Systemic intervention in a university department: Reflections on arrested action research

Systemic Practice and Action Research

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 133-152

  Houston, Don ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Boundary critique; Higher education; Quality; Systemic intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 40849141286     PISSN: 1094429X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11213-007-9087-z     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ackoff RL, Pourdehand J (2001) On misdirected systems. Syst Res 18:199-205
2. Askling B, Stensaker B (2002) Academic leadership: prescriptions, practices and paradoxes. TEAM 8:113-125
3. Attwater R (2000) Pluralism, economic rhetoric, and common property. Syst Prac Act Res 13:543-557
4. Badley G (2004) Reading an academic journal is like doing ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 5(1):Article 40. Retrieved on 20 June 2006 from http://www. qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-04/1-04badley-e.htm
5. Baldwin G (1994) The student as customer: the discourse of "quality" in higher education. J Tert Educ Adm 16:125-133
6. Banathy BH (1999) Systems thinking in higher education: learning comes into focus. Syst Res 16:133-145
7. Barton J, Emery M, Flood RL, Selsky JW, Wolstenholme E (2004) A maturing of systems thinking? Evidence from three perspectives. Syst Prac Act Res 17:3-36
8. Beer S (1984) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soc 35:7-25
9. Blaxter L, Hughes C, Tight M (1998) Telling it how it is: accounts of academic life. High Educ Q 52:300-315
10. Bowden J, Marton F (1998) The university of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. Kogan Page, London
11. Carmichael R, Palermo J, Reeve L, Vallence K (2001) Student learning: 'the heart of quality' in education and training. Assess Eval High Educ 26:450-463
12. Carr W, Kemmis S (1986) Becoming critical-education, knowledge and action research. Falmer Press, London
13. Colbeck C (2004) A cybernetic systems model of teaching and research production: Impact of disciplinary difference. Paper presented at the international colloquium on research and teaching: closing the divide? Winchester Hampshire, UK. Retrieved on May 30, 2006 from http://www.solent.ac. uk/ExternalUP/318/carol_colbeck_s_updated_paper.doc
14. Coupal L (2004) Practitioner-research and the regulation of research ethics: the challenge of individual, organizational, and social interests [34 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal] 6(1):Art. 6. Retrieved on 20 June 2006 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-05/05-1-6-e.htm
15. Coghlan D, Shani AB (2005) Roles, politics and ethics in action research design. Syst Prac Act Res 15:533-546
16. Deming WE (1993) The new economics for industry, education and government. MIT CAES, Cambridge, Mass
17. Elton L (2001) Research and teaching: conditions for a positive link. Teach High Educ 6:43-56
18. Flood RL (1995) Solving problem solving: a potent force for effective management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
19. Flood RL, Jackson M (1991) Creative problem solving: total systems intervention. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
20. Galbraith PL (1998) Systems dynamics and university management. Syst Dynam Rev 14:69-84
21. Galbraith PL (1999a) Systems thinking: a missing component in higher education planning? High Educ Policy 12:141-157
22. Galbraith PL (1999b) Universities as learning organisations-or not! In: Proceedings of 17th international conference of the system dynamics society and 5th Australian and New Zealand systems conference [CD-ROM], Wellington
23. Gregory A (2000) Problematizing participation: a critical review of approaches to participation in evaluation theory. Evaluation 6:179-199
24. Harvey L, Knight PT (1996) Transforming higher education. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham
25. Hawk DL (1999) Innovation versus environmental protection presumptions. Syst Prac Act Res 12:355-366
26. Horsburgh M (1999) Quality monitoring in higher education: the impact on student learning. Qual High Educ 5:9-25
27. Houston DJ (2007) TQM and higher education: a critical systems perspective on fitness for purpose. Qual High Educ 13:3-17
28. Ishikawa K (1985) What is total quality control? The Japanese way. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
29. Ison R (1999) Applying systems thinking to higher education. Syst Res 16:107-112
30. Jackson MC (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publisher, New York
