Entangling operations and their implementation using a small amount of entanglement

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 544-547

  Cirac, J I ^a   Dur W ^a   Kraus, B ^a   Lewenstein, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE FOURIER TRANSFORMS; ELECTRONIC DENSITY OF STATES; HAMILTONIANS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; VECTORS;

ISOMORPHISM; MULTIPARTICLE STATES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0038721037     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.544     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. P. Zanardi, C. Zalka, and L. Faoro, quant-ph/0005031.
2. W. Dür et al., quant-ph/0006034.
3. Special issue, edited by S. Braunstein and Hoi-Kwang Lo [Fortschr. Phys. 48, Nos. 9-11 (2000)].
4. C. A. Sackett et al., Nature (London) 404, 256-259 (2000); A. Rauschenbeutel et al., Science 288, 2024-2028 (2000).
5. C. A. Sackett et al., Nature (London) 404, 256-259 (2000); A. Rauschenbeutel et al., Science 288, 2024-2028 (2000).
6. A. Jamiolkowski, Rep. Math. Phys. 3, 275-278 (1972).
7. J. I. Cirac et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 4249 (1999).
8. A. Chefles, C. R. Gilson, and S. M. Barnett, quant-ph/ 0003062; quant-ph/0006106.
9. D. Gottesman, quant-ph/9807006.
10. J. Eisert et al., quant-ph/0005101.
11. D. Collins, N. Linden, and S. Popescu, quant-ph/0005102.
12. B. Schumacher and M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. A 54, 2629 (1996).
13. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277 (1989).
14. M. Lewenstein et al., quant-ph/0006064.
15. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996).
16. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 8 (1996).
17. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997).
18. E. M. Rains, quant-ph/9707002.
19. Note that this does not contradict the statement given in Ref. [22], in which it is shown that there are certain trace preserving separable completely positive maps that cannot he implemented locally with probability one.
20. 1,2.
21. 2, respectively, the swap operation can indeed produce nonlocal entangled states.
22. Bound entangled states are nonseparable states that cannot be distilled to maximally entangled states [16].
23. C. H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
24. R. Jozsa, quant-ph/9707033.
25. In practice, only (N - 2) steps have to be performed, as it happens that the required operation in step (N - 1), U(π/2), is a local operation which can be performed with certainty and without classical communication.
26. N.
27. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
28. D. Bouwmeester et al., Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998).
29. W. Dür et al. (to be published).