Computational Approaches for Assessment of Toxicity: A Historical Perspective and Current Status

Computational Toxicology: Risk Assessment for Pharmaceutical and Environmental Chemicals

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 183-215

  Gombar, Vijay K ^a   Mattioni, Brian E ^a   Zwickl, Craig ^a   Deahl, J Thom ^a  

^a ELI LILLY AND COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational approaches in toxicity assessment; Machine learning approaches; Web based toxicity predictors

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549138106     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470145890.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (344)

1. Vainio H, Coleman M, Wilbourn J. Carcinogenicity evaluations and ongoing studies: The IARC databases. Environ Health Perspect 1991;96:5-9.
2. Lynch DG, Tirado NF, Boethling RS, Huse GR, Thom GC. Performance of online chemical property estimation methods with TSCA premanufacture notice chemicals. Ecotox Environ Safety 1991;22:240-9.
3. Fishbein L. Critical elements in priority selections and ranking systems for risk assessment of chemicals. In: Mehlman MA, editor, Advances in modern environmental toxicology: Safety evaluation; Toxicology, methods, concepts and risk assessment, Vol. X. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publications, 1987. p. 1-50.
4. Helma C, King RD, Kramer S, Srinivasan A. The predictive toxicology challenge 2000-2001. Bioinform Appl Note 2001;17:107-8.
5. Balls M, et al. Development and validation of non-animal tests and testing strategies: The identification of a coordinated response to the challenge and the opportunity presented by the sixth amendment to the Cosmetics Directive (76/768/EEC). ECVAN workshop report 7, ATLA 1995;23:398-409.
6. Borodin A. On the analogy of arsenic acid with phosphoric acid in chemical and toxicological behaviour. Doctorate dissertation. Medico-Surgical Academy, Russia, 1858.
7. Mendeleev D. The periodic law of the chemical elements. J Chem Soc. 1889;55:634-56.
8. Borman S. New QSAR techniques eyed for environmental assessments. Chem Eng News 1990;68:20-3.
9. Cros AFA. Action de l'alcohol amylique sur l'organisme. University of Strasbourg, 1863.
10. Crum-Brown A, Fraser TR. On the connection between chemical constitution and physiological action. Part 1. On the physiological action of the salts of the smmonium bases, derived from Strychnia, Brucia, Thebaia, Codeia, Morphia, and Nicotia. Trans R Soc Edinburgh 1868-9;25:151-203.
11. Richardson BW. Lectures on experimental and practical medicine. Physiological research on alcohols. Med Times Gaz 1869;2:703-6.
12. Richet C. Note sur le Rapport Entre la Toxicite et les Propriretes Physiques des Corps. Compt Rend Soc Biol (Paris) 1893;45:775-6.
13. Meyer H. Zur theorie der alkoholnarkose. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol 1899;42:109-18.
14. Overton E. Ueber die allgemeinen osmotischen Eigenschaften der Zelle, ihre vermutlichen Ursachen und ihre Bedeutung fur die Physiologie. Vierteljahrsschr Naturforsch Ges Zurich 1899;44:88-114.
15. Lewis GN. The atom and the molecule. J Am Chem Soc 1916;38:762-86.
16. Langley JN. On the contraction of muscle, chiefly in relation to the presence of "receptor" substances. Part IV. J Physiol 1904;33:374.
17. Hammett LP. Some relations between reaction rates and equilibrium constants. Chem Rev 1935;17:125-36.
18. Hammett LP. Physical organic chemistry: Reaction rates, equilibria and mechanism, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
19. Taft RW, Lewis IC. Evaluation of resonance effects on reactivity by application of the linear inductive energy relationship: V. Concerning a sR scale of resonance effects. J Am Chem Soc 1959;81:5343.
20. Taft RW Jr. Separation of polar, steric and resonance effects in reactivity. In: Newman MS, editor, Steric effects in organic chemistry. New York: Wiley, 1956. p. 556-675.
21. Hansch C, Maloney PP, Fujita T, Muir RM. Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 1962;194:178-80.
22. Hansch C, Fujita T. β-σ-π analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc 1964;86:1616.
23. Klopman G, Grinberg H, Hopfinger AJ. MINDO/3 calculations of the conformation and carcinogenicity of epoxy-metabolites of aromatic hydrocarbons: 7,8-Dihydroxy-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene. J Theor Biol 1979 Aug 7; 79(3):355-66.
24. Enslein K, Craig PN. A toxicity prediction system. J Environ Toxicol 1978;2:115-21.
25. Smithing MP, Daravas F. HazardExpert: An expert system for predicting chemical toxicity. In: Finley, JW, Armstrong DJ, Robinson, SF, editors, Food safety assessment. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1992. p. 191:200.
26. Bevan DR. QSAR and drug design. .
27. Borman S. New QSAR techniques eyed for environmental assessments. Chem Eng News 1990;68:20-3.
28. Debnath AK. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) paradigm-Hansch era to new millenium. Mini Rev Med Chem 2001;1:187-95.
29. Hansch C. Quantitative structure-activity relationships and the unnamed science. Acc Chem Res 1993;26:147-53.
30. Kubinyi H. From narcosis to hyperspace: The history of QSAR. Quant Struct-Act Rel 2002;21:348-56.
31. Martin YC. Quantitative drug design: A critical introduction. New York: Dekker, 1978.
32. McKinney JD, Richard A, Waller C, Newman MC, Gerberick F. The practice of structure activity relationships (SAR) in toxicology. Toxicol Sci 2000;56:8-17.
33. Purcell WP, Bass GE, Clayton JM. Strategy of drug design: A molecular guide to biological activity. New York: Wiley, 1973.
34. Rekker RF. The history of drug research: From Overton to Hansch. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1992;11:195-9.
35. Schultz TW, Cronin MTD, Walker JD, Aptula AO. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: A historical perspective. Theochem J Mol Struct 2003;622:1-22.
36. Selassie CD. History of quantitative structure-activity relationships. In: Abraham DJ, editor, Burger's medicinal chemistry and drug discovery. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2003. p. 1:48.
37. Tute MS. History and objectives of quantitative drug design. In: Ramsden CA, editor, Quantitative drug design. Vol. 4 of: Hansch C, Sammes PG, Taylor JB, editors, Medicinal chemistry: the rational design, mechanistic study and therapeutic application of chemical compounds. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1990. p. 1:31.
38. Van de Waterbeemd H. The history of drug research: From Hansch to the present. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1992;11:200-4.
39. Baum F. Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol (Naunyn-Schmied) 1899;42:119.
40. Lipnick RL, Filov VA. Nikolai Vasilyevich Lazarev, toxicologist and pharmacologist, comes in from the cold. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1992;13:56-60.
41. Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D. Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem Rev 1971;71:525-616.
42. oct from structures. Chem Rev 1993;93:1281-306.
43. Rekker RF. The hydrophobic fragmental constant. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977.
44. Lipnick RL. Charles Ernest Overton: Narcosis studies and a contribution to general pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1986;7:161.
45. Lipnick RL. Hans Horst Meyer and the lipoid theory of narcosis. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1989;10:265.
46. Hansch C, Maloney PP, Fujita T, Muir RM. Correlation of biological activity of phenoxyacetic acids with Hammett substituent constants and partition coefficients. Nature 1962;194:178-80.
47. Fujita T, Iwasa J, Hansch C. A new substituent constant, π, derived from partition coefficients. J Am Chem Soc 1964;86:51-75.
