Teacher education in the generative virtual classroom: Developing learning theories through a web-delivered, technology-and-science education context

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1451-1469

  Schaverien, Lynette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TEACHING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 0348077565     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069032000070234     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. COSGROVE, M. (1995). A case study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 295-310.
2. COSGROVE, M. and ALEXANDER, S. (1995). Computer mediated learning: designing an interactive multimedia tutoring system for foundation science ideas. In Y. C. Yong and C. K. Looi (Eds.), Proceedings of ICCE 95 The International Conference on Computers in Education, Singapore, 5-8 December (Singapore: Information Technology Institute), 133-140.
3. COSGROVE, M. and SCHAVERIEN, L. (1994). Technology learning 1: towards a curriculum for children who are technologists. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4, 227-240.
4. COSGROVE, M. and SCHAVERIEN, L. (1996). Children's conversations and learning science and technology. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 105-116.
5. COSGROVE, M., SCHAVERIEN, L., FORRET, M. and TROWSDALE, R. (2000). Where does the cold come from? A hybrid CD-ROM and web-based e-learning environment (Sydney: UTS).
6. DAWKINS, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker (Harlow: Longman).
7. EDELMAN, G. (1992). Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind (London: Penguin Books).
8. EDELMAN, G. (1993). Neural Darwinism: selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function. Neuron, 10, 115-125.
9. GODLEE, F. (1998). Applying research evidence to individual patients: evidence based case reports will help. British Medical Journal, 316, 1621-1622.
10. GOLDMAN SEGALL, R. (1991). A multimedia research tool for ethnographic investigation. In I. Harel and S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (Norwood, NJ: Ablex), 467-497.
11. HALL, R. and SCHAVERIEN, L. (2001). Families' engagement with young children's science and technology learning at home. Science Education, 85(4), 454-481.
12. HARLEN, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understanding in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27 (3), 323-337.
13. MAYR, E. (2000). Darwin's influence on modern thought. Scientific American, July, 66-71.
14. MINSKY, M. (1985). The society of mind (New York: Touchstone).
15. PAPERT, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas (Brighton: Harvester Press).
16. PLOTKIN, H. (1994). The nature of knowledge (London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press).
17. PLOTKIN, H. (1997). Evolution in mind: an intruduction to evolutionary psychology (London: Penguin Books).
18. POPPER, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery (New York: Harper and Row).
19. SCHAVERIEN, L. (2000). Towards research-based designing for understanding fundamental concepts: the case of the web-delivered Generative Virtual Classroom for teacher education. Australian Journal Educational Technology, 16(1), 1-12.
20. SCHAVERIEN, L. and COSGROVE, M. (1995). Technology learning 2: towards reawakening the technologists within primary teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 5, 51-68.
21. SCHAVERIEN, L. and COSGROVE, M. (1997a). Learning to teach generatively. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 317-346.
22. SCHAVERIEN, L. and COSGROVE, M. (1997b). Computer based learning environments in teacher education: helping students to think accurately, boldly and critically. In R. Kevill, R. Oliver and R. Phillips (Eds.), ASCILITE97: What Works and Why? Conference Proceedings: 14th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology Press), 544-550.
23. SCHAVERIEN, L. and COSGROVE, M. (1999). A biological basis for generative learning in technology-and-science: Part I-a theory of learning. International Journal of Science Education, 21(12), 1223-1235.
24. SCHAVERIEN, L. and COSGROVE, M. (2000). A biological basis for generative learning in technology-and-science: Part II-implications for technology-and-science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 13-35.
25. THELEN, E. and SMITH, L. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
26. TOBIAS, S. (1999). Some recent developments in teacher education in mathematics and science: A review and commentary. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 21-31.
27. WHITE, A. and KLAPPER, M. (1994). An agenda for science education research. Cognosos, 3(3), 1-10.
28. WITTROCK, M. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11 (2), 87-95.
29. WITTROCK, M. (1994). Generative science teaching. In P. Fensham, R. Gunstone and R. White (Eds.), The content of science (London: Falmer Press), 29-38.