Hostile behavior and profit in virtual negotiation: A meta-analysis

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 69-93

  Stuhlmacher, Alice F ^a   Citera, Maryalice ^b  

^a DEPAUL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24044553283     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-005-6984-y     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Adrianson, L. & Hjelmquist, E. (1991). Group processes in face-to-face and computer mediated communication. Behaviour & Information Technology, 10, 281-296.
2. Allerheiligen, R. P. (1986). Communications medium and product class: Their effect on negotiation medium, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
3. Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 175-187.
4. Arunachalam, V. (1991). Decision aiding in multi-party transfer pricing negotiation: The effects of computer-mediated communication and structured interaction. Doctoral Dissertation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
5. Arunachalam, V., & Dilla, W. N. (1992). Computer-mediated communication and structured interaction in transfer pricing negotiation. Journal of Information Systems, 6, 149-170.
6. Arunachalam, V., & Dilla W. N. (1995). Judgment accuracy and outcomes in negotiation: A causal modeling analysis of decision-aiding effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 289-304.
7. Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002). Computer-mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156-179.
8. Barki, R. (1995). An empirical study of the impact of proximity, leader, and incentives on negotiation process and outcomes in a group decision support setting. Doctoral Dissertation Ohio State University.
9. Barsness, Z., & Tenbrunsel A.E. (1998). Technologically-mediated communication and negotiation: Do relationships matter? Annual conference for the International Association for Conflict Management, College Park, MA, June 7-10.
10. Bazerman, M. H. & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally. New York: The Free Press.
11. Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston TX: Gulf Publishing.
12. Ben-Yoav, O. & Pruitt, D. G. (1984). Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 323-335.
13. Carnevale, P. J. D., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1-13.
14. Carnevale, P. J. D., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
15. Champagne, M. V., Wong Y.-C., & Stuhlmacher, A. F. (2001). The impact of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication on the negotiation process. Unpublished Manuscript DePaul University.
16. Citera, M., Beauregard, R., & Mitsuya T. (2005). An experimental study of credibility in e-negotiations. Psychology and Marketing, 22, 163-179.
17. Citera, M., & Beauregard, R. (1997). Credibility in computer-mediated bargaining: Bargainer beware. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, St, Louis, MO.
18. Clyman, D. R. (1995). Measures of joint performance in dyadic mixed-motive negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 38-48.
19. Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990). Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Science, 36, 689-703.
20. Croson, R. T. A (1999). Look at me when you say that: An electronic negotiation simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 30, 23-37.
21. Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group decisions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
22. Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior vol. V (pp. 191-233). Greenwich: JAI Press.
23. DeDreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92, 280-295.
24. DeDreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analysis review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
25. Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 26-50.
26. El-Shinnawy, M. & Vinze, A. S. (1997). Technology, culture, and persuasiveness: A study of choice-shifts in group settings. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 473-496.
27. Erez, A., Bloom, M. C., & Wells, M. T. (1996). Using random rather than fixed effects models in meta-analysis: Implications for situational specificity and validity generalization. Personnel Psychology, 49, 275-306.
28. Fry, W. R. (1985). The effect of dyad Machiavellianism and visual access on integrative bargaining outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 51-62.
29. Graetz, K., Barlow, C., Prouix, N., Odenweller, L., Weierman, S., Blankenship, C., & Strazzo, D. (1999). Negotiation at a distance: Why you might want to use the telephone. Poster presented at the 14th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.
30. Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-334.
32. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990). The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14, 313-321.
33. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
34. King, D. C., & Glidewell, J. C. (1980). Dyadic bargaining under individualistic and competitive orientation, Human Relations, 33, 781-803.
35. Latane, B. (1984). The psychology of social impact, American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
36. Lewis, S. A., & Fry, W. R. (1977). Effects of visual access and orientation on the discovery of integrative bargaining alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20, 75-92.
37. Lim, J. (2000). An experimental investigation of the impact of NSS and proximity on negotiation outcomes. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19, 329-338.
38. Martin, C. L. & Nagao, D. H. (1989). Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 72-80.
39. Mennecke, B. E., Valacich, J. S., & Wheeler, B. C. (2000). The effects of media and task on user performance: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis. Group Decision & Negotiation, 9, 507-529.
