Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument

Cognitive Science

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 733-773

  Strom, Dolores ^a   Kemeny, Vera ^a   Lehrer, Richard ^a   Forman, Ellice ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038139052     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00052-0     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Anderson R.C., Chinn C., Chang J., Waggoner M., Yi H. On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction. 15:1997;135-167.
2. Arcavi A., Meira L., Smith J.P., Kessel C. Teaching mathematical problem solving An analysis of an emergent classroom community . Schoenfeld A.H., Kaput J., Dubinsky E., Research in collegiate mathematics education, Vol. III. 1991;1-70 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
3. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Making believe: the collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom. In D. Phillips (Ed.), Yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Constructivism in education. (pp. 193-224). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Brown A.L. Design experiments Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings . Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2:1992;141-178.
5. Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting the improvement of learning and teaching in social and institutional context. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: 25 years of progress (pp. 455-478). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Cobb P., Wood T., Yackel E. Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. Forman E.A., Minick N., Stone C.A.ddison, . Contexts for learning. 1993;91-119 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Davis P.J., Hersch R. The mathematical experience. 1981;Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
8. Forman E.A., Larreamendy-Joerns J., Stein M.K., Brown C.A. "You're going to want to find out which and prove it" Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom . Learning and Instruction. 8:(6):1998;527-548.
9. Goffman E. Frame analysis. 1974;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Goffman E. Forms of talk. 1981;University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
11. Goodwin C. Vision and inscription in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity. 7:(1 & 2):2000;19-36.
12. Hall R. The organization and development of discursive practices for "having a theory." Discourse Processes. 27:1999;187-218.
13. Harel G., Sowder L. Students' proof schemas Results from exploratory studies . Schoenfeld A.H., Kaput J., Dubinsky E., Research in collegiate mathematics education, III. 1998;234-283 Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC.
14. Healy L., Hoyles C. A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31:2000;396-428.
15. Kline M. The loss of certainty. 1980;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Krummheuer G. The ethnography of argumentation. Cobb P., Bauersfeld H., The emergence of mathematical meaning Interaction in classroom cultures . 1995;229-269 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
17. Kuhn D. Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review. 96:1989;674-689.
18. Lakatos I. Proofs and refutations. 1976;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Lampert M. When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer Mathematical knowing and teaching . American Educational Research Journal. 27:1990;29-63.
20. Latour B. Drawing things together. Lynch M., Woolgar S., Representation in scientific practice. 1990;19-68 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Lave J., Murtaugh M., de la Rocha O. The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. Rogoff B., Lave J., Everyday cognition Development in social context . 1984;67-94 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Lehrer R., Jenkins M., Osana H. Longitudinal study of children's reasoning about space and geometry. Lehrer R., Chazan D., Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. 1998;137-167 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
23. Lehrer R., Jacobson C., Thoyre G., Kemeny V., Strom D., Horvath J., Gance S., Koehler M. Developing understanding of space and geometry in the primary grades. Lehrer R., Chazan D., Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space. 1998;169-200 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
24. Lehrer R., Jacobson C., Kemeny V., Strom D. Building on children's intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. Fennema E., Romberg T.A., Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. 1999;63-87 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
25. Martin W.G., Harel G. Proof schemes of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 20:1989;41-51.
26. Mayr E. This is biology. 1997;Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics . Principles and standards for school mathematics. 2000;Author, Reston, VA.
28. Newell A., Simon H.A. Human problem solving. 1972;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
29. Ochs E., Taylor C., Rudolph D., Smith R. Storytelling as a theory-building activity. Discourse Processes. 15:1992;37-72.
30. O'Connor M.C., Michaels S. Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy . Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 24:1993;318-335.
31. O'Connor M.C., Michaels S. Shifting participant frameworks Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion . Hicks D., Discourse, learning and schooling. 1996;63-103 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Outhred L.N., Mitchelmore M.C. Young children's intuitive understanding of rectangular area measurement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31:2000;144-167.
33. Piaget J., Inhelder B. The child's conception of space. 1956;Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
34. Piaget J., Inhelder B., Szeminska A. The child's conception of geometry. 1960;Basic Books, New York.
35. Rittle-Johnson B., Siegler R. The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics A review . Donlan C., The development of mathematical skills. 1998;75-110 Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis, East Sussex, UK.
36. Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking Cognitive development in social context . 1990;Oxford University Press, New York.
37. Rotman B. Ad infinitum. 1993;Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
38. Rotman B. Toward a semiotics of mathematics. Semiotica. 72:1988;1-35.
39. Schauble L., Glaser R. Scientific thinking in children and adults. Kuhn D., Developmental perspectives in teaching and learning thinking skills Contributions to human development . Vol. 21:1990;9-27 Karger, Basel.
40. Schoenfeld A.H. On having and using geometric knowledge. Hiebert J., Conceptual and procedural knowledge The case of mathematics . 1986;225-264 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
41. Schoenfeld A.H. Explorations of students' mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 20:1989;338-355.
42. Silver E.A. Using conceptual and procedural knowledge A focus on relationships . Hiebert J., Conceptual and procedural knowledge The case of mathematics . 1986;181-198 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
43. Simon H.A. The sciences of the artificial. 1969;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Tharp R.G., Gallimore R. Rousing minds to life. 1988;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
45. Wenger E. Communities of practice Learning, meaning and identity . 1998;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Wertsch J. Mind as action. 1998;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. Yackel E., Cobb P. Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 27:(4):1996;458-477.