Ethics at home: Informed consent in your own backyard

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 797-815

  Malone, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010495405     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390310001632153     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, P.V. (1998). Simple gifts: Ethical issues in the conduct of person-based composition research. College Composition and Communication, 49, 63-89.
2. Bishop, W. (1999). Ethnographic writing research: Writing it down, writing it up, and reading it. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
3. Brueggemann, B.J. (1996). Still-life: Representations and silences in the participant-observer role. In P. Mortensen & G.E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 17-39). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
4. Brunner, C.C. (1999). Lessons in moral inquiry. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 5, 137-156.
5. Caputo, J. (1993). Against ethics: contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
6. Cassell, J. (1980). Ethical principles for conducting fieldwork. American Anthropologist, 82, 28-41.
7. Dale, H. (1996). Dilemmas of fidelity: Qualitative research in the classroom. In P. Mortensen & G.E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 77-93). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
8. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
10. Eisner, E. & Peshkin, A. (1990). Introduction. In Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 1-14). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Gambell, TJ. (1995). Ethnography as veneration. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41, 162-174.
12. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
13. Goldstein, L.S. (2000). Ethical dilemmas in designing collaborative research: lessons learned the hard way. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 517-530.
14. Jonas, H. (1980). Philosophical reflections on experimenting with human subjects. In Philosophical essays: From current creed to technological man (pp. 105-131). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Lincoln, YS. (1990). Toward a categorical imperative for qualitative research. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate, (pp. 277-295). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Lincoln, Y.S. & Guba, E.G. (1989). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. Review of Higher Education, 12, 221-240.
18. Lofty, J. & Blot, R. (1997). Covering one’s tracks: Respecting and preserving informant anonymity. In C. Kirklighter, C. Vincent, & J.M. Moxley (Eds.), Voices and visions: Refiguring ethnography in composition, (pp. 45-56). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
19. Magolda, P.M. & Robinson, B.M. (1993, April). Doing harm: Unintended consequences of fieldwork. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC ED 362 560)
20. Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Moje, E.B. (2000). Changing our minds, changing our bodies: Power as embodied in research relations. Intwnational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 25-43.
22. Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G.E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 3-16). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
23. Peshkin, A. (1988). Virtuous subjectivity: In the participants-observer’s I’s. In D. Berg & K. Smith (Eds.), The self in social inquiry (pp. 267-282). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Rossman, G.B. (1984). “I owe you one”: Considerations of role and reciprocity in a study of graduate education for school administrators. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 15, 225-234.
25. Smith, L.M. (1990). Ethics, field studies, and the paradigm crisis. In E.G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 139-157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Smits, H., Friesen, D. Hicks, N., & Leroy, C. (1997). Encountering obligation in qualitative educational research: A postmodern perspective. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 43, 192-206.
27. Van Maanen, J. (1983). The moral fix: On the ethics of fieldwork. In R.M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: A collection of readings (pp. 269-287). Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
28. Williams, C.L. (1996). Dealing with the data: Ethical issues in case study research. In P. Mortensen & G.E. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 40-57). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
29. Zeni, J. (2001). A guide to ethical decision making for insider research. In Ethical issues in practitioner research (pp. 153-165). New York: Teachers College Press.