Erratum to "Effect of superposed electromagnetic noise on DNA damage of lens epithelial cells induced by microwave radiation" (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci., (2008), 49, 5, (2009-2015), 10.1167/iovs.07-1333);Effect of superposed electromagnetic noise on DNA damage of lens epithelial cells induced by microwave radiation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 2009-2015

  Yao, Ke ^a,d   Wu, Wei ^a   Yu, Yibo ^a   Zeng, Qunli ^b   He, Jiliang ^c   Lu, Deqiang ^b   Wang, Kaijun ^a  

^a Second Affiliated Hospital   (China)

^b Bioelectro Magnetics Laboratory   (China)

^c ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DICHLORODIHYDROFLUORESCEIN DIACETATE; DNA; FLUORESCENT DYE; HISTONE H2AX; ISOPROTEIN; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

ALKALINITY; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE G0 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; COMET ASSAY; DNA DAMAGE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; LENS EPITHELIUM; MICROWAVE RADIATION; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN VARIANT; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION; SHAM PROCEDURE; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE; CYTOLOGY; EPITHELIUM CELL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; LENS; METABOLISM;

APOPTOSIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE; COMET ASSAY; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EPITHELIAL CELLS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE, INDIRECT; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROWAVES; REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES;

EID: 44449100069     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1333     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Garaj VV, Horvat D, Koren Z. The relationship between colony- forming ability, chromosome aberrations and incidence of micro- nuclei in V79 Chinese hamster cells exposed to microwave radiation. Mutat Res. 1991;263(3):143-149.
2. Lai H, Singh NP. Acute low-intensity microwave exposure increases DNA single-strand breaks in rat brain cells. Bioelectromag- netics. 1995;16(3):207-210.
3. Lai H, Singh NP. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int JRadiat Biol. 1996;69(4):513-521.
4. Diem E, Schwarz C, Adlkofer F, Jahn O, Rüdiger H. Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R17 rat granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat Res. 2005;583(2):178-183.
5. Malyapa RS, Ahern EW, Bi C, et al. DNA damage in rat brain cells after in vivo exposure to 2450 MHz electromagnetic radiation and various methods of euthanasia. Radiat Res. 1998;149(6):637-645.
6. Hook GJ, Zhang P, Lagroye I, et al. Measurement of DNA damage and apoptosis in Molt-4 cells after in vitro exposure o radiofre- quency radiation. Radiat Res. 2004;161(2):193-200.
7. Belyaev IY, Koch CB, Terenius O, et al. Exposure of rat brain to 915 MHz GSM microwaves induces changes in gene expression but not double stranded DNA breaks or effects on chromatin conformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(4):295-306.
8. Lixia S, Yao K, Kaijun W, et al. Effects of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field on DNA damage and expression of heat shock protein 70 in human lens epithelial cells. Mutat Res. 2006;602(1-2):135-142.
9. Zhang DY, Xu ZP, Chiang H, Lu DQ, Zeng QL. Effects of GSM 1800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on DNA damage in Chinese hamster lung cells. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;40(3):149-152.
10. Baohong W, Jiliang H, Lifen J, et al. Studying the synergistic damage effects induced by 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field radiation (RFR) with four chemical mutagens on human lymphocyte DNA using comet assay in vitro. Mutat Res. 2005;578(1-2):149-157.
11. Stopczyk D, Gnitecki W, Buczyński A, Kowalski W, Buczyńska M, Kroc A. Effect of electromagnetic field produced by mobile phones on the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD-1)-in vitro researches. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2005;51(suppl 1):125-128.
12. Moustafa YM, Moustafa RM, Belacy A, et al. Effects of acute exposure to the radiofrequency fields of cellular phones on plasma lipid peroxide and antioxidase activities in human erythrocytes. JPharm Biomed Anal. 2001;26(4):605-608.
13. Moneda AP, Ioannidou MP, Chrissoulidis DP. Radio-wave exposure of the human head: analytical study based on a versatile eccentric spheres model including a brain core and a pair of eyeballs. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003;50(6):667-676.
14. Lipman RM, Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC. Cataract induced by microwave and ionizing radiation. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;33(3):200 -210.
15. Ye J, Yao K, Lu D, Wu R, Jiang H. Low power density microwave radiation induced early changes in rabbit lens epithelial cells. Chin Med J (Engl). 2001;114(12):1290-1294.
16. Truscott RJ. Age-related nuclear cataract-oxidation is the key. Exp Eye Res. 2005;80(5):709 -725.
17. Spector A. Oxidative stress-induced cataract mechanism of action. FASEB J. 1995;9(12):1173-1182.
18. Kleiman NJ, Spector A. DNA single strand breaks in human lens epithelial cells from patients with cataract. Curr Eye Res. 1993;12(5):423- 431.
19. Litovitz TA, Krause D, Mullins JM. Effect of coherence time of the applied magnetic field on ornithine decarboxylase activity. Bio- chem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;178(3):862-865.
20. Litovitz TA, Montrose CJ, Doinov P, Brown KM, Barber M. Superimposing spatially coherent electromagnetic noise inhibits field- induced abnormalities in developing chick embryos. Bioelectro- magnetics. 1994;15(2):105-113.
21. Litovitz TA, Krause D, Montrose CJ, Mullins JM. Temporally incoherent magnetic fields mitigate the response of biological systems to temporally coherent magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 1994;15(5):399-409.
