Design of virtual learning environments for deep learning

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 55-64

  Mimirinis, Mike ^a   Bhattacharya, Madhumita ^b  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34648846909     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Bhattacharya, M. (2001). Electronic portfolios, student reflective practices, and the evaluation of effective learning [Online], 19-10-2006, Available: nttp://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/bha01333.htm
2. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for qualily learning at university. What the student does. Second edition. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
3. Britain, S., & Liber, O. (2004). A Framework for the Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments. Report 41, JISC Technology Applications Programme. [Online], 19-10-2006, Available: http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/pedagogy/files/4thMeet_framework/ VLEfullReport
4. Cairncross S., Mannion, M., & McEwan, T. (2003). Learning technology research in practice: Reflections from the field. In Communities of Practice: Research Proceedings of the 10th Association for Learning Technology Conference (ALT-C 2003) Association for Learning Technology, pp. 70-81.
5. Collis, B. (1997). Tele-learning in a digital world: The future of distance learning. London: International Thomson Computer Press.
6. Enjelvin, G., & Sutton, A. (2004). Let's ask the students for a change. Investigating student learning approaches to, and perceived gains from VLE-novation. UCN Working Papers Series, Vol. 1.
7. Entwistle, N. (1992). The impact of teaching on learning outcomes in higher education: A literature review, Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom, Universities, Staff Development Unit (CVCP-USDU).
8. Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning. IV - Effectives of motivation and test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244- 257.
9. Gibbs, G. (1999). Learning to learn in a virtual learning environment for philosophy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 221-231.
10. Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Jäärvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 129-156). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Hoskins, S. & van Hoaff, J. C. (2005). Web-based learning: Predictors of student use and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 177-192.
12. Jelfs, A., & Colbourn, C. (2002). Virtual seminars and their impact on the role of the teaching staff. Computers and Education 38, 127-136.
13. Jenkins, M., Browne, T., & Armitage, S. (2001) Management and implementation of Virtual Learning Environments. Report. UCISA. [Online], 19-10-2006, Available: http://www.ucisa.ac.uk/groupstlig/vle/ VLEReport.doc
14. Jonassen, D. H. (2001). Design of constructivist learning environments, [Online], 19-10-2006, Available: http:// www.coe.missouri.edu/~jonassen/courses/CLE/index.html
15. Konrad, J. (2003). 'Review of educational research on virtual learning environments [VLE] - implications for the improvement of teaching and learning and access to formal learning in Europe'. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Hamburg, 17-20 September.
16. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46: 4-11.
17. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In: F. Marton, D. Hounsell and N. Entwistle, eds. The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 39-58.
18. McNaught, C., & Lam, P. (2005). Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-learning in three Hong Kong universities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 629-642.
19. Oliver, M. (2000). An introduction to the evaluation of learning technology. Educational Technology & Society 3(4). [Online], 19-10-2006, Available: http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_2000/ intro.html
20. Pahl, C. (2003). Managing evolution and change in web-based teaching and learning environments. Computers in Education, 40. 99-114.
21. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
22. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Second Edition. London: Routeldge Falmer.
23. Richardson, J. (2001). An evaluation of virtual learning environments and their learners: Do individual differences affect perception of virtual learning environments, Interactive Multimedia, 3: 38-52.
24. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method of students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education 35: 453-472.
25. Storey, M-A., Phillips, B., Maczewski, M., & Wang, M. (2002) Evaluating the Usability of Web-based Learning Tools. Educational Technology & Society 5(3). [Online] 19-10-2006, Available: http: //ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_3_2002/storey.html
26. Tait, H., Entwistle, N. J., & McCune, V. (1998). ASSIST: A reconceptualisation of the approaches to studying inventory. In: C. Rust, ed. Improving student learning: Improving students as learners. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, 262-271.
27. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37: 57-70.