Learning social preferences in games

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 226-231

  Gal, Ya'akov ^a   Pfeffer, Avi ^a   Marzo, Francesca ^b   Grosz, Barbara J ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN PLAYER; NASH EQUILIBRIUM; NEGOTIATION GAME; ONE-SHOT GAMES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; GAME THEORY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 9444240310     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bolton, G., and Ockenfels, A. 2002. A stress test of fainess measures in models of social utility. Technical report, Max Plank Institute.
2. Bolton, G. 1991. A comparative model of bargaining. American Economic Review (81):1096-1136.
3. Camerer, C. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton University Press.
4. Chajewska, U.; Koller, D.; and Ormoneit, D. 2001. Learning an agent's utility function by observing behavior. In ICML'01.
5. Charness, G., and Rabin, M. 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics (117):817-869.
6. Davidson, A.; Billings, D.; Schaeffer, J.; and Szafron, D. 2000. Improved opponent modeling in poker. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence(ICAI00).
7. Dempster, A.; Laird, N.; and Rubin, D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 39(1).
8. Fudenberg, D., and Levine, D. K. 1998. The Theory of Learning in Games. MIT Press.
9. Grosz, B.; Kraus, S.; Talman, S.; and Stossel, B. 2004. The influence of social dependencies on decision-making. Initial investigations with a new game. In AAMAS'04.
10. Guth, W.; Schmittberger, R.; and Schwarze, B. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (3):367-388.
11. J.Nash. 1971. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155-162.
12. Kagel, J., and Roth, A., eds. 1995. The hanbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press.
13. Loewenstein, G.; Bazerman, M.; and Thompson, L. 1989. Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social psychology (57)(3):426-441.
14. Neal, R. 1992. Connectionist learning of belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 56:71-113.
15. Ng, A., and Russell, S. 2000. Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. In ICML'00.