Residue contact-count potentials are as effective as residue-residue contact-type potentials for ranking protein decoys

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Bolser, Dan M ^a   Filippis, Ioannis ^a   Stehr, Henning ^a   Duarte, Jose ^a   Lappe, Michael ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN DATABASE; THERMODYNAMICS;

AMINO ACIDS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 60949087021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-8-53     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Residue contacts in protein structures and implications for protein folding. S Narayana P Argos, Int J Pept Protein Res 1984 24 25 39 6480212
2. An analysis of incorrectly folded protein models. Implications for structure predictions. J Novotn'y R Bruccoleri M Karplus, J Mol Biol 1984 177 787 818 6434748
3. A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. J Bowie R Lüthy D Eisenberg, Science 1991 253 164 170 1853201
4. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. T Blundell B Sibanda M Sternberg J Thornton, Nature 1987 326 347 352 3550471
5. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. A Sali T Blundell, J Mol Biol 1993 234 779 815 8254673
6. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. S Vajda M Sippl J Novotny, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997 7 222 228 9094333
7. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. M Levitt, J Mol Biol 1976 104 59 107 957439
8. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. S Tanaka HA Scheraga, Macromolecules 1976 9 6 945 950 1004017
9. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. KT Simons I Ruczinski C Kooperberg BA Fox C Bystroff D Baker, Proteins 1999 34 82 95 10336385
10. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Ponder F Richards, J Mol Biol 1987 193 775 791 2441069
11. A computer model to dynamically simulate protein folding: studies with crambin. C Wilson S Doniach, Proteins 1989 6 193 209 2622905
12. Folding behaviors of lattice model proteins with three kinds of contact potentials. M Qin J Wang Y Tang W Wang, Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2003 67 061905 16241259
13. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. C Anfinsen, Science 1973 181 223 230 4124164
14. A multibody, whole-residue potential for protein structures, with testing by Monte Carlo simulated annealing. S Mayewski, Proteins 2005 59 2 152 169 15723360
15. Conformational analysis of the 20 naturally occurring amino acid residues using ECEPP. S Zimmerman M Pottle G Némethy H Scheraga, Macromolecules 1977 10 1 9 839855
16. Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to proline-containing peptides. G Nemethy KD Gibson KA Palmer CN Yoon G Paterlini A Zagari S Rumsey HA Scheraga, Journal of Physical Chemistry 1992 96 15 6472 6484
17. Conformational analysis. 130. MM2. A hydrocarbon force field utilizing V1 and V2 torsional terms. NL Allinger, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1977 99 25 8127 8134
18. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1. NL Allinger YH Yuh JH Lii, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1989 111 23 8551 8566
19. A new force-field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic-acids and proteins. S Weiner P Kollman D Case U Singh C Ghio G Alagona S Profeta P Weiner, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1984 106 765 784
20. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules. WD Cornell P Cieplak CI Bayly IR Gould KM Merz DM Ferguson DC Spellmeyer T Fox JW Caldwell PA Kollman, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1995 117 19 5179 5197
21. A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. B Brooks R Bruccoleri B Olafson D States S Swaminathan K M, J Comput Chem 1983 4 187 217
22. All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins. A MacKerell D Bashford M Bellott R Dunbrack J Evanseck M Field S Fischer J Gao H Guo S Ha D Joseph-McCarthy L Kuchnir K Kuczera F Lau C Mattos S Michnick T Ngo D Nguyen B Prodhom W Reiher B Roux M Schlenkrich J Smith R Stote J Straub M Watanabe J Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera D Yin M Karplus, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1998 102 18 3586 3616
23. Empirical force field study of geometries and conformational transitions of some organic molecules. JC Smith M Karplus, Journal of the American Chemical Society 1992 114 3 801 812
24. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. E Lindahl B Hess D van der Spoel, Journal of Molecular Modeling 2001 7 8 306 317
25. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. S Miyazawa RL Jernigan, Macromolecules 1985 18 3 534 552
26. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. MJ Sippl, J Mol Biol 1990 213 4 859 883 2359125
27. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids? Analysis of energy parameter sets. A Godzik A Kolinski J Skolnick, Protein Sci 1995 4 10 2107 2117 8535247
28. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? P Thomas K Dill, J Mol Biol 1996 257 457 469 8609636
29. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. J Richardson, Adv Protein Chem 1981 34 167 339 7020376
30. A novel super-secondary structure of proteins and the relation between the structure and the amino acid sequence. A Efimov, FEBS Lett 1984 166 33 38 6692923
31. Why do globular proteins fit the limited set of folding patterns? A Finkelstein O Ptitsyn, Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1987 50 171 190 3332386
32. The classification and origins of protein folding patterns. C Chothia A Finkelstein, Annu Rev Biochem 1990 59 1007 1039 2197975
33. Four helix bundle diversity in globular proteins. N Harris S Presnell F Cohen, J Mol Biol 1994 236 1356 1368 8126725
34. Principles of helix-helix packing in proteins: the helical lattice superposition model. D Walther F Eisenhaber P Argos, J Mol Biol 1996 255 536 553 8568896
35. T Hill, Statistical mechanics: principles and selected applications McGraw-Hill series in advanced chemistry, New York: McGraw-Hill 1956
36. Extracting knowledge-based energy functions from protein structures by error rate minimization: Comparison of methods using lattice model. Y Xia M Levitt, J Chem Phys 2000 113 20 9318 9330
37. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. M Hendlich P Lackner S Weitckus H Floeckner R Froschauer K Gottsbacher G Casari MJ Sippl, J Mol Biol 1990 216 167 180 2121999
38. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. S Miyazawa RL Jernigan, J Mol Biol 1996 256 3 623 644 8604144
39. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. MR Betancourt D Thirumalai, Protein Sci 1999 8 2 361 369 [Comparative Study] 10048329
40. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. KT Simons C Kooperberg E Huang D Baker, J Mol Biol 1997 268 209 225 9149153
41. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. R Samudrala J Moult, J Mol Biol 1998 275 5 895 916 9480776
42. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. VN Maiorov GM Crippen, J Mol Biol 1992 227 3 876 888 1404392
43. Optimal protein-folding codes from spin-glass theory. RA Goldstein ZA Luthey-Schulten PG Wolynes, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89 11 4918 4922 1594594
44. Optimizing Potential Functions for Protein Folding. MH Hao H Scheraga, J Phys Chem 1996 100 34 14540 14548
45. How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. LA Mirny EI Shakhnovich, J Mol Biol 1996 264 5 1164 1179 [Comparative Study] 9000638
46. Optimizing energy potentials for success in protein tertiary structure prediction. TL Chiu RA Goldstein, Fold des 1998 3 3 223 228 9669880
47. Comparison of database potentials and molecular mechanics force fields. J Moult, Curr Opin Struct Biol 1997 7 2 194 199 9094335
48. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. H Zhou Y Zhou, Protein Sci 2002 11 2714 2726 12381853
49. A new approach to protein fold recognition. D Jones W Taylor J Thornton, Nature 1992 358 86 89 1614539
50. Boltzmann's principle, knowledge-based mean fields and protein folding. An approach to the computational determination of protein structures. M Sippl, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993 7 473 501 8229096
51. Model of protein folding: inclusion of short-, medium-, and long-range interactions. S Tanaka H Scheraga, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975 72 3802 3806 1060065
52. Uncovering network systems within protein structures. L Greene V Higman, J Mol Biol 2003 334 781 791 14636602
53. Protein decoy sets for evaluating energy functions. D Gilis, J Biomol Struct Dyn 2004 21 725 736 15106995
54. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. R Samudrala M Levitt, Protein Sci 2000 9 1399 1401 10933507
55. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. D Eisenberg A McLachlan, Nature 1986 319 199 203 3945310
56. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. J Novotný A Rashin R Bruccoleri, Proteins 1988 4 19 30 3186690
57. Polarity as a criterion in protein design. G Baumann C Frömmel C Sander, Protein Eng 1989 2 329 334 2928295
58. Protein model structure evaluation using the solvation free energy of folding. L Chiche L Gregoret F Cohen P Kollman, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990 87 3240 3243 2326281
59. Structure-derived hydrophobic potential. Hydrophobic potential derived from X-ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native folds. G Casari M Sippl, J Mol Biol 1992 224 725 732 1569551
60. Sequence-structure matching in globular proteins: application to supersecondary and tertiary structure determination. A Godzik J Skolnick, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89 12098 12102 1465445
61. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. R Lüthy J Bowie D Eisenberg, Nature 1992 356 83 85 1538787
62. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from three-dimensional structures. C Ouzounis C Sander M Scharf R Schneider, J Mol Biol 1993 232 805 825 8355272
63. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. E Huang S Subbiah M Levitt, J Mol Biol 1995 252 709 720 7563083
64. Statistical potentials for fold assessment. F Melo R Sánchez A Sali, Protein Sci 2002 11 430 448 11790853
65. Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. H Zhou Y Zhou, Proteins 2004 55 1005 1013 15146497
66. Assessing protein structures with a non-local atomic interaction energy. F Melo E Feytmans, J Mol Biol 1998 277 1141 1152 9571028
67. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. D Jones, J Mol Biol 1999 287 797 815 10191147
68. Evaluation of local structure alphabets based on residue burial. R Karchin M Cline K Karplus, Proteins 2004 55 3 508 518 15103615
69. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. P Benkert S Tosatto D Schomburg, Proteins 2008 71 1 261 277 17932912
70. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. M Vendruscolo E Domany, J Chem Phys 1998 109 24 11101 11108
71. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. P Munson R Singh, Protein Sci 1997 6 1467 1481 9232648
72. Simplicial neighborhood analysis of protein packing (SNAPP): a computational geometry approach to studying proteins. A Tropsha C Carter S Cammer I Vaisman, Meth Enzymol 2003 374 509 544 14696387
73. Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. H Gan A Tropsha T Schlick, Proteins 2001 43 161 174 11276086
74. Four-body contact potentials derived from two protein datasets to discriminate native structures from decoys. Y Feng A Kloczkowski R Jernigan, Proteins 2007 68 57 66 17393455
75. Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials. P Pokarowski A Kloczkowski R Jernigan N Kothari M Pokarowska A Kolinski, Proteins 2005 59 49 57 15688450
76. The effect of experimental resolution on the performance of knowledge-based discriminatory functions for protein structure selection. T Liu R Samudrala, Protein Eng Des Sel 2006 19 431 437 16845128
77. Predicting residue-wise contact orders in proteins by support vector regression. J Song K Burrage, BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7 425 17014735
78. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction. T Ishida S Nakamura K Shimizu, Proteins 2006 64 940 947 16788993
79. Improved alignment of weakly homologous protein sequences using structural information. J Gracy L Chiche J Sallantin, Protein Eng 1993 6 821 829 8309929
80. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. FC Bernstein TF Koetzle GJ Williams EFJ Meyer MD Brice JR Rodgers O Kennard T Shimanouchi M Tasumi, J Mol Biol 1977 112 3 535 542 875032
81. The Protein Data Bank. HM Berman J Westbrook Z Feng G Gilliland TN Bhat H Weissig IN Shindyalov PE Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res 2000 28 235 242 10592235
82. Basic local alignment search tool. SF Altschul W Gish W Miller EW Myers DJ Lipman, J Mol Biol 1990 215 3 403 410 2231712