Entanglement observables and witnesses for interacting quantum spin systems

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2005, Pages

  Wu, L A ^a   Bandyopadhyay, S ^a,b   Sarandy, M S ^a   Lidar, D A ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OPTIMAL BIPARTITE ENTANGLEMENT OBSERVABLES; QUANTUM SPIN SYSTEMS; SPIN OBSERVABLES;

HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMBER THEORY; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; THERMODYNAMICS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 28844483404     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032309     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000).
2. K. M. O'Connor and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.052302 63, 052302 (2001).
3. M. C. Arnesen, S. Bose, and V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.017901 87, 017901 (2001);
4. D. Gunlycke, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.042302 64, 042302 (2001);
5. X. Wang, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.012313 64, 012313 (2001);
6. A. Saguia and M. S. Sarandy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.012315 67, 012315 (2003).
7. S. Ghosh, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli, and S. N. Coppersmith, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature01888 425, 48 (2003).
8. C. Brukner, V. Vedral, and A. Zeilinger, e-print quant-ph/0410138.
9. B. M. Terhal, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(00)00401- 1 271, 319 (2000);
10. D. Bruß, J. Math. Phys. JMAPAQ 0022-2488 10.1063/1.1494474 43, 4237 (2002).
11. M. Bourennane, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92. 087902 92, 087902 (2004);
12. R. Rahimi, e-print quant-ph/0405175;
13. M. Stobinska and K. Wódkiewicz, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032304 71, 032304 (2005).
14. C. Brukner and V. Vedral, e-print quant-ph/0406040.
15. G. Toth, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.010301 71 010301 (R) (2005).
16. M. R. Dowling, A. C. Doherty, and S. D. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062113 70, 062113 (2004).
17. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 57, 120 (1998).
18. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30156 393, 133 (1998);
19. R. Vrijen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012306 62, 012306 (2000).
20. We note that conceptually related studies established a connection between concurrence and correlation functions: (a) X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00885-X 301, 1 (2002);
21. (b) U. Glaser, H. Buttner, and H. Fehske, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.032318 68, 032318 (2003).
22. K. V. Kavokin, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.075305 64, 075305 (2001);
23. K. V. Kavokin, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.075302 69, 075302 (2004).
24. L.-A. Wu and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.097904 91, 097904 (2003).
25. L.-A. Wu, M. S. Sarandy, and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.250404 93, 250404 (2004).
26. G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314 65, 032314 (2002).
27. A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413 77, 1413 (1996).
28. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2 223, 1 (1996).
29. E. Barouch and B. M. McCoy, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.3.786 3, 786 (1971).
30. P. C. Hohenberg and W. F. Brinkman, Phys. Rev. B PLRBAQ 0556-2805 10.1103/PhysRevB.10.128 10, 128 (1974).