22. Litovitz TA, Penafiel LM, Farrel JM, Krause D, Meister R, Mullins JM. Bioeffects induced by exposure to microwaves are mitigated by superposition of ELF noise. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(6):422-430.
23. Lai H. Interaction of microwaves and a temporally incoherent magnetic field on spatial learning in the rat. Physiol Behav. 2004;82(5):785-789.
24. Xie L, Jiang H, Sun WJ, Fu YT, Lu DQ. GSM 1,800 MHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields induced clustering of membrane surface receptors and interference by noise magnetic fields. Zhon- ghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2006;24(8):461-464.
25. Zeng Q, Ke X, Gao X, et al. Noise magnetic fields abolish the gap junction intercellular communication suppression induced by 50 Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 2006;27(4):274-279.
26. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998;74(4):494-522.
27. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 KHz to 300 GHz. Std C95.1. IEEE; 1999.
28. Schonborn F, Pokovic K, Burkhardt M, Kuster N. Basis for optimization of in vitro exposure apparatus for health hazard evaluations of mobile communications. Bioelectromagnetics. 2001;22(8):547-559.
29. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175(1):184-191.
30. Lawler JM, Song W, Demaree SR. Hindlimb unloading increases oxidative stress and disrupts antioxidant capacity in skeletal muscle. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003;35(1):9 -16.
31. Ibaraki N, Chen SC, Lin LR, Okamoto H, Pipas JM, Reddy VN. Human lens epithelial cell line. ExpEye Res. 1998;67(5):577-585.
32. Arita T, Lin LR, Susan SR, Reddy VN. Enhancement of differentiation of human lens epithelium in tissue culture by changes in cell-substrate adhesion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31(11):2395-2404.
33. Arita T, Murata Y, Lin LR, Tsuji T, Reddy VN. Synthesis of lens capsule in long-term culture of human lens epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34(2):355-362.
34. Brusick D, Albertini R, McRee D, et al. Genotoxicity of radiofre- quency radiation: DNA/Genetox Expert Panel. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1998;32(1):1-16.
35. Fairbairn DW, Olive PL, O'Neill KL. The comet assay: a comprehensive review. Mutat Res. 1995;339(1):37-59.
36. Singh NP. Microgel electrophoresis of DNA from individual cells. In: Pfeifer GP, ed. Technologies for Detection ofDNA Damage and Mutations. New York: Plenum Press, NY; 1996:3-24.
37. Redon C, Pilch D, Rogakou E, Sedelnikova O, Newrock K, Bonner W. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12(2):162-169.
38. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Lee A, Nussenzweig M, Nussenzweig A. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3(8-9):959 -967.
39. Pilch DR, Sedelnikova OA, Redon C, Celeste A, Nussenzweig A, Bonner WM. Characteristics of gamma-H2AX foci at DNA double- strand breaks sites. Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;81(3):123-129.
40. Ward IM, Minn K, Jorda KG, Chen J. Accumulation of checkpoint protein 53BP1 at DNA breaks involves its binding to phosphory-lated histone H2AX. JBiol Chem. 2003;278(22):19579 -19582.
41. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Chen HT, Celeste A, et al. DNA damage- induced G2-M checkpoint activation by histone H2AX and 53BP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(12):993-997.
42. Furuta T, Takemura H, Liao ZY, et al. Phosphorylation of histoneH2AXand activation of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 in response to replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complexes. JBiol Chem. 2003;278(22):20303-20312.
43. Fernandez-Capetillo O, Celeste A, Nussenzweig A. Focusing on foci: H2AX and the recruitment of DNA-damage response factors. Cell Cycle. 2003;2(5):426- 427.
44. Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(10):5858-5868.
45. Paull TT, Rogakou EP, Yamazaki V, Kirchgessner CU, Gellert M, Bonner WM. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr Biol. 2000; 10(15):886-895.
46. MacPhail SH, Bańath JP, Yu TY, Chu EH, Lambur H, Olive PL. Expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX in cultured cell lines following exposure to X-rays. Int JRadiat Biol. 2003;79(5):351- 358.
47. Stiff T, O'Driscoll M, Rief N, Iwabuchi K, Löbrich M, Jeggo PA. ATM and DNA-PK function redundantly to phosphorylate H2AX after exposure to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 2004;64(7): 2390-2396.
48. Wang H, Wang M, Wang H, Böcker W, Iliakis G. Complex H2AX phosphorylation patterns by multiple kinases including ATM and DNA-PK in human cells exposed to ionizing radiation and treated with kinase inhibitors. J Cell Physiol. 2005;202(2):492-502.
49. Rothkamm K, Löbrich M. Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low X-ray doses. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA. 2003;100(9):5057-5062.
50. Bańath JP, Olive PL. Expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX as a surrogate of cell killing by drugs that create DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res. 2003;63(15):4347-4350.
51. Taneja N, Davis M, Choy JS, et al. Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a predictor of radiosensitivity and target for radiotherapy. JBiol Chem. 2004;279(3):2273-2280.
52. Albino AP, Huang X, Jorgensen E, et al. Induction of H2AX phos- phorylation in pulmonary cells by tobacco smoke: a new assay for carcinogens. Cell Cycle. 2004;3(8):1062-1068.
53. Gallmeier E, Winter JM, Cunningham SC, Kahn SR, Kern SE. Novel genotoxicity assays identify norethindrone to activate p53 and phosphorylate H2AX. Carcinogenesis. 2005;26(10):1811-1820.
54. Barzilai A, Yamamoto K. DNA damage responses to oxidative stress. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3(8-9):1109-1115.
55. Balci M, Devrim E, Durak I. Effects of mobile phones on oxidant/ antioxidant balance in cornea and lens of rats. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(1):21-25.
56. Dizdaroglu M. Mechanisms of free radical damage to DNA. In: Aruoma O, Halliwell B, eds. DNA and Free Radicals. London: OICA International. 1998:3-26.
57. Marnett LJ. Oxyradicals and DNA damage. Carcinogenesis. 2000; 21(3):361-370.