Student Perceptions of Educational Technology Tools

Journal of Marketing Education

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 169-177

  Clarke, Irvine ^a   Flaherty, Theresa B ^a   Mottner, Sandra ^b  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992777549     PISSN: 02734753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0273475301233002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Atwong, Catherine T., and Paul S. Hugstad. 1997. Internet technology and the future of marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education 19 (3): 44-55.
2. Avis, James. 2000. Policing the subject: Learning outcomes, managerialism and research in PCET. British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (1): 38-57.
3. Bransford, John D., Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, eds. 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Cyert, Richard M., and Paul S. Goodman. 1997. Creating effective universityindustry alliances: An organizational learning perspective. Organizational Dynamics 25 (4): 45-57.
5. Davis, Richard, Shkhar Misra, and Stuart Van Auken. 2000. Relating pedagogical preference of marketing seniors and alumni to attitude toward the major. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 147-154.
6. Ferrell, O. C. 1995. Improving marketing education in the 1990s: A faculty retrospective and perspective view. Marketing Education Review 5 (3): 1-6.
7. Galbreath, Jeremy. 1999. Preparing the 21st century worker: The link between computer-based technology and future skill sets. Educational Technology 39 (6): 14-22.
8. Hamer, Lawrence O. 2000. The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (1): 25-34.
9. Hazzan, Orit. 1999. Information technologies and objects to learn with. Educational Technology 39 (3): 55-59.
10. Henke, John W., Jr., William B. Locander, John T. Mentzer, and George Nastas III. 1988. Teaching techniques for the new marketing instructor: Bringing the business world into the classroom. Journal of Marketing Education 10 (spring): 1-10.
11. Hung, David W.L., and Angela F. L. Wong. 2000. Activity theory as a frame-work for project work in learning environments. Educational Technology 40 (2): 33-37.
12. Jonassen, David H. 2000. Transforming learning with technology: Beyond modernism and post-modernism or whoever controls the technology creates the reality. Educational Technology 40 (2): 21-25.
13. Kaynama, Shohreh A., and Garland Keesling. 2000. Development of a Web-based Internet marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 84-89.
14. Kearsley, Greg, and Ben Shneiderman. 1998. Engagement theory: A frame-work for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology 38 (5): 20-23.
15. Maddux, Cleborne D., Rhoda Cummings, and Edil Torres-Rivera. 1999. Facilitating the integration of information technology into higher-education instruction. Educational Technology (3): 43-47.
16. Marks, Ronald B. 2000. Determinants of student evaluations of global measures of instructor and course value. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 108-119.
17. Marsden, Peter V. 1994. The hiring process. American Behavioral Scientist 37 (7): 979-992.
18. McBane, Daniel A. 1997. Marketing departments on the World Wide Web: State of the art and recommendations. Journal of Marketing Education 19 (spring): 14-25.
19. McCloy, Rodney A., John P. Campbell, and Robert Cudeck. 1994. A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (4): 493-516.
20. McGinn, Daniel. 2000. Caught in the Web. Newsweek, November, 10-13.
21. McLelland, Dorothy. 1994. Transferring information-seeking skills from education to employment. Education & Training 36 (6): 16-20.
22. Mohr, Jakki. 2000. The marketing of high-technology products and services: Implications for curriculum content and design. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (3): 246-259.
23. Monks, Kathy. 1995. Combining academic rigour and transferable skills: A business degree for the 1990s. Education & Training 37 (1): 17-22.
24. Roach, Scott S., Mark W. Johnston, and Joseph F. Hair, Jr. 1994. The current state of marketing education: Perceptions of marketing academicians and doctoral students. Marketing Education Review 4 (1): 2-9.
25. Seels, Barbara B., and Rita C. Richey. 1994. Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
26. Siegel, Carolyn F. 1996. Using computer networks (Intranet and Internet) to enhance your students'marketing skills. Journal of Marketing Education 18 (fall): 14-24.
27. Siegel, Carolyn F. 2000. Introducing marketing students to business intelligence using project-based learning on the World Wide Web. Journal of Marketing Education 22 (2): 90-98.
28. Sixteenth Annual AACSB/UCLA Computer Usage Survey. 2000. Newsline [Online]. Available: http://www.aacsb.edu/publications/newsline/2000/wnusage_1.html.Accessed3September2000
29. Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley, and Jeffrey S. Conant. 1999. Marketing education in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenges anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education 21 (3): 206-216.
30. Smart, Denise T., Chuck Tomkovick, Eli Jones, and Anil Menon. 1999. Undergraduate marketing education in the 21st century: Views from three institutions. Marketing Education Review 9 (spring): 1-9.
31. Strauss, Judy, and Raymond D. Frost. 1999. Selecting instructional technology media for the marketing classroom. Marketing Education Review 9 (1): 11-20.
32. Strauss, Judy. 2001. E-marketing. 2d ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Strauss, Judy, Ted Mitchell, and John Bennett. 1999. Similarities and differences in university Internet marketing courses. In Proceedings: Society for marketing advances, edited by J. Young, R. Green, and F. Gilbert, 147-151. Atlanta, GA: Society for Marketing Advances.
34. Wager, Walter. 1998. Social determinants of affective behavior and learning. Educational Technology 38 (6): 15-16.
35. Williams, Tim. 1992. Validating a degree: Subject relevance and assessment issues in the development of a new degree. Education & Training 34 (3): 31-33.