. Estes, and P. K. Gupta. 1986. Assessment of the genomic systematic classification in the Triticeae. Am. J. Bot. 74:1388-1395.
8. Baum, B. R., and M. A. Ragan. 1993. Reply to A. G. Rodrigo's "A comment on Baum's method for combining phylogenetic trees". Taxon 42:637-640.
9. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., and H. N. Bryant. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Syst. Biol. 47:497-508.
10. Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., J. L. Gittleman, and A. Purvis. 1999. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: A complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol. Rev. 74:143-175.
11. Bremer, K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
12. *Buckler, E. S., IV, and T. P. Holtsford. 1996. Zea systematics: Ribosomal ITS evidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:612-622.
13. Camin, J. H., and R. R. Sokal. 1965. A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution 19:311-326.
14. *Catalan, P., E. A. Kellogg, and R. G. Olmstead. 1997. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:150-166.
15. *Clark, L. G., W. Zhang, and J. F. Wendel. 1995. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on ndhF sequence data. Syst. Bot. 20:436-460.
16. Constantinescu, M., and D. Sankoff. 1995. An efficient algorithm for supertrees. J. Classif. 12:101-112.
17. *Cummings, M. P., L. M. King, and E. A. Kellogg. 1994. Slipped-strand mispairing in a plastid gene: rpoC2 in grasses (Poaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1-8.
18. *Darbyshire, S. J., and S. I. Warwick. 1992. Phylogeny of North American Festuca (Poaceae) and related genera using chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Can. J. Bot. 70:2415-2419.
19. *Davis, J. I., and R. J. Soreng. 1993. Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Am. J. Bot. 80:1444-1454.
20. *Doebley, J., M. Durbin, E. M. Golenberg, M. T. Clegg, and D. P. Ma. 1990. Evolutionary analysis of the large subunit of carboxylase (rbcL) nucleotide sequence among the grasses (Gramineae). Evolution 44:1097-1108.
21. *Duvall, M. R., and B. R. Morton. 1996. Molecular phylogenetics of Poaceae: An expanded analysis of rbcL sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:352-358.
22. *Duvall, M. R., P. M. Peterson, E. E. Terrell, and A. H. Christensen. 1993. Phylogeny of North American oryzoid grasses as constructed from maps of plastid DNA restriction sites. Am. J. Bot. 80:83-88.
23. Effron, B., E. Halloran, and S. Holmes. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7085-7090.
24. *Esen, A., and K. W. Hilu. 1991. Electrophoretic and immunological studies of prolamins in the Poaceae. II. Phylogenetic affinities of the Atistideae. Taxon 40:5-17.
25. *Esen, A., and K. W. Hilu. 1993. Prolamin and immunological studies in the Poaceae. IV. Subfamily Panicoids. Can. J. Bot. 71:315-322.
26. Farris, J. S., A. G. Kluge, and M. J. Eckhardt. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19:172-191.
27. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
28. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-416.
29. *Frederiksen, S., and O. Seberg. 1991. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae). Hereditas 115:15-19.
30. *Gaut, B. S., A. S. Peek, B. R. Morton, and M. T. Clegg. 1999. Patterns of genetic diversification within the Adh gene family in the grasses (Poaceae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1086-1097.
31. Goldmann, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
32. Gordon, A. D. 1980. On the assessment and comparison of classifications. Pages 149-160 in Analyse de donnees et informatique (R. Tomassone, ed.). INRA, Le Chesnay, France.
33. GPWG. 2000. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae), as inferred from eight character sets. Pages 3-7 in Grasses: Systematics and evolution. (S. W. L. Jacobs and J. Everett, eds.). CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
34. *Grebenstein, B., O. Grebenstein, W. Sauer, and V. Hemleben. 1996. Distribution and complex organization of satellite DNA sequences in Aveneae species. Genome 39:1045-1050.
35. *Grebenstein, B., M. RoÌser, W. Sauer, and V. Hemleben. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic relationships in Aveneae (Poaceae) species and other grasses as inferred from ITS1 and ITS2 rDNA sequences. Plant Syst. Evol. 213:233-250.
