Waiting for sympatric speciation

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 895-899

  Bolnick, Daniel I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive speciation; Assortative mating; Constraint; Evolutionary branching; Speciation rate

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; GENETIC VARIATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 2342525221     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00421.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barraclough, T. G., and A. P. Vogler. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155:419-434.
2. Bolnick, D. I. 2004. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58.
3. Bolnick, D. I., and M. Doebeli. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-2449.
4. Coyne, J. A., and T. D. Price. 2000. Little evidence for sympatric speciation in island birds. Evolution 54:2166-2171.
5. Day, T. 2001. Population structure inhibits evolutionary diversification under competition for resources. Genetica 112-113: 71-86.
6. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
7. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156:S77-S101.
8. Drossel, B., and A. McKane. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetic models. J. Theor. Biol. 204:467-478.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
10. Gavrilets, S. 2000. Waiting time to parapatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 256:2483-2492.
11. Hall, D. W., M. Kirkpatrick, and B. West. 2000. Runaway sexual selection when female preferences are directly selected. Evolution 54:1862-1869.
12. Jones, A. G., G. I. Moore, C. Kvarnemo, D. Walker, and J. C. Avise. 2003. Sympatric speciation as a consequences of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 6598-6603.
13. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
14. Kondrashov, A. S., and A. F. Kondrashov. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351-354.
15. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. McCune, A. R., and N. R. Lovejoy. 1998. The relative rate of sympatric and allopatric speciation in fishes: tests using DNA sequence divergence between sister species and among clades. Pp. 172-185 in D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
17. Schliewen, U. K., D. Tautz, and S. Pääbo. 1994. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of Crater Lake cichlids. Nature 368:629-632.
18. Schliewen, U., K. Rassmann, M. Markmann, J. Markert, T. Kocher, and D. Tautz. 2001. Genetic and ecological divergence of a monophyletic cichlid species pair under fully sympatric conditions in Lake Ejagham, Cameroon. Mol. Ecol. 10:1471-1488.
19. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-342.
20. Via, S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:381-390.