Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1587-1600

  Doebeli, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive speciation; Assortative mating; Disruptive selection; Female preference; Marker trait; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ASSORTATIVE MATING; MATE CHOICE; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX FACTORS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 28444441925     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00897.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrams, P.A., Matsuda, H. & Harada, Y. 1993. Evolutionarily unstable fitness maxima and stable fitness minima of continuous traits. Evol. Ecol. 7: 465-487.
2. Ackermann, M. & Doebeli, M. 2004. Evolution of niche width and adaptive diversification. Evolution 58: 2599-2612.
3. Arnegard, M.E. & Kondrashov, A.S. 2004. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely. Evolution 58: 222-237.
4. Bolnick, D.I. 2004. Waiting for sympatric speciation. Evolution 58: 895-899.
5. Bolnick, D.I. & Doebeli, M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution 57: 2433-2449.
6. Christiansen, F.B. 1991. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying trait. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 13-38.
7. Dieckmann, U. & Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 354-357.
8. Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 43: 1308-1311.
9. Dieckmann, U., Doebeli, M., Metz, J.A.J. & Tautz, D. (eds) 2004. Adaptive Speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Doebeli, M. 1996. A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 893-909.
11. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2000. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 156: S77-S101.
12. Doebeli, M & Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 421: 259-264.
13. Doebeli, M & Dieckmann, U. 2005. Adaptive dynamics as a mathematical tool for studying the ecology of speciation processes. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1194-1200.
14. Drossel, B. & McKane, A. 2000. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetic models. J. Theor. Biol. 204: 467-478.
15. Eberhard, W.G. 1985. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
16. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124-238.
17. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, É., Meszéna, G. & Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12: 35-57.
18. Hendry, A.P., Wenburg, J.K., Bentzen, E., Volk, E.C. & Quinn, T.P. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516-518.
19. Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. 1999. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402: 523-526.
20. Kirkpatrick, M. & Nuismer, S.L. 2004. Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 271: 687-693.
21. Kisdi, E. & Gyllenberg, M. 2005. Adaptive dynamics and the paradigm of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1170-1173.
22. Kondrashov, A.S. & Kondrashov, F.A. 1999. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 400: 351-354.
23. Koskinen, M.T., Haugen, T.O. & Primmer, C.R. 2002. Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations. Nature 419, 826-830.
24. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. & Gavrilets, S. 2001. Long-term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2: 41-64.
25. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. & van Heerwaarden, J.S. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems, Proceedings of the Royal Dutch Academy of Science (KNAW Verhandelingen) (S. J. van Strien & S. M. Verduyn Lunel, eds), pp. 183-231. North Holland, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
26. Schluter, D. & Nagel, L.M. 1995. Parallel speciation by natural selection. American Naturalist 146: 292-301.
27. Waxman, D. & Gavrilets, S. 2005. 20 questions on adaptive dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1139-1154.
28. Wu, C.-I. 1985. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 39: 66-82.