Knowledge transfer in online learning environments

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 93-105

  Hansen, David E ^a  

^a TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experiential learning; Knowledge transfer; Online education; Traditional course delivery; Virtual community

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749133841     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: 15526550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475308317702     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anstine, J., & Skidmore, M. (2005). A small sample study of traditional and online courses with sample selection adjustment. Journal of Economic Education, 36(2), 107-127.
2. Benbunan-Fich, R., Lozada, H.R., Pirog, S., Priluck, R., & Wiesenblit, J. (2001). Integrating information technology into the marketing curriculum: A pragmatic paradigm. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(4), 5-15.
3. Bocchi, J., Eastman, J.K., & Swift, C.O. (2004). Retaining the online learner: Profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. Journal of Education for Business, 79(4), 245-253.
4. Brookfield, S.D. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Clarke, I., III, Flaherty, T.B., & Mottner, S. (2001). Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 169-177.
6. Cooper, L.W. (2001). A comparison of online and traditional computer applications classes. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 28(8), 52-58.
7. Corston, R., & Coleman, A.M. (1996). Gender and social facilitation effects on computer competence and attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 171-183.
8. Cosse, T.J., Ashworth, D.N., & Weisenberger, T.M. (1999). The effects of team size in a marketing simulation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 98-107.
9. Daly, S.P. (2001). Student-operated Internet businesses, true experiential learning in entrepreneurship and retail management. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 204-215.
10. Drago, W., & Peltier, J.W. (2004). The effects of class size on effectiveness of online courses. Management Research News, 27(10), 27-36.
11. Drago, W., Peltier, J.W., Hay, A., & Hodgkinson, M. (2005). Dispelling the myths of online education: Learning via the information superhighway. Management Research News, 28(7), 1-17.
12. Drago, W., Peltier, J.W., & Sorensen, D. (2002). Course content or the instructor: Which is more important in on-line teaching? Management Research News, 25(6/7), 69-78.
13. Eastman, J.K., & Swift, C.O. (2001). New horizons in distance education: The online learner-centered marketing class. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 25-34.
14. E-learning explodes. (2006, October 16). U. S. News & World Report.
15. Gefen, D., & Straub, D.W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of email: An extension of the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400.
16. Granitz, N., & Greene, C.S. (2003). Applying e-marketing strategies to online distance learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(4), 16-30.
17. Gregan-Paxton, J., & John, D.R. (1997). Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 266-284.
18. Hacker, R., & Sova, B. (1998). Initial teacher education: A study of the efficacy of computer mediated courseware delivery in a partnership context. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 3312-3341.
19. Iverson, K.M., Colky, D.L., & Cyboran, V. (2005). E-learning takes the lead: An empirical investigation of learner differences in online and classroom delivery. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(4), 5-18.
20. Jenkins, S.J., & Downs, E. (2003). Demographic, attitude, and personality differences reported by students enrolled in online versus traditional courses. Psychological Reports, 93(1), 213-221.
21. Johnson, S.D., Aragon, S.R., Shaik, N., & Palma, R.H. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face to face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), 29-49.
22. Karns, G.L. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities, structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2), 163-171.
23. Kartha, C.P. (2006). Learning business statistics: Online vs. traditional. The Business Review: Cambridge, 5(1), 27-38.
24. Katz, Y.J., & Yablon, Y.B. (2003). Online university learning: Cognitive and affective perspectives. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20(2), 48-54.
25. Kolb, A.Y., & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193-212.
26. Kolb, D.A., & Fry, R. (1975). Toward an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of Group Process. London: John Wiley.
27. Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Marks, R.B., Sibley, S.D., & Arbaugh, J.B. (2005). A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29(4), 531-547.
29. McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction, online versus traditional course delivery. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 25-32.
30. Peltier, J.W., Drago, W., & Schibrowsky, J.A. (2003). Virtual communities and the assessment of online marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(4), 260-276.
31. Peltier, J.W., Schibrowsky, J.A., & Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A causal model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 140-153.
32. Pride, W.M., & Ferrell, O.C. (2005). Marketing (13th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Priluck, R. (2004). Web-assisted courses for business education: An examination of two sections of principles of marketing. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(2), 161-173.
34. Ramocki, S.P. (2007). Metacognition and transfer: Keys to improving marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 29(1), 18-24.
35. Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
36. Salter, G. (2003). Comparing online and traditional teaching- Adifferent approach. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 20(4), 137-145
37. Shohreh, A.K., & Keesling, G. (2000). Development of a Web-based Internet marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(2), 84-89.
38. Smith, L.J. (2001). Content and delivery: A comparison and contrast of electronic and traditional MBA marketing planning courses. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(4), 35-44.
39. Soong, M.H.V., Chan, H.C., Chua, B.C., & Loh, K.F. (2001). Critical success factors for online course resources. Computers and Education, 36(2), 101-120.
40. Sweeney, J.C., & Ingram, D. (2001). A comparison of traditional and Web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(4), 55-62.
41. Weber, J.M., & Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-course comparison of traditional versus Web-based course delivery systems. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-19.
42. Zemelman, S., Daniels, H., & Hyde, A. (1998). Best practice: New standards for teaching and learning in America's schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.