Entanglement detection

Physics Reports

Volumn 474, Issue 1-6, 2009, Pages 1-75

  Gühne, Otfried ^a,b   Tóth, Géza ^c,d,e,f  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^d BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

^e ICFO INSTITUT DE CIENCIES FOTONIQUES   (Spain)

^f INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Entanglement detection; Genuine multipartite entanglement; Separability criteria

Indexed keywords

EID: 64349108096     PISSN: 03701573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (539)

1. Einstein A., Podolsky B., and Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) 777
2. Schrödinger E. Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935) 807-812 823-828; 844-849
3. Bell J.S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1 (1964) 195 Reprinted in J. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2004
4. Ekert A.K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 661
5. Bennett C.H., Brassard G., Crépeau C., Jozsa R., Peres A., and Wootters W.K. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 1895
6. Raussendorf R., and Briegel H.J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5188
7. Leibfried D., Knill E., Seidelin S., Britton J., Blakestad R.B., Chiaverini J., Hume D.B., Itano W.M., Jost J.D., Langer C., Ozeri R., Reichle R., and Wineland D.J. Creation of a six-atom 'Schrödinger cat' state. Nature 438 (2005) 639
8. Häffner H., Hänsel W., Roos C.F., Benhelm J., Chek-al-kar D., Chwalla M., Körber T., Rapol U.D., Riebe M., Schmidt P.O., Becher C., Gühne O., Dür W., and Blatt R. Scalable multi-particle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature 438 (2005) 643
9. Lu C.-Y., Zhou X.-Q., Gühne O., Gao W.-B., Zhang J., Yuan Z.-S., Goebel A., Yang T., and Pan J.-W. Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nature Phys. 3 (2007) 91
10. W.-B. Gao, C.-Y. Lu, X.-C. Yao, P. Xu, O. Gühne, A. Goebel, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Z. Peng, Z.-B. Chen, J.-W. Pan, Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state, 2008. arXiv:0809.4277
11. Neumann P., Mizuochi N., Rempp F., Hemmer P., Watanabe H., Yamasaki S., Jacques V., Gaebel T., Jelezko F., and Wrachtrup J. Entanglement among single spins in diamond. Science 320 (2008) 1326
12. Hald J., Sørensen J.L., Schori C., and Polzik E.S. Spin squeezed atoms: A macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1319
13. Mandel O., Greiner M., Widera A., Rom T., Hänsch T., and Bloch I. Controlled collisions for multi-particle entanglement of optically trapped atoms. Nature 425 (2003) 937
14. Braunstein S.L., and van Loock P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Modern Phys. 77 (2005) 513
15. Eisert J., and Plenio M.B. Introduction to the basics of entanglement theory in continuous-variable systems. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 1 (2003) 479
16. Adesso G., and Illuminati F. Entanglement in continuous variable systems: Recent advances and current perspectives. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 7821
17. Wang X.B., Hiroshima T., Tomita A., and Hayashi M. Quantum information with Gaussian states. Phys. Rep. 448 (2007) 1
18. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, 2007. quant-ph/0702225
19. Plenio M.B., and Virmani S. An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 1
20. Terhal B.M. Detecting quantum entanglement. J. Theor. Comput. Sci. 287 (2002) 313
21. van Enk S.J., Lütkenhaus N., and Kimble H.J. On experimental procedures for entanglement verification. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 052318
22. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Horodecki R. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum communication. In: Alber G., et al. (Ed). Quantum Information: An Introduction to Basic Theoretical Concepts and Experiments. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics (2001) See also quant-ph/0109124
23. Bruß D. Characterizing entanglement. J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 4237
24. Bruß D., Cirac J.I., Horodecki P., Hulpke F., Kraus B., Lewenstein M., and Sanpera A. Reflections upon separability and distillability. J. Mod. Opt. 49 (2002) 1399
25. J. Eisert, D. Gross, Multi-particle entanglement, 2006. quant-ph/0505149
26. Amico L., Fazio R., Osterloh A., and Vedral V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Modern Phys. 80 (2008) 517
27. Mintert F., Carvalho A.R.R., Kuś M., and Buchleitner A. Measures and dynamics of entangled states. Phys. Rep. 415 (2005) 207
28. Horodecki M. Entanglement measures. Quantum Inf. Comput. 1 (2001) 3
29. Peres A. All the Bell inequalities. Found. Phys. 29 (1999) 589
30. Werner R.F., and Wolf M.M. Bell inequalities and entanglement. Quantum Inf. Comput. 1 3 (2002) 1
31. Genovese M. Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses. Phys. Rep. 413 (2005) 319
32. J.-W. Pan, Z.-B. Chen, M. Żukowski, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Multi-photon entanglement and interferometry, 2008. arXiv:0805.2853
33. Kok P., Munro W.J., Nemoto K., Ralph T.C., Dowling J.P., and Milburn G.J. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Rev. Modern Phys. 79 (2007) 135
34. Tittel W., and Weihs G. Photonic entanglement for fundamental tests and quantum communication. Quantum Inf. Process. 1 (2001) 3
35. Raimond J.M., Brune M., and Haroche S. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Rev. Modern Phys. 73 (2001) 565
36. Leibfried D., Blatt R., Monroe C., and Wineland D. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Modern Phys. 75 (2003) 281
37. Blatt R., and Wineland D. Entangled states of trapped atomic ions. Nature 453 (2008) 1008
38. Eschner J. Quantum computation with trapped ions. Proceedings of the International School of Physics 'Enrico Fermi' Course CLXII. Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos (2006), IOS Press. http://www.icfo.es/images/publications/Proc.06-002.pdf Available at http://www.icfo.es/images/publications/Proc.06-002.pdf
39. Häffner H., Roos C.F., and Blatt R. Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469 (2008) 155
40. Peres A. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
41. In: Bruß D., and Leuchs G. (Eds). Lectures on Quantum Information (2006), Wiley-VCH
42. Nielsen M.A., and Chuang I.L. Quantum Computation and Quantum information (2000), Cambridge University Press
43. Vedral V. Introduction to Quantum Information Science (2007), Oxford University Press
44. Werner R.F. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 4277
45. Carathéodory C. Über den Variabilitätsbereich der Fourierschen Konstanten von positiven harmonischen Funktionen. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 32 (1911) 193
46. Wootters W.K. Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2245
47. Sanpera A., Tarrach R., and Vidal G. Quantum inseparability as local pseudomixture. Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 826
48. Verstraete F., Dehaene J., and De Moor B. On the geometry of entangled states. J. Mod. Opt. 49 (2002) 1277
49. Peres A. Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1413
50. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Horodecki R. Separability of mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Lett. A 223 (1996) 1
51. Horodecki P. Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition. Phys. Lett. A 232 (1997) 333
52. Zyczkowski K., Horodecki P., Sanpera A., and Lewenstein M. On the volume of the set of mixed entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 883
53. Vidal G., and Werner R.F. A computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 032314
54. Rudolph O. Further results on the cross norm criterion for separability. Quantum Inf. Process. 4 (2005) 219 See also quant-ph/0202121
55. Chen K., and Wu L.-A. A matrix realignment method for recognizing entanglement. Quantum Inf. Comput. 3 (2003) 193
56. Yu S., and Liu N.-L. Entanglement detection by local orthogonal observables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 150504
57. Terhal B.M., and Horodecki P. A Schmidt number for density matrices. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 040301
58. P. Aniello, C. Lupo, On the relation between Schmidt coefficients and entanglement, 2008. arxiv:0812.4167
59. Rudolph O. A separability criterion for density operators. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 3951
60. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Horodecki R. Separability of mixed quantum states: Linear contractions approach. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 13 (2006) 103
61. Chen K., and Wu L.-A. The generalized partial transposition criterion for separability of multipartite quantum states. Phys. Lett. A 306 (2002) 14
62. Wocjan P., and Horodecki M. Characterization of combinatorially independent permutation separability criteria. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 12 (2005) 331
63. Clarisse L., and Wocjan P. On independent permutation separability criteria. Quantum Inf. Comput. 6 (2006) 277
64. Rudolph O. Some properties of the computable cross norm criterion for separability. Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 032312
65. Bennett C.H., DiVincenzo D.P., Mor T., Shor P.W., Smolin J.A., and Terhal B.M. Unextendible product bases and bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 5385
66. Bruß D., and Peres A. Construction of quantum states with bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 30301
67. Størmer E. Positive linear maps of operator algebras. Acta Math. 110 (1963) 233
68. Woronowicz S. Positive maps of low dimensional matrix algebras. Rep. Math. Phys. 10 (1976) 165
69. Choi M.-D. Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 10 (1975) 285
70. Maurer J. Positive Abbildungen auf der Matrizenalgebra. Arch. Math. 28 (1977) 510
71. Terhal B.M. A family of indecomposable positive linear maps based on entangled quantum states. Linear Algebra Appl. 323 (2000) 61
72. Breuer H.-P. Optimal entanglement criterion for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 080501
