Different orientations of males and females in computer-mediated negotiations

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 516-534

  Katz, Ron ^a   Amichai Hamburger, Yair ^b   Manisterski, Efrat ^a   Kraus, Sarit ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Computer mediated negotiations; Gender

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GAME THEORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

COLORED TRAILS (CT); COMPUTER-MEDIATED-NEGOTIATIONS; FACE-TO-FACE (FTF);

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 38149067549     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amichai-Hamburger Y. Personality and the Internet. In: Amichai-Hamburger Y. (Ed). The social net: Human behavior in cyberspace (2005), Oxford University Press, New York 27-55
2. Bhappu A.D., Griffith T.L., and Northcraft G.B. Media effects and communication bias in diverse groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70 (1997) 199-205
3. Billig M., and Tajfel H. Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 3 (1973) 27-52
4. Bordia P. Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: a synthesis of the experimental literature. The Journal of Business Communication 34 (1997) 99-120
5. Bourhis, R.Y. (1994). Power, gender, and intergroup discrimination: Some minimal group experiments. In Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology, Vol. 7.
6. Brewer M.B., and Silver M. Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology 8 (1978) 393-400
7. Buss D. The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In: Higgins E., and Kruglanski A. (Eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (1997), The Guilford Press, New York
8. Buss D.M., and Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100 (1993) 204-232
9. Calhoun P.C., and Smith W.P. Integrative bargaining: Does gender make a difference?. International Journal of Conflict Management 10 (1999) 201-224
10. Carnevale P.J.D., and Isen A.M. The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (1986) 1-13
11. Carnevale P.J.D., Pruitt D.G., and Seilheimer S. Looking and competing: accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (1981) 111-120
12. Danet B. Text as mask: Gender, play, and performance on the Internet. In: Jones S.G. (Ed). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (1998), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 129-158
13. Delfabbro P.H., and Winefield A.H. Predictors of irrational thinking in regular slot machine gamblers. Journal of Psychology 134 (2000) 117-128
14. De Waal F. Chimpanzee politics: Sex and power among apes (1982), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
15. Eagly A.H. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation (1987), L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
16. Eagly A.H., and Wood W. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist 54 (1999) 408-423
17. Gaertner L., and Insko C.A. Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: categorization, reciprocation, or fear?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 1 (2000) 77-94
18. Gal, Y., Pfeffer A., Marzo F., & Grosz B. (2004). Learning social preferences in games. In National conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI), San Jose, CA.
19. Galin A., Gross M., and Gosalker G. E-negotiation versus face-to-face negotiation what has changed - if anything?. Computers in Human Behavior 23 1 (2007) 787-797
20. Gefen D., and Ridings C.M. If you spoke as she does, sir, instead of the way you do: a sociolinguistics perspective of gender differences in virtual communities. ACM SIGMIS Database 36 2 (2005) 78-92
21. Grosz, B., Kraus, S., Talman, S., Stossel B., & Havlin M. (2004), The influence of social dependencies on decision-making. In Proceeding of AAMAS 2004.
22. Guadagno, R.E., & Cialdini, R.B. (2002). Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influence. Group dynamics: Theory research and practice. Special Issue on Internet Research, 6, pp. 38-51.
23. Guadagno R.E., and Cialdini R.B. Persuade him by email, but see her in person: online persuasion revisited. Computers in Human Behavior 23 2 (2007) 999-1015
24. Guiller J., and Durndell A. 'I totally agree with you': gender interactions in educational online discussion groups. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 5 (2006) 368-381
25. Kray L.J., Thompson L., and Galinsky A. Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 6 (2001) 942-958
26. Lewis S., and Fry W. Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 20 (1977) 75-92
27. Marzo, F., Gal, Y., Grosz, B., & Pfeffer, A. (2004) Social preferences in relational context. In IV Conference in collective intentionality, Siena, Italy.
28. Rickman D. Negotiations. Social-psychological perspectives (1977), Sage, Beverly Hills
29. Rubin J.Z., and Brown B.R. Bargainers as individuals. The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation (1975), Academic Press, New York 157-196
30. Sheffield J. (1989). The effects of bargaining orientation and communication medium on negotiations in the bilateral monopoly task: a comparison of decision room and computer conferencing communication media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Wings for the mind, March 1989, pp. 43-48.
31. Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., and McGuire T.W. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 (1986) 157-187
32. Sonsino D., and Sirota J. Strategic pattern recognition - experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 44 (2003) 390-411
33. Stuhlmacher A.F., and Citera M. Hostile behavior and profit in virtual negotiations: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 20 (2005) 69-93
34. Stuhlmacher, A. F., Citera, M., & Willis, T. (2006). Gender differences in virtual negotiations: A meta-analysis. In Gender, Conflict, and Influence: New Directions and Findings, 21st Annual conference of the Society of Industrial-Organizational Psychology (SIOP), Dallas, TX.
35. Tajfel H. Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American 5 223 (1970) 79-97
36. Talman S., Gal Y., Kraus S., & Hadad M. (2005). Adapting to agents' personalities in negotiation. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS) 2005, pp. 383-389.
37. Tooby J., and DeVore I. The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In: Kinzey W. (Ed). Primate models of hominid behavior (1987), SUNY Press, New York
38. Walters A.E., Stuhlmacher A.F., and Meyer L.L. Gender and negotiator competitiveness: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 1 (1998) 1-29
39. Wang, F. & Yamagishi, T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and gender difference in China. In The 4th annual conference of asian association of social psychology. Australia: The University of Melbourne, July 10-13.
40. Wang, F., & Yamagishi, T. (2004). An experimental study on group identity and ingroup favoritism in China. The 4th Academic Conference of Chinese Psychologists. Taipei Academia Sinica, October 25-28.
41. Watson C. Gender differences in negotiating behavior and outcomes. Fact or artifact?. In: Taylor A., and Beinstein Miller J. (Eds). Conflict and gender (1994), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ
42. Watson C. Gender versus power as a predictor of negotiation behavior and outcomes. Negotiation Journal 10 (1994) 117-127
43. Wilson E.V. Persuasive effects of system features in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 15 2 (2005) 161-184