If You Spoke as She Does, Sir, Instead of the Way You Do: A Sociolinguistics Perspective of Gender Differences in Virtual Communities

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 78-92

  Gefen, David ^a   Ridings, Catherine M ^b  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LEHIGH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community Quality; Gender; Responsiveness; Social Support; Virtual Communities

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748112837     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1066149.1066156     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson, K.J. and Leaper, C. (1998). “Meta analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How,” Sex Roles, Vol. 39, No. 3/4, pp. 225–252.
2. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986). “The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 6, pp. 1173–1182.
3. Bellman, S., Lohse, G.L. and Johnson, E.J. (1999). “Predictors of Online Buying Behavior,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No. 12, pp. 32–38.
4. Boneva, B., Kraut, R. and Frohlich, D. (2001). “Using e-Mail for Personal Relationships: The Difference Gender Makes,” American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 530–549.
5. Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and Linguistic Theory, New York: St. Martin's Press.
6. Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. and O'Leary, K. (1988). “Lakoff in Context: The Social and Linguistic Functions of Tag Questions,” in Coates, J. and Cameron, D. (Eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, New York: Longman Group Limited, pp. 74–93.
7. Chidambaram, L. and Jones, B. (1993). “Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 465 491.
8. Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men and Languages: Studies in Language and Linguistics, London, UK: Longman.
9. Costa, P.T.J., Terracciano, A. and McCrae, R.R. (2001). “Gender Differences in Personalilty Traits Across Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 2, pp. 322–331.
10. Crawford, M. (1995). Talking Difference. On Gender and Language., London, UK: Sage.
11. Davison, R.M. (1997). “An Instrument for Measuring Meeting Success,” Information and Management, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 163–176.
12. Deeter-Schmelz, D.R. and Ramsey, R.P. (1978). “Considering Sources and Types of Social Support: A Psychometric Evaluation of the House and Wells Instrument,” The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 49–61.
13. Edelsky, C. (1993). “Who's Got the Floor?,” in Tannen, D.(Ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 189–227.
14. Feingold, A. (1994). “Gender Differences in Personality: A Meta-analysis,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 429–456.
15. Gefen, D. (2000a). “Gender Differences in the Perception and Adoption of E-mail and Computer-Mediated Communication Media: A Sociolinguistics Approach,” in Kent, A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia Of Library And Information Science (Volume 69), New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp. 139–153.
16. Gefen, D. (2000b). “It is not Enough To Be Responsive: The Role of Cooperative Intentions in MRP II Adoption,” The. DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 65–79.
17. Gefen, D. (2003). “Tutorial Assessing Unidimensionality through LISREL: An Explanation and Example,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1–26.
18. Gefen, D. and Keil, M. (1998). “The Impact of Developer Responsiveness on Perceptions of Usefulness and Ease of Use: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model,” The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 35–49.
19. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. (1997). “Gender Differences in Perception and Adoption of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 389 400.
20. Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21. Hawkins, K. and Power, C.B. (1999). “Gender Differences In Questions Asked During Small Decision-Making Group Discussions,” Small Group Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 235–256.
22. Herring, S.C. (1993). “Gender and Democracy in Computer Mediated Communication,” Electronic Journal of Communication, Vol. 3, No. 2, http://dc.smu.edu/dc/ classroom/gender.txt.
23. Herring, S.C. (1996a). “Posting in a Different Voice: Gender and Ethics in Computer-Mediated Communication,” in Ess, C. (Ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 115–145.
24. Herring, S.C. (1996b). “Two Variants of an Electronic Message Schema,” in Herring, S.C. (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 81–106.
25. Herring, S.C., Johnson, D.A. and DiBenedetto, T. (1985). “This Discussion is Going Too Far!: Male Resistance to Female Participation on the Internet,” in Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (Eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 67–96.
26. Hiltz, S.R. (1984). Online Communities: A Case Study of the Office of the Future, Norwood, NJ.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
27. Hiltz, S.R. and Wellman, B. (1997). “Asynchronous Learning Networks as a Virtual Classroom,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 9, pp. 44–49.
28. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, London, UK: Sage.
29. Holmes, J. (1992). “Women's Talk in Public Contexts,” Discourse and Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 131–150.
30. House, J.S. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Knoll, K. and Leidner, D.E. (1998). “Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in global Virtual Teams,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29–64.
32. Kilbourne, W. and Weeks, S. (1997). “A Socio economic Perspective on Gender Bias in Technology,” Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 243–260.
33. Mulac, A., Erlandson, K.T., Farrar, W.J. and Hallett, J.S. (1998). “Uh-huh. What's That all about? Differing Interpretations of Conversational Backchannels and Questions as Source of Miscommunication Across Gender Boundaries,” Communication Research, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 641–668.
34. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Parks, M.R. and Floyd, K. (1996). “Making Friends in Cyberspace,” Journal of Communications Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 80–97.
36. Preisler, B. (1987). “The Tentative Female,” English Today, Vol. 12, pp. 29–30.
37. Ridings, C., Gefen, D. and Arinze, B. (2002). “Some Antecedents and Effects of Trust in Virtual Communities,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3–4, pp. 271–295.
38. Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D. and Kelley, M. (1996). “Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups,” Journal of computer mediated communication, Vol. 2, No. 3, http://jcmc.indiana.edu/
39. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1986). “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1492–1512.
40. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
41. Stewart, C.M., Shields, S.F. and Sen, N. (2001). “Diversity in On-Line Discussions: A study of Cultural and Gender Differences in Listervs,” in Ess, C. and Sudweeks, F. (Eds.), Culture, Technology, Communication: Towards an Intercultural Global Village, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 161–186.
42. Sussman, N.M. and Tyson, D.H. (2000). “Sex and Power: Gender Differences in Computer- Mediated Interactions,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 381–394.
43. Tannen, D. (1994). You Just Don’t Understand Women and Men in Conversation, New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
44. Tannen, D. (1995). “The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 5, pp. 138–148.
45. Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. (2000). “Why Don’t Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 115–139.
46. Wang, R.Y. and M., S.D. (1996). “Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 5–34.
47. Weatherall, A. (1998). “Re-visioning Gender and Language Research,” Women and Language, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1–9.
48. West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1983). “Small Insults: A Study of Interruptions in Cross-Sex Conversations between Unacquainted Persons,” in Thorne, B., Kramarae, H. and Henley N. (Eds.), Lauguage, Gender and Society, Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 103–118.
49. Witmer, D.F., Colman, R.W. and Katzman, S.L. (1999). “From Paper-and-Pencil to Screen-and- Keyboard: Toward a Methodology for Survey Research on the Internet,” in Jones, S. (Ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 145–161.
50. Yaeger-Dror, M. (1998). “Factor Influencing the Contrast Between Men's and Women's Speech,” Women and Language, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 40–46.
51. Yates, S.J. (2001). “Gender, Language an CMC for Education,” Learning and Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 21–34.
52. Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975). “Sex-Roles, Interruptions and Silences in Conversation,” in Thorne, B., Kramarae, H. and Henley N. (Eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, Rowley: Newbury House, pp. 89–101.