73. Chruscinski D., and Kossakowski A. On the structure of entanglement witnesses and new class of positive indecomposable maps. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 14 (2007) 275
74. N bound entangled states revealed by non-decomposable maps. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 012345
75. D. Chruscinski, A. Kossakowski, Geometry of quantum states: New construction of positive maps, 2009. arXiv:0902.0885
76. Horodecki M., and Horodecki P. Reduction criterion of separability and limits for a class of distillation protocols. Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 4206
77. Hall W. A new criterion for indecomposability of positive maps. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 14119
78. Nielsen M.A., and Kempe J. Separable states are more disordered globally than locally. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5184
79. Cerf N.J., and Adami C. Negative entropy and information in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 5194
80. Horodecki R., and Horodecki M. Information-theoretic aspects of inseparability of mixed states. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 1838
81. Vollbrecht K.G.H., and Wolf M.M. Conditional entropies and their relation to entanglement criteria. J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 4299
82. Abe S., and Rajagopal A.K. Quantum entanglement inferred by the principle of maximum Tsallis entropy. Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 3461
83. Hiroshima T. Majorization criterion for distillability of a bipartite quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 057902
84. Augusiak R., Stasinska J., and Horodecki P. Beyond the standard entropic inequalities: Stronger scalar separability criteria and their applications. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 012333
85. Augusiak R., and Stasinska J. A general scheme for construction of scalar separability criteria from positive maps. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 010303
86. R. Augusiak, J. Stasińska, Positive maps, majorization, entropic inequalities, and detection of entanglement, 2008. arXiv:0811.3604
87. Doherty A.C., Parrilo P.A., and Spedalieri F.M. Distinguishing separable and entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 187904
88. Werner R. An application of Bell's inequalities to a quantum state extension problem. Lett. Math. Phys. 17 (1989) 359
89. Vandenberghe L., and Boyd S. Semidefinite programming. SIAM Rev. 38 (1996) 49
90. Doherty A.C., Parrilo P.A., and Spedalieri F.M. A complete family of separability criteria. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 022308
91. Doherty A.C., Parrilo P.A., and Spedalieri F.M. Detecting multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 032333
92. Eisert J., Hyllus P., Gühne O., and Curty M. Complete hierarchies of efficient approximations to problems in entanglement theory. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 062317
93. Lasserre J.B. Global optimization with polynomials and the problem of moments. SIAM J. Optim. 11 (2001) 796
94. Ioannou L.M., Travaglione B.C., Cheung D., and Ekert A.K. Improved algorithm for quantum separability and entanglement detection. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 060303
95. R.R. Zapatrin, An asymptotical separability criterion for bipartite density operators, 2005. quant-ph/0504169
96. Hulpke F., and Bruß D. A two-way algorithm for the entanglement problem. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 5573
97. A. Wolf, Inseparability criteria in finite Hilbert spaces, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Ulm, 2006
98. Brandao F.G.S.L., and Vianna R.O. Separable multipartite mixed states-operational asymptotically necessary and sufficient conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 220503
99. Brandao F.G.S.L., and Vianna R.O. A robust semidefinite programming approach to the separability problem. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 062309
100. Perez-Garcia D. Deciding separability with a fixed error. Phys. Lett. A 330 (2004) 149
101. Ioannou L.M. Computational complexity of the quantum separability problem. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 335
102. Terhal B.M., Doherty A.C., and Schwab D. Local hidden variable theories for quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 157903
103. Vianna R.O., and Doherty A.C. Study of the distillability of Werner states using entanglement witnesses and robust semidefinite programs. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052306
104. Synak B., Horodecki K., and Horodecki M. Bounds on localisable information via semidefinite programming. J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 082107
105. L. Gurvits, Classical deterministic complexity of Edmonds' problem and quantum entanglement, in: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 9-11 June 2003, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. See also quant-ph/0303055
106. S. Gharibian, Strong NP-hardness of the quantum separability problem, 2008. arXiv:0810.4507
107. Hofmann H.F., and Takeuchi S. Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 032103
108. Gühne O. Characterizing entanglement via uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 117903
109. Gühne O., Hyllus P., Gittsovich O., and Eisert J. Covariance matrices and the separability problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 130504
110. Gühne O., Mechler M., Tóth G., and Adam P. Entanglement criteria based on local uncertainty relations are strictly stronger than the computable cross norm criterion. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 010301
111. Werner R.F., and Wolf M.M. Bound entangled Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3658
112. Giedke G., Kraus B., Lewenstein M., and Cirac J.I. Separability criterion for all bipartite Gaussian states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 167904
113. Hyllus P., and Eisert J. Optimal entanglement witnesses for continuous-variable systems. New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 51
114. Gittsovich O., Gühne O., Hyllus P., and Eisert J. Unifying several separability conditions using the covariance matrix criterion. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 052319
115. Zhang C.-J., Zhang Y.-S., Zhang S., and Guo G.-C. Entanglement detection beyond the cross-norm or realignment criterion. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 060301
116. Zhang C.-J., Zhang Y.-S., Zhang S., and Guo G.-C. Optimal entanglement witnesses based on local orthogonal observables. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 012334
117. de Vicente J.I. Separability criteria based on the Bloch representation of density matrices. Quant. Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 624
118. Shchukin E., and Vogel W. Inseparability criteria for continuous bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 230502
119. Korbicz J.K., and Lewenstein M. Group-theoretical approach to entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 022318
120. Moroder T., Keyl M., and Lütkenhaus N. Truncated su(2) moment problem for spin and polarization states. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008) 275302
121. A. Miranowicz, M. Piani, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Inseparability criteria based on matrices of moments, 2006. quant-ph/0605001
122. Moroder T., Gühne O., and Lütkenhaus N. Iterations of nonlinear entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 032326
123. Häseler H., Moroder T., and Lütkenhaus N. Testing quantum devices: Practical entanglement verification in bipartite optical systems. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 032303
124. Rigas J., Gühne O., and Lütkenhaus N. Entanglement verification for quantum key distribution systems with an underlying bipartite qubit-mode structure. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 012341
125. Bennett C.H., Brassard G., Popescu S., Schumacher B., Smolin J.A., and Wootters W.K. Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 722
126. Deutsch D., Ekert A., Jozsa R., Macchiavello C., Popescu S., and Sanpera A. Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2818
127. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Horodecki R. Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a "bound" entanglement in nature?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5239
128. Piani M., and Mora C. Class of PPT bound entangled states associated to almost any set of pure entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 012305
129. Horodecki P., Lewenstein M., Vidal G., and Cirac I. Operational criterion and constructive checks for the separability of low rank density matrices. Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000) 032310
130. Horodecki K., Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Oppenheim J. Secure key from bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 160502
131. Horodecki K., Pankowski L., Horodecki M., and Horodecki P. Low dimensional bound entanglement with one-way distillable cryptographic key. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 54 (2008) 2621
132. Gisin N., and Wolf S. Linking classical and quantum key agreement: Is there "bound information"?. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 1880 (2000) 482
133. Acín A., Cirac J.I., and Masanes L. Multipartite bound information exists and can be activated. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 107903
134. Salles A., Cavalcanti D., and Acin A. Quantum non-locality and partial transposition for continuous-variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 040404
135. Dür W., Cirac J.I., Lewenstein M., and Bruß D. Distillability and partial transposition in bipartite systems. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 062313
136. DiVincenzo D.P., Shor P.W., Smolin J.A., Terhal B.M., and Thapliyal A.V. Evidence for bound entangled states with negative partial transpose. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 062312
137. L. Pankowski, M. Piani, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, Few steps more towards NPT bound entanglement, 2007. arXiv:0711.2613