48. Kaiser KLE. QSAR in environmental toxicology-II. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
49. Hermans JLM, Opperhuizen A. QSAR in environmental toxicology-TV. New York: Elsevier, 1991.
50. Karcher W, Devillers J. Practical applications of QSAR in environmental chemistry and toxicology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1990.
51. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of molecular descriptors, Vol. 11. In: Mannhold R, Kubinyi H, Timmerman H, editors, Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2000.
52. Wold H. Estimation of principal components and related models by iterative least squares. In: Krishnaiah PR, editor, Multivariate analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1966. p. 391:420.
53. Wold H. Soft modelling with latent variables: The nonlinear iterative partial least squares approach. In: Gani J, editor, Perspectives in probability and statistics: Papers in honour of M.S. Barlett. London: Academic Press, 1975. p. 114-42.
54. Martens H, Jensen SA. Partial least Squares Regression: A new two-stage NIR calibration methods. In: Holas and Kratochvil, editors, Proceedings of the World Cereal and Bread Congress, Prague, June 1982. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1982. p. 607-47.
55. Wold H. PLS regression. In: Johnson NL, Kotz S, editors, Encyclopaedia of statistical sciences, Vol 6. New York: Wiley, 1984. p. 581-91.
56. Bishop C. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: University Press, 1995.
57. Carling A. Introducing neural networks. Wilmslow, UK: Sigma Press, 1992.
58. Fausett L. Fundamentals of neural networks. New York: Prentice Hall, 1994.
59. Haykin S. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. New York: Macmillan, 1994.
60. Patterson D. Artificial neural networks. Singapore: Prentice Hall, 1996.
61. Ripley BD. Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
62. Nilakantan R, Nunn DS, Greenblatt L, Walker G, Haraki K, et al. A family of ring system-based structural fragments for use in structure-activity studies: Database mining and recursive partitioning. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46(3):1069-77.
63. Hawkins DM, Young SS, Rusinko A. Analysis of a large structure-activity data set using recursive partitioning. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1997;16(4):296-302.
64. Rusinko A, Farmen MW, Lambert CG, Brown PL, Young SS. Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39(6):1017-26.
65. Young SS, Gombar VK, Emptage MR, Cariello NF, Lambert C. Mixture deconvolution and analysis of Ames mutagenicity data. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 2002;60:5-11.
66. Blower P, Fligner M, Verducci J, Bjoraker J. On combining recursive partitioning and simulated annealing to detect groups of biologically active compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002 Mar-Apr; 42(2):393-404.
67. Steiner G, Suter L, Boess F, Gasser R, de Vera MC, et al. Discriminating different classes of toxicants by transcript profiling. Environ Health Perspect 2004;112:1236-48.
68. Yap CW, Cai CZ, Xue Y, Chen YZ. Prediction of torsade-causing potential of drugs by support vector machine approach. Toxicol Sci 2004;79:170-7.
69. Thukral SK, Nordone PJ, Hu R, Sullivan L, Galambos E, et al. Prediction of nephrotoxicant action and identification of candidate toxicity-related biomarkers. Toxicol Pathol 2005;33:343-55.
70. Yao XJ, Panaye A, Doucet JP, Chen HF, Zhang RS, et al. Comparative classification study of toxicity mechanisms using support vector machines and radial basis function neural networks. Anal Chim Acta 2005;535:259-73.
71. Panaye A, Fan BT, Doucet JP, Yao XJ, Zhang RS, et al. Quantitative stru-cture-toxicity relationships (QSTRs): A comparative study of various nonlinear methods. General regression neural network, radial basis function neural network and support vector machine in predicting toxicity of nitro-and cyano-aromatics to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2006;17:75-91.
72. Zhao CY, Zhang HX, Zhang XY, Liu MC, Hu ZD, et al. Application of support vector machine (SVM) for prediction toxic activity of different data sets. Toxicology 2006;217:105-19.
73. Liu HX, Yao XJ, Zhang RS, Liu MC, Hu ZD, et al. The accurate QSPR models to predict the bioconcentration factors of nonionic organic compounds based on the heuristic method and support vector machine. Chemosphere 2006;63:722-33.
74. Mazzatorta P, Cronin MTD, Benfenati E. A QSAR study of avian oral toxicity using support vector machines and genetic algorithms. QSAR Comb Sci 2006;25:616-28.
75. Votano JR, Parham M, Hall LH, Kier LB, Oloff S, et al. Three new consensus QSAR models for the prediction of Ames genotoxicity. Mutagenesis 2004;19:365-77.
76. Votano JR, Parham M, Hall LH, Kier LB. New predictors for several ADME/Tox properties: Aqueous solubility, human oral absorption, and Ames genotoxicity using topological descriptors. Mol Divers 2004;8:379-91.
77. Gombar VK, Emptage MR, Cariello NF, Lambert C. Mixture deconvolution and analysis of Ames mutagenicity data. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 2002;60(1-2):5-11.
78. Hall LH, Hall LM. QSAR modeling based on structure-information for properties of interest in human health. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2005;16(1-2):13-41.
79. Kazius J, McGuire R, Bursi R. Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. J Med Chem 2005;48(1):312-20.
80. Villemin D, Cherqaoui D, Cense JM. Neural networks studies-Quantitative structure-activity relationship of mutagenic aromatic nitro compounds. J Chim Phys Phys Chim Biol 1993;90(7-8):1505-19.
81. Debnath AK, Shusterman AJ, Decompadre RLL, Hansch C. The importance of the hydrophobic interaction in the mutagenicity of organic compounds. Mutat Res 1994;305(1):63-72.
82. Knize MG, Hatch FT, Tanga MJ, Lau EY, Colvin ME. A QSAR for the mutagenic potencies of twelve 2-amino-trimethylimidazopyridine isomers: Structural, quantum chemical, and hydropathic factors. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2006;47(2):132-46.
83. Andrews LE, Bonin AM, Fransson LE, Gillson AME, Glover SA. The role of steric effects in the direct mutagenicity of N-acyloxy-N-alkoxyamides. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2006;605(1-2):51-62.
84. Bhat KL, Hayik S, Sztandera L, Bock CW. Mutagenicity of aromatic and hetero-aromatic amines and related compounds: A QSAR investigation. QSAR Combin Sci. 2005;24(7):831-43.
85. Snyder RD, Smith MD. Computational prediction of genotoxicity: Room for improvement. Drug Discov Today 2005;10(16):1119-24.
86. Wang XD, Lin ZF, Yin DQ, Liu SS. Wang LS. 2D/3D-QSAR comparative study on mutagenicity of nitroaromatics. Sci China B-Chem. 2005;48(3):246-52.
87. Maran U, Sild S. QSAR modeling of mutagenicity on non-congeneric sets of organic compounds. Art Intell Meth Tools Sys Biol. 2004;5:19-35.
88. Gonzalez MP, Moldes MDT, Fall Y, Dias LC, Helguera AM. A topological sub-structural approach to the mutagenic activity in dental monomers. 3. Heterogeneous set of compounds. Polymer 2005;46(8):2783-90.
89. Popelier PLA, Smith PJ, Chaudry UA. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic activity from quantum topological descriptors: triazenes and halogenated hydroxyfuranones (mutagen-X) derivatives. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2004;18(11):709-18.
