Measuring learning effectiveness: A new look at no-significant-difference findings

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2000, Pages

  Joy II, Ernest H ^a   Garcia, Federico E ^b  

^a FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b CNA CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

ALN; Computer aided instruction; Instructional assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010380622     PISSN: 19395256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Moore, D. M., Personal communications, Spring 1997.
2. Schramm, V., Big Media, Little Media: Tools and Technologies for Instruction, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications, 1977.
3. Maddux, C. D., Research in Educational Computing: Problems of Internal and External Validity, Computers in the Schools, 11(3), 7-10, 1995.
4. Clark, R. E., Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media, Review of Education Research, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 445-459, 1983.
5. Clark, R. E., Evidence for Confounding in Computer Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta-Analyses, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 235-262, 1985.
6. Clark, R. E., Media Will Never Influence Learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 21-29, 1994.
7. Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., and Wager, W. W., Principles of Instructional Design, 4th ed., Orlando, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992.
8. Kozma, R. B., Will Media Influence Learning? Reframing the Debate, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 7-19, 1994.
9. Kozma, R. B., A Reply: Media and Methods, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 11-13, 1994.
10. Russell, T. L., Television's Indelible Impact on Distance Education: What We Should Have Learned From Comparative Research, Research in Distance Education, October 2-4, 1992.
11. Rachal, J. D., Computer Assisted Instruction in Adult Basic and Secondary Education: A Review of the Experimental Literature 1984-1992, Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp 165-172, 1993.
12. Reeves, T. C., Pseudoscience in Computer-Based Instruction: The Case of Learner Control Research, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp 39-46, 1993.
13. Sivin-Kachala, J., and Bialo, E. R., Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools, 1990-1994. New York: Interactive Educational Systems Design, Inc., 1994.
14. Reglin, G. L., CAI Effects on Mathematics Achievement and Academic Self-Concept Seminar, Journal of Education Technology Systems, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 43-48, 1989.
15. Clements, D. H., Enhancement of Creativity in Computer Environments, American Education Research Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 173-187, 1991.
16. Skinner, M. E., The Effects of Computer-Based Instruction on the Achievement of College Students as a Function of Achievement Status and Mode of Presentation, Computers in Human Behavior, pp. 351-360, 1990.
17. Gardner, C. M., Simmons, P. E., and Simpson, R. D., The Effects of CAI and Hands-on Activities on Elementary Students' Attitudes and Weather Knowledge, School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 92, No. 6, pp. 334-336, 1992.
18. Funkhouser, C. P., The Influence of Problem-Solving Software on Student Attitudes about Mathematics, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 339-346, 1993.
19. Orlansky, J., The Cost Effectiveness of Military Training. Paper presented at the Symposium on Military Value and Cost-Effectiveness of Training, Brussels, Belgium, 1985.