138. Tóth G., Knapp C., Gühne O., and Briegel H.J. Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 250405
139. Ferraro A., Cavalcanti D., Garcia-Saez A., and Acín A. Thermal bound entanglement in macroscopic systems and area laws. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 080502
140. Terhal B.M. Bell inequalities and the separability criterion. Phys. Lett. A 271 (2000) 319
141. Lewenstein M., Kraus B., Cirac J.I., and Horodecki P. Optimization of entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000) 052310
142. F. Hirzebruch, W. Scharlau, Einführung in die Funktionalanalysis, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1971
143. Horn R., and Johnson C. Matrix Analysis (1990), Cambridge University Press
144. Chen K., and Wu L.-A. Test for entanglement using physically observable witness operators and positive maps. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 022312
145. Bourennane M., Eibl M., Kurtsiefer C., Gaertner S., Weinfurter H., Gühne O., Hyllus P., Bruß D., Lewenstein M., and Sanpera A. Experimental detection of multipartite entanglement using witness operators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 087902
146. Sanpera A., Bruß D., and Lewenstein M. Schmidt number witnesses and bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001) 050301
147. Gühne O., Tóth G., Hyllus P., and Briegel H.J. Bell inequalities for graph states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 120405
148. Gühne O., Hyllus P., Bruß D., Ekert A., Lewenstein M., Macchiavello C., and Sanpera A. Experimental detection of entanglement via witness operators and local measurements. J. Mod. Opt. 50 (2003) 1079
149. Hyllus P., Alves C.M., Bruß D., and Macchiavello C. Generation and detection of bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 032316
150. Pittenger A.O., and Rubin M.H. Convexity and the separability problem of quantum mechanical density matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 346 (2002) 47
151. Bertlmann R.A., Narnhofer H., and Thirring W. A geometric picture of entanglement and Bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 66 (2002) 032319
152. Bertlmann R.A., Durstberger K., Hiesmayr B.C., and Krammer P. Optimal entanglement witnesses for qubits and qutrits. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 052331
153. Bertlmann R.A., and Krammer P. Geometric entanglement witnesses and bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 024303
154. Jafarizadeh M.A., Akbari Y., and Behzadi N. Two-qutrit entanglement witnesses and Gell-Mann matrices. Eur. Phys. J. D 47 (2008) 283
155. Krammer P. Characterizing entanglement with geometric entanglement witnesses. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009) 065305
156. R.A. Bertlmann, P. Krammer, Entanglement witnesses and geometry of entanglement of two-qutrit states, 2009. arXiv:0901.4729
157. Mintert F. Concurrence via entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 052302
158. Chruscinski D., and Kossakowski A. How to construct entanglement witnesses. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 (2008) 145301
159. Sperling J., and Vogel W. Necessary and sufficient conditions for bipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 022318
160. P. Badziag, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, R. Augusiak, Separability in terms of a single entanglement witness, 2007. quant-ph/0703097
161. de Pillis J. Linear transformations which preserve hermitian and positive semidefinite operators. Pacific J. Math. 23 (1967) 129
162. Jamiołkowski A. Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators. Rep. Math. Phys. 3 (1972) 275
163. Choi M.-D. Positive linear maps. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 38 (1982) 583
164. Ranade K.S., and Ali M. The Jamiołkowski isomorphism and a conceptionally simple proof for the correspondence between vectors having Schmidt number k and k-positive maps. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 4 (2007) 371
165. Gilchrist A., Langford N.K., and Nielsen M.A. Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 062310
166. Cirac J.I., Dur W., Kraus B., and Lewenstein M. Entangling operations and their implementation using a small amount of entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 544
167. M. Lewenstein, Quantum information theory, Lecture at the University of Hannover, 2004. Notes available at: http://www.quantware.ups-tlse.fr/IHP2006/lectures/lewenstein2.pdf o r http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/qit_main.pdf
168. Lewenstein M., Kraus B., Horodecki P., and Cirac J.I. Characterization of separable states and entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001) 044304
169. F. Bodoky, O. Gühne, M. Blaauboer, Decay of entanglement for solid-state qubits, 2008. arXiv:0809.3561
170. Gisin N. Hidden quantum nonlocality revealed by local filters. Phys. Lett. A 210 (1996) 151
171. Verstraete F., Dehaene J., and De Moor B. Normal forms and entanglement measures for multipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 012103
172. Leinaas J.M., Myrheim J., and Ovrum E. Geometrical aspects of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 012313
173. Svetlichny G. Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell-type inequality. Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3066
174. Greenberger D.M., Horne M.A., and Zeilinger A. Going beyond Bell's theorem. In: Kafatos M. (Ed). Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe (1989), Kluwer, Dordrecht 69-72 See also arXiv:0712.0921v1
175. Zeilinger A., Horne M.A., and Greenberger D.M. Higher-order quantum entanglement. NASA Conf. Publ. 3135 (1992) 73
176. Dür W., Vidal G., and Cirac J.I. Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways. Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000) 062314
177. Carteret H.A., Higuchi A., and Sudbery A. Multipartite generalisation of the Schmidt decomposition. J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 7932
178. Sudbery A. On local invariants of pure three-qubit states. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 643
179. Acín A., Andrianov A., Jane E., and Tarrach R. Three-qubit pure-state canonical forms. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 6725
180. Kempe J. Multi-particle entanglement and its applications to cryptography. Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 910
181. L. Tamaryan, D. Park, S. Tamaryan, Generalized Schmidt decomposition based on injective tensor norm, 2008. arXiv:0809.1290
182. Acín A., Andrianov A., Costa L., Jane E., Latorre J.I., and Tarrach R. Generalized Schmidt decomposition and classification of three-quantum-bit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 1560
183. Scarani V., and Gisin N. Spectral decomposition of Bell's operators for qubits. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 6043
184. Koashi M., Bužek V., and Imoto N. Entangled webs: Tight bound for symmetric sharing of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 62 (2000) 050302
185. Acín A., Bruß D., Lewenstein M., and Sanpera A. Classification of mixed three-qubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 040401
186. Dür W., Cirac J.I., and Tarrach R. Separability and distillability of multiparticle quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3562
187. Cubitt T.S., Verstraete F., Dür W., and Cirac J.I. Separable states can be used to distribute entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 037902
188. Dür W., and Briegel H.J. Entanglement purification and quantum error correction. Rep. Progr. Phys. 70 (2007) 1381
189. Dür W., and Cirac J.I. Classification of multi-qubit mixed states: Separability and distillability properties. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 042314
190. Seevinck M., and Uffink J. Partial separability and entanglement criteria for multiqubit quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 032101
191. Seevinck M., and Uffink J. Sufficient conditions for three-particle entanglement and their tests in recent experiments. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 012107
192. Gühne O., Tóth G., and Briegel H.J. Multipartite entanglement in spin chains. New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 229
193. Gühne O., and Tóth G. Energy and multipartite entanglement in multidimensional and frustrated spin models. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 052319
194. Verstraete F., Dehaene J., De Moor B., and Verschelde H. Four qubits can be entangled in nine different ways. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 052112
195. Lamata L., Leon J., Salgado D., and Solano E. Inductive classification of multipartite entanglement under SLOCC. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052336
196. Eisert J., and Briegel H. The Schmidt measure as a tool for quantifying multi-particle entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 022306
197. Chitambar E., Duan R., and Shi Y. Tripartite entanglement transformations and tensor rank. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 140502
198. Leibfried D., Barrett M.D., Schätz T., Britton J., Chiaverini J., Itano W.M., Jost J.D., Langer C., and Wineland D.J. Toward Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states. Science 304 (2004) 1476
199. Giovannetti V., Lloyd S., and Maccone L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306 (2004) 1330
200. Hillery M., Bužek V., and Berthiaume A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 1829
201. Zhao Z., Chen Y.-A., Zhang A.-N., Yang T., Briegel H.J., and Pan J.-W. Experimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination teleportation. Nature 430 (2004) 54
202. Gottesman D., and Chuang I. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations. Nature 402 (1999) 390
203. Chen K., and Lo H.-K. Multi-partite quantum cryptographic protocols with noisy GHZ states. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 (2007) 689
204. Christandl M., and Wehner S. Quantum anonymous transmissions. Proc. of 11th ASIACRYPT. LNCS vol. 3788 (2005) 217
