Detection of entanglement with few local measurements

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 623051-623055

  Guhne O ^a   Hyllus, P ^a   Bruss D ^a   Ekert, A ^b   Lewenstein, M ^a   Macchiavello, C ^c   Sanpera, A ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c INFM   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; VECTORS;

ENTANGLEMENT;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0036992054     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
2. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
3. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
4. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
5. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
6. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
7. W. Tittel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3563 (1998); G. Weihs et al., ibid. 81, 5039 (1998); E. Hagley et al., ibid. 79, 1 (1997); C.A. Sackett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 404, 256 (2000); A. Furasawa et al., Science 282, 706 (1998); J.C. Howell, A. Lamas-Linares, and D. Bouwmeester, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 030401 (2002); H. Weinfurter (private communication).
8. J.M.G. Sancho and S.F. Huelga, Phys. Rev. A 61, 042303 (2000).
9. P. Horodecki and A. Ekert, e-print quant-ph/0111064.
10. P. Horodecki e-print quant-ph/0111082.
11. A. Ekert and P. Horodecki (private communication).
12. B. Terhal, Linear Algebr. Appl. 323, 61 (2001); see also Ref. [10](b).
13. M. Lewenstein et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000); ibid. 63, 044304 (2001); D. Bruß et al., J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1399 (2002).
14. M. Lewenstein et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000); ibid. 63, 044304 (2001); D. Bruß et al., J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1399 (2002).
15. M. Lewenstein et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 052310 (2000); ibid. 63, 044304 (2001); D. Bruß et al., J. Mod. Opt. 49, 1399 (2002).
16. R. Filip, Phys. Rev. A 65, 062320 (2002).
17. For detection of spin S particles a Stern-Gerlach device can be used, for which a setting corresponds to the choice of the direction of the magnetic field and detection of each of the possible 2S + 1 outputs.
18. (a) A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996)
19. (b) M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996).
20. A.G. White et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3138 (1998).
21. G. Jaeger, M.A. Horne, and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1023 (1993); J. Volz, C. Kurtsiefer, and H. Weinfurter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 869 (2001).
22. G. Jaeger, M.A. Horne, and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. A 48, 1023 (1993); J. Volz, C. Kurtsiefer, and H. Weinfurter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 869 (2001).
23. J. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965); J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969); for a review of recent results see R. F. Werner; and M. M. Wolf; e-print quant-ph/0107093.
24. J. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965); J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969); for a review of recent results see R. F. Werner; and M. M. Wolf; e-print quant-ph/0107093.
25. J. Bell, Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1965); J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969); for a review of recent results see R. F. Werner; and M. M. Wolf; e-print quant-ph/0107093.
26. B. Terhal, Phys. Lett. A 271, 319 (2000).
27. For example, all bound entangled states with positive partial transposes with respect to all possible groupings of the involved observers into two parties do not violate any Bell inequality involving two dychotomic observables for each of the observers. It has been even conjectured that such states admit a local hidden variable model; A. Peres, Found. Phys. 29, 589 (1999); R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/9910063; see also R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0102024; M. Zukowski and C. Brukner, e-print quant-ph/0102039.
28. For example, all bound entangled states with positive partial transposes with respect to all possible groupings of the involved observers into two parties do not violate any Bell inequality involving two dychotomic observables for each of the observers. It has been even conjectured that such states admit a local hidden variable model; A. Peres, Found. Phys. 29, 589 (1999); R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/9910063; see also R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0102024; M. Zukowski and C. Brukner, e-print quant-ph/0102039.
29. For example, all bound entangled states with positive partial transposes with respect to all possible groupings of the involved observers into two parties do not violate any Bell inequality involving two dychotomic observables for each of the observers. It has been even conjectured that such states admit a local hidden variable model; A. Peres, Found. Phys. 29, 589 (1999); R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/9910063; see also R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0102024; M. Zukowski and C. Brukner, e-print quant-ph/0102039.
30. For example, all bound entangled states with positive partial transposes with respect to all possible groupings of the involved observers into two parties do not violate any Bell inequality involving two dychotomic observables for each of the observers. It has been even conjectured that such states admit a local hidden variable model; A. Peres, Found. Phys. 29, 589 (1999); R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/9910063; see also R.F. Werner and M.M. Wolf, e-print quant-ph/0102024; M. Zukowski and C. Brukner, e-print quant-ph/0102039.
31. C. Macchiavello and G.M. Palma, Phys. Rev. A 65, 050301 (2002).
32. A. Sanpera, R. Tarrach, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. A 58, 826 (1998).
33. K. Zyczkowski and H.-J. Sommers, J. Phys. A 34, 7111 (2001).
34. P. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 232, 233 (1997).
35. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5239 (1998).
36. C.H. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5385 (1999).
37. A. Pittenger and H. Rubin, e-print quant-ph/0207024.