90. Winkler DA. Neural networks in ADME and toxicity prediction. Drugs Future 2004;29(10):1043-57.
91. Mekenyan O, Dimitrov S, Serafimova R, Thompson E, Kotov S, et al. Identification of the structural requirements for mutagenicity by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals I: TA100 model. Chem Res Toxicol 2004;17(6):753-66.
92. Vracko M, Mills D, Basak SC. Structure-mutagenicity modelling using counter propagation neural networks. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2004;16(1-2):25-36.
93. Hawkins DM, Basak SC, Mills D. QSARs for chemical mutagens from structure: Ridge regression fitting and diagnostics. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2004;16(1-2):37-44.
94. Vracko M, Szymoszek A, Barbieri P. Structure-mutagenicity study of 12 trime-thylimidazopyridine isomers using orbital energies and "spectrum-like representation" as descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44(2):352-58.
95. Helguera AM, Gonzalez MP, Briones JR. TOPS-MODE approach to predict mutagenicity in dental monomers. Polymer 2004;45(6):2045-50.
96. Maran U, Sild S. QSAR modeling of genotoxicity on non-congeneric sets of organic compounds. Artificial Intell Rev 2003;20(1-2):13-38.
97. Sztandera L, Garg A, Hayik S, Bhat KL, Bock CW. Mutagenicity of aminoazo dyes and their reductive-cleavage metabolites: A QSAR/QPAR investigation. Dyes Pigm 2003;59(2):117-33.
98. Dearden JC. In silico prediction of drug toxicity. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2003;17(2):119-27.
99. Schultz TW, Cronin MTD, Walker JD, Aptula AO. Quantitative structure-activ-ity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: A historical perspective. Theochem J Mol Struct 2003;622(1-2):1-22.
100. Schultz TW, Cronin MTD, Netzeva TI. The present status of QSAR in toxicology. Theochem J Mol Struct 2003;622(1-2):23-38.
101. Greene N. Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: An update. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2002;54(3):417-31.
102. Cash GG. Prediction of the genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2001;491(1-2):31-7.
103. Benigni R, Giuliani A, Franke R, Gruska A. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines. Chem Rev 2000;100(10):3697-714.
104. Karelson M, Sild S, Maran U. Non-linear QSAR treatment of genotoxicity. Mol Simul 2000;24(4-6):229-42.
105. Basak SC, Grunwald GD, Gute BD. Balasubramanian K. Opitz D. Use of statistical and neural net approaches in predicting toxicity of chemicals. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40(4):885-90.
106. Basak SC, Gute BD, Grunwald GD. Assessment of the mutagenicity of aromatic amines from theoretical structural, parameters: A hierarchical approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1999;10(2-3):117-29.
107. Compadre RL, Byrd C, Compadre CM. Comparative QSAR and 3-D-QSAR analysis of the mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds. Comparative QSAR 1998;111-36.
108. Baeten A, Tafazoli M, Kirsch-Volders M, Geerlings P. Use of the HSAB principle in quantitative structure-activity relationships in toxicological research: Application to the genotoxicity of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Int J Quant Chem 1999;74(3):351-5.
109. Maran U, Karelson M, Katritzky AR. A comprehensive QSAR treatment of the genotoxicity of heteroaromatic and aromatic amines. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1999;18(1):3-10.
110. Fan M, Byrd C, Compadre CM, Compadre RL. Comparison of CoMFA models for Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA98 + S9 and TA100 + S9 mutagenicity of nitroaromatics. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1998;9(3-4):187.
111. Colvin ME, Seidl ET. Structural and quantum chemical factors affecting mutagenic potency of aminoimidazo-azaarenes. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996;27(4):314-30.
112. Hansch C, Hoekman D, Leo A, Zhang LT, Li P. The expanding role of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology. Toxicol Lett 1995;79(1-3):45-53.
113. Tuppurainen K. QSAR approach to molecular mutagenicity-A survey and a case study-mx compounds. Theochem J Mol Struct 1994;112(1):49-56.
114. Contrera JF, Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Benz RD. In silico screening of chemicals for bacterial mutagenicity using electrotopological E-state indices and MDL QSAR software. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2005;43(3):313-23.
115. Anderson B, Mayo K, Bogaczyk S, Tunkel J. Predicting genotoxicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines using electrotopological state indices. Mutat Res 2005;585(1-2):170-83.
116. Mattioni BE, Kauffman GW, Jurs PC, Custer LL, Durham SK, et al. Predicting the genotoxicity of secondary and aromatic amines using data subsetting to generate a model ensemble. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003;43(3):949-63.
117. Lewis DF, Ioannides C, Parke DV. A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study of mutagenicity in several series of organic chemicals likely to be activated by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 2003;(Suppl) 1:187-93.
118. Livingstone DJ, Greenwood R, Rees R, Smith MD. Modelling mutagenicity using properties calculated by computational chemistry. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13(1):21-33.
119. Tuppurainen K. Frontier orbital energies, hydrophobicity and steric factors as physical QSAR descriptors of molecular mutagenicity: A review with a case study: MX compounds. Chemosphere 1999;38(13):3015-30.
120. Ferguson LR, Denny WA. Potential antitumor agents. 33. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for mutagenic activity and antitumor activity of substituted 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfonanilide derivatives. J Med Chem 1980;23(3):269-74.
121. Venger BH, Hansch C, Hatheway GJ, Amrein YU. Ames test of 1-(X-phenyl)-3,3-dialkyltriazenes: A quantitative structure-activity study. J Med Chem 1979;22(5):473-6.
122. Wishnok JS, Archer MC, Edelman AS, Rand WM. Nitrosamine carcinogenicity: A quantitative Hansch-Taft structure-activity relationship. Chem Biol Interact 1978;20:43-54.
123. Chou JT, Jurs PC. Computer assisted structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens: An N-nitroso compound data set. J Med Chem 1979;22:792-7.
124. Dunn WJ 3rd, Wold S. As assessment of carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds by the SIMCA method of pattern recognition. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1981;21:8-13.
125. Niculescu-Duvaz I, Craescu T, Tugulea M, Croisy A, Jacquignon PC. A quantitative structure-activity analysis of the mutagenic and carcinogenic action of 43 structurally related heterocyclic compounds. Carcinogenesis 1981;2:269-75.
126. Yuta K, Jurs PC. Computer-assisted structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens: Aromatic amines. J Med Chem 1981;24:241-51.
127. Jurs PC, Hasan MN, Henry DR, Stouch TR, Whalen-Pedersen EK. Computer-assisted studies of molecular structure and carcinogenic activity. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1983;3:343-9.
128. Frierson MR, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Structure-activity relationships (SARs) among mutagens and carcinogens: A review. Environ Mutagen 1986;8:283-327.
129. Enslein K. An overview of structure-activity relationships as an alternative to testing in animals for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, dermal and eye irritation, and acute oral toxicity. Toxicol Ind Health 1988;4:479-98.
130. Benigni R, Andreoli C, Giuliani A. Structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens: Use of an electrophilic reactivity parameter in a new QSAR model. Carcinogenesis 1989;10:55-61.
131. Benigni R, Pellizzone G, Giuliani A. Comparison of different computerized classification methods for predicting carcinogenicity from short-term test results. J Toxicol Environ Health 1989;28:427-44.
132. Enslein K, Borgstedt HH. A QSAR model for the estimation of carcinogenicity: example application to an azo-dye. Toxicol Lett 1989;49:107-21.
133. Benigni R. QSAR prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for a set of chemicals currently bioassayed by the US National Toxicology Program. Mutagenesis 1991;6:423-5.
