Back from the beach but hanging on the telephone? English adolescents' attitudes and experiences of mobile phones and the Internet

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 359-367

  Madell, Dominic ^a   Muncer, Steven ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNET; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL HUMAN; ONLINE SYSTEM; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX RATIO; TELEPHONE; TEXT MESSAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CELLULAR PHONE; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 3042773969     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/1094931041291321     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Thomas, G., & Wyatt S. (2000). Access is not the only problem: using and controlling the internet. In: S. Wyatt (ed.), Technology and inequality: questioning the information society. London: Routledge, pp. 21-45.
2. Wyatt, S. (2000). Talking about the future: metaphors of the internet. In: N. Brown, B. Rappert, & A. Webster (eds.), Contested futures. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 19-21.
3. Wyatt, S., Thomas, G., & Terranova, T. (2002). They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: conceptualizing use and non-use of the internet goes here. In: S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyperbole, reality. Oxford: OUP, pp. 23-41.
4. Woolgar, S. (2002). Five rules of virtuality. In: S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyperbole, reality. Oxford: OUP, pp. 1-22.
5. Lenhart, A. (2000). Who's not online: 57% of those without Internet access say they do not plan to log on [On-line]. Available: www.pewinternet.org.
6. Childwise Monitor. (2002). Children and their media [On-line]. Available: www.childwise.co.uk/monitor. htm.
7. Harris Poll No. 76. (1999). Online population growth surges to 56% of all adults [On-line]. Available: www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp? PID=9.
8. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Home computers and internet use in the United States [On-Line]. Available: www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf.
9. Office for National Statistics. (2002). Internet access: households and individuals [On-line]. Available: www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/intacc0702.pdf.
10. Bowman, J. (2002). The impact of the internet and other ICTs on society. Office for National Statistics [On-line]. Available www.statistics.gov.uk/ themes/economy/articles/general/downloads/NEMW(08)JB_e-society.pdf.
11. Nua Internet Survey. (2002). How many online [On-line]. Available: www.nua.ie.
12. Odell, P.M., Korgen, K.O., Schumacher, P., et al. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology & Behavior 3:855-862.
13. Jordan, T. (2001). Measuring the internet: Host counts versus business plans. Information, Communication and Society 4:34-53.
14. Burrows, R., Loader, B., Pleace, N., et al. (2000). Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication and Society 3:95-121.
15. D'Haenens, L. (2001). Old and new media: access and ownership in the home. In: S.L. Livingstone and M. Bovill (ed.), Children and their changing media environment: a European comparative study. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 53-85.
16. Powell, J. (2001). Mediaweek: TGI examines whether internet usage amongst the young has peaked [On-Line]. Available: www.bmrb.co.uk/news/newsstory cfm?id=423.
17. Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., & Shemla, A. (2000). Internet usage by students in an Israeli high school. Journal of Educational Computing Research 22:55-73.
18. Ebersole, S. (2000). Uses and gratifications of the web among students. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6:1-16 [On-line]. Available: www.ascusc. org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/ebersole.html.
19. La Ferle, C., Edwards, S., & Lee, W. (2000). Teens' use of traditional media and the internet. Journal of Advertising Research 3:55-65.
20. Cooper, G., Green, N., Murtagh, G., et al. (2002). Mobile society? Technology, distance and presence. In: S. Woolgar (ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyperbole, reality. Oxford: OUP, pp. 206-302.
21. Yaguchi, H., Nobutomo, K., Shingu, K., et al. (2000). Attitudes of undergraduate students to electromagnetic fields. International Medical Journal 7:265-272.
22. Preece, A. (2000). Mobile phones and human heads. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research 11:1.
23. Garcia-Larrea, L., Perchet, C., Perrin, F., et al. (2001). Interference of cellular phone conversations with visuomotor tasks: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology 15:14-21.
24. Funston, A., & MacNeill, K. (1999). Mobile matters: young people and phones [On-Line]. Available: www.dcita.gov.au/crf/paper99/funston.html.
25. Miller, L.M., Schweingruber, H., & Brandenburg, C.L. (2001). Middle school students' technology practices and preferences: re-examining gender differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 10:125-140.
26. Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behaviour 17:95-110.