205. Greenberger D.M., Horne M.A., Shimony A., and Zeilinger A. Bell's theorem without inequalities. Amer. J. Phys. 58 (1990) 131
206. Mermin N.D. Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1838
207. Sackett C.A., Kielpinski D., King B.E., Langer C., Meyer V., Myatt C.J., Rowe M., Turchette Q.A., Itano W.M., Wineland D.J., and Monroe C. Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404 (2000) 256
208. Roos C.F., Riebe M., Häffner H., Hänsel W., Benhelm J., Lancaster G.P.T., Becher C., Schmidt-Kaler F., and Blatt R. Control and measurement of three-qubit entangled states. Science 304 (2004) 1478
209. Bouwmeester D., Pan J.-W., Daniell M., Weinfurter H., and Zeilinger A. Observation of three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1345
210. Pan J.-W., Bouwmeester D., Daniell M., Weinfurter H., and Zeilinger A. Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement. Nature 403 (2000) 515
211. Zhao Z., Yang T., Chen Y.-A., Zhang A.-N., Żukowski M., and Pan J.-W. Experimental violation of local realism by four-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 180401
212. Dicke R.H. Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes. Phys. Rev. 93 (1954) 99
213. Tóth G. Detection of multipartite entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric Dicke states. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24 (2007) 275
214. Gühne O., Bodoky F., and Blaauboer M. Multiparticle entanglement under the influence of decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 060301R
215. Kiesel N., Schmid C., Tóth G., Solano E., and Weinfurter H. Experimental observation of four-photon entangled Dicke state with high fidelity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 063604
216. Eibl M., Kiesel N., Bourennane M., Kurtsiefer C., and Weinfurter H. Experimental realization of a three-qubit entangled W state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 077901
217. Wieczorek W., Schmid C., Kiesel N., Pohlner R., Gühne O., and Weinfurter H. Experimental observation of an entire family of four-photon entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 010503
218. Dür W., and Briegel H.J. Stability of macroscopic entanglement under decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 180403
219. Hein M., Eisert J., and Briegel H.J. Multi-party entanglement in graph states. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 062311
220. M. Hein, W. Dür, J. Eisert, R. Raussendorf, M.V. den Nest, H.J. Briegel, Entanglement in graph states and its applications, in: Proceedings of the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" on "Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos", Varenna, Italy, July, 2005, quant-ph/0602096, 2006
221. Gottesman D. Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 1862
222. Hartmann L., Calsamiglia J., Dür W., and Briegel H. Weighted graph states and applications to spin chains, lattices and gases. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40 (2007) S1
223. Gross D., and den Nest M.V. The LU-LC conjecture diagonal local operations and quadratic forms over GF(2). Quantum Inf. Comput. 8 (2008) 263
224. Z. Ji, J. Chen, Z. Wei, M. Ying, The LU-LC conjecture is false, 2007. arXiv:0709.1266
225. A. Cabello, A.J. Lopez-Tarrida, P. Moreno, J.R. Portillo, Entanglement in eight-qubit graph states, 2008. arxiv:0812.4625
226. Briegel H.J., and Raussendorf R. Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 910
227. Gottesman D. A class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 1862
228. Scarani V., Acín A., Schenck E., and Aspelmeyer M. Nonlocality of cluster states of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 042325
229. Cabello A., Gühne O., and Rodriguez D. Mermin inequalities for perfect correlations. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 062106
230. Han Y.J., Raussendorf R., and Duan L.M. A scheme for demonstration of fractional statistics of anyons in an exactly solvable model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 150404
231. den Nest M.V., Dür W., and Briegel H.J. Classical spin models and the quantum stabilizer formalism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 117207
232. Kiesel N., Schmid C., Weber U., Tóth G., Gühne O., Ursin R., and Weinfurter H. Experimental analysis of a four-qubit photon cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 210502
233. Walther P., Resch K.J., Rudolph T., Schenck E., Weinfurter H., Vedral V., Aspelmeyer M., and Zeilinger A. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434 (2005) 169
234. Vallone G., Pomarico E., Mataloni P., De Martini F., and Berardi V. Realization and characterization of a two-photon four-qubit linear cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 180502
235. Chen K., Li C.-M., Zhang Q., Chen Y.-A., Goebel A., Chen S., Mair A., and Pan J.-W. Experimental realization of one-way quantum computing with two-photon four-qubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 120503
236. Lu C.-Y., Gao W.-B., Gühne O., Zhou X.-Q., Chen Z.-B., and Pan J.-W. Demonstrating anyonic fractional statistics with a six-qubit quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 030502
237. Weinfurter H., and Żukowski M. Four-photon entanglement from down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 010102
238. Cabello A. Six-qubit permutation-based decoherence-free orthogonal basis. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 020301
239. Cabello A. Supersinglets. J. Mod. Opt. 50 (2003) 10049
240. Lidar D.A., Chuang I.L., and Whaley K.B. Decoherence free subspaces for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 2594
241. Zanardi P., and Rasetti M. Noiseless quantum codes Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 3306
242. Eibl M., Gaertner S., Bourennane M., Kurtsiefer C., Żukowski M., and Weinfurter H. Experimental observation of four-photon entanglement from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 200403
243. Gaertner S., Kurtsiefer C., Bourennane M., and Weinfurter H. Experimental demonstration of four-party quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 020503
244. Bourennane M., Eibl M., Gaertner S., Kurtsiefer C., Cabello A., and Weinfurter H. Decoherence-free quantum information processing with four-photon entangled states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 107901
245. Tóth G., and García-Ripoll J. Efficient algorithm for multiqudit twirling for ensemble quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 42311
246. Eggeling T., and Werner R. Separability properties of tripartite states with U ⊗ U ⊗ U symmetry. Phys. Rev. A 63 (2001) 042111
247. Gross D., Audenaert K., and Eisert J. Evenly distributed unitaries: On the structure of unitary designs. J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007) 052104
248. Emerson J., Silva M., Moussa O., Ryan C., Laforest M., Baugh J., Cory D., and Laflamme R. Symmetrized characterization of noisy quantum processes. Science 317 (2007) 1893
249. Osterloh A., and Siewert J. Constructing N-qubit entanglement monotones from anti-linear operators. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 012337
250. Osterloh A., and Siewert J. Entanglement monotones and maximally entangled states in multipartite qubit systems. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 4 (2006) 531
251. B. Kraus, Entanglement properties of quantum states and quantum operations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Innsbruck, 2003
252. M. Aulbach, D. Markham, S. Miyashita, M. Murao, The maximally entangled state of three and more qubits in terms of the geometric measure, in: Poster at the AQIS 2007 Conference in Kyoto, 2007. Available at: http://www.martinaulbach.de/quantum/AQIS_poster_43.pdf
253. Bruß D., DiVincenzo D.P., Ekert A., Fuchs C.A., Macchiavello C., and Smolin J.A. Optimal universal and state-dependent quantum cloning. Phys. Rev. A 57 (1998) 2368
254. C. Kruszynska, B. Kraus, Multipartite entanglement and global information, 2008. arXiv:0808.3862
255. Uffink J. Quadratic Bell inequalities as tests for multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 230406
256. M. Seevinck, Parts & wholes, Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, 2008. See also arXiv:0811.1027
257. Uffink J., and Seevinck M. Strengthened Bell inequalities for orthogonal spin directions. Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 1205
258. Laskowski W., and Żukowski M. Detection of N-particle entanglement with generalized Bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 062112
259. Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Horodecki R. Separability of n-particle mixed states: Necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of linear maps. Phys. Lett. A 283 (2000) 1
260. Yu C.-S., and Song H.-S. Separability criterion of tripartite qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022333
261. Hassan A.S.M., and Joag P.S. Separability criterion for multipartite quantum states based on the Bloch representation of density matrices. Quantum Inf. Comput. 8 (2008) 9
262. Dür W., and Cirac J.I. Multiparticle entanglement and its experimental detection. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 6837
263. Wei T.-C., and Goldbart P.M. Geometric measure of entanglement and applications to bipartite and multipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 042307
264. Tóth G., and Gühne O. Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement with two local measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 060501
265. Roy S.M. Multipartite separability inequalities exponentially stronger than local reality inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 010402
266. Durkin G.A., and Simon C. Multi-partite entanglement inequalities via spin vector geometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 180402
267. Badziag P., Brukner Č., Laskowski W., Paterek T., and Zukowski M. Experimentally friendly geometrical criteria for entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 140403
268. Kaszlikowski D., and Kay A. A witness of multipartite entanglement strata. New J. Phys. 10 (2008) 053026