134. Enslein K, Gombar VK, Blake BW. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Use of SAR in computer-assisted prediction of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of chemicals by the TOPKAT program. Mutat Res 1994;305:47-61.
135. Moriguchi I. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and computer-aided drug design. Yakugaku Zasshi 1994;114:135-46.
136. Ashby J. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Two million rodent carcinogens? The role of SAR and QSAR in their detection. Mutat Res 1994;305:3-12.
137. Villemin D, Cherqaoui D, Mesbah A. Predicting carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from back-propagation neural network. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:1288-93.
138. Benigni R. Predicting chemical carcinogenesis in rodents: The state of the art in light of a comparative exercise. Mutat Res 1995;334:103-13.
139. Lewis DF, Parke DV. The genotoxicity of benzanthracenes: A quantitative struc-ture-activity study. Mutat Res 1995;328:207-14.
140. Benigni R, Giuliani A. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies of mutagens and carcinogens. Med Res Rev 1996;16:267-84.
141. Benigni R, Richards AM. QSARs of mutagens and carcinogens: Two case studies illustrating problems in the construction of models for noncongeneric chemicals. Mutat Res 1996;371:29-46.
142. King RD, Srinivasan A. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:1031-40.
143. Moriguchi I, Hirano H, Hirono S. Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of organic compounds from their chemical structures using the FALS method. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104:1051-8.
144. Rosenkranz HS, Liu M, Cunningham A, Klopman G. Application of structural concepts to evaluate the potential carcinogenicity of natural products. SAR QSAR Environ Res 5(2):79-98, 1996.
145. Cunningham AR, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Identification of structural features and associated mechanisms of action for carcinogens in rats. Mutat Res 1998;405:9-27.
146. Matthews EJ, Contrera JF. A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software. Regul Toxicol Pharm 1998;28:242-64.
147. Gini G, Lorenzini M, Benfenati E, Grasso P, Bruschi M. Predictive carcinogenicity: A model for aromatic compounds, with nitrogen-containing substituents, based on molecular descriptors using an artificial neural network. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1999;39:1076-80.
148. Bahler D, Stone B, Wellington C, Bristol DW. Symbolic, neural, and Bayesian machine learning models for predicting carcinogenicity of chemical compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40:906-14.
149. Benigni R, Giuliani A, Franke R, Gruska A. Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines. Chem Rev 2000;100:3697-714.
150. Vracko M. A study of structure-carcinogenicity relationship for 86 compounds from NTP database using topological indices as descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2000;11:103-15.
151. Franke R, Gruska A, Giuliani A, Benigni R. Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: A quantitative structure-activity relationships model. Carcinogenesis 2001;22:1561-71.
152. Singh AK. Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting risk of exposure from carcinogens in animals. Cancer Invest 2001;19:611-20.
153. Benigni R, Passerini L. Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: From structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment. Mutat Res 2002;511:191-206.
154. Greene N. Computer systems for the prediction of toxicity: An update. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 2002;54:417-31.
155. Richards AM, Benigni R. AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: Survey and status report. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:1-19.
156. Benigni R, Passerini L, Rodomonte A. Structure-activity relationships for the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of simple and alpha-beta unsaturated aldehydes. Environ Mol Mutagen 2003;42:136-43.
157. Benigni R, Zito R. Designing safer drugs: (Q)SAR-based identification of mutagens and carcinogens. Curr Top Med Chem 2003;3:1289-300.
158. Contrera JF, Matthews EJ, Benz RD. Predicting the carcinogenicity potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using molecular structural similarity and E-state indices. Regul Toxicol Pharm 2003;38:243-59.
159. Dearden JC. In silico prediction of drug toxicity. J Comput Aid Mol Des 2003;17:119-27.
160. Patlewicz G, Rodford R, Walker JD. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22:1885-93.
161. Shen Q, Jiang JH, Shen GL, Yu RQ. Variable selection by an evolution algorithm using modified Cp based on MLR and PLS modeling: QSAR studies of carcinogenicity of aromatic amines. Anal Bioanal Chem 2003;375:248-54.
162. Benigni R. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity. J Exp Clin Canc Res 2004;23:5-8.
163. Klopman G, Chakravarti SK, Zhu H, Ivanov JM, Saiakhov RD. ESP: A method to predict toxicity and pharmacological properties of chemicals using multiple MCASE databases. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44:704-15.
164. Sun H. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity from molecular structure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44:1506-14.
165. Contrera JF, MacLaughlin P, Hall LH, Kier LB. QSAR modeling of carcinogenic risk using discriminant analysis and topological molecular descriptors. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2005;2:55-67.
166. He L, Jurs PC, Kreatsoulas C, Custer LL, Durham SK, Pearl GM. Probabilistic neural network multiple classifier system for predicting the genotoxicity of qui-nolone and quinoline derivatives. Chem Res Toxicol 2005;18:428-40.
167. Helguera AM, Cabrera-Perez MA, Gonzalez MP, Ruiz RM, Gonzalez-Diaz H. A topological substructural approach applied to the computational prediction of rodent carcinogenicity. Bioorg Med Chem 2005;13:2477-88.
168. Lagunin AA, Dearden JC, Filimonov DA, Poroikov VV. Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction. Mutat Res 2005;586:138-46.
169. Luan F, Zhang R, Zhao C, Yao X, Liu M, et al. Classification of the carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds based on support vector machines and linear discriminant analysis. Chem Res Toxicol 2005;18:198-203.
170. Rallo R, Espinosa G, Giralt F. Using an ensemble of neural based QSARs for the prediction of toxicological properties of chemical contaminants. Process Saf Environ 2005;83:387-92.
171. Morales AH, Perez MA, Combes RD, Gonzalez MP. Quantitative structure-activity relationship for the computational prediction of nitrocompounds carcinogenicity. Toxicology 2006;220:51-62.
172. Kavlock RJ. Structure-activity relationships in the developmental toxicity of substituted phenols: In vivo effects. Teratology 1990;41:43-59.
173. Frierson MR, Mielach FA, Kochhar DM. Computer-automated structure evaluation (CASE) of retinoids in teratogenesis bioassays. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1990;14:408-28.
174. Dawson DA, Schultz TW, Baker LL, Mannar A. Structure-activity relationships for osteolathyrism: III. Substituted thiosemicarbazides. J Appl Toxicol 1990;10:59-64.
175. Klopman G, Dimayuga ML. Computer automated structure evaluation (CASE) of the teratogenicity of retinoids with the aid of a novel geometry index. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1990;4:117-30.
176. Ridings JE, Manallack DT, Saunders MR, Baldwin JA, Livingstone DJ. Multivariate quantitative structure-toxicity relationships in a series of dopamine mimet-ics. Toxicology 1992;76:209-17.
177. Klopman G, Ptchelintsev D. Antifungal triazole alcohols: a comparative analysis of structure-activity, structure-teratogenicity and structure-therapeutic index relationships using the multiple computer-automated structure evaluation (MultiCASE) methodology. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1993;7:349-62.
178. Takihi N, Rosenkranz HS, Klopman G, Mattison DR. Structural determinants of developmental toxicity. Risk Anal 1994;14:649-57.
179. Hansch C, Telzer BR, Zhang LT. Comparative QSAR in toxicology-Examples from teratology and cancer chemotherapy of aniline mustards. Crit Rev Toxicol 1995;25:67-89.
