Computer-aided rodent carcinogenicity prediction

Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

Volumn 586, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 138-146

  Lagunin, Alexey A ^a   Dearden, John C ^b   Filimonov, Dmitri A ^a   Poroikov, Vladimir V ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

^b LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carcinogenicity; CPDB; NTP; PASS; Prediction; Rodents; SAR

Indexed keywords

CARCINOGEN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CARCINOGEN TESTING; CARCINOGENIC ACTIVITY; CARCINOGENICITY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA BASE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RODENT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TOXICOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ANIMALS; CARCINOGENICITY TESTS; CARCINOGENS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RODENTIA; SEX FACTORS; SOFTWARE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

ANIMALIA; RODENTIA;

EID: 28644449257     PISSN: 13835718     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. L.S. Gold, N.B. Manley, and B.N. Ames Extrapolation of carcinogenicity between species: qualitative and quantitative factors Risk Anal. 12 4 1992 579 588
2. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), http://monographs. iarc.fr/
3. V.A. Fung, J.C. Barrett, and J. Huff The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards Environ. Health Perspect. 103 1995 680 683
4. R. Tennant Stratification of rodent carcinogenicity bioassay results to reflect relative human hazards Mutat. Res. 286 1993 111 118
5. G.A. Kerckaert, R. Brauninger, R.A. LeBoeuf, and R.J. Istorf Use of the Syrian hamster embryo cell transformation assay for carcinogenicity prediction of chemical currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program in rodent bioassays Environ. Health Perspect. 104 1996 1075 1084
6. V.J. Feron, M. Schwarz, K. Hemminki, and D. Krewski Long- and medium-term carcinogenicity studies in animals and short-term genotoxicity tests IARC Sci. Publ. 131 1999 103 129
7. Y.T. Woo, D.Y. Lai, J.C. Arcos, M.F. Argus, M.C. Cimino, S. DeVito, and L. Keifer Mechanism-based structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis of carcinogenic potential of 30 NTP test chemicals Environ. Carcin. Eco. Rev. C 15 1997 139 160
8. C.A. Marchant Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity using the DEREK system for 30 chemicals currently being tested by the National Toxicology Program Environ. Health Perspect. 104 1996 1065 1074
9. Y.P. Zhang, N. Sussman, O.T. Macina, H.S. Rosenkranz, and G. Klopman Prediction of the carcinogenicity of a second group of organic chemicals undergoing carcinogenicity testing Environ. Health Perspect. 104 1996 1045 1050
10. D.F.V. Lewis, C. Ioannides, and D.V. Parke COMPACT and molecular structure in toxicity assessment: a prospective evaluation of 30 chemicals currently being tested for rodent carcinogenicity by the NCI/NTP Environ. Health Perspect. 104 1996 1011 1016
11. R.D. King, and A. Srinivasan Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity biossays from molecular structure using inductive logic programming Environ. Health Perspect. 104 1996 1031 1040
12. A.M. Richard, and R. Benigni AI and SAR approaches for predicting chemical carcinogenicity: survey and status report SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 13 1 2002 1 20
13. R. Benigni, and R. Zito The second National Toxicology Program comparative exercise on the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity: definitive results Mutat. Res. 566 1 2004 49 63
14. V.V. Poroikov, D.A. Filimonov, Yu.V. Borodina, A.A. Lagunin, and A. Kos Robustness of biological activity spectra predicting by computer program pass for non-congeneric sets of chemical compounds J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40 6 2000 1349 1355
15. PASS, http://www.ibmh.msk.su/PASS.
16. A.V. Stepanchikova, A.A. Lagunin, D.A. Filimonov, and V.V. Poroikov Prediction of biological activity spectra for substances: evaluation on the diverse set of drug-like structures Curr. Med. Chem. 10 2003 225 233
17. V. Poroikov, and D. Filimonov PASS: prediction of biological activity spectra for substances Helma Christoph Predictive Toxicology 2005 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Boca Raton 459 478
18. V.V. Poroikov, and D.A. Filimonov How to acquire new biological activities in old compounds by computer prediction J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 16 11 2003 819 824
19. National Toxicology Program, Reports of NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of chemicals in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice, National Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1980-1998.
20. National Toxicology Program, http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/htdocs/pub. html.
21. L.S. Gold, N.B. Manley, T.H. Slone, and J.M. Ward Compendium of chemical carcinogens by target organ: results of chronic bioassays in rats, mice, hamsters, dogs, and monkeys Toxicol. Pathol. 29 6 2001 639 652
22. Carcinogenic Potency Database, http://potency.berkeley.edu/cpdb.html.
23. MDL Information Systems Inc., http://www.mdl.com.
24. N. Takihi, Y.P. Zhang, G. Klopman, and H.S. Rosenkranz An approach for evaluating and increasing the informational content of mutagenicity and clastogenicity data base Mutagenesis 8 1993 257 264
25. M. Liu, N. Sussman, G. Klopman, and H.S. Rosenkranz Estimation of the optimal data base size for structure-activity analyses: the Salmonella mutagenicity data base Mut. Res. 358 1996 63 72
26. L.C. Gold, N.B. Manley, T.H. Slone, and L. Rohrbach Supplement to the Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB): results of animal bioassays published in the general literature in 1993 to 1994 and by the National Toxicology Program in 1995 to 1996 Environ. Health Perspect. Suppl. 107 Suppl. 4 1999 527 602
27. C.A. Marchant, and D.B. Combes Artificial intelligence: the use of computer methods in the prediction of metabolism and toxicity M.G. Ford R. Greenwood G.T. Brooks R. Franke Bioactive Compound Design: Possibilities for Industrial Use 1996 BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd. 153 162
28. E.J. Matthews, and J.F. Contrera A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 28 1998 242 264