The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning

Computers and Education

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 223-234

  Shaw, Graham ^a   Marlow, Nigel ^b  

^a Department of Basic Medical Sciences   (United States)

^b LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attitude; Computer assisted learning; Gender; Learning styles

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038453729     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00020-2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allinson C.W., Hayes J. The learning styles questionnaire: an alternative to Kolb's inventory? Journal of Management Studies. 25:1988;269-281.
2. Biggs, J.B., 1987. Student approaches to learning and studying. Research Monograph. Australian council for educational research Ltd. (ERIC No ED 308 201).
3. Curry L. Patterns of learning styles across selected medical specialities. Educational Psychology. 11:(3/4):1991;247-277.
4. Ellis D., Ford N., Wood F. Hypertext and learning styles. The Electronic Library. 11:(1):1993;13-18.
5. Dambrot F.H. The correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 27:(1):1985;71-86.
6. Dippelhofer-Stiem B. The development of research-oriented learning in five European countries. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 4:1989;489-503.
7. Hart, G., 1995. Learning styles and hypertext: Exploring user attitudes. Ascilite95.unimelb.edu.au/SMTU/ASCILITE95/papers/hart.pdf.
8. Honey P., Mumford A. The Manual of Learning Styles. 1986;Peter Honey, 10 Linden Avenue, Maidenhead.
9. Kolb D.A. Experimential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. 1984;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
10. Liu M. The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behaviour. 10:(4):1994;419-434.
11. Merrill M.D. Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology. 31:(5):1991;45-53.
12. Oliver M., Conole G. Evaluating communication and information technologies: a toolkit for practitioners. Active Learning. 8:1998;3-8.
13. Ory, J., 1997. Gender similarity in the use of and attitudes about ALN in a university setting. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1 (1). http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/issue1/ory.htm.
14. Parlett M., Hamilton D. Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programmes. Murphy R., Torrance H. Evaluating Education: Issues and Methods. 1987;Harper & Row, London.
15. Spennemann, D.R., 1996. Gender imbalances in computer access among environmental science students. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 1 (2), www.usq.edu.au/electpub/e-jist/spenne.htm.
16. Wolf R.M. Questionnaire. Keeves J.P. Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook. 1988;Pergamon Press, Oxford.