180. Gombar VK, Enslein K, Blake BW. Assessment of developmental toxicity potential of chemicals by quantitative structure-toxicity relationship models. Chemo-sphere 1995;31:2499-510.
181. Dawson DA, Schultz TW, Hunter RS. Developmental toxicity of carboxylic acids to Xenopus embryos: A quantitative structure-activity relationship and computer-automated structure evaluation. Teratogen Carcin Mut 1996;16:109-24.
182. Richard AM, Hunter ES III. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for the developmental toxicity of haloacetic acids in mammalian whole embryo culture. Teratology 1996;53:352-60.
183. Ghanooni M, Mattison DR, Zhang YP, Macina OT, Rosenkranz HS, Klopman G. Structural determinants associated with risk of human developmental toxicity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:799-805.
184. Pearl GM, Livingston-Carr S, Durham SK. Integration of computational analysis as a sentinel tool in toxicological assessments. Curr Top Med Chem 2001;1:247-55.
185. Devillers J, Chezeau A, Thybaud E, Rahmani R. QSAR modeling of the adult and developmental toxicity of glycols, glycol ethers and xylenes to Hydra attenu-ata. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:555-66.
186. Devillers J, Chezeau A, Thybaud E. PLS-QSAR of the adult and developmental toxicity of chemicals to Hydra attenuata. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:705-12.
187. Cronin MTD, Dearden JC, Walker JD, Worth AP. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for human health effects: Commonalities with other endpoints. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22:1829-43.
188. Schultz TW, Cronin MTD, Netzeva TI. The present status of QSAR in toxicology. Theochem J Mol Struc 2003;622:23-38.
189. Arena VC, Sussman NB, Mazumdar S, Yu S, Macina OT. The utility of structure-activity relationship (SAR) models for prediction and covariate selection in developmental toxicity: Comparative analysis of logistic regression and decision tree methods. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2004;15:1-18.
190. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Cimino MC, Benz RD, Contrera JF. An analysis of genetic toxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, and carcinogenicity data: II. Identification of genotoxicants, reprotoxicants, and carcinogens using in silico methods. Regul Toxicol Pharm 2006;44:97-110.
191. Dimitrov S, Koleva Y, Schultz TW, Walker JD, Mekenyan O. Interspecies quantitative structure-activity relationship model for aldehydes: Aquatic toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 2004;23(2):463-70.
192. Klopman G, Stuart SE. Multiple computer-automated structure evaluation study of aquatic toxicity. III. Vibrio fischeri. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003 Mar; 22(3):466-72.
193. Yan XF, Xiao HM, Ju XH, Gong XD. QSAR study of nitroaromatic compounds toxicity to the Tetrahymenapyriformis. Acta Chim Sinica 2006;64(5):375-80.
194. Netzeva TI, Schultz TW. QSARs for the aquatic toxicity of aromatic aldehydes from Tetrahymena data. Chemosphere 2005;61(11):1632-43.
195. Yan XF, Xiao HM, Ju XH, Gong XD. DFT study on the OSAR of nitroaromatic compound toxicity to the fathead minnow. Chin J Chem 2005;23(8):947-52.
196. Kamaya Y, Fukaya Y, Suzuki K. Acute toxicity of benzoic acids to the crustacean Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 2005;59(2):255-61.
197. Niculescu SP, Atkinson A, Hammond G, Lewis M. Using fragment chemistry data mining and probabilistic neural networks in screening chemicals for acute toxicity to the fathead minnow. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2004;15(4):293-309.
198. Netzeva TI, Schultz TW, Aptula AO, Cronin MTD. Partial least squares modelling of the acute toxicity of aliphatic compounds to Tetrahymena pyriformis. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2003;14(4):265-83.
199. Liu XH, Wang B, Huang Z, Han SK, Wang LS. Acute toxicity and quantitative structure-activity relationships of alpha-branched phenylsulfonyl acetates to Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 2003;50(3):403-8.
200. Papa E, Villa F, Gramatica P. Statistically validated QSARs, based on theoretical descriptors, for modeling aquatic toxicity of organic chemicals in Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow). J Chem Inf Model 2005;45(5):1256-66.
201. Oberg T. A QSAR for baseline toxicity: Validation, domain of application, and prediction. Chem Res Toxicol 2004;17(12):1630-7.
202. Tao S, Xi XH, Xu FL, Dawson R. A QSAR model for predicting toxicity (LC50) to rainbow trout. Water Res 2002;36(11):2926-30.
203. Martin TM, Young DM. Prediction of the acute toxicity (96-h LC50) of organic compounds to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) using a group contribution method. Chem Res Toxicol 2001;14(10):1378-85.
204. Wang XD, Dong YY, Wang LS, Han SK. Acute toxicity of substituted phenols to Rana japonica tadpoles and mechanism-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study. Chemosphere 2001;44(3):447-55.
205. Uppgard L, Sjostrom M, Wold S. Multivariate quantitative structure-activity relationships for the aquatic toxicity of alkyl polyglucosides. Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents 2000;37(2):131-8.
206. Cash GG. Prediction of chemical toxicity to aquatic organisms-ECOSAR vs. Microtox(r) assay. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 1998;13(3):211-16.
207. Russom CL, Bradbury SP, Broderius SJ, Hammermeister DE, Drummond RA. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure-Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 1997;16(5):948-67.
208. Karabunarliev S, Mekenyan OG, Karcher W, Russom CL, Bradbury SP. Quantum-chemical descriptors for estimating the acute toxicity of electrophiles to the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)-An analysis based on molecular mechanisms. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1996;15(4):302-10.
209. Lindgren A, Sjostrom M, Wold S. QSAR modelling of the toxicity of some technical non-ionic surfactants towards fairy shrimps. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1996;15(3):208-18.
210. Jackel H, Nendza M. Reactive substructures in the prediction of aquatic toxicity data. Aquatic Toxicol 1994;29(3-4):305-14.
211. Purdy R. The utility of computed superdelocalizability for predicting the LC50 values of epoxides to guppies. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:553-56.
212. Nendza M, Russom CL. QSAR modelling of the ERL-D fathead minnow acute toxicity database. Xenobiotica 1991;21(2):147-70.
213. Lipnick RL, Watson KR, Strausz AK. A QSAR study of the acute toxicity of some industrial organic chemicals to goldfish: Narcosis, electrophile and proelec-trophile mechanisms. Xenobiotica 1987;17(8):1011-25.
214. Konemann H. Quantitative structure-activity relationships in fish toxicity studies: Part 1. relationship for 50 industrial pollutants. Toxicology 1981;19(3):209-21.
215. Klopman G, Tu M. Structure-biodegradability study and computer-automated prediction of aerobic biodegradation of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 16(9):1829-35.
216. Roberts DW. Application of QSAR to biodegradation of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) isomers and homologues. Sci Total Environ 1991 Dec; 109-10:301-6.
217. Degner P, Nendza M, Klein W. Predictive QSAR models for estimating biodegradation of aromatic compounds. Sci Total Environ 1991 Dec; 109-10:253-9.
218. Peijnenburg WJGM. Structure-activity relationships for biodegradation: A critical review. Pure Appl Chem 1994;66(9):1931-41.
219. Dearden JC. Prediction of environmental toxicity and fate using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). J Braz Chem Soc 2002;13(6).
220. Loonen H, Lindgren F, Hansen B, Karcher W, Niemelä J, et al. Prediction of biodegradability from chemical structure: Modeling of ready biodegradation test data. Environ Toxicol Chem 1999;18(8):1763-8.
