Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake

Chemical Senses

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 211-220

  Dess, Nancy K ^a   Chapman, Clinton D ^a   Monroe, Derek ^a  

^a OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Maltodextrin; Rats; SC45647; Selective breeding; Splenda; Sucralose

Indexed keywords

MALTODEXTRIN; SACCHARIN; SUCRALOSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID INTAKE; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SWEETNESS; TASTE AVERSION; TASTE PREFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; FOOD PREFERENCES; GUANIDINES; RATS; SACCHARIN; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE;

MAMMALIA; RATTUS;

EID: 60849124540     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn078     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. 1994. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusions of dilute Polycose solutions. Physiol Behav. 55(5):957-962.
2. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. 2001. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses. 26:905-913.
3. Badia Elder N, Kiefer SW, Dess NK. 1995. Taste reactivity in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin consumption. Physiol Behav. 59: 749-755.
4. Berridge KC. 2004. Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiol Behav. 81(2):179-209.
5. Bello NT, Hajnal A. 2005. Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose. Nutr Res. 25:693-699.
6. Binns NM. 2003. Sucralose - all sweetness and light. Nutr Bull. 28:53-58.
7. Browning L. 2007. Artificial sweetener makers reach settlement on slogan [Internet]. [cited 2008 May 21]. Available from: URL http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/12/business/media/12splenda.html.
8. Carroll ME, Morgan AD, Anker JJ, Perry JL, Dess NK. 2008. Selective breeding for differential saccharin intake as an animal model of drug abuse. Behav Pharmacol. 19:435-460.
9. Danilova V, Hellekant G. 2004. Sense of taste in a New World monkey, the common marmoset. II. Link between behavior and nerve activity. J Neurophysiol. 92:1067-1076.
10. Danilova V, Hellekant G, Tinti JM, Nofre C. 1998. Gustatory responses of the hamster Mesocricetus auratus to various compounds considered sweet by humans. J Neurophysiol. 80:2102-2112.
11. Davis JD, Breslin PAS. 2000. A behavioral analysis of the ingestion of glucose, maltose and maltooligosaccharide by rats. Physiol Behav. 69(4-5): 477-485.
12. De Francisco J, Dess NK. 1998. Aspartame consumption in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake. Physiol Behav. 65:393-396.
13. Delamater AR, Campese V, LoLordo VM, Sclafani A. 2006. Unconditioned stimulus devaluation effects in nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 32(3):295-306.
14. Dess NK. 1993. Saccharin's aversive taste: Evidence and implications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 17:359-372.
15. Dess NK. 2000. Responses to basic taste qualities in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake. Physiol Behav. 69:247-257.
16. Dess NK, Badia-Elder NE, Thiele TE, Kiefer SW, Blizard DA. 1998. Ethanol consumption in rats selectively bred for differential saccharin intake. Alcohol. 16:275-278.
17. Dess NK, Minor TR. 1996. Taste and emotionality in rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin intake. Anim Learn Behav. 24:105-115.
18. Dess NK, Richard JM, Fletcher-Severe S, Chapman CD. 2008. Temporal organization of eating in low- and high-saccharin-consuming rats. Int J Comp Psychol. 20:317-340.
19. Feigin MB, Sclafani A, Sunday SR. 1987. Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 11: 231-240.
20. Frank GKW, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH. 2008. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Neuroimage. 39:1559-1569.
21. Glaser D. 2002. Specialization and phyletic trends of sweetness perception in animals. Pure Appl Chem. 74(7):1153-1158.
22. Glaser D, Tinti JM, Nofre C. 1995. Evolution of the sweetness receptor in primates: I. Why does alitame taste sweet in all prosimians and simians and aspartame only in Old World simians? Chem Senses. 20:573-584.
23. Gordesky-Gold B, Rivers N, Ahmed OM, Breslin PA. 2008. Drosophila melanogaster prefers compounds perceived sweet by humans. Chem Senses. 33(3):301-309.
24. Gosnell BA, Krahn DD, Yracheta JM, Harasha BJ. 1998. The relationship between intravenous cocaine self-administration and avidity for saccharin. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 60(1):229-236.
25. Hanger LY, Lotz A, Lepeniotis S. 1996. Descriptive profiles of selected high intensity sweeteners (HIS), HIS blends, and sucrose. J Food Sci. 61(2): 456-458.
26. Hayes JE. 2008. Transdisciplinary perspectives on sweetness. Chem Percept. 1:48-57.
27. Hellekant G, Danilova V. 1996. Species differences toward sweeteners. Food Chem. 56(3):323-328.
28. Hettinger TP, Frank ME, Myers WE. 1996. Are the tastes of Polycose and monosodium glutamate unique? Chem Senses. 21:341-347.
29. Heyer BR, Taylor-Burds CC, Mitzelfelt JD, Delay ER. 2004. Monosodium glutamate and sweet taste: Discrimination between the tastes of sweet stimuli and glutamate in rats. Chem Senses. 29:721-729.
30. Heyer BR, Taylor-Burds CC, Tran LH, Delay ER. 2003. Monosodium glutamate and sweet taste: Generalization of conditioned taste aversion between glutamate and sweet stimuli in rats. Chem Senses. 28:631-641.