40. Metate-Mejia, G. L. A. (1998). Power asymmetry in computer supported negotiating dyads: Effects on conflict management and power enactment, Unpublished Dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
41. Morley, L. E., & Stephenson, G. M. (1969). Interpersonal and interparty exchange: A laboratory simulation of an industrial negotiation at the plant level. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 543-545.
42. Morley, L. E., & Stephenson, G. M. (1970). Formality in experimental negotiations: A validation study. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 383-384.
43. Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., & Thompson, L. (2002). Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubrication in e-mail negotiations. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, Practice, 6, 89-100.
44. Naquin, C. E., & Paulson, G. D. (2003). Online bargaining and interpersonal trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 113-120.
45. Pinkley, R. L., Griffith, T. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1995). "Fixed pie" a la mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 101-112.
46. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
47. Pruitt, D. G. & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48. Pruitt, D. G. & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
49. Purdy, J. M., Nye, P., & Balakrishnan, P. V. (2000). The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 162-187.
50. Rhee, H. S. (1993). A study of the impact of a negotiation support system on the negotiation process and outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.
51. Ruble, T. L. & Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 16, 142-155.
52. Schultz, J., & Pruitt, D. (1978). The effects of mutual concern on joint welfare. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 14, 480-492.
53. Sheffield, J. (1995). The effect of communication medium on negotiation performance. Group Decision & Negotiation, 42, 159-179.
54. Short, J. A. (1971). Cooperation and competition in an experimental bargaining game conducted over two media. Unpublished Communication Studies Group Paper no. E/71160/SH.
55. Reported in Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie B., 1976. The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
56. Short, J. A. (1974). Effects of medium of communication on experimental negotiation. Human Relations, 27, 225-234.
57. Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
58. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. W. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
59. Smilowitz, M., Compton, D. C., & Flint, L. (1998). The effects of computer-mediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 311-321.
60. Smith, D. H. (1969). Communication and negotiation outcome. The Journal of Communication, 19, 248-256.
61. Stuhlmacher, A. F. & Walters, A. E. (1999). Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 52, 653-677.
62. Suarga (1997). Design and implementation of collective bargaining support system (CBSS) - A web-based negotiation support system. Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 59-08A, p. 3083.
63. Thomas, K. W. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Eds.), Handbook of industrial/organizational psychology vol. V (pp. 889-935). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
64. Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 515-532.
65. Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Stein (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology vol. V (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
66. Turnbull, A. A., Strickland, L., & Shaver, K. G. (1974). Phasing of concessions, differential power, and medium of communication; Negotiating success and attributions to the opponent, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 228-230.
67. Turnbull, A A., Strickland, L., & Shaver, K. G. (1976). Medium of communication, differential power, and phasing of concessions; Negotiating success and attributions to the opponent, Human Communication Research, 2, 262-270.
68. Tysoe, M. (1984). Social cues and the negotiation process. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 61-67.
69. Valley, K. L., Moag, J., & Bazerman, M. H. (1998a). 'A matter of trust': Effects of communication on the efficiency and distribution of outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organizations, 34, 211-238.
70. Valley, K., Thompson, L., Gibbons, R., & Bazerman, M. H. (1998b). Using dyadic strategies to outperform equilibrium models of communication in bargaining games. Working paper, Harvard Business School.
71. Van deVen, A. H. & Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision making effectiveness, Academy of Management Journal, 14, 202-212.
72. Wachter, R. M. (1993). An empirical investigation of the effects of communication media differences and the social relationships of individuals on the performance of two-party negotiations. Graduate thesis, School of Business, Indiana University.
73. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1-29.
74. Watson, C. (1994). Gender versus power as a predictor of negotiation behavior and outcomes. Negotiation Journal, 10, 117-127.
75. Wellens, A. R. (1986). Use of psychological distancing model to assess differences in telecommunication media. In L. Parker & C. Olgen (Eds.), Teleconferencing and electronic media vol. V (pp. 347-361). Madison, WI: Center for Interactive Programs.
76. Wellens, A. R. (1989). Effects of telecommunication media upon information sharing and team performance: Some theoretical and empirical observations. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 4(9), 13-19.
77. Wichman, H. (1970). Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 114-120.
78. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparison of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.