221. Gombar VK, Enslein K. Structure-biodegradability relationship model by discriminant analysis. In: Devillers J, Karcher W, editors, Applied multivariate analysis in SAR and environmental studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991.
222. Sabljic A. Chemical topology and ecotoxicology. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:197-220.
223. Degner P, Nendza M, Klein W. Predictive QSAR models for estimating biodegradation of aromatic compounds. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:253-9.
224. Roberts DW. Application of QSAR to biodegradation of linear alkylbenzene sulphonate (LAS) isomers and homologues. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:301-6.
225. Devillers J. Neural modelling of the biodegradability of benzene derivatives. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1993;1:161-7.
226. Klopman G, Zhang Z, Woodgate SD, Rosenkranz HS. The structure-toxicity relationship challenge at hazardous waste sites. Chemosphere 1995;31:2511-9.
227. Klopman G, Zhang ZT, Balthasar DM, Rosenkranz HS. Computer-automated predictions of aerobic biodegradation of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 1995;14:395-403.
228. Cowan CE, Federle TW, Larson RJ, Feijtel TC. Impact of biodegradation test methods on the development and applicability of biodegradation QSARs. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1996;5:37-49.
229. Okey RW, Stensel HD. A QSAR-based biodegradability model-A QSBR. Water Res 1996;30:2206-14.
230. Damborsky J, Schultz TW. Comparison of the QSAR models for toxicity and biodegradability of anilines and phenols. Chemosphere 1997;34:429-46.
231. Klopman G, Tu MH. Structure-biodegradability study and computer-automated prediction of aerobic biodegradation of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 1997;16:1829-35.
232. Kompare B. Estimating environmental pollution by xenobiotic chemicals using QSAR (QSBR) models based on artificial intelligence. Water Sci Technol 1998;37:9-18.
233. Klopman G, Saiakhov R, Tu MH, Pusca F, Rorije E. Computer-assisted evaluation of anaerobic biodegradation products. Pure Appl Chem 1998;70:1385-94.
234. Damborsky J, Berglund A, Kuty M, Ansorgova A, Nagata Y, et al. Mechanism-based quantitative structure-biodegradability relationships for hydrolytic deha-logenation of chloro-and bromo-alkenes. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1998;17:450-8.
235. Rorije E, Peijnenburg WJGM, Klopman G. Structural requirements for anaerobic biodegradation of organic chemicals-A fragment model analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 1998;17:1943-50.
236. Hornak V, Balaz S, Schaper KJ, Seydel JK. Multiple binding modes in 3D-QSAR-Microbial degradation of polychlorinated biphenyls. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1998;17:427-36.
237. Huuskonen J. Prediction of biodegradation from the atom-type electrotopologi-cal state indices. Environ Toxicol Chem 2001;20:2152-7.
238. Raymond JW, Rogers TN, Shonnard DR, Kline AA. A review of structure-based biodegradation estimation methods. J Hazard Mater 2001;84:189-215.
239. Cartwright HM. Investigation of structure-biodegradability relationships in polychlorinated biphenyls using self-organizing maps. Neural Comput Appl 2002;11:30-6.
240. Srikanth K, Debnath B, Jha T. QSAR study on adenosine kinase inhibition of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine nucleoside analogues using the Hansch approach. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2002;12:899-902.
241. Lindner AS, Whitfield C, Chen N, Semrau JD, Adriaens P. Quantitative struc-ture-biodegradation relationships for ortho-substituted biphenyl compounds oxidized by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22:2251-7.
242. Liu Y, Liu SS, Cui SH, Cai SX. A novel quantitative structure-biodegradability relationship (QSBR) of substituted benzenes based on MHDV descriptor. J Chin Chem Soc 2003;50:319-24.
243. Lu GH, Wang C, Yuan X, Zhao YH. QSBR study of substituted phenols and benzoic acids. J Environ Sci 2003;15:88-91.
244. Yang H, Jiang Z, Shi S. Anaerobic biodegradability of aliphatic compounds and their quantitative structure biodegradability relationships. Sci Total Environ 2004;322:209-19.
245. Liu SS, Yan DQ, Cui SH, Wang LS. VSMP for modeling the biodegradability of substituted benzenes based on electrotopological state indices for atom types. Chin J Chem 2005;23:622-6.
246. Kuanar M, Kuanar SK, Patel S, Mishra BK. QSAR studies on biological oxygen demand of alcohols. Ind J Chem B 2006;45:766-72.
247. Yang H, Jiang Z, Shi S. Aromatic compounds biodegradation under anaerobic conditions and their QSBR models. Sci Total Environ 2006;358:265-76.
248. Sabljic A. The prediction of fish bioconcentration factors of organic pollutants from the molecular connectivity model. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hygiene und Ihre Grenzgebiete 1987;33:493-6.
249. de Voogt P, Wegener JW, Klamer JC, van Zijl GA, Govers H. Prediction of environmental fate and effects of heteroaromatic polycyclic aromatics by QSARs: The position of n-octanol/water partition coefficients. Biomed Environ Sci 1988;1:194-209.
250. Geyer HJ, Scheunert I, Bruggemann R, Steinberg C, Korte F, et al. QSAR for organic chemical bioconcentration in Daphnia, algae, and mussels. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:387-94.
251. de Bruijn J, Hermens J. Qualitative and quantitative modelling of toxic effects of organophosphorous compounds to fish. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:441-55.
252. McCarty LS, Mackay D, Smith AD, Ozburn GW, Dixon DG. Interpreting aquatic toxicity QSARs: The significance of toxicant body residues at the pharmacologic endpoint. Sci Total Environ 1991;109-10:515-25.
253. Bintein S, Devillers J, Karcher W. Nonlinear dependence of fish bioconcentration on n-octanol/water partition coefficient. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1993;1:29-39.
254. Nendza M, Jackel H, Muller M, Giesreuschel A, Klein W. Estimation of exposure and ecotoxicity related parameters by computer based structure-property and structure-activity relationships. Toxicol Environ Chem 1993;40:57-69.
255. Hermens J. Prediction of environmental toxicity based on structure-activity relationships using mechanistic information. Sci Total Environ 1995;171:235-42.
256. Todeschini R, Gramatica P. 3D-Modelling and prediction by WHIM descriptors: 6. Application of WHIM descriptors in QSAR studies. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1997;16:120-5.
257. Tao S, Hu H, Xu F, Dawson R, Li B, Cao J. QSAR modeling of bioconcentration factors in fish based on fragment constants and structural correction factors. J Environ Sci Heal B 2001;36:631-49.
258. Wei D, Zhang A, Wu C, Han S, Wang L. Progressive study and robustness test of QSAR model based on quantum chemical parameters for predicting BCF of selected polychlorinated organic compounds (PCOCs). Chemosphere 2001;44:1421-8.
259. Dearden JC. Prediction of environmental toxicity and fate using quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). J Braz Chem Soc 2002;13:754-62.
260. Dimitrov SD, Mekenyan OG, Walker JD. Non-linear modeling of bioconcentration using partition coefficients for narcotic chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:177-84.
261. Nakai S, Saito S, Takeuchi M, Takimoto Y, Matsuo M. The inorganic and organic characters for predicting bioconcentration on wide variety of chemicals in fish. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:667-73.
262. Dimitrov SD, Dimitrova NC, Walker JD, Veith GD, Mekenyan OG. Predicting bioconcentration factors of highly hydrophobic chemicals: Effects of molecular size. Pure Appl Chem 2002;74:1823-30.
