An observable measure of entanglement for pure states of multi-qubit systems

Quantum Information and Computation

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 619-626

  Brennen, Gavin K ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Entanglement

Indexed keywords

OPTICAL LATTICES; QUBITS;

ATOMIC QUBITS; ENTANGLEMENT; PHYSICAL QUANTITIES; PURE STATE; QUANTUM STATE TOMOGRAPHY; QUBIT ENTANGLEMENT; QUBIT SYSTEM;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 0344120636     PISSN: 15337146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. D.A. Meyer and N.R. Wallach (2002), J. of Math. Phys., 43, pp. 4273.
2. G. Vidal (2000), J. Mod. Opt., 47, pp. 355.
3. J. Grondalski, D.M. Etlinger, and D.F.V. James (2002), Phys. Lett. A, 300, pp. 569-576.
4. H. Barnum and N. Linden (2001), J. Phys. A, 34, pp. 6787.
5. J. Eisert and Hans J. Briegel (2001), Phys. Rev. A, 64, pp. 022306.
6. P. Horodecki (2003), Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, pp. 167901.
7. This equivalence was first recognized by Rolando Somma. M. Knill (private communication).
8. H. Barnum, E. Knill, G. Ortiz, R. Somma, and L. Viola, "A subsystem-independent generalization of entanglement", quant-ph/0305023.
9. H.J. Briegel and R. Raussendorf (2001), Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, pp. 910.
10. W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J.I. Cirac (2000), Phys. Rev. A, 62, pp. 062314.
11. R. Filip (2002), Phys. Rev. A, 65, pp. 062320.
12. N. Khaneja, R. Brockett, and S.J. Glaser (2001), Phys. Rev. A, 63, pp. 032308.
13. G.K. Brennen, C.M. Caves, P.S. Jessen, and I.H. Deutsch (1999), Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, pp. 1060.; D. Jaksch, et al. (1999), Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, pp. 1975.
14. G.K. Brennen, C.M. Caves, P.S. Jessen, and I.H. Deutsch (1999), Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, pp. 1060.; D. Jaksch, et al. (1999), Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, pp. 1975.
15. D. Jaksch, et al. (2000), Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, pp. 2208.;
16. E. Charron, E. Tiesinga, F Mies, and C. Williams (2002), Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, pp. 077901.
17. L. You and M.S. Chapman (2000), Phys. Rev. A, 62, pp. 052302.
18. The particular implementation will determine the proper encoding. For instance, to interact atoms via controlled ground state collisions, the magnetic moments of the atoms may need to be rotated to the new quantization axis & before the c-SWAP sequence.