36. *Hamby, R. K., and E. A. Zimmer. 1987. Ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring phylogeny within the grass family (Poaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 160:29-37.
37. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, London.
38. Hillis, D. M. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383:130-131.
39. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
40. *Hilu, K. W., L. A. Alice, and H. Liang. 1999. Phylogeny of Poaceae inferred from matK sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 86:835-851.
41. *Hilu, K. W., and A. Esen. 1992. Prolamin and immunological strudies in the Poaceae. III. Subfamily Chloridoids. Am. J. Bot. 80:104-113.
42. *Hilu, K. W., and H. Liang. 1997. The matK gene: Sequence variation and application in plant systematics. Am. J. Bot. 84:830-839.
43. *Hilu, K. W., and K. Wright. 1982. Systematics of Gramineae: A cluster analysis study. Taxon 31:9-37.
44. *Hsiao, C., N. J. Chatterton, K. H. Asay, and K. B. Jensen. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of 10 grass species: An assessment of phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer region in nuclear ribosomal DNA in monocots. Genome 37:112-120.
45. *Hsiao, C., N. J. Chatterton, K. H. Asay, and K. B. Jensen. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. Genome 38:211-223.
46. *Hsiao, C., N. J. Chatterton, K. H. Asay, and K. B. Jensen. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of the pooids (Poaceae) based on nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 90:389-398.
47. *Hsiao, C., S. W. Jacobs, N. P. Barker, and N. J. Chatterton. 1998. A molecular phylogeny of the subfamily arundinoids (Poaceae) based on sequences of rDNA. Aust. Syst. Bot. 11:41-52.
48. *Hsiao, C., S. W. L. Jacobs, N. J. Chatterton, and K. H. Asay. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) based on the sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS). Aust. Syst. Bot. 11:667-688.
49. Johnson, L. A., and D. E. Soltis. 1998. Assessing congruence: Empirical examples from molecular data. Pages 297-348 in Molecular systematics of plants II: DNA sequencing (D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and J. J. Doyle, eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.
50. *Katayama, H., and Y. Ogihara. 1996. Phylogenetic affinities of the grasses to other monocots as revealed by molecular analysis of chloroplast DNA. Curr. Genet. 29:572-581.
51. *Kelchner, S. A., and L. G. Clark. 1997. Molecular evolution and phylogenetic utility of the chloroplast rpl16 intron in Chusquea and the bambusoids (Poaceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:385-397.
52. *Kellogg, E. A. 1989. Comments on genomic genera in the Triticeae (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 76:796-805.
53. *Kellogg, E. A. 1992. Tools for studying the chloroplast genome in the Triticeae (Gramineae): An ecoRI map, a diagnostic deletion, and support for Bromus as an outgroup. Am. J. Bot. 79:186-197.
54. *Kellogg, E. A. 1998a. Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:2005-2010.
55. *Kellogg, E. A. 1998b. Who's related to whom? Recent results from molecular systematic studies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:149-158.
56. *Kellogg, E. A., and R. Appels. 1995. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. Genetics 140:325-343.
57. *Kellogg, E. A., and L. Watson. 1993. Phylogenetic studies of a large data set. I. bambusoids, Andropogonodae, and pooids (Gramineae). Bot. Rev. 59:273-311.
58. Kim, J. 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsimony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45:363-374.
59. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies form DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
60. *Liang, H., and K. W. Hilu. 1995. Application of the matK gene sequence to grass systematics. Can. J. Bot. 74:125-134.
61. Mabberley, D. J. 1993. The plant-book: A portable dictionary of the vascular plants, 2nd edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
62. *Macfarlane, T. D., and L. Watson. 1982. The classification of Poaceae subfamily pooids. Taxon 31:178-203.
63. *Mason-Gamer, R. J., and E. A. Kellogg. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45:524-545.
64. *Mason-Gamer, R. J., C. F. Weil, and E. A. Kellogg. 1998. Granule-bound starch synthase: Structure, function, and phylogenetic utility. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1658-1673.
65. *Mathews, S., and R. A. Sharrock. 1996. The phytochrome gene family in grasses (Poaceae): A phylogeny and evidence that grasses have a subset of the loci found in dicot angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1141-1150.