263. Dimitrov SD, Dimitrova NC, Walker JD, Veith GD, Mekenyan OG. Bioconcentration potential predictions based on molecular attributes-An early warning approach for chemicals found in humans, birds, fish and wildlife. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22:58-68.
264. Fatemi MH, Jalali-Heravi M, Konuze E. Prediction of bioconcentration factor using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. Anal Chim Acta 2003;486:101-8.
265. Gramatica P, Papa E. QSAR modeling of bioconcentration factor by theoretical molecular descriptors. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22:374-85.
266. Khadikar PV, Singh S, Mandloi D, Joshi S, Bajaj AV. QSAR study on bioconcentration factor (BCF) of polyhalogenated biphenyls using the PI index. Bioorg Med Chem 2003;11:5045-50.
267. Sacan MT, Erdem SS, Ozpinar GA, Balcioglu IA. QSPR study on the bioconcentration factors of nonionic organic compounds in fish by characteristic root index and semiempirical molecular descriptors. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 2004;44:985-92.
268. Bermudez-Saldana JM, Escuder-Gilabert L, Medina-Hernandez MJ, Villanueva-Camanas RM, Sagrado S. Modelling bioconcentration of pesticides in fish using biopartitioning micellar chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2005;1063:153-60.
269. Gramatica P, Papa E. An update of the BCF QSAR model based on theoretical molecular descriptors. QSAR Comb Sci 2005;24:953-60.
270. Khadikar PV, Singh S, Mandloi D, Joshi S, Bajaj AV. QSAR study on bioconcentration factor (BCF) of polyhalogented biphenyls using the PI index. Bioorg Med Chem 2003 Nov 17; 11(23):5045-50.
271. Tao S, Hu H, Xu F, Dawson R, Li B, Cao J. QSAR modeling of bioconcentration factors in fish based on fragment constants and structural correction factors. J Environ Sci Health B 2001 Sep; 36(5):631-49.
272. Veith GD, DeFoe DL, Bergstedt BV. Measuring and estimating the bioconcentration factor in fish. J Fish Res Bourd Can 1979;36:1040-8.
273. Vanbavel B, Andersson P, Wingfors H, Ahgren J, Bergqvist PA, et al. Multivariate modeling of PCB bioaccumulation in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Environ Toxicol Chem 1996;15:947-54.
274. MacDonald D, Breton R, Sutcliffe R, Walker J. Uses and limitations of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) to categorize substances on the Canadian domestic substance list as persistent and/or bioaccumulative, and inherently toxic to non-human organisms. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2002;13:43-55.
275. Carlsen L, Walker JD. QSARs for prioritizing PBT substances to promote pollution prevention. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22:49-57.
276. Arnot JA, Gobas FAPC. A generic QSAR for assessing the bioaccumulation potential of organic chemicals in aquatic food webs. QSAR Comb Sci 2003;22:337-45.
277. Dearden JC. QSAR modeling of bioaccumulation. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ, editors, Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004. p. 333:55.
278. Mekenyan OG, Dimitrov SD, Pavlov TS, Veith GD. POPs: A QSAR system for developing categories for persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic chemicals and their metabolites. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2005;16:103-33.
279. Ivanciuc T, Ivanciuc O, Klein DJ. Modeling the bioconcentration factors and bioaccumulation factors of polychlorinated biphenyls with posetic quantitative super-structure/activity relationships (QSSAR). Mol Divers 2006;10:133-45.
280. Gombar VK, Enslein K, Hart JB, Blake BW, Borgstedt HH. Estimation of maximum tolerated dose for long-term bioassays from acute lethal dose and structure by QSAR. Risk Anal 1991 Sep; 11(3):509-17.
281. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Benz RD, Contrera JF. Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: I. QSAR estimation of the maximum recommended therapeutic dose (MRTD) and no effect level (NOEL) of organic chemicals based on clinical trial data. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2004 Jan; 1(1):61-76.
282. Roy K, Ghosh G. QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. VI. Acute toxicity of benzene derivatives to tadpoles. J Mol Model 2006;12(3):306-16.
283. Wang ZY, Han XY, Wang LS. Quantitative correlation of chromatographic retention and acute toxicity for alkyl(1-phenylsulfonyl) cycloalkane carboxylates and their structural parameters by DFT. Chin J Struct Chem 2005;24(7):851-7.
284. Devillers J. Prediction of mammalian toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides from QSTR modeling. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2004;15(5-6):501-10.
285. Cronin MTD. Dearden JC. QSAR in toxicology: 2. Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity and interspecies correlations. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1995;14(2):117-20.
286. Moore DR. Breton RL. MacDonald DB. A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure-activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 2003;22(8):1799-809.
287. Zmuidinavicius D, Japertas P, Petrauskas A, Didziapetris R. Progress in toxin-formatics: The challenge of predicting acute toxicity. Curr Topics Med Chem 2003;3(11):1301-14.
288. Huuskonen J. QSAR modeling with the electrotopological state indices: Predicting the toxicity of organic chemicals. Chemosphere 2003;50(7):949-53.
289. Muzikant AL, Penland RC. Models for profiling the potential QT prolongation risk of drugs. Curr Opin Drug Discover Devel 2002;5:127-35.
290. Cavalli A, Poluzzi E, De Ponti F, Recanatini M. Toward a pharmacophore for drugs inducing the long QT syndrome: Insights from a CoMFA study of HERG K(+) channel blockers. J Med Chem 2002;45:3844-53.
291. Roche O, Trube G, Zuegge J, Pflimlin P, Alanine A, et al. A virtual screening method for prediction of the HERG potassium channel liability of compound libraries. ChemBioChem 2002;3:455-9.
292. Keseru GM. Prediction of hERG potassium channel affinity by traditional and hologram QSAR methods. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2003;13:2773-5.
293. Pearlstein RA, Vaz RJ, Kang J, Chen XL, Preobrazhenskaya M, Shchekotikhin AE, Korolev AM, Lysenkova LN, Miroshnikova OV, Hendrix J, Rampe D. Characterization of HERG potassium channel inhibition using CoMSIA 3D QSAR and homology modeling approaches. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2003;13:1829-35.
294. Aptula AO, Cronin MTD. Prediction of hERG K+ blocking potency: Application of structural knowledge. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2004;15:399-411.
295. Fernandez D, Ghanta A, Kauffman GW, Sanguinetti MC. Physicochemical features of the HERG channel drug binding site. J Biol Chem 2004;279:10120-7.
296. Tobita M, Nishikawa T, Nagashima R. A discriminant model constructed by the support vector machine method for HERG potassium channel inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005;15:2886-90.
297. Cianchetta G, Li Y, Kang J, Rampe D, Fravolini A, et al. Predictive models for hERG potassium channel blockers. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005;15:3637-42.
298. O'Brien SE, de Groot MJ. Greater than the sum of its parts: Combining models for useful ADMET prediction. J Med Chem 2005;48:1287-91.
299. Crumb WJ, Ekins S, Sarazan RD, Wikel JH, Wrighton SA, Carlson C, et al. Effects of antipsychotic drugs on I-to, I-Na, I-sus, I-K1, and hERG: QT prolongation, structure activity relationships, and network analysis. Pharmaceut Res 2006;23:1133-43.
300. Seierstad M, Agrafiotis DK. A QSAR model of HERG binding using a large, diverse, and internally consistent training set. Chem Biol Drug Des 2006;67:284-96.