269. Jafarizadeh M.A., Rezaee M., and Yagoobi S.K.A.S. Bell-state diagonal entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 062106
270. Jafarizadeh M.A., Najarbashi G., Akbari Y., and Habibian H. Multi-qubit stabilizer and cluster entanglement witnesses. Eur. Phys. J. D 47 (2008) 233
271. Jafarizadeh M.A., Najarbashi G., and Habibian H. Manipulating multi-qudit entanglement witnesses by using linear programming. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 052326
272. Vedral V., Plenio M.B., Rippin M.A., and Knight P.L. Quantifying entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2275
273. Plenio M.B. The logarithmic negativity: A full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 090503
274. Vidal G. Entanglement monotones. J. Mod. Opt. 47 (2000) 355
275. Horodecki M. Simplifying monotonicity conditions for entanglement measures. Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 12 (2005) 231
276. Demkowicz-Dobrzanski R., Buchleitner A., Kus M., and Mintert F. Evaluable multipartite entanglement measures: Are multipartite concurrences entanglement monotones?. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052303
277. Chen K., Albeverio S., and Fei S.-M. Concurrence of arbitrary dimensional bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 040504
278. Chen K., Albeverio S., and Fei S.-M. Entanglement of formation of bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 210501
279. Bennett C.H., DiVincenzo D.P., Smolin J.A., and Wootters W.K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54 (1996) 3824
280. Hill S., and Wootters W.K. Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 5022
281. Rungta P., Bužek V., Caves C.M., Hillery M., and Milburn G.J. Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 042315
282. Vedral V., and Plenio M.B. Entanglement measures and purification procedures. Phys. Rev. A 57 (1998) 1619
283. Vidal G., and Tarrach R. Robustness of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 141
284. Steiner M. Generalized robustness of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 054305
285. Harrow A.W., and Nielsen M.A. How robust is a quantum gate in the presence of noise?. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 012308
286. Shimony A. Degree of entanglement. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755 (1995) 675
287. Barnum H., and Linden N. Monotones and invariants for multi-particle quantum states. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34 (2001) 6787
288. Werner R.F., and Holevo A.S. Counterexample to an additivity conjecture for output purity of quantum channels. J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 4353
289. Wei T.-C., Ericsson M., Goldbart P.M., and Munro W.J. Connections between relative entropy of entanglement and geometric measure of entanglement. Quantum Inf. Comput. 4 (2004) 252
290. Hayashi M., Markham D., Murao M., Owari M., and Virmani S. Bounds on multipartite entangled orthogonal state discrimination using local operations and classical communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 040501
291. Tamaryan L., Park D., and Tamaryan S. Analytic expressions for geometric measure of three qubit states. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 022325
292. Markham D., Miyake A., and Virmani S. Entanglement and local information access for graph states. New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 194
293. Hayashi M., Markham D., Murao M., Owari M., and Virmani S. Entanglement of multiparty stabilizer, symmetric, and antisymmetric states. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 012104
294. Coffman V., Kundu J., and Wootters W.K. Distributed entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 052306
295. Osborne T.J., and Verstraete F. General monogamy inequality for bipartite qubit entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 220503
296. Lohmayer R., Osterloh A., Siewert J., and Uhlmann A. Entangled three-qubit states without concurrence and three-tangle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 260502
297. H. Fan, Y.-C. Ou, V. Roychowdhury, Entangled multi-qubit states without higher-tangle, 2007. arXiv:0707.1578
298. Clauser J.F., and Horne M.A. Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 526
299. Clauser J.F., Horne M.A., Shimony A., and Holt R.A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880
300. Clauser J.F., Horne M.A., Shimony A., and Holt R.A. Erratum: Proposed experiment to test local hidden variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (1970) 549E
301. Braunstein S.L., Mann A., and Revzen M. Maximal violation of Bell inequalities for mixed states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3259
302. Cirel'son B.S. Quantum generalizations of Bell's inequality. Lett. Math. Phys. 4 (1980) 93
303. Horodecki R., Horodecki P., and Horodecki M. Violating Bell inequality by mixed spin-1 / 2 states: Necessary and sufficient condition. Phys. Lett. A 200 (1995) 340
304. Masanes L., Liang Y.-C., and Doherty A.C. All bipartite entangled states display some hidden nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 090403
305. Liang Y.-C., and Doherty A.C. Bounds on quantum correlations in Bell inequality experiments. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 042103
306. Leggett A.J. Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: An incompatibility theorem. Found. Phys. 33 (2003) 1469
307. Gröblacher S., Paterek T., Kaltenbaek R., Brukner Č., Żukowski M., Aspelmeyer M., and Zeilinger A. An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature 446 (2007) 871
308. Branciard C., Brunner N., Gisin N., Kurtsiefer C., Lamas-Linares A., Ling A., and Scarani V. A simple approach to test Leggett's model of nonlocal quantum correlations. Nature Phys. 4 (2008) 681
309. Cerf N., Gisin N., Massar S., and Popescu S. Simulating maximal quantum entanglement without communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 220403
310. Popescu S., and Rohrlich D. Quantum nonlocality as an axiom. Found. Phys. 24 (1994) 379
311. Barrett J. Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 042302
312. Carpasso V., Fortunato D., and Selleri F. Sensitive observables of quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7 (1973) 319
313. Gisin N. Bell's inequality holds for all non-product states. Phys. Lett. A 154 (1991) 201-202
314. Gisin N., and Peres A. Maximal violation of Bell's inequality for arbitrarily large spin. Phys. Lett. A 162 (1992) 15-17
315. Hyllus P., Gühne O., Bruß D., and Lewenstein M. Relations between entanglement witnesses and Bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 012321
316. Acín A., Gisin N., and Toner B. Grothendieck's constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 062105
317. Vértesi T. More efficient Bell inequalities for Werner states. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 032112
318. Seevinck M., and Svetlichny G. Bell-type inequalities for partial separability in N-particle systems and quantum mechanical violations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 060401
319. Collins D., Gisin N., Popescu S., Roberts D., and Scarani V. Bell-type inequalities to detect true N-body non-separability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 170405
320. Tóth G., Gühne O., and Briegel H.J. Two-setting Bell inequalities for graph states. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 022303
321. Hsu L.-Y. Bell-type inequalities embedded in the subgraph of graph states. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 042308
322. Cabello A., and Moreno P. Bipartite all-versus-nothing proofs of Bell's theorem with single-qubit measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 220402
323. Ardehali M. Bell inequalities with a magnitude of violation that grows exponentially with the number of particles. Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 5375
324. Gühne O., and Cabello A. Generalized Ardehali-Bell inequalities for graph states. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 032108
325. Belinskii A., and Klyshko D.N. Phys. Usp. 36 (1993) 653
326. Klyshko D.N. The Bell and GHZ theorems: A possible three-photon interference experiment and the question of nonlocality. Phys. Lett. A 172 (1993) 399
327. Werner R.F., and Wolf M.M. All-multipartite Bell-correlation inequalities for two dichotomic observables per site. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 032112
328. Żukowski M., and Brukner Č. Bell's theorem for general N-qubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 210401
329. Żukowski M., Brukner Č., Laskowski W., and Wieśniak M. Do all pure entangled states violate Bell's inequalities for correlation functions?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 210402
330. Popescu S., and Rohrlich D. Generic quantum nonlocality. Phys. Lett. A 166 (1992) 293
331. Walther P., Aspelmeyer M., Resch K.J., and Zeilinger A. Experimental violation of a cluster state Bell inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 020403
332. Mitchell P., Popescu S., and Roberts D. Conditions for the confirmation of three-particle nonlocality. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 060101
333. S. Ghose, N. Sinclair, S. Debnath, P. Rungta, R. Stock, Tripartite entanglement versus tripartite nonlocality in 3-qubit GHZ-class states, 2008. arXiv:0812.3695
334. Kaszlikowski D., Gnaciński P., Żukowski M., Miklaszewski W., and Zeilinger A. Violations of local realism by two entangled N-dimensional systems are stronger than for two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 4418
335. Collins D., Gisin N., Linden N., Massar S., and Popescu S. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 40404
336. Ito T., Imai H., and Avis D. Bell inequalities stronger than the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality for three-level isotropic states. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 42109
337. Fine A. Hidden variables, joint probability, and the Bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 291
338. Pitowsky I. Quantum Probability-Quantum Logic. Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 321 (1989), Springer