31. Jackson MC (2003) Systems thinking: creative holism for managers. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
32. Jacques ML (1999) The call of quality: doing right things right. Qual Prog 32(9):48-54
33. Jauch LR, Orwig RA (1997) A violation of assumptions about TQM: why TQM won't work in the ivory tower. J Qual Manag 2:279-292
34. Jauch LR, Orwig RA (1999) The quality revolution in academe: a rejoinder to Mullin and Wilson. J Qual Manag 4(2):265-271
35. Jenkins A (2004) A guide to the research evidence on teaching-research relations. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved on August 26, 2005 from http: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record§ion= generic&id=383
36. Kezar A (2005) What campuses need to know about organizational learning and the learning organization. New Dir Higher Educ 131:7-22
37. Kezar A, Eckel P (2002) The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education. J High Edu 73:435-460
38. Knight P, Trowler PR (2000) Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Stud High Educ 25:69-83
39. Lomas L (2004) Embedding quality: the challenges for higher education. Qual Assur Educ 12:157-165
40. Malone S (2003) Ethics at home: informed consent in your own backyard. Qual Stud Educ 16:797-815
41. McIntyre J (2004) Facilitating critical systemic praxis (CSP) by means of experiential learning and conceptual tools. Syst Res 21:37-61
42. McWilliam E (2004) W(h)ither practitioner research? Aust Educ Res 31:113-126
43. Metcalf GS (2003) Learning to design systems. World Future 59:21-36
44. Meyer LH, Evans IM (2003) Motivating the professoriate: why sticks and carrots are only for donkeys. High Educ Manag Policy 15:151-167
45. Meyerson DE, Scully MA (1995) Tempered radicalism and the politics and ambivalence of change. Organ Sci 6:585-600
46. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
47. Morton A (1999) Ethics in action. Syst Prac Act Res 12:219-222
48. Mullin R, Wilson G (2000) Quality of undergraduate education: examining the current paradigm and system. J Quality Manag 5:225-246
49. Newton J (2002) Barriers to effective quality management and leadership: case study of two academic departments. High Educ 44:185-212
50. Quinlan KM (2002) Scholarly dimensions of academics' beliefs about engineering education. Teachers Teach 8:41-64
51. Ragsdell G (2000) Engineering a paradigm shift? An holistic approach to organisational change management. J Organ Change Manag 13:104-120
52. Reason P (2006) Choice and quality in action research practice. J Manage Inq 15:187-203
53. Reger RK, Gustafson LT, Demarie SM, Mullane JV (1994) Reframing the organization: why implementing total quality is easier said than done. Acad Manage Rev 19:565-584
54. Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Random House, Sydney
55. Seymour D, Kelley JM, Jasinski J (2004) Linking planning, quality improvement, and institutional research. New Dir Inst Res 123:50-56
56. Sharrock G (1998) Performance management and cultural difference in the Australian university. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 36:87-101
57. Soobrayan V (2003) Ethics, truth and politics in constructivist qualitative research. Westminst Stud Educ 26:107-123
58. Spear R (2001) The dark side of the moon-unilluminated dimensions of systems practice. Syst Pract Act Res 14:779-790
59. Srikanthan G, Dalrymple J (2005) Implementation of a holistic model for quality in higher education. Qual High Educ 11:69-81
60. Swepson P (2003) Some common ground that can provide a basis for collaboration between action researchers and scientists: a philosophical case that works in practice. Syst Prac Act Res 16(2):99-111
61. Tickle L (2001) Opening windows, closing doors: ethical dilemmas in educational action research. J Philos Educ 35:345-359
62. Trowler PR (2005) A sociology of teaching, learning and enhancement: improving practices in higher education. Rev Sociol 76:13-32
63. Ulrich W (2001) The quest for competence in systemic research and practice. Syst Res 18:3-28
64. Walker B, Haslett T (2002) Action research in management-ethical dilemmas. Syst Prac Act Res 15(6):523-533
65. Weick KE (1976) Educational organisations as loosely coupled systems. Admin Sci Quart 21:1-19
66. Weil S (1999) Re-creating universities for 'beyond the stable state': from 'dearingesque' systematic control to post-dearing systemic learning and inquiry. Syst Res 16:171-190
67. Wright T (1999) Systems thinking and systems practice: working in the fifth dimension. Syst Prac Act Res 12:607-631
68. Zeni J (1998) A guide to ethical issues and action research. Educ Action Res 6(1):9-19