31. Inoue M, Glendinning JI, Theodorides ML, Harkness S, Li X, Bosak N, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA. 2007. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice. Physiol Genomics. 32: 82-94.
32. Kamerud JK, Delwiche JF. 2007. Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners. Chem Senses. 32(9):803-810.
33. Kennedy JF, Noy RJ, Stead JA, White CA. 1985. Oligosaccharide component composition and storage properties of commercial low DE maltodextrins and their further modi.cation by enzymatic treatment. Starch. 37(10): 343-351.
34. Laska M, Kohlmann S, Scheuber HP, Hernandez Salazar LT, Rodriguez Luna E. 2001. Gustatory responsiveness to polycose in four species of nonhuman primates. J Chem Ecol. 27:1997-2011.
35. Lu K, McDaniel AH, Tordoff MG, Li X, Beauchamp GK, Bachmanov AA, VanderWeele DA, Chapman CD, Dess NK, Huang L, et al. 2005. No relationship between sequence variation in protein coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene and saccharin preference in rats. Chem Senses. 30:1-10.
36. McNeil Nutritionals LLC. How is SPLENDA® brand sweetener made? [Internet]. [cited 2008 July 5]. Available from: URL http://splenda.com/ page.jhtml?id=splenda/faqs/nocalorie.inc#q1. data unknown.
37. Mennella JA, Yanina Pepino M, Reed DR. 2005. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics. 115: E216-e222.
38. Mathlouthi M, Hutteau F. 1999. Sweet-bitter interactions and the solution properties of chlorinated sugars. Food Chem. 1(1):77-82.
39. McCaughey SA. 2007. Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. J Neurosci. 27(1):35-45.
40. Nissenbaum JW, Sclafani A. 1987. Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: A two-carbohydrate taste model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 11:187-196.
41. Quezada-Calvillo R, Robayo-Torres CC, Ao Z, Hamaker BR, Quaroni A, Brayer GD, Sterchi EE, Baker SS, Nichols BL. 2007. Luminal substrate "brake" on mucosal maltase-glucoamylase activity regulates total rate of starch digestion to glucose. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 45:32-43.
42. Ramirez I. 1991. Does starch taste like Polycose®? Physiol Behav. 50(2): 389-392.
43. Ramirez I. 1994. Glucose polymer taste is not unitary for rats. Physiol Behav. 55:355-360.
44. Ramirez I. 1995. Stimulation of fluid intake by maltodextrins and starch. Physiol Behav. 57(4):687-692.
45. Reed DR, Li S, Li X, Huang L, Tordoff MG, Starling-Roney R, Taniguchi K, West DB, Ohmen JD, Beauchamp GK, et al. 2004. Polymorphisms in the taste receptor gene (Tas1r3) region are associated with saccharin preference in 30 mouse strains. J Neurosci. 24:938-946.
46. Roller S. 1996. Starch-derived fat mimetics: Maltodextrins. In: Roller S, Jones SA, editors. Handbook of fat replacers. London: CRC Press. p. 99-118.
47. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Losee ML, Pecore SD, Warwick ZS. 1995. Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration. Brain Res Bull. 36: 505-513.
48. Schilling A, Danilova V, Hellekant G. 2004. Behavioral study in the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) using compounds considered sweet by humans. Am J Primatol. 62:43-48.
49. Sclafani A. 2006. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking. Physiol Behav. 87(4):734-744.
50. Sclafani A, Abrams M. 1986. Rats show only a weak preference for the artificial sweetener aspartame. Physiol Behav. 37:253-256.
51. Sclafani A, Clare RA. 2004. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose. Chem Senses. 29:523-528.
52. Sclafani A, Einberg LT, Nissenbaum JW. 1987. Influence of saccharin on Polycose, sucrose, and glucose intake and preference in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 11(2):223-229.
53. Sclafani A, Hertwig H, Vigorito M, Sloan H, Kerzner B. 1987. Influence of saccharide length on polysaccharide appetite in the rat. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 11(2):197-200.
54. Sclafani A, Nissenbaum JW. 1987. Taste preference thresholds for Polycose, maltose, and sucrose in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 11(2):181-185.
55. Sclafani A, Thompson B, Smith JC. 1998. The rat's acceptance and preference for sucrose, maltodextrin, and saccharin solutions and mixtures. Physiol Behav. 63(4):499-503.
56. Shamil S, Birch GG, Mathlouthi M, Clifford MN. 1987. Apparent specific volumes and tastes of cyclamates, other sulfamates, saccharins and acesulfame sweeteners. Chem Senses. 12:397-409.
57. Smith JC, Foster DF. 1980. Some determinants of intake of glucose + saccharin solutions. Physiol Behav. 25:127-133.
58. Thiele TE, Badia Elder NE, Kiefer SW, Dess NK. 1997. Continuous intraoral saccharin infusions reveal line differences between rats selectively bred for high versus low saccharin consumption. Physiol Behav. 61:149-152.
59. Wiet SG, Beyts PK. 1992. Sensory characteristics of sucralose and other high intensity sweeteners. J Food Sci. 57(4):1014-1019.
60. Yeomans MR, Leitch M, Gould N, Mobini S. 2008. Differential hedonic, sensory and behavioral changes associated with flavor-nutrient and flavor-flavor learning. Physiol Behav. 93:798-806.
61. Zhao L, Tepper BJ. 2007. Perception and acceptance of selected high-intensity sweeteners and blends in model soft drinks by propylthiouracil (PROP) non-tasters and super-tasters. Food Qual Pref. 18:531-540.