Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity from molecular structure

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1506-1514

  Sun, Hongmao ^a  

^a HOFFMANN LA ROCHE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL CARCINOGENICITY; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION (FDA); HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING (HTS); MOLECULAR DESCRIPTOR SYSTEMS;

DRUG PRODUCTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEALTH RISKS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTAGENS; STATISTICAL METHODS; TOXICITY;

CARCINOGENS;

CARCINOGEN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CARCINOGEN TESTING; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOUSE; RAT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALS; CARCINOGENICITY TESTS; CARCINOGENS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MALE; MICE; RATS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 4043086954     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci049917y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sun, H. A Universal Molecular Descriptor System for Prediction of logP, logS, logBB and Absorption. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 748-757.
2. National Toxicology Program. http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/main_pages/ about_NTP.html.
3. Contrera, J. F.; Jacobs, A. C.; DeGorge, J. J. Carcinogenicity testing and the evaluation of regulatory requirements for pharmaceuticals. Regul. Toxicol. Phamacol. 1997, 25, 130-145.
4. Sato, S.; Tomita, I. Short-Term Screening Method for the Prediction of Carcinogenicity of Chemical Substances: Current Status and Problems of an in vivo Rodent Micronucleus Assay. J. Health Sci. 2001, 47, 1-8.
5. Ames, B. N.; Durston, W. E.; Yamasaki, E.; Lee, F. D. Carcinogens Are Mutagens: A Simple Test System Combining Liver Homogenates for Activation and Bacteria for Detection. P roc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1973, 70, 2281-2285.
6. Maron, D. M.; Ames, B. N. Revised Methods for the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test. Mutat. Res. 1983, 113, 173-215.
7. Yuspa, S. H.; Poirier, M. C, Chemical Carcinogenesis: From Animal Models to Molecular Models in One Decade. Adv. Cancer Res. 1988, 50, 25-70.
8. Lee, Y.; Buchanan, B. G.; Klopman, G.; Dimayuga, M.; Rosenkranz, H. S. The Potential of Organ Specific Toxicity for Predicting Rodent Carcinogenicity. Mutat. Res. 1996, 358, 37-62.
9. Sanderson, D. M.; Earnshaw, C. G. Compuer Prediction of Possible Toxic Action from Chemical Structure; the DEREK System. Human Exp. Toxicol. 1991, 10, 261-273.
10. Franke, R.; Gruska, A.; Giuliani, A.; Benigni, R. Prediction of Rodent Carcinogenicity of Aromatic Amines: A Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships Model. Carcinogenisis 2001, 22, 1561-1571.
11. Benigni, R.; Passerini, L. Carcinogenicity of the Aromatic Amines: From Structure-Activity Relationships to Mechanisms of Action and Risk Assessment, Mutat. Res. 2002, 511, 191-206.
12. Cariello, N. F.; Wilson, J. D.; Britt, B. H.; Wedd, D. J. Burlinson, B.; Gombar, V. Comparison of the Computer Programs DEREK and TOPKAT to Predict Bacterial Mutagenicity. Mutagenesis 2002, 14, 321-329.
13. Enslein, K.; Gombar, V. K.; Blake, B. W. Use of SAR in Computer-Assisted Prediction of Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity of Chemicals by the TOPKAT Program. Mutat. Res. 1994, 305, 47-61.
14. Debnath, A. K.; Lopez de Compadre, R. L.; Debnath, G.; Shusterman, A. J.; Hansch, C. Structure-Activity Relationship of Mutagenic Aromatic and Heteroaromatic Nitro Compounds, J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 786-797.
15. Young, S. S.; Gombar, V. K.; Emptage, M. R.; Cariello, N. F.; Lambert, C. Mixture Deconvolution and Analysis of Ames Mutagenicity Data. Chem. Intell. Lab. Sys. 2002, 60, 5-11.
16. Lee, Y.; Buchanan, B. G.; Mattison, D. M.; Klopman, G.; Dimayuga, M.; Rosenkranz, H. S. Learning Rules to Predict Rodent Carcinogenicity of Non-Genotoxic Chemicals, Mutat. Res. 1995, 328, 127-149.
17. Taningher, M.; Malacarne, D.; Perrotta, A,; Parodi, S. Computer-Aided Analysis of Mutagenicity and Cell Transformation Data for Assessing Their Relationship With Carcinogenicity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1999, 33, 226-239.
18. Klopman, G.; Chakravarti, S. K.; Zhu, H.; Ivanov, J. M.; Saiakhov, R. D. ESP: A Method To Predict Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties of Chemicals Using Multiple MCASE Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 41, 671-678.
19. http://www.predictive-toxicology.org/data/ntp/.
20. http://www.predictive-toxicology.org/data/fda/.
21. Eriksson, L.; Johansson, E.; Kettaneh-Wold, N.; Wold, S. Multi- and Megavariate Data Analysis Principles and Applications; 2001; Umetrics Academy: Kinneion, NJ.
22. SIMCA-P 10.0, Umetric Inc., Kinnelon, NJ, http://www.umetrics.com.
23. ChemTree, Golden Helix, Inc. Bozeman, MT. http://www.goldenhelix.com.
24. Rao, S. N.; Stockfisch, T. P. Partially Unified Multiple Property Recursive Partitioning (PUMP-RP) Analyses of Cyclooxygenase (COX) Inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1614-1622.