Sympatric speciation by sexual selection

Nature

Volumn 402, Issue 6761, 1999, Pages 523-526

  Higashi, M ^a   Takimoto, G ^a   Yamamura, N ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MATING; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PREDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; ANIMAL; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033518146     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/990087     Document Type: Letter

References (23)

1. Turner, G. F. Speciation mechanism in Lake Malawi cichlids: A critical review. Arch. Hydrobiol. 44, 139-160 (1994).
2. Deutsch, J. C. Colour diversification in Malawi cichlids: evidence for adaptation, reinforcement or sexual selection? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62, 1-14 (1997).
3. Seehausen, O., Alphen, J. J. M. & Witte, F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808-1811 (1997).
4. Seehausen, O. & Alphen, J. J. M. The effect of male coloration on female mate choice in closely related Lake Victoria cichlids (Haplochromis nyererei complex). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 1-8 (1998).
5. Ritchie, M. G. & Phillips, S. D. F. in Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H.) 291-308 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).
6. Albertson, R. C., Markert, J. A., Danley, P. D. &Kocher, T. D. Phylogenyofarapidlyevolving clade: The cichlid fishes of Lake Malawi, East Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5107-5110 (1999).
7. Tauber, C. A. &Tauber, M.J. in Speciation and its Consequences (eds Otte, D. & Endler, J. A.) 307-344 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1989).
8. Bush, G. L. Sympatric speciation in animals: new wine in old bottles. Trends Ecol Evol. 9, 285-288 (1994).
9. Maynard Smith, J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100, 637-650 (1966).
10. Tauber, G. A. &Tauber, M. J. Agenetic model for sympatric speciation throughhabitatdiversification and seasonal isolation. Nature 268, 702-705 (1977).
11. Doebeli, M. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 893-909 (1996).
12. Kawecki, T. J. Sympatric speciation via habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations. Evolution 51, 1751-1763 (1997).
13. Kodrashov, A. S. &Kondrashov, F. A. Interactions amongquantitativetraits inthe course ofsympatric speciation. Nature 400, 351-354 (1999).
14. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400, 354-357 (1999).
15. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930).
16. Lande, R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721-3725 (1981).
17. Seger, J. Unifying genetic models for the evolution offemale choice. Evolution 39, 1185-1193 (1985).
18. Pomiankowski, A. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J. Theor. Biol. 128, 195-218 (1987).
19. Liou, L. W. & Price, T. D. Speciationbyreinforcementofpremating isolation. Evolution 48,1451-1459 (1994).
20. Turner, G. F. & Burrows, M.T.A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 287-292 (1995).
21. Pomiankowski, A., Iwasa, Y. & Nee, S. The evolution of costly mate preferences I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45, 1422-1430 (1991).
22. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. & Nee, S. The evolution of costly mate preferences II. The ‘handicap’ principle. Evolution 45, 1431-1442 (1991).
23. Wu, G.-I. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39, 66-82 (1985).