The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2185-2206

  Bürger, Reinhard ^a,b   Schneider, Kristan A ^a   Willensdorfer, Martin ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Frequency dependent selection; Genetic variation; Intraspecific competition; Linkage disequilibrium; Multilocus genetics; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATING BEHAVIOR; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; GENETIC SPECIATION; GENOTYPE; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 33845535300     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-321.1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Barton, N. H., and P. Keightley. 2002. Understanding quantitative genetic variation. Nature Rev. Genetics 3:11-21.
2. Barton, N. H., and M. Shpak. 2000. The stability of symmetric solutions to polygenic models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57:249-263.
3. Bolnick, D. I. 2004a. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58:608-613.
4. _. 2004b. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58:895-899.
5. _. 2006. Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 241:734-744.
6. Bolnick, D. I., and M. Doebeli. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57:2433-2449.
7. Bolnick, D. I., R. Svanbäck, J. A. Fordyce, L. H. Yang, J. M. Davis, C. D. Hulsey, and M. L. Forrister. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161:1-28.
8. Bulmer, M. G. 1974. Density-dependent selection and character displacement. Am. Nat. 108:45-58.
9. _. 1980. The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U. K.
10. Bürger, R. 1983. Nonlinear analysis of some models for the evolution of dominance. J. Math. Biol. 16:269-280.
11. _. 2000. The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U. K.
12. _. 2005. A multilocus analysis of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a quantitative trait. J. Math. Biol. 50:355-396.
13. Bürger, R., and A. Gimelfarb. 2004. The effects of intraspecific competition and stabilizing selection on a polygenic. Genetics 167:1425-1443.
14. Bürger, R., and K. A. Schneider. 2006. Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. Am. Nat. 167:190-205.
15. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
16. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354-357.
17. Dieckmann, U., M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz. 2004. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
18. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9:893-909.
19. _. 2005. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1587-1600.
20. Doebeli, M., and U. Dieckmann. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interaction. Am. Nat. 156:S77-S101.
21. Doebeli, M., U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz. 2005. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible. Evolution 59:691-695.
22. Drossel, B., and A. McKane. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetics models. J. Theor. Biol. 204:467-478.
23. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
24. Gavrilets, S. 2003. Models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57:2197-2215.
25. _. 2004. Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. _. 2005. "Adaptive speciation": it is not that easy. A reply to Doebeli et al. Evolution 59:696-699.
27. Gavrilets, S., and C. R. B. Boake. 1998. On the evolution of premating isolation after a founder event. Am. Nat. 152:706-716.
28. Geritz, S. A. H., and E. Kisdi. 2000. Adaptive dynamics in diploid, sexual populations and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Proc. R. Soc. London B 267:1671-1678.
29. Gourbiere, S. 2004. How do natural and sexual selection contribute to sympatric speciation? J. Evol. Biol. 17:1297-1309.
30. Gyllenberg, M., and G. Meszéna. 2005. On the impossibility of coexistence of infinitely many strategies. J. Math. Biol. 50:133-160.
31. Hassell, M. P. 1975. Density-dependence in single-species populations. J. Animal Ecol. 44:283-296.
32. Johnson, T., and N. Barton. 2005. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 360:1411-1425.
33. Jones, A. G., G. I. Moore, C. Kvarnemo, D. Walker, and J. C. Avise. 2003. Sympatric speciation as a consequence of male pregnancy in seahorses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 100:6598-6603.
34. Kawecki, T. 1997. Sympatric speciation by habitat specialization driven by deleterious mutations. Evolution 51:1751-1763.
35. _. 2004. Genetic theories of sympatric speciation. Pp. 36-53 in U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, eds. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
36. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gibert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
37. Kirkpatrick, M., and S. L. Nuismer. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:687-693.
38. Kirkpatrick, M., and V. Ravigné. 2002. Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159:S22-S35.
39. Kondrashov, A. S., and F. A. Kondrashov. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400:351-354.
40. Kopp, M., and J. Hermisson. 2006. The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Evolution 60:1537-1550.
41. Matessi, C., A. Gimelfarb, and S. Gavrilets. 2001. Long-term build-up of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: How far does it go? Selection 2:41-64.
42. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100:637-650.
43. _. 1974. Models in ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.
44. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. McKinnon, J. S., S. Mort, B. K. Blackman, L. David, D. M. Kingsley, L. Jamieson, J. Chou, and D. Schluter. 2004. Evidence for ecology's role in speciation. Nature 429:294-298.
46. Meszéna, G., M. Gyllenberg, L. Pásztor, and J. A. J. Metz. 2006. Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69:68-87.
47. Nagylaki, T., J. Hofbauer, and P. Brunovský. 1999. Convergence of multilocus systems under weak epistasis or weak selection. J. Math. Biol. 38:103-133.
48. Otto, S. P., and D. Bourguet. 1999. Balanced polymorphism and the evolution of dominance. Am. Nat. 153:561-574.
49. Polechová, J., and N. H. Barton. 2005. Speciation through competition: a critical review. Evolution 59:1194-1210.
50. Ricker, W. E. 1954. Stock and recruitment. J. Fisheries. Res. Board Can. 11:559-623.
51. Roughgarden, J. 1972. Evolution of niche width. Am. Nat. 106:683-718.
52. Schluter, D. 2003. Frequency-dependent natural selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Evolution 57:1142-1150.
53. Schneider, K. A. 2006. A multilocus-multiallele analysis of frequency-dependent selection induced by intraspecific competition. J. Math. Biol. 52:483-523.
54. Schneider, K. A., and R. Bürger. 2006. Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? J. Evol. Biol. 19:570-588.
55. Slatkin, M. 1979. Frequency- and density-dependent selection on a quantitative character. Genetics 93:755-771.
56. Swanson, B. O., A. C. Gibb, J. C. Marks, and D. A. Hendrickson. 2003. Trophic polymorphism and behavioral differences decrease intraspecific competition in a cichlid, Herichthys minckleyi. Ecology 84:1441-1446.
57. Turelli, M., and N. H. Barton. 2004. Polygenic variation maintained by balancing selection: pleiotropy, sex-dependent allelic effects and G x E interactions. Genetics 166:1053-1079.
58. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:330-343.
59. Van Dooren, T. J. M. 1999. The evolutionary ecology of dominance-recessivity. J. Theor. Biol. 198:519-532.
60. van Doorn, G. S., and U. Dieckmann. 2004. The long-term evolution of multi-locus traits under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. In G. S. van Doorn. Sexual selection and sympatric speciation. Ph. D. diss., University of Groningen.
61. Via, S. 2001. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:381-390.
62. Waxman, D., and S. Gavrilets. 2005. Twenty questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1139-1154.
63. Willensdorfer, M., and R. Bürger. 2003. The two-locus model of Gaussian stabilizing selection. Theor. Popul. Biol. 64:101-117.
64. Wilson, D. S., and M. Turelli. 1986. Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches. Am. Nat. 127:835-850.