339. Sliwa C. Symmetries of the Bell correlation inequalities. Phys. Lett. A 317 (2003) 165
340. Collins D., and Gisin N. A relevant two qubit Bell inequality inequivalent to the CHSH inequality. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 (2004) 1775
341. Froissart M. Constructive generalization of Bell's inequalities. Il Nuovo Cimento B 64 (1981) 241
342. Brunner N., and Gisin N. Partial list of bipartite Bell inequalities with four binary settings. Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 3162
343. Pal K.F., and Vértesi T. Quantum bounds on Bell inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 022120
344. Perez-Garcia D., Wolf M.M., Palazuelos C., Villanueva I., and Junge M. Unbounded violation of tripartite Bell inequalities. Comm. Math. Phys. 279 (2008) 455
345. Żukowski M., and Kaszlikowski D. Critical visibility for N-particle Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger correlations to violate local realism. Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997) 1682
346. Żukowski M. On tight multiparty Bell inequalities for many settings. Quantum Inf. Process. 5 (2006) 287
347. Wieśniak M., Badziag P., and Żukowski M. Explicit form of correlation-function three-setting tight Bell inequalities for three qubits. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 12110
348. Tóth G., and Acín A. Genuine tripartite entangled states with a local hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 30306
349. In: Bouwmeester D., Ekert A., and Zeilinger A. (Eds). The Physics of Quantum Information (2000), Springer
350. Tóth G., Gühne O., Seevinck M., and Uffink J. Addendum to "Sufficient conditions for three-particle entanglement and their tests in recent experiments". Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 014101
351. Nagata K., Koashi M., and Imoto N. Observables suitable for restricting the fidelity to multipartite maximally entangled states. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 042314
352. Gisin N., and Bechmann-Pasquinucci H. Bell inequality, Bell states and maximally entangled states for n qubits. Phys. Lett. A 246 (1998) 1
353. Nagata K., Koashi M., and Imoto N. Configuration of separability and tests for multipartite entanglement in Bell-type experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 260401
354. Fuchs C.A., Gisin N., Griffiths R.B., Niu C.-S., and Peres A. Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography: I. Information bound and optimal strategy. Phys. Rev. A 56 (1997) 1163
355. Gisin N., and Huttner B. Quantum cloning, eavesdropping and Bell's inequality. Phys. Lett. A 228 (1997) 13
356. Gisin N., and Huttner B. Erratum: Quantum cloning, eavesdropping and Bell's inequality. Phys. Lett. A 232 (1997) 463
357. Scarani V., and Gisin N. Quantum communication between N partners and Bell's inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 117901
358. Scarani V., and Gisin N. Quantum key distribution between N partners: Optimal eavesdropping and Bell's inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2001) 012311
359. Acín A., Brunner N., Gisin N., Massar S., Pironio S., and Scarani V. Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 23 (2007) 230501
360. Brukner Č., Żukowski M., Pan J.-W., and Zeilinger A. Bell's inequalities and quantum communication complexity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 127901
361. Buhrman H., van Dam W., Hoyer P., and Tapp A. Multiparty quantum communication complexity. Phys. Rev. A 60 (1999) 2737
362. E.F. Galvao, Experimental requirements for quantum communication complexity protocols, 2000. quant-ph/0009014
363. Acín A. Distillability, Bell inequalities and multiparticle bound entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2001) 027901
364. Acín A., Scarani V., and Wolf M.M. Bell's inequalities and distillability in N-quantum-bit systems. Phys. Rev. A 66 (2002) 042323
365. Dür W. Multipartite bound entangled states that violate Bell's inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 230402
366. Werner R.F., and Wolf M.M. Bell's inequalities for states with positive partial transpose. Phys. Rev. A 61 (2000) 062102
367. Nagata K., Laskowski W., and Paterek T. Bell inequality with an arbitrary number of settings and its applications. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 062109
368. Pearle P.M. Hidden-variable example based upon data rejection. Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1418
369. Santos E. Critical analysis of the empirical tests of local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646
370. Eberhard P.H. Background level and counter efficiencies required for a loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment. Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 747R
371. Larsson J.-Å. Bell's inequality and detector inefficiency. Phys. Rev. A 57 (1998) 3304
372. Brunner N., Gisin N., Scarani V., and Simon C. Detection loophole in asymmetric Bell experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 220403
373. Cabello A., Rodriguez D., and Villanueva I. Necessary and sufficient detection efficiency for the Mermin inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 120402
374. Cabello A., and Larsson J.-Å. Minimum detection efficiency for a loophole-free atom-photon Bell experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 220402
375. Rowe M., Kielpinski D., Meyer V., Sackett C., Itano W., Monroe C., and Wineland D. Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409 (2001) 791
376. Matsukevich D., Maunz P., Moehring D., Olmschenk S., and Monroe C. Bell inequality violation with two remote atomic qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 150404
377. Aspect A., Dalibard J., and Roger G. Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1804
378. Weihs G., Jennewein T., Simon C., Weinfurter H., and Zeilinger A. Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5039
379. Kwiat P.G., Eberhard P.H., Steinberg A.M., and Chiao R.Y. Proposal for a loophole-free Bell inequality experiment. Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209
380. T. Scheidl, R. Ursin, J. Kofler, S. Ramelow, X.-S. Ma, T. Herbst, L. Ratschbacher, A. Fedrizzi, N. Langford, T. Jennewein, A. Zeilinger, Violation of local realism with freedom of choice, 2008. arXiv:0811.3129
381. Kwiat P.G., Mattle K., Weinfurter H., Zeilinger A., Sergienko A.V., and Shih Y. New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4337
382. Gühne O., Hyllus P., Bruß D., Ekert A., Lewenstein M., Macchiavello C., and Sanpera A. Detection of entanglement with few local measurements. Phys. Rev. A 66 (2002) 062305
383. Filip R. A device for feasible fidelity purity, Hilbert-Schmidt distance and entanglement witness measurements. Phys. Rev. A 65 (2002) 062320
384. Pittenger A.O., and Rubin M.H. The geometry of entanglement witnesses and local detection of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 012327
385. Barbieri M., De Martini F., Di Nepi G., Mataloni P., D'Ariano G.M., and Macchiavello C. Detection of entanglement with polarized photons: Experimental realization of an entanglement witness. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 227901
386. C. Schuck, Experimental implementation of a quantum game, Diploma Thesis, LMU Munich, 2003
387. Gühne O., and Hyllus P. Investigating three qubit entanglement with local measurements. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 42 (2003) 1001
388. O. Gühne, Detecting quantum entanglement: Entanglement witnesses and uncertainty relations, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hannover, 2004. Available at http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01dh04/393503704.pdf
389. Chen L.C., and Chen Y.-X. Multiqubit entanglement witness. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 022330
390. Gühne O., Lu C.-Y., Gao W.-B., and Pan J.-W. Toolbox for entanglement detection and fidelity estimation. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 030305
391. Tokunaga Y., Yamamoto T., Koashi M., and Imoto N. Fidelity estimation and entanglement verification for experimentally produced four-qubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 020301R
392. Skwara P., Kampermann H., Kleinmann M., and Bruß D. Entanglement witnesses and a loophole problem. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 012312
393. Seevinck M., and Uffink J. Local commutativity versus Bell inequality violation for entangled states and versus non-violation for separable states. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 042105
394. Beaudry N.J., Moroder T., and Lütkenhaus N. Squashing models for optical measurements in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 093601
395. Brunner N., Pironio S., Acin A., Gisin N., Methot A.A., and Scarani V. Testing the Hilbert space dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 210503
396. Acín A., Gisin N., and Masanes L. From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 120405
397. Tóth G., and Gühne O. Entanglement detection in the stabilizer formalism. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022340
398. Li C.-M., Hsu L.-Y., Chen Y.-N., Chuu D.-S., and Brandes T. Entanglement detection via condition of quantum correlation. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 032313
399. Somma R.D., Chiaverini J., and Berkeland D.J. Lower bounds for the fidelity of entangled-state preparation. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052302
400. Tóth G. Entanglement detection in optical lattices of bosonic atoms with collective measurements. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 052327
401. Kwiat P.G. Hyper-entangled states. J. Mod. Opt. 44 (1997) 2173
402. Barreiro J.T., Langford N.K., Peters N.A., and Kwiat P.G. Hyper-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 260501
403. Barreiro J.T., Wei T.-C., and Kwiat P.G. Beating the channel capacity limit for linear photonic superdense coding. Nature Phys. 4 (2008) 282
404. Vallone G., Ceccarelli R., De Martini F., and Mataloni P. Hyperentanglement of two photons in three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 030301R
