Web-Assisted Courses for Business Education: An Examination of Two Sections of Principles of Marketing

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 161-173

  Priluck, Randi ^a  

^a PACE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

distance education; hybrid courses and marketing; online learning; Web assisted

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990348110     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475304265635     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alavi, Maryam, Youngjin Yoo, and Douglas R. Vogel. 1997. Using information technology to add value to management education. Academy of Management Journal 40 (6): 1310-1333.
2. Allen, I. Elaine, and Jeffrey Seaman. 2003. Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Needham, MA: Sloan-C. http://www.sloan-c.org (accessed March 15, 2004).
3. Ambady, Nalini, and Robert Rosenthal. 1993. Half a minute predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64:431-441.
4. Angelo, Thomas A., and K. Patricia Cross. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Aragon, Steven R., Scott D. Johnson, and Najmuddin Shaik. 2000. The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online vs. face- to face environments. ERIC ED448745.
6. Aron, Laurie Joan. 1999. Online U. Across the board 36 (8): 63-66.
7. Beattie, John, Fred Spooner, and LuAnn Jordan. 2002. Evaluating instruction in distance learning classes. Teacher Education and Special Education 25 (2): 124-132.
8. Benbunan-Fich, Raquel, Hector Lozada, Stephen Pirog, Randi Priluck, and Joseph Wisenblit. 2001. Integrating information technology into the marketing curriculum: A pragmatic paradigm. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 5-15.
9. Clark, Richard. 1994. Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 42 (2): 21-29.
10. Clarke, Irvine, Theresa B. Flaherty, and Sandra Mottner. 2001. Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (3): 169-177.
11. Clayson, Dennis E., and Debra A. Haley. 1990. Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education 12 (Fall): 9-17.
12. Conhaim, Wallys W. 2003. Education ain’t what it used to be. Information Today 20 (11): 37-38.
13. Eastman, Jacqueline K., and Cathy Owens Swift. 2001. New horizons in distance education: The online learner-centered marketing class. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 25-34.
14. Etzel, Michael J., Bruce J. Walker, and William J. Stanton. 2004. Marketing, 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
15. Glenn, Amy. 2001. A comparison of distance learning and traditional learning environments. ERIC ED457778.
16. Helford, Paul Q., and Richard M. Lei. 1999. Using the web to deliver and enhance classes: Two case studies. ERIC ED453794.
17. Huang, Hsiu-Mei. 2000. Instructional technologies facilitating online courses, educational technology. EducationalTechnology 40 (4): 41-46.
18. Johnson, Scott D., Steven R. Aragon, Najmuddin Shaik, and Nilda Palma-Rivas. 1999. Comparative analysis of online vs. face-to-face instruction. Department of Human Resource Education. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
19. Jones, Edward R. 1999. A comparison of an all Web-based class to a traditional class. ERIC ED432286.
20. Karakaya, Fahri, Thomas L. Ainscough, and John Chopoorian. 2001. The effects of class size and learning style on student performance in a multimedia-based marketing Course. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (2): 84-90.
21. Leasure, A. Rene, Lisa Davis, and Susan L. Thievon. 2000. Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. world wide web based baccalaureate nursing research course. Journal of Nursing Education 39 (4): 149-154.
22. Light, Richard J. 2001. Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Boston: Harvard University Press.
23. McGinn, Daniel. 2000. College online. Newsweek 135 (April 24): 54-59.
24. Murray, Harry G., J. Philippe Rushton, and Sampo V. Paunonen. 1990. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (2): 250-261.
25. Oblender, Thomas E. 2002. A hybrid course model: One solution to the high online drop-out rate. Learning and Leading with Technology 29 (6): 42-46.
26. Ortinau, David J., and Robert P. Bush. 1987. The propensity of college students to modify course expectations and its impact on course performance information. Journal of Marketing Education 9 (Spring): 42-52.
27. Palloff, Rene, and Keith Pratt. 2001. Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Phipps, Ronald, and Jamie Merisotis. 1999. What’s the difference. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.
29. Ponzurick, Thomas G., Karen Russo France, and Cyril M. Logar. 2000. Delivering graduate marketing education: Ananalysis of face-to-face versus distance education. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (3): 180-187.
30. Russell, Thomas L. 1999. The no significant difference phenomenon. Chapel Hill: Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University.
31. Schutte, Jerald G. 1996. Virtual teaching in higher education. http://www.csun.edu/sociology/virexp.htm (accessed March 15, 2004).
32. Smeaton, Alan F., and Gary Keogh. 1999. An analysis of the use of virtual delivery of undergraduate lectures. Computers and Education 32:83-94.
33. Spooner, Fred, Luann Jordan, and Robert Algozzine. 1999. Student ratings of instruction in distance learning and on-campus classes. Journal of Education Research 92 (3): 132-140.
34. Sweeney, Jillian C., and Deborah Ingram. 2001. A comparison of traditional and web-based tutorials in marketing education: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 55-62.
35. Truell, Allen D. 2001. Student attitudes toward and evaluations of Internetassisted instruction. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 43 (1): 40-49.
36. Tucker, Sheila Y. 2000. Assessing the effectiveness of distance education versus traditional on-campus education. ERIC ED443378.
37. Tuchman, Bruce W. 2002. EvaluatingADAPT: A hybrid instructional model combining web-based and classroom components. Computers and Education 39:261-269.
38. Ueltschy, Linda C. 2001. Anexploratory study of integrating interactive technology into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education 23 (1): 63-72.
39. Willis, Barry. 1994. Distance education: Research. College of Engineering, University of Idaho. http://www.uidaho.edu/eo/dist9.html (accessed March 15, 2004).
40. Wilson, Carol. 2002. A tale of two classes: Face-to-face versus online. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference, April 7-9.