Self-esteem, interpersonal risk, and preference for e-mail to face-to-face communication

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 472-478

  Joinson, Adam N ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; SELF ESTEEM; TELEPHONE;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECEPTION; ELECTRONIC MAIL; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); RISK-TAKING; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 4344650870     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.472     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: the role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31:177-192.
2. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23:3-43.
3. Budman, S. (2000). Behavioral health care dot-com and beyond: computer-mediated communications in mental health and substance abuse treatments. American Psychologist 55:1290-1300.
4. Joinson, A.N., & Banyard, P. (2002). Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet. ASLIB Proceedings: New Information Perspectives 54:95-102.
5. Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the Internet: a discipline on the threshold of a new millennium. Applied and Preventive Psychology 8:231-246.
6. Barak, A., & Fisher, W.A. (2003). Experience with an Internet-based, theoretically grounded educational resource for the promotion of sexual and reproductive health. Sexual and Relationship Therapy 18:293-308.
7. Preece, J. (1999). Emphatic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers 12:63-77.
8. Joinson, A.N. (1999). Anonymity, disinhibition and social desirability on the Internet. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 31:433-438.
9. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: home-steading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Rosson, M.B. (1999). I get by with a little help from my cyber-friends: sharing stories of good and bad times on the Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication [On-line]. Available: http://jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol4/issue4/.
11. McKenna, K.Y.A., and Bargh, J. (2000). Plan 9 from Cyberspace: the implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4:57-75.
12. Tidwell, L.C., & Walther, J.B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations: getting to know one another a bit at a time. Human Communication Research 28:317-348.
13. Markus, M.L. (1994). Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12:119-149.
14. O'Sullivan, P. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research 26:403-431.
15. Fischer, C.S. (1992). America calling: a social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
16. Culwin, F., and Faulkner, X. (2001). SMS: users and usage. Presented at the UPA/Design Council Seminar.
17. Hamburger, Y.A., and Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior 16:441-449.
18. Swickert, R.J., Hittner, J.B., Harris, J.L., et al. (2002). Relationships among Internet use, personality and social support. Computers in Human Behavior 18:437-451.
19. Joinson, A.N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of the Internet: virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., et al. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues 58:49-74.
21. Baumeister, R.F., Tice, D.M., & Hutton, D.G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality 57:547-579.
22. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
23. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Buchanan, T. (2001). Online personality assessment. In: Reips, U., and Bosnjak, M. (eds.), Dimensions of Internet science. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers, pp. 57-74.
25. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Scharlott, B.W., and Christ, W.G. (1995). Overcoming relationship- initiation barriers: the impact of a computer-dating system on sex role, shyness and appearance inhibitions. Computers in Human Behavior 11:191-204.
27. Sheperd, R.-M., and Edelmann, R.J. (2001). Caught in the Web. The Psychologist 14:520-521.
28. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
29. Biggs, S. (2000). Charlotte's Web: how one woman weaves positive relationships on the Net. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3:655-663.
30. Baker, A. (2002). What makes an online relationship successful? Clues from couples who met in Cyberspace. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5:363-375.