Separability conditions from the Landau-Pollak uncertainty relation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  De Vicente, Julio I ^a   Sánchez Ruiz, Jorge ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIPARTITE SYSTEMS; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMS; LANDAU-POLLAK FORMULATION; QUBITS;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

EID: 26944487659     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052325     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. A. Einstein, N. Podolski, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 47, 777 (1935).
2. A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661 67, 661 (1991);
3. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 70, 1895 (1993).
4. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 77, 1413 (1996).
5. A. Peres, Found. Phys. FNDPA4 0015-9018 10.1023/A:1018816310000 29, 589 (1999) and references therein.
6. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00724-4 223, 8 (1996);
7. M. Lewenstein, B. Kraus, J. I. Cirac, and P. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.052310 62, 052310 (2000).
8. L.-M. Duan, G. Giedke, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2722 84, 2722 (2000).
9. H. F. Hofmann and S. Takeuchi, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032103 68, 032103 (2003);
10. O. Gühne, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 117903 92, 117903 (2004).
11. H. P. Robertson, Phys. Rev. PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.34.163 34, 163 (1929).
12. V. Giovannetti, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.012102 70, 012102 (2004).
13. O. Gühne and M. Lewenstein, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.022316 70, 022316 (2004).
14. D. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.631 50, 631 (1983).
15. H. Maassen and J. B. M. Uffink, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1103 60, 1103 (1988).
16. J. Sánchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90269-6 173, 233 (1993);
17. J. Snchez-Ruiz, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 27, L843 (1994);
18. J. Snchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(95) 00219-S 201, 125 (1995).
19. J. B. M. Uffink, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Utrecht, 1990.
20. H. J. Landau and H. O. Pollak, Bell Syst. Tech. J. BSTJAN 0005-8580 40, 65 (1961).
21. A. Rényi, Probability Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1970).
22. C. Tsallis, J. Stat. Phys. JSTPBS 0022-4715 10.1007/BF01016429 52, 479 (1988).
23. G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, and G. Pólya, Inequalities (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1952).
24. W. K. Wootters and B. D. Fields, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) APNYA6 0003-4916 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9 191, 363 (1989).
25. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 40, 4277 (1989).
26. A. O. Pittenger and M. H. Rubin, Opt. Commun. OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/S0030-4018(00)00612-X 179, 447 (2000).
27. N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)80001-6 210, 151 (1996).
28. R. Horodecki and M. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1838 54, 1838 (1996);
29. R. A. Bertlmann, H. Narnhofer, and W. Thirring, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.032319 66, 032319 (2002).
30. J. Schwinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 46, 570 (1960);
31. J. Schwinger, reprinted in Quantum Kinematics and Dynamics (Benjamin, New York, 1970).
32. I. D. Ivanović, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/14/ 12/019 14, 3241 (1981).
33. J. Sánchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(93)90638-G 181, 193 (1993).
34. Recently, O. Gühne and M. Lewenstein have pointed out [AIP Conf. Proc. APCPCS 0094-243X 10.1063/1.1834422 734, 230 (2004)] that variance-based separability conditions can be viewed as nonlinear EW's which improve the linear optimal EW's.