66. *Mathews, S., R. C. Tsal, and E. A. Kellogg. 2000. Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae): Evidence from the nuclear gene phytochrome B. Am. J. Bot. 87:96-107.
67. *Monte, J. V., C. L. McIntyre, and J. P. Gustafson. 1993. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships in the Triticeae tribe using RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:649-655.
68. *Morton, B. R., and M. T. Clegg. 1993. A chloroplast DNA mutation hotspot and gene conversion in a noncoding region near rbcL in the grass family (Poaceae). Curr. Genet. 24:357-365.
69. *Nadot, S., R. Bajon, and B. Lejeune. 1994. The chloroplast gene rps4 as a tool for the study of Poaceae phylogeny. Plant Syst. Evol. 191:27-38.
70. *Nadot, S., G. Bittar, L. Carter, R. Lacroix, and B. Lejeune. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of Monocotyledons based on the chloroplast gene rps4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:257-282.
71. Pagel, M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
72. *Petersen, G., and O. Seberg. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on rpoA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:217-230.
73. Purvis, A. 1995a. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-255.
74. Purvis, A. 1995b. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 348:405-421.
75. Purvis, A., J. J. Gittleman, and H. K. Luh. 1994. Truth or consequences-Effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167:293-300.
76. Purvis, A., and D. L. J. Quicke. 1997a. Building phylogenies: Are the big easy? Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:49-50.
77. Purvis, A., and D. L. J. Quicke. 1997b. Are the big indeed easy? Reply from A. Purvis and D. L. J. Quicke. Correspondence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 357-358.
78. Ragan, M. A. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:53-58.
79. Robinson, D. F., and L. R. Foulds. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math. Biol. 59:131-144.
80. Rodrigo, A. G. 1993. Calibrating the bootstrap test of monophyly. Int. J. Parasitol. 23:507-514.
81. Ronquist, F. 1996. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting. Syst. Biol. 45:247-253.
82. Sanderson, M. J., A. Purvis, and C. Henze. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:105-110.
83. Sanderson, M. J., and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 49:671-685.
84. Savolainen, V., M. W. Chase, S. B. Hoot, C. M. Morton, D. E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M. F. Fay, A. Y. De Bruijn, S. Sullivan, and Y.-L. Qiu. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49:306-362.
85. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
86. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D. C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prince, W. J. Kress, K. C. Nixon, and J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 133:381-461.
87. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. E. Mort, M. W. Chase, V. Savolainen, S. B. Hoot, and C. M. Morton. 1999. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: An empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. Syst. Biol. 47:32-42.
88. *Soreng, R. J., J. I. Davis, and J. J. Doyle. 1990. A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in Poaceae subfam. Pooids. Plant Syst. Evol. 172:83-97.
89. Steel, M. 1992. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees. J. Classif. 9:91-116.
90. Steel, M., A. W. M. Dress, and S. Bocker. 2000. Simple but fundamental limitations on supertree and consensus tree methods. Syst. Biol. 49:363-368.
91. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
92. *Van Den Borre, A., and L. Watson. 1997. On the classification of the chloridoids (Poaceae). Aust. Syst. Bot. 10:491-531.
93. *Verboom, G. A., H. P. Linder, and N. P. Barker. 1994. Haustorial synergids: An important character in the systematics of danthonioid grasses (arundinoids: Poaceae)? Am. J. Bot. 81:1601-1610.
94. *Watanabe, M., M. Ito, and S. Kurita. 1994. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of Asian bamboos (bambusoids, Poaceae) and its systematic implication. J. Plant Res. 107:253-261.
95. *Watson, L., H. T. Clifford, and M. J. Dallwitz. 1985. The classification of Poaceae: Subfamilies and supertribes. Aust. J. Bot. 33:433-483.
96. Yang, Z., and N. Goldman. 1997. Are the big indeed easy? Correspondance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:357-358.
97. *Zhang, W. 2000. Phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) from rpl16 intron sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15:135-146.
98. Zharkikh, A., and W.-H. Li. 1995. Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: The complete-and-partial bootstrap technique. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:44-63.