301. Yoshida K, Niwa T. Quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on inhibition of HERG potassium channels. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46:1371-8.
302. Coi A, Massarelli I, Murgia L, Saraceno M, Calderone V, et al. Prediction of hERG potassium channel affinity by the CODESSA approach. Bioorg Med Chem 2006;14:3153-9.
303. Song M, Clark M. Development and evaluation of an in silico model for hERG binding. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46:392-400.
304. Ekins S, Balakin KV, Savchuk N, Ivanenkov Y. Insights for human ether-ago-go-related gene potassium channel inhibition using recursive partitioning and Kohonen and Sammon mapping techniques. J Med Chem 2006;49:5059-71.
305. 50 values. In: Benchmark papers in toxicology, Vol 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Scientific Publishers, 1983.
306. Enslein K, Tuzzeo TM, Borgstedt HH, et al. Prediction of rat oral LD50 from Daphnia magna LC50 and chemical structure. In: Kaiser LE, editor, Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) in environmental toxicology: II. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on QSAR in Environmental Toxicology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, June 9-13, l986. 1987. p. 9l-106.
307. Enslein K, Blake BW, Tomb ME, Brgstedt HH. Prediction of Ames test results by structure-activity relationships. In vitro Toxicol 1986;1:33-44.
308. Enslein K, Tomb ME, Lander TR. Structure-activity models of biological oxygen demand. In: Kaiser, KLE, editor, QSAR in environmental toxicology. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984. p. 89-109.
309. Luger GF. Artificial intelligence: Structures and strategies for complex problem solving, 5th Edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2005.
310. Kahn J. From airports tarmacs to online job banks to medical labs, artificial intelligence is everywhere. Wired 2002;10(3).
311. Zhu Q, Stillman MJ. Expert systems and analytical chemistry: Recent progress in the Acexpert Project. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1996;36:497-509.
312. Huixiao H, Xinquan X. ESSESA: An expert system for structure elucidation from spectra: 5. Substructure constraints from analysis of first-order 1H-NMR spectra. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:1259-66.
313. Benfenati E, Gini G. Computational predictive programs (expert systems) in toxicology. Toxicology 1997;119(3):213-25.
314. Schmidt O. Die Characterisierung der einfachen und Kerbs erzeugenden aroma-tischen Kohlenwasserstoffe durch die Dichteverteilung bestimmer Valenzelec-tronen. Z Phys Chem 1939;42:83-110.
315. Coulson CA. Electronic configuration and carcinogenesis. Adv Cancer Res 1953;1:1-56.
316. Pullman A, Pullman B. Electronic structure and carcinogenic activity of aromatic molecules; new developments. Adv Cancer Res 1955;3:117-69.
317. Pullman B, Pullman A. Electron-donor or electron-acceptor properties and carcinogenic activity of organic molecules. Nature 1963;199:467-9.
318. Nagata C, Hukui K, Yonezava T, Tagashira Y. Electronic structure and carcinogenic activity of aromatic compounds. Cancer Res 1955;15:233-9.
319. Smith IA, Seybold PG. Substituent effects in chemical carcinogens: Methyl derivatives of the benzacridines. J Hetero Chem 1979;16:421-5.
320. Woo Y, Lai D, Argus M, Arcos J. Development of structure-activity relationship rules for predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Toxicol Lett 1995;79:219-28.
321. Sanderson DM, Earnshaw CG. Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure: The DEREK system. Hum Exp Toxicol 1991;10:261-73.
322. Dearden JC, et al. The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity: The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM Workshop 24). ATLA 1997;25:223-52.
323. Crettaz P, Benigni R. Prediction of the rodent carcinogenicity of 60 pesticides by the DEREKfW expert system. J Chem Inf Model 2005;45:1864-73.
324. Turing AM. The automatic computing engine (ACE) report (1945). In: Davies DW, editor, Com. Sci. 57, National Physical Laboratory, Apr. 1972.
325. Klopman G. Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies: Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 1984;106(24):7315-21.
326. Klopman G. MULTICASE. 1. A hierarchical computer automated structure evaluation program. Quant Struct-Act Rel 1992;11(2):176-84.
327. Klopman G, Zhu H, Fuller MA, Saiakhov RD. Searching for an enhanced predictive tool for mutagenicity. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2004;15(4):251-63.
328. Klopman G, Chakravarti SK, Harris N, Ivanov J, Saiakhov RD. In-silico screening of high production volume chemicals for mutagenicity using the MCASE QSAR expert system. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2003;14(2):165-80.
329. Rosenkranz HS, Mersch-Sundermann V, Klopman G. SOS chromotest and mutagenicity in Salmonella: Evidence for mechanistic differences. Mutat Res Fundam Mol 1999;431:(1) 31-38.
330. Zeiger E, Ashby J, Bakale G, Enslein K, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Prediction of Salmonella mutagenicity. Mutagenesis 1996 Sep; 11(5):471-84.
331. Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens: Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTICASE. Mutat Res 1994 Feb 1; 305(1):33-46.
332. Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and muta-genesis-Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using multi-case. Mutat Res 1994;305:(1) 33-46.
333. Mersch-Sundermann V, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Chemical structure and genotoxicity: Studies of the SOS chromotest. Mutat Res 1996;340(2-3):81-91.
334. Grant SG, Zhang YP, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Modeling the mouse lymphoma forward mutational assay: The Gene-Tox program database. Mutat Res-Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2000;465(1-2):201-29.
335. Henry B, Grant SG, Klopman G, Rosenkranz HS. Induction of forward mutations at the thymidine kinase locus of mouse lymphoma cells: Evidence for elec-trophilic and non-electrophilic mechanisms. Mutat Res 1998 Feb 2; 397(2):313-35.
336. Rosenkranz HS, Klopman G. Relationships between electronegativity and geno-toxicity. Mutat Res 1995 May; 328(2):215-27.
337. Matthews EJ, Kruhlak NL, Weaver JL, Benz RD, Contrera JF. Assessment of the health effects of chemicals in humans: II. Construction of an adverse effects database for QSAR modeling. Curr Drug Discov Technol 2004 Dec; 1(4):243-54.
338. Rosenkranz HS, Klopman G. Structural relationships between mutagenicity, maximum tolerated dose, and carcinogenicity in rodents. Environ Mol Mutagen 1993;21(2):193-206.
339. Japertas P, Didziapetris R, Petrauskas A. Fragmental methods in the analysis of biological activities of diverse compound sets. Mini Rev Med Chem 2003;3(8):797-808.
340. Zmuidinavicius D, Japertas P, Petrauskas A, Didziapetris R. Progress in toxin-formatics: The challenge of predicting acute toxicity. Curr Top Med Chem. 2003;3(11):1301-14.
341. Bicciato, S. Artificial neural network technologies to identify biomarkers for therapeutic intervention. Curr Opin Mol Ther 2004;6(6):616-23.
342. Islaih M, Li B, Kadura IA, Reid-Hubbard JL, Deahl JT, et al. Comparison of gene expression changes induced in mouse and human cells treated with direct-acting mutagens. Environ Mol Mutagen 2004;44(5):401-19.
343. Kramer S, Helma, C. Machine learning and data mining. In: Helma C, editor, Predictive toxicology. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 2005. p. 223-54.
344. Helma C. Lazy structure-activity relationships (lazar) for the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity and Salmonella mutagenicity. Mol Divers 2006 May; 10(2):147-58.