405. Schuck C., Huber G., Kurtsiefer C., and Weinfurter H. Complete deterministic linear optics Bell state analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 190501
406. Vallone G., Ceccarelli R., De Martini F., and Mataloni P. Hyperentanglement witness. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 062305
407. Korbicz J.K., Gühne O., Lewenstein M., Häffner H., Roos C.F., and Blatt R. Generalized spin-squeezing inequalities in N-qubit systems: Theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052319
408. Cirac J.I., and Zoller P. Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4091
409. Sørensen A., and Mølmer K. Quantum computation with ions in thermal motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1971
410. Mølmer K., and Sørensen A. Multi-particle entanglement of hot trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1835
411. Cirac J.I., and Zoller P. A scalable quantum computer with ions in an array of microtraps. Nature 404 (2000) 579
412. Mintert F., and Wunderlich C. Ion-trap quantum logic using long-wavelength radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 257904
413. Retzker A., Solano E., and Reznik B. Tavis-Cummings model and collective multi-qubit entanglement in trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 022312
414. Hradil Z., Rehacek J., Fiurasek J., and Jezek M. Maximum-likelihood methods in quantum mechanics. Lect. Notes Phys. 649 (2004) 59
415. Nha H. Linear optical scheme to demonstrate genuine multipartite entanglement for single-particle W states. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 062328
416. P. Lougovski, S. van Enk, K.S. Choi, S.B. Papp, H. Deng, H. Kimble, Verifying multi-partite mode entanglement of W states, 2009. arXiv:0903.0851
417. Horodecki R., Horodecki M., and Horodecki P. Entanglement processing and statistical inference: The Jaynes principle can produce fake entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 59 (1999) 1799
418. Gühne O., Reimpell M., and Werner R.F. Estimating entanglement measures in experiments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 110502
419. Eisert J., Brandão F.G.S.L., and Audenaert K.M.R. Quantitative entanglement witnesses. New J. Phys. 9 (2007) 46
420. Gühne O., Reimpell M., and Werner R.F. Lower bounds on entanglement measures from incomplete information. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 052317
421. Rockafellar R. Convex Analysis (1997), Princeton University Press
422. R.F. Werner, Statistische Thermodynamik, Lecture Notes, 1991. Available at http://www.imaph.tu-bs.de/ftp/werner/sm91.ps.gz
423. Brandao F.G.S.L. Quantifying entanglement with witness operators. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022310
424. Brandao F.G.S.L., and Vianna R.O. Witnessed entanglement. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 4 (2006) 331
425. Cavalcanti D., and Terra Cunha M.O. Estimating entanglement of unknown states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89 (2006) 084102
426. Cavalcanti D., Saldanha P.L., Cosme O., Brandao F.G.S.L., Monken C.H., Padua S., Santos M.F., and Terra Cunha M.O. Geometrically induced singular behavior of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 012318
427. Verstraete F., and Wolf M.M. Entanglement versus Bell violations and their behaviour under local filtering operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 170401
428. Breuer H.-P. Separability criteria and bounds for entanglement measures. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 (2006) 11847
429. Audenaert K.M.R., and Plenio M.B. When are correlations quantum?-Verification and quantification of entanglement by simple measurements. New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 266
430. H. Wunderlich, M.B. Plenio, Quantitative verification of entanglement and fidelities from incomplete measurement data, 2009. arXiv:0902.2093
431. P. Lougovski, S.J. van Enk, Detecting and quantifying entanglement via Bayesian updating, 2008. arXiv:0806.4165
432. R. Blume-Kohout, Optimal, reliable estimation of quantum states, 2006. quant-ph/0611080
433. Gisin N., Ribordy G., Tittel W., and Zbinden H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Modern Phys. 74 (2002) 145
434. Dusek M., Lütkenhaus N., and Hendrych M. Quantum cryptography. In: Wolf E. (Ed). Progress in Optics, vol. 49 (2006) 381 See also quant-ph/0601207
435. Loepp S., and Wootters W. Protecting Information (2006), Cambridge University Press
436. V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N.J. Cerf, M. Dusek, N. Lütkenhaus, M. Peev, The security of practical quantum key distribution, 2008. arXiv:0802.4155
437. Bennett C.H., and Brassard G. Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India (1984), IEEE, New York 175-179
438. Bennett C.H. Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3121
439. Bruß D. Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 3018
440. Bennett C.H., Brassard G., and Mermin N.D. Quantum cryptography without Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 557
441. Curty M., Lewenstein M., and Lütkenhaus N. Entanglement as a precondition for secure quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 217903
442. Acin A., and Gisin N. Quantum correlations and secret bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 020501
443. Curty M., Gühne O., Lewenstein M., and Lütkenhaus N. Detecting two-party quantum correlations in quantum key distribution protocols. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 022306
444. Lorenz S., Rigas J., Heid M., Andersen U.L., Lütkenhaus N., and Leuchs G. Witnessing effective entanglement in a continuous variable prepare-and-measure setup and application to a quantum key distribution scheme using postselection. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 042326
445. Horodecki R., Horodecki P., and Horodecki M. Quantum α-entropy inequalities: Independent condition for local realism?. Phys. Lett. A 210 (1996) 377
446. Bovino F.A., Castagnoli G., Ekert A., Horodecki P., Alves C.M., and Sergienko A.V. Direct measurement of nonlinear properties of bipartite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 240407
447. Ekert A.K., Alves C.M., Oi D.K.L., Horodecki M., Horodecki P., and Kwek L.C. Direct estimations of linear and non-linear functionals of a quantum state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 217901
448. Alves C.M., Horodecki P., Oi D.K.L., Kwek L.C., and Ekert A.K. Direct estimation of functionals of density operators by local operations and classical communication. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 032306
449. S.J. van Enk, The joys of permutation symmetry: Direct measurements of entanglement, 2009. arXiv:0902.2007
450. S.J. van Enk, Can measuring entanglement be easy? 2006. quant-ph/0606017
451. Alves C.M., and Jaksch D. Multipartite entanglement detection in bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 110501
452. Palmer R.N., Alves C.M., and Jaksch D. Detection and characterization of multipartite entanglement in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 042335
453. Walborn S.P., Ribeiro P.H.S., Davidovich L., Mintert F., and Buchleitner A. Experimental determination of entanglement by a projective measurement. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 032338
454. Walborn S.P., Ribeiro P.H.S., Davidovich L., Mintert F., and Buchleitner A. Experimental determination of entanglement with a single measurement. Nature 440 (2006) 1022
455. Romero G., Lopez C.E., Lastra F., Solano E., and Retamal J.C. Direct measurement of concurrence for atomic two-qubit pure states. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 032303
456. Mintert F., and Buchleitner A. Observable entanglement measure for mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 140505
457. Borras A., Majtey A.P., Plastino A.R., Casas M., and Plastino A. Typical features of the Mintert-Buchleitner lower bound for concurrence. Phys. Rev. A 79 (2009) 022112
458. Zhang C.-J., Gong Y.-X., Zhang Y.-S., and Guo G.-C. Observable estimation of entanglement for arbitrary finite-dimensional mixed states. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 042308
459. Schmid C., Kiesel N., Wieczorek W., Weinfurter H., Mintert F., and Buchleitner A. Experimental direct observation of mixed state entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 260505
460. Mintert F., Kus M., and Buchleitner A. Concurrence of mixed multi-partite quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 260502
461. Aolita L., and Mintert F. Measuring multipartite concurrence with a single factorizable observable. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 050501
462. Aolita L., Buchleitner A., and Mintert F. Scalable experimental estimation of multipartite entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 022308
463. Duan L.-M., Giedke G., Cirac J.I., and Zoller P. Inseparability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2722
464. Simon R. Peres-Horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2726
465. van Loock P., and Furusawa A. Detecting genuine multipartite continuous-variable entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 052315
466. Mancini S., Giovannetti V., Vitali D., and Tombesi P. Entangling macroscopic oscillators exploiting radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 120401
467. Tóth G., Simon C., and Cirac J.I. Entanglement detection based on interference and particle counting. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 062310
468. Giovannetti V., Mancini S., Vitali D., and Tombesi P. Characterizing the entanglement of bipartite quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003) 022320
469. Gühne O., and Lewenstein M. Separability criteria from uncertainty relations. AIP Conf. Proc. 734 (2004) 230
470. Hofmann H.F. Bound entangled states violate a non-symmetric local uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 034307
471. Gühne O., and Lewenstein M. Entropic uncertainty relations and entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 022316
472. Giovannetti V. Separability conditions from entropic uncertainty relations. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 012102
473. de Vicente J.I., and Sanchez-Ruiz J. Separability conditions from the Landau-Pollak uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 052325
474. de Vicente J.I. Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions. Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007) 052320
475. de Vicente J.I. Erratum: Lower bounds on concurrence and separability conditions. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 039903E
476. de Vicente J.I. Further results on entanglement detection and quantification from the correlation matrix criterion. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 41 (2008) 065309
477. Wang Z.-W., Huang Y.-F., Ren X.-F., Zhang Y.-S., and Guo G.-C. Experimental entanglement verification and quantification via uncertainty relations. Europhys. Lett. 78 (2007) 40002
478. Gühne O., and Lütkenhaus N. Nonlinear entanglement witnesses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 170502
479. Gühne O., and Lütkenhaus N. Nonlinear entanglement witnesses covariance matrices and the geometry of separable states. J. Phys. C: Conf. Ser. 67 (2007) 012004
480. Ioannou L.M., and Travaglione B.C. Quantum separability and entanglement detection via entanglement-witness search and global optimization. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 052314
481. Horodecki P., and Ekert A. Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 127902
482. Korbicz J.K., Almeida M.L., Bae J., Lewenstein M., and Acín A. Structural approximations to positive maps and entanglement-breaking channels. Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008) 062105
483. Horodecki P. From limits of quantum operations to multicopy entanglement witnesses and state-spectrum estimation. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 052101
484. Keyl M., and Werner R.F. Estimating the spectrum of a density operator. Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001) 052311
485. Horodecki P. Measuring quantum entanglement without prior state reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 167901
486. Carteret H.A. Noiseless quantum circuits for the Peres separability criterion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 040502
487. Leifer M.S., Linden N., and Winter A. Measuring polynomial invariants of multi-party quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 052304
488. Grassl M., Roetteler M., and Beth T. Computing local invariants of qubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 58 (1998) 1833
489. Cai J., and Song W. Novel schemes for directly measuring entanglement of general states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 190503
490. H.A. Carteret, Exact interferometers for the concurrence and residual 3-tangle, 2003. quant-ph/0309212
491. Horodecki P., Augusiak R., and Demianowicz M. General construction of noiseless networks detecting entanglement with help of linear maps. Phys. Rev. A 74 (2006) 052323
492. Augusiak R., Demianowicz M., and Horodecki P. Universal observable detecting all two-qubit entanglement and determinant based separability tests. Phys. Rev. A 77 (2008) 030301
493. Schliemann J. Entanglement in SU(2)-invariant quantum spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 012309
494. Augusiak R., and Stasinska J. Rotationally invariant bipartite states and bound entanglement. Phys. Lett. A 363 (2007) 182
495. Kitagawa M., and Ueda M. Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) 5138
496. Wineland D.J., Bollinger J.J., Itano W.M., Moore F.L., and Heinzen D.J. Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 6797R
497. Wineland D.J., Bollinger J.J., Itano W.M., and Heinzen D.J. Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 50 (1994) 67
498. K. Hammerer, A.S. Sorensen, E.S. Polzik, Quantum interface between light and atomic ensembles, 2008. arXiv:0807.3358
499. Messikh A., Ficek Z., and Wahiddin M.R.B. Spin squeezing as a measure of entanglement in a two-qubit system. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 064301
500. Sørensen A., Duan L.-M., Cirac J.I., and Zoller P. Many-particle entanglement with Bose-Einstein condensates. Nature 409 (2001) 63
501. Sørensen A.S., and Mølmer K. Entanglement and extreme spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 4431
502. Wang X., and Sanders B.C. Spin squeezing and pairwise entanglement for symmetric multiqubit states. Phys. Rev. A 68 (2003) 012101
503. G. Tóth, C. Knapp, O. Gühne, H.J. Briegel, Spin squeezing and entanglement, 2008. arXiv:0806.1048
504. Kuzmich A., Bigelow N., and Mandel L. Atomic quantum non-demolition measurements and squeezing. Europhys. Lett. 42 (1998) 481
505. Tóth G. Entanglement witnesses in spin models. Phys. Rev. A 71 (2005) 010301
506. Korbicz J.K., Cirac J.I., and Lewenstein M. Spin squeezing inequalities and entanglement of N qubit states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 120502
507. Korbicz J.K., Cirac J.I., and Lewenstein M. Erratum: Spin squeezing inequalities and entanglement of N qubit states [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 120502]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 259901E
508. Vidal J. Concurrence in collective models. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 062318
509. Coleman A.J. Structure of fermion density matrices. Rev. Modern Phys. 35 (1963) 668
510. Č. Brukner, V. Vedral, Macroscopic thermodynamical witnesses of quantum entanglement, 2004. quant-ph/0406040
511. Dowling M.R., Doherty A.C., and Bartlett S.D. Energy as an entanglement witness for quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. A 70 (2004) 062113
512. Wu L., Bandyopadhyay S., Sarandy M., and Lidar D. Entanglement observables and witnesses for interacting quantum spin systems. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 32309
513. Vedral V. Quantifying entanglement in macroscopic systems. Nature 453 (2008) 1004
514. Anders J., Kaszlikowski D., Lunkes C., Ohshima T., and Vedral V. Detecting entanglement with a thermometer. New J. Phys. 8 (2006) 140
515. Hide J., Son W., and Vedral V. Enhancing the detection of natural thermal entanglement with disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 100503
516. Hide J., Son W., Lawrie I., and Vedral V. Witnessing macroscopic entanglement in a staggered magnetic field. Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007) 022319
517. Y. Nakata, D. Markham, M. Murao, Thermal robustness of multipartite entanglement of the 1-D spin 1/2 XY model, 2008. arXiv:0806.3644
518. Markham D., Anders J., Vedral V., Murao M., and Miyake A. Survival of entanglement in thermal states. Europhys. Lett. 81 (2008) 40006
519. Tóth G., and Gühne O. Detection of multipartite entanglement with two-body correlations. Appl. Phys. B 82 (2006) 237
520. Richert J., and Gühne O. Low energy properties of even-legged d-dimensional quantum spin systems: A variational approach. Phys. Status Solidi (b) 245 (2008) 1552
521. Wieśniak M., Vedral V., and Brukner Č. Magnetic susceptibility as a macroscopic entanglement witness. New J. Phys. 7 (2005) 258
522. Brukner Č., Vedral V., and Zeilinger A. Crucial role of quantum entanglement in bulk properties of solids. Phys. Rev. A 73 (2006) 012110
523. Rappoport T.G., Ghivelder L., Fernandes J.C., Guimarães R.B., and Continentino M.A. Experimental observation of quantum entanglement in low-dimensional spin systems. Phys. Rev. B 75 (2007) 054422
524. Bose I., and Tribedi A. Thermal entanglement properties of small spin clusters. Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 022314
525. 7. Phys. Rev.B 73 (2006) 134404
526. Treutlein P., Steinmetz T., Colombe Y., Lev B., Hommelhoff P., Reichel J., Greiner M., Mandel O., Widera A., Rom T., et al. Quantum information processing in optical lattices and magnetic microtraps. Fortschr. Phys. 54 (2006) 702
527. Zoller P., Cirac J.I., Duan L., and García-Ripoll J.J. Implementing quantum information processing with atoms, ions and photons. In: Estève D., Raimond J.M., and Dalibard J. (Eds). Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School, Session 79 (2004), Elsevier, Amsterdam See also quant-ph/0405025
528. Garcia-Ripoll J.J., and Cirac J.I. Spin dynamics for bosons in an optical lattice. New J. Phys. 5 (2003) 76
529. Brennen G., Caves C., Jessen P., and Deutsch I. Quantum logic gates in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1060
530. Jaksch D., Briegel H., Cirac J., Gardiner C., and Zoller P. Entanglement of atoms via cold controlled collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 1975
531. Rey A., Gritsev V., Bloch I., Demler E., and Lukin M. Preparation and detection of magnetic quantum phases in optical superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 140601
532. Eckert K., Romero-Isart O., Rodriguez M., Lewenstein M., Polzik E., and Sanpera A. Quantum non-demolition detection of strongly correlated systems. Nature Phys. 4 (2007) 50
533. Brennen G.K. An observable measure of entanglement for pure states of multi-qubit systems. Quantum Inf. Comput. 3 (2003) 619
534. Vollbrecht K.G.H., and Cirac J.I. Delocalized entanglement of atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 190502
535. Paredes B., Widera A., Murg V., Mandel O., Fölling S., Cirac I., Shiapnikov G., Hänsch T., and Bloch I. Tonks-Girardeau gas of ultracold atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 429 (2004) 277
536. G. Toth, W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P. Michelberger, H. Weinfurter, Practical methods for witnessing genuine multi-qubit entanglement in the vicinity of symmetric states, 2009. arXiv:0903.3910
537. S. Campbell, M.S. Tame, M. Paternostro, Characterizing multipartite symmetric Dicke states under the effects of noise, 2009. arXiv:0903.3939
538. W. Wieczorek, R. Krischek, N. Kiesel, P. Michelberger, G. Toth, H. Weinfurter, Experimental entanglement of a six-photon symmetric Dicke state, 2009. arXiv:0903.2213
539. R. Prevedel, G. Cronenberg, M.S. Tame, M. Paternostro, P. Walther, M.S. Kim, A. Zeilinger, Experimental realization of Dicke states of up to six qubits for multiparty quantum networking, 2009. arXiv:0903.2212