Inferring ideal amino acid interaction forms from statistical protein contact potentials

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 49-57

  Pokarowski, Piotr ^a   Kloczkowski, Andrzej ^b   Jernigan, Robert L ^b   Kothari, Neha S ^b   Pokarowska, Maria ^c   Kolinski, Andrzej ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Knowledge based potentials; Protein folding; Protein structure prediction; Residue based contact potentials; Statistical potentials; Threading

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; MATRIX PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION;

AMINO ACIDS; BINDING SITES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 14644410346     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20380     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force - an approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-883.
2. Hinds DA, Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol 1994;243:668-682.
3. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein-sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
4. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino acids?: analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4:2107-2117.
5. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258:367-392.
6. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
7. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: 2. Parameterization of short-range interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by Z-score optimization. J Computational Chem 1997;18:874-887.
8. Skolnick J, Jaroszewski L, Kolinski A, Godzik A. Derivation and testing of pair potentials for protein folding: When is the quasichemical approximation correct? Protein Sci 1997;6:676-688.
9. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
10. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
11. Skolnick J, Kolinski A, Ortiz A. Derivation of protein-specific pair potentials based on weak sequence fragment similarity. Proteins 2000;38:3-16.
12. Zhang C, Kim S-H. Environment-dependent residue contact energies for proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:2550-2555.
13. Boniecki M, Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J, Kolinski A. Protein fragment reconstruction using various modeling techniques. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2003;17:725-738.
14. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-950.
15. Robson B, Osguthorpe DJ. Refined models for computer-simulation of protein folding - applications to the study of conserved secondary structure and flexible hinge points during the folding of pancreatic trypsin-inhibitor. J Mol Biol 1979;132:19-51.
16. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-369.
17. Liwo A, Oldziej S, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: 1. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J Comput Chem 1997;18:849-873.
18. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures - quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-552.
19. Park BH, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-846.
20. Keskin O, Bahar I, Badretdinov OB, Ptitsyn OB, Jernigan RL. Empirical solvent-mediated potentials hold for both intramolecular and inter-molecular inter-residue interactions. Protein Sci 1998;7:2578-2586.
21. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 1996;256:623-644.
22. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Self-consistent estimation of interresidue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins 1999;34:49-68.
23. Kolinski A. Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation. Acta Biochim Pol 2004;51:349-371.
24. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1992;227:876-888.
25. Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI. How to derive a protein folding potential?: a new approach to an old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264:1164-1179.
26. Thomas PD, Dill KA. An iterative method for extracting energy-like quantities from protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:11628-11633.
27. Tobi D, Shafran G, Linial N, Elber R. On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials. Proteins 2000;40:71-85.
28. Vendruscolo M, Domany E. Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J Chem Phys 1998;109:11101-11108.
29. Vendruscolo M, Mirny LA, Shakhnovich EI, Domany E. Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: Perceptron and Z score. Proteins 2000;41:192-201.
30. Micheletti C, Seno F, Banavar JR, Maritan A. Learning effective amino acid interactions through iterative stochastic techniques. Proteins 2001;42:422-431.
31. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-235.
32. Hao MH, Scheraga HA. Designing potential energy functions for protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:184-188.
33. Buchete NV, Straub JE, Thirumalai D. Orientational potentials extracted from protein structures improve native fold recognition. Protein Sci 2004;13:862-874.
34. Bradley P, Chivian D, Meiler J, Misura KM, Rohl C, Schief W, Wedemeyer WJ, Schueler-Furman O, Murphy P, Schonbrun J, Strauss C, Baker D. Rosetta predictions in CASP5: Successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation. Proteins 2003;53:457-468.
35. Fang QJ, Shortle D. Prediction of protein structure by emphasizing local side-chain/backbone interactions in ensembles of turn fragments. Proteins 2003;53:486-490.
36. Jones DT, McGuffin LJ. Assembling novel protein folds from super-secondary structural fragments. Proteins 2003;53:480-485.
37. Panchenko AR, Marchler-Bauer A, Bryant SH. Combination of threading potentials and sequence profiles improves fold recognition. J Mol Biol 2000;296:1319-1331.
38. Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, Lee J, Ripoll DR, Kamierkiewicz R, Odziej S, Wedemeyer WJ, Gibson KD, Arnautova YA, Saunders J, Ye YJ, Scheraga HA. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:2329-2333.
39. Shao Y, Bystroff C. Predicting interresidue contacts using templates and pathways. Proteins 2003;53:497-502.
40. Skolnick J, Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Kolinski A, Boniecki A, Szilagyi A, Kihara D. TOUCHSTONE: a unified approach to protein structure prediction. Proteins 2003;53:469-479.
41. Xia Y, Huang ES, Levitt M, Samudrala R. Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach. J Mol Biol 2000;300:171-185.
42. Munson PJ, Singh RK. Statistical significance of hierarchical multi-body potentials based on Delaunay tessellation and their application in sequence-structure alignment. Protein Sci 1997;6:1467-1481.
43. Georgescu RE, Alexov EG, Gunner MR. Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. Biophys J 2002;83:1731-1748.
44. Mehler EL, Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Garcia-Moreno EB. The role of hydrophobic microenvironments in modulating pKa shifts in proteins. Proteins 2002;48:283-292.
45. Sandberg L, Edholm O. A fast and simple method to calculate protonation states in proteins. Proteins 1999;36:474-483.
46. Tollinger M, Crowhurst KA, Kay LE, Forman-Kay JD. Site-specific contributions to the pH dependence of protein stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:4545-4550.
47. Laurents DV, Huyghes-Despointes BMP, Bruix M, Thurlkill RL, Schell D, Newsom S, Grimsley GR, Shaw KL, Trevi S, Rico M, Briggs JM, Antosiewicz JM, Scholtz JM, Pace CN. Charge-charge interactions are key determinants of the pK values of ionizable groups in ribonuclease Sa (pI = 3.5) and a basic variant (pI = 10.2). J Mol Biol 2003;325:1077-1092.
48. Pokarowski P, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. A minimal physically realistic protein-like lattice model: designing an energy landscape that ensures all-or-none folding to a unique native state. Biophys J 2003;84:1518-1526.
49. Pokarowski P, Droste K, Kolinski A. A minimal protein-like lattice model: an alpha-helix motif. 2004. Submitted for publication.
50. Rao CR. Linear statistical inference and its applications. New York: Wiley; 1973.
51. Li H, Tang C, Wingreen NS. Nature of driving force for protein folding: a result from analyzing the statistical potential. Phys Rev Lett 1997;79:765-768.
52. Contreras-Moreira B, Fitzjohn PW, Offman M, Smith GR, Bates PA. Novel use of a genetic algorithm for protein structure prediction: searching template and sequence alignment space. Proteins 2003;53:424-429.
53. Bastolla U, Farwer J, Knapp EW, Vendruscolo M. How to guarantee optimal stability for most representative structures in the Protein Data Bank. Proteins 2001;44:79-96.
54. Du R, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T. Models of protein interactions: how to choose one. Fold Des 1998;3:203-211.
55. Gan HH, Tropsha A, Schlick T. Lattice protein folding with two and four-body statistical potentials. Proteins 2001;43:161-174.