Violation of local uncertainty relations as a signature of entanglement

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2003, Pages

  Hofmann, Holger F ^a   Takeuchi, Shigeki ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC CLOCKS; CORRELATION METHODS; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; ERROR ANALYSIS; LITHOGRAPHY; SYNCHRONIZATION;

ATOMIC CLOCK SYNCHRONIZATION; ENTANGLED STATES; ENTANGLEMENT GENERATION; QUANTUM LITHOGRAPHY; QUANTUM STATES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0242694950     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 412, 313 (2001).
2. A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240401 (2002).
3. A. Lamas-Linares, J.C. Howell, and D. Bouwmeester, Nature (London) 412, 887 (2001).
4. J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002).
5. E. Hagley, X. Maitre, G. Nogues, C. Wunderlich, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1 (1997).
6. O. Gühne, P. Hyllus, D. Brusß, A. Ekert, M. Lewenstein, C. Macchiavello, and A. Sanpera, Phys. Rev. A 66, 062305 (2002).
7. A.G. White, D.F.V. James, P.H. Eberhard, and P.G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3103 (1999).
8. G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039 (1998).
9. R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
10. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 8 (1996).
11. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J.I. Cirac, and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000).
12. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
13. E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 807 (1935)
14. E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 823 (1935)
15. E. Schrödinger, Naturwissenschaften 23, 844 (1935)
16. E. Schrödinger, in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J.A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), pp. 3-49 and 138-141.
17. S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 797 (2002).
18. H.F. Hofmann, Phys. Rev. A 67, 022106 (2003).
19. K. Tsujino, S. Takeuchi, and K. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042314 (2002).
20. A.N. Boto, P. Kok, D.S. Abrams, S.L. Braunstein, C.P. Williams, and J.P. Dowling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2733 (2000).
21. I.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2006 (2000).
22. R. Jozsa, D.S. Abrams, J.P. Dowling, and C.P. Williams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2010 (2000).
23. M.D. Reid, Phys. Rev. A 40, 913 (1989).
24. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J.I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2722 (2000).
25. Note that this precise correlation is also the essential feature of entanglement in quantum teleportation, as discussed in H.F. Hofmann, Phys. Rev. A 66, 032317 (2002).
26. S. Hill and W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
27. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
28. A different approach to multipartite entaglement based on an extension of our local uncertainty relations has recently been proposed by O. Gühne, e-print quant-ph/0306194. This approach directly identifies global uncertainty limits and may therefore be more compact than the separate investigation of partitions.
29. Recently, we have found that some bound entanglemed states violate a non-symmetric local uncertainty relation [see H.F. Hofmann, Phys. Rev. A 68, 034307 (2003)]. This seems to indicate that distillability may depend on